Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Domestic Gas Delivery and Service Satisfaction of Indian Customers
Domestic Gas Delivery and Service Satisfaction of Indian Customers
Domestic Gas Delivery and Service Satisfaction of Indian Customers
Abstract: LP Gas is a clean and portable fuel that provides In today's LPG market, complains registration is
heat and power in rural areas as well as in densely
done through computerised process by the customers and
populated urban areas. As it is portable in size so, it is not
dependent on transmission lines or pipeline grids. Its most the customers are becoming more sensitive to LPG gas
popular use is for cooking and heating in the residential and problems. Customers also have the right to select their
commercial segments. As this gas is very important for day suppliers of LPG as well as good service quality. For
to day life domestic purposes, so it 's supply and delivery
understanding these complex processes and developing
processes must be perfect to satisfy consumer. Indian
households are fully dependent on LPG cylinders.Therefore, tools, factor analysis has been conducted. On the basis of
attention needs to be diverted towards customers' perception questionerrie survey, service satisfaction of Indian
on quality of supply of LPG gases and its related services so consumers are studied and suggestions are provided to
that distributors can focus on specific areas of concern to
improve service quality.
improve customer satisfaction. In this paper, attempt is
made for concrete and measurable improvements in the
service through an extensive study on customer’s perception II. LITERATURE REVIEW
and various extents of the LPG gas supply. Some suggestions
are provided for the improvement in service quality in Customer satisfaction is a term which is frequently used in
Indian context. Marketing. This is the Main goal of any organization in
the world. An organization progresses only if they can
I. INTRODUCTION satisfy their customer by the performance of their product.
If we see from the customer‟s point of view then a
Sandhu and Bala (2011) have discussedthat, in Till the date of 1st april of 2005 the no of LPG
today‟s competitive market the service quality turn in to a customers are served about 845 lakh through 9001 LPG
highly instrumental co-efficient. Charoenpong (2003) distributors of Indian LPG companies. The 1.2 million
has stated the service quality is the measurement factor of indene cylinders are delivered per day to the door of 53
Customer Satisfaction. If we perceived the process quality million houses. Bharat gas is also serving 25 million
and output quality then service quality is a function of pre houses. The no of retail outlet in India is about 40,819 till
purchase customers‟ expectation. Parasuraman et al. the year of 2011.IOCL has the largest retail outlet in India
(1988) has defined the service quality as the gaps created with no of 19,057 till the year of 2011. This no. of retail
between the customers‟ expectation from the service and outlet is continuously increasing. The no of LPG
the service experience of the industry. distributor is 9686 till the year of 2010.But still the
customer complaints regarding late delivery,
According to the Garnin (1984), ESQ can be measured dissatisfaction in service is a big headache for distribution
by some parameters like performance, features, reliability, company .Many of the places are far away from these
conformance, durability, serviceability, prestige and services . Still people of these areas are cooking their
aesthetics. food by woods and coals. So researches are essential to
map the service delivery.
In the process of production, when the employees
come into the contact with the customers to provide the III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
service, then this Internal Service Quality comes into the
picture. Here the human factor forms the key factor of the Consumer survey is the best method to measure service
service quality of the organization as the human, who has quality in any service industry. For determining the
presented to the customer for service, reflects the service customer satisfaction with service quality of LPG utility
of the organization. So it is obvious for the service industry, a questionnaire is designed for all type of
consumers and a questionnaire survey is conducted. The
marketers to motivate the employees for a better serve to
questionnaire consists of 24 items for investigating the
the customer. Internal Service Quality is thought of the respondents' perception about the service quality of LPG
employees regarding their job, colleagues and company. It industry and eight questions about demographic profile of
mainly depends upon the feeling about work life of the customer. Two hundred forty five (245) questionnaires are
employee. It can be measure by benefits, pay, distributed to many consumers by phone, personal contact
opportunities, openness, job security, pride in work, and internet. Among them 188 responses are obtained.
friendliness and fairness etc.. The response rate is 76.73% and is good for this type of
survey. A five point likert scale is designed for each
A. Status of Indian LPG gas item(1=totally disagree, 2=Somewhat disagree,3=no
reply, 4=Somewhat agree, 5=Totally agree).After
There are four public sector Oil marketing collecting the data, an instrument is designed to measure
company in India (i.e., Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Indian consumers satisfaction on LPG gas service. Then
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Bharat data analysis like factor analysis, regression analysis and
correlation analysis is done to validate the instrument.
Petroleum Corporation Limited and IBP). They distribute
To measure the service satisfaction level , the collected all dimensions is .7884 .which is well above the
data‟s or responses of LPG gas cylinder consumers are acceptable value of 0.70 for demonstrating internal
subjected to various statistical analyses such as factor consistency of the established scale (Nunnally 1998). The
analysis, and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test. Factor value of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO), which is a measure
analysis on one hundred eighty eight useful responses has of sampling adequacy, was found to be 0.68 indicating
been conducted using principal component method that the factor analysis test has proceeded correctly and
followed by varimax rotation via. SPSS 19.0. Sixteen the sample used is adequate as the minimum acceptable
items were loaded more than 0.5 among twenty four value of KMO is 0.5 (Othman and Owen 2001).
items for measuring customer satisfaction. These sixteen Therefore, it can be concluded that the matrix did not
items categorized under eight dimensions as per Granin's suffer from multicollinearity or singularity. The result of
service quality measurement model. These eight Bartlett test of Sphericity shows that it is highly
dimensions are considered as various variables for significant (sig=0.000) which indicates that the factor
proposed instrument for measuring the customer analysis processes is correct and suitable for testing
satisfaction of LPG gas. The items that fail to get loaded multidimensionality (Othman and Owen 2001). Therefore,
less than 0.5 were not considered for further analysis. the statistical tests has resulted that the proposed items
They refer to items 1,4,9,15,18,19,21 and 23. Percentage and all dimensions of instruments are sound enough for
of total variance explained was found to be 76.9% which analysis. In Table1, 2, the dimensions are named like
is an acceptable value for the principal component performance,feature,reliability,conformance,durability,ser
varimax rotated factor loading procedure (Johnson and vicability,asthetics and prestige according to the
Wichern 2002). The internal consistency of the actual character.
survey data were tested by computing the Cronbach‟s
Alpha (α). The value of alpha for each dimension is
shown in Table 2, and Table 3 and the value of alpha for
Dimension Item Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Factor4 Factor5 Factor6 Factor7 Factor8 Chrobanchs
alpha
Feature 10.7 2
Reliability 8.2 3
Conformance 7.8 4
Durability 7.5 5
Serviceability 7.1 6
Aesthetics 6.2 7
Prestige 5.9 8
Performan 1
ce
Feature 0.306 1
0.000
0.029 0.000
Coefficient
Histogram
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) (response is customer satisfaction)
20
* . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
15
X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7,X8 are representing the
eight constructs found from factorial analysis. Then the
Frequency
A high degree of significant positive correlation is also [1] Charoenpong, P. (2003), “International Tourists: Satisfaction
observed between dimension Performance and Feature , with the Quality of Service in Accommodation in Thailand”.
Feature and Reliability,Reliability and Dissertation (Population Education). Bangkok: Graduate School,
Mahidol University.
confirms,Durability and Servicability and Servicability [2] Garnin David,A., (1984), “What does quality really mean?”
and Asthetics.It is clear from this, that the Indian Sloan Management Review, fall,pp. 45-54.
customers are satisfied with the constructs like [3] Hovland, P.E.L., Bambenek, M., (2007), “Improving Customer
Performance,Feature,Reliability,Confirms,Durability,Serv Service, The Paperless Utility Advantage”, Vol .07, 6-8 May
2007, pp.A1-A1-2.
ixability and Asthetics as these constructs are having [4] Johnson, R.A. and Wichern, D.W. (2002) Applied Multivariate
positive relations with each other. Again negative Statistical Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle
correlations are observed in the last rows containing River, NJ.
Prestige and servicability and Asthetics as these [5] Khan, M.S, Mahapatra, S.S, Sreekumar (2009) „Service quality
evaluation in internet banking: an empirical study in India‟
correlations are of low degree. From the lowest International Journal of Indian Culture and Business
correlations it is confirm that these constructs are not Management (IJICBM), Vol. 2, No. 1, pp 30-46.
suitable for Indina customers and they do not have good [6] Nunnally, J.C. (1988). „Psychometric Theory‟, Englewood
relations with each other .All independent variables, Cliffs, NJ: McGraw-Hill.
[7] Oyeniyi, O., & Abiodun A. J. (2008). „Customer service in the
which are Performance, Feature, Reliability retention of mobile phone users in Nigeria‟, African Journal of
,Conformance, Durability, Servicability, Asthetics and Business Management, Vol.2, No.2, pp 026-031. [Online]
prestige had statistically significant and positive Available: http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM.
relationships with the customer satisfaction in LPG gas [8] Ojo. (2010). „The relationship between service quality and
customer satisfaction in the telecommunication industry:
delivery service, where p≤0.05. The dimension Feature Evidence from Nigeria‟, Broad Research in Accounting,
are the most significant independent variable with the Negotiation, and Distribution, Vol.1, No.1, pp 88.
largest beta coefficient (β = 0.94820) at the 0.002 [9] Othman, A. and Owen, L. (2001) „the multidimensionality of
significance level, followed by the dimension Prestige (β CARTER model to measure customer Service Quality (SQ) in
Islamic banking industry: a study in Kuwait Finance