Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Medical Incident Lucas Ngwenya Matla Power Station
Medical Incident Lucas Ngwenya Matla Power Station
240-94026713 Rev 4
Identifier
Business Management System
Effective Date 04/03/2020
Initial Notification of Occurrence
(INO) Review Date 04/03/2025
Page 1 of 4
YES NO YES NO
PLACE OF INCIDENT Matla Ash dust plant Unit 1 WORK RELATED x REPEAT x
NOTE: To classify an Environmental incident please complete page 3 before indicating either Environmental Legal Contravention or Environmental Event below.
INJURY CLASSIFICATION – MARK THE APPROPRIATE BOX WITH AN X
POTENTIAL OUTCOME x
NOTE: The priority level is calculated on SAP which will inform actions required to manage and investigate the incident.
TYPE OF CONTACT/INCIDENT CAUSED BY – MARK THE APPROPRIATE BOX WITH AN X
MOTOR OD EXPOSURE
FALL/
VEHICLE x THEFT HI-JACKING INSECT BITE ERGONOMICS ASSAULT
TRIP/SLIP
ACCIDENT
CAUGHT IN
BETWEEN OIL/PETROL/
STRUCK ASH CONTACT OPERATING
DIESEL COAL SPILL CUT BY
BY/AGAINST SPILL WITH FUMES ERROR
SPILL
OTHER (describe)
TASK INFORMATION CLARIFICATION – MARK THE APPROPRIATE BOX WITH AN (Y=yes or N =no)
HIRA IN PLACE x EQUIPMENT IN GOOD CONDITION PROCEDURE IN PLACE TRAINING TAKEN PLACE x
INJURED DETAILS – MARK THE APPROPRIATE BOX WITH AN X AND ADD COMPANY NAME
FULL NAME (No initials) *EMP/LB/CNTR/PCTR/MoP COMPANY NAME UNIQUE NO./ID NO. AGE SERVICE PERIOD
EMP=EMPLOYEE, LB = LABOUR BROKER, CNTR=CONTRACTOR, PCNTR=PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR, MoP =MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
FULL NAME(S) OF WITNESS(S)
FULL NAME *EMP/LB/CNTR/PCTR COMPANY NAME UNIQUE NO. /ID NO. TEL NUMBER
Controlled Disclosure
When downloaded from the document management system, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line with the
authorised version on the system.
No part of this document may be reproduced without the expressed consent of the copyright holder, Eskom Rotek Industries SOC Ltd
Page 2 of 4
On the 17 July 2021 at approximately 22h00, the night shift reported to work and continued with their daily tasks. In the early hours of Saturday the injured employee was tasked to go and fill up
the instrument air compressor at Unit 1Ash Plant, during the process of preparation the injured fell into an open drain injuring his right hand ankle. The task was stopped immediately and incident
was reported to ERT Team and to Management. Apparently the decision was taken for the removal of the instrument air compressor from the Slurry plant to Unit 1 Dust Plant. On the 16 July
2021.the employee was attended by ERT Team on site and transported to Witbank Cosmos hospital. The X-ray was done and revealed no fracture only a soft tissue injury. The injured was not
referred to another medical practitioner, The injured was discharged the same day and advised to make a follow up on Monday to see doctor Spoestra. SHEQ arranged with scaffolding company
to install the solid barricading in the area, the barricading was installed immediately.
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS:
The incident reporting process was followed
The supervisor on shift did not approve the employee risk assessment
The task for filling up the diesel was not included on a risk assessment
The employee was injured on his R/H ankle
The trench was open without a cover
The team was busy filling up a diesel into the instrument air compressor
The instrument air compressor was removed from the Slurry Plant on the 16 July 2021 due to excessive dust
Controlled Disclosure
When downloaded from the document management system, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line with the
authorised version on the system.
No part of this document may be reproduced without the expressed consent of the copyright holder, Eskom Rotek Industries SOC Ltd
Page 3 of 4
Eskom and/or Could have Could have Could have Could have Could have
contractor resulted, or resulted, or resulted, or resulted, or resulted, or
employee near miss previously did previously did previously did previously did previously did
incidents result, in a first aid result, in a lost time result, in a lost time result, in a result, in
(within the same or medical injury injury where single fatality multiple
OU/ BU) Treatment case. where fewer 14 days or more or a serious Fatalities.
than 14 days were lost. Incident.
were lost.
Environmental incidents Little or no Minor ecological Aspect could Aspect could Aspect has a
ecological effect Effect. result in a result in a recognised
and no Ecological moderate major global
measurable damage can be uncontained or uncontained or environmental
impact on human remedied within sustained sustained impact.
Health. Six months. environmental environmental Widespread
Minor hazard to release, impacting release, or permanent
humans in the the local impacting the local
immediate Environment only. regional ecological
Vicinity. Ecological environment damage.
damage can be only. Remediation
remedied in less Ecological would take
than one year. damage can longer than
Health hazard to be remedied one year.
humans in the within 1 year. Could result
immediate vicinity, Health hazard in a major
but not resulting in to humans in public health
critical or fatal the immediate hazard.
Injury/illness. vicinity Magnitude is
resulting in unknown.
critical or fatal Incident gives
injury/illness. rise to a legal
Incident gives contravention.
rise to a legal
contravention.
Likelihood Table
Probability Categories Likelihood or recurrence of event Description
Frequent, Almost certain 1 or more times per month Is expected to occur again either immediately or within a short period of time (i.e. within the next few
weeks)
Likely Occurs once per month Will probably occur in most circumstances (several times a year)
Possible Occurs once per year or every 2 Years Possibly will recur – might occur at some time (may happen every 1 to 2 years)
Unlikely Occurs more than once every 10 Years Possibly will recur – could occur at some time in the next 2 to 5 years
Rare Occurs once every 10 years or once in a Unlikely to occur – may occur only in exceptional circumstances (may happen every 10 to 100 years)
lifetime
Priority Matrix
Consequence/Severity
Low/Minimum Minor Moderate Major Serious/Critical
Frequent, almost certain Moderate Moderate High Extreme Extreme
Likely Low Moderate High Extreme Extreme
Likelihood Possible Low Moderate Moderate Extreme Extreme
Unlikely Low Low Moderate Extreme Extreme
Rare Low Low Moderate Extreme Extreme
Environmental
Guide Incident detail
Results of Evaluation to
As per flow diagram set out in EPC 32-249 Annexure H.
Determine If a “Repeat Event”
ELC Criteria for Classification of Legal and OHD Contravention's
Element N/A Yes No
1. Did the event result in either: sterilising the soil, or, destroying rare, endangered or protected fauna or flora?
2. Did the event result in making any water resource unfit for its original purpose such as: domestic, agricultural, industrial use or
reduce the water quality to such a state that human intervention is required to restore it to its original quality?
3. Were reasonable measures taken to prevent pollution or degradation from occurring?
4. Were measures taken to prevent pollution or degradation from continuing?
5. Were measures taken to prevent pollution or degradation from recurring?
6. Was the incident reported to the authorities?
7. Were measures taken to contain and minimise the effects of the event on the environment and to the Health, Safety and
Property of persons?
8. Was event report submitted within fourteen (14) days to the authorities providing the information required i.e. NEMA section
30(5) (a-e)?
9. Contravention of any other environmental legislation? (List if applicable)
10. CLASSIFIED AS ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL CONTRAVENTION (if “Yes” for 1, 2 or 9 or “No” for any from 3 - 8) (Any Shaded Area Marked)
11. CLASSIFIED AS ENVIRONMENTAL EVENT (if “No” for 1, 2 or 9 or “Yes” for any from 3 - 8)
NOTE: If Classified as an Environmental Legal Contravention, Check Against Following Criteria.
Controlled Disclosure
When downloaded from the document management system, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line with the
authorised version on the system.
No part of this document may be reproduced without the expressed consent of the copyright holder, Eskom Rotek Industries SOC Ltd
Page 4 of 4
Criteria Yes No
1. 0
2. Contravention reported within the Division.
3. Contravention reported to appropriate Government Department.
4. Registered on OHD by ELC member in consultation with MD.
5. Contravention was addressed timeously.
6. Repeat legal contravention
OHD EVENT (Any shaded area marked)
Compiled By
Controlled Disclosure
When downloaded from the document management system, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line with the
authorised version on the system.
No part of this document may be reproduced without the expressed consent of the copyright holder, Eskom Rotek Industries SOC Ltd