Department of Education

Region V
Division of Camarines Sur
Siruma District
SIRUMA CENTRAL SCHOOL
Poblacion, Siruma, Camarines Sur

SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE VALIDATION FORM

Name of School: SIRUMA CENTRAL SCHOOL District: SIRUMA
Division: CAMARINES SUR Region: V Date : _____________________
I. IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES (60%)
A. ACCESS (45%)
School- Enrolment % of increase Rating and Equiv. Points
Year (A-B)/ B (100)
2016-2017 565 Baseline 1-Marginal at least 1% Increase
2017-2018 567 2/565 (100) = 0.35% 2- Average at least 7% Increase
2018-2019 569 2/567 (100) = 0.35% 3- High at least 10% Increase
2019-2020 574 5/569 (100) = 0.88%
Average % of Increase (0.35+0.35 +0.88)/3 = Marginal = 1
0.53%
B. EFFICIENCY (25%)
School- Dropout % of Decrease (100) Rating and Equiv. Points
Year Rate (Baseline – 7.06)
2017-2018 0 1-Marginal at least 25% decrease
2018-2019 0 2- Average at least 50% decrease
2019-2020 0 3- High - has 0% DR
Average Decrease = 0 Average= 3
School- Completio % of Increase Rating and Equiv. Points
Year n Rate (A-B)/B (100)
(Baseline – 75%)
2017-2018 88.98 13.98/75 (100) = 18.64% 1-Marginal at least 5% Increase
2018-2019 69.07 -5.93/75 (100) = -7.91% 2- Average at least 7% Increase
2019-2020 100.00 25/75 (100) = 33.33% 3- High at least 10% Increase
Average Increase = 14.69% Average = 3
School- Cohort % of Increase Rating and Equiv. Points
Year Survival (A-B)/B (100)
Rate Baseline - 75%
2017-2018 88.98 13.98/75 (100) = 18.64% 1-Marginal at least 5% Increase
2018-2019 71.13 -3.87/75 (100) = -5.16% 2- Average at least 7% Increase
2019-2020 100.00 25/75 (100) = 33.33% 3- High at least 10% Increase
Average Increase = 15.60% Marginal - 3
Average Efficiency DR + CR + CSR/3 = 3 + 3 +3 =9/3 = 3
Rating
C. QUALITY
School- Average Average Rating and Equiv. Points
Year Final (SY1 +SY2 + SY3) /3
Rating
2017-2018 80.95 1-Marginal : 65- 75%
2018-2019 82.34 (80.95 + 82.34 + 81.42)/3 = 2-Average : 76- 85%
2019-2020 81.42 81.57 3-High : 86-100%
Average 81.57 Average - 2
Summary:
CATEGORY WEIGHT AVE. RATING X Weight Weighted Rating
ACCESS 45% 1 X 0.45 0.45
EFFICIENCY 25% 3 X 0.25 .75
QUALITY 30% 2 X 0.30 .60
TOTAL 100% 1.80 - Better
Legend:
Numerical rating Scale Description
A- Accomplishment
0.50 – 1.40 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best
B- B- Baseline

II. Validated Practices Using DOD (40%)

Cumulative Scores of
SBM Principles Weight Validators per Principle Results
Computation
Leadership 30% 2.53 x 0.3 0.76
Curriculum Learning 30% 1.37 x 0.3 0.41
Accountability 25% 2.00 x 0.25 0.50
Resource Management 15% 1.77 x 0.15 0.27
Sub- total 100% 1.94 = BETTER
Legend :
Numerical rating Scale Description
0.50 – 1.40 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best

III. Computation for the Final Rating

Areas Weight Computation Results

Performance Improvement 60% 1.80 X 0.60 1.08
SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 40% 1.94 X 0.40 0.78
TOTAL 100% 1.86 - Maturing

Interpretation
________ Developing (Level I)
___√___ Maturing (Level II)
________ Advanced ( Level III)

Description of SBM Level of Practice:

Numerical rating Scale Description

0.50 – 1.40 Developing
1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
2.50 – 3.00 Advanced

Prepared by:
MELANIE C. BAGASALA
School SBM Coordinator

Noted:

NIDA B. SARMIENTO
School Principal 1

Approved by:

MARIA REBECCA SANDY T. YANAN

Public Schools District Supervisor