Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Visual Inspection For CUI
Visual Inspection For CUI
Visual Inspection For CUI
The first and simplest method of inspection is, of course, visual inspection. It
involves removing the insulation, checking the surface condition of the pipe,
and replacing the insulation. It’s also the most expensive and time-consuming
method. The logistics of insulation removal occasionally involves asbestos and
attendant complications. Process-related problems may also occur if the insulation is
removed while the piping is in service. Nowadays, visual inspections are usually
performed with portable visual scanners, which allows for precise, traceable sizing of
surface corrosion at the outer diameter.
Neutron Backscatter
This method as used for NDT is designed to detect wet insulation in pipes and
vessels. A radioactive source emits high-energy neutrons into the insulation. If
there’s moisture in the insulation, the hydrogen nuclei attenuate the energy of the
emitted neutrons. The inspection instrument’s gauge detector displays a low-energy
neutrons count proportional to the amount of water in the insulation. High
counts per time period indicate more moisture and a higher probability of the
present of CUI.
X-Rays or Radiography to Detect CUI
X-rays are used in a variety of ways in detecting CUI, such as real-time radiography
(RTR), computed radiography (CR), and digital detector arrays (DDA; flat-panel
detectors).
Real-Time Radiography
RTR provides a view of a pipe’s outer diameter profile through the insulation. The
real-time device has a radiation source and an image intensifier/detector. There
are two major categories of RTR devices on the market today; one using an X-ray
source and one using a radioactive source. Each has its own advantages and
disadvantages, but the X-ray systems deliver far better resolution than the isotope-
type equipment. If there is a change in the outer diameter profile, it normally means
a corrosion buildup. However, it’s not possible to measure thickness and difficult to
correlate the loss in wall thickness and the corrosion profile. The method is limited to
small structures and requires access to both sides.
Computed Radiography
PEC averages wall thickness over a relatively large foot print. As a result, PEC
is suitable for general wall loss, but isolated pitting defects cannot be detected,
making it a screening tool only.