Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fall of The Berlin Wall
Fall of The Berlin Wall
Name
Course Title
Date
2
Introduction
There was the partitioning of Germany into four separate areas when the World War II
came to an end and each of them was controlled by allied powers namely the United Kingdom,
the Soviet Union, United States and France. Due to the deterioration of the relationship with the
USSR, there was a hardening of the split into two separate regions: East and West Germany.
West Germany was reinforced by the United States and other democracies from the West
whereas East Germany remained manned by the Soviet Union. However, the Berlin Wall was
built by the German Democratic Republic to maintain the separation between the East and the
West Berlin which also become a symbol of the division that was supposed to exist between the
communism and the democracy. However, when Mikhail Gorbachev became the General
Secretary, his collaborated with President Ronald Reagan opened the door that led to the fall of
the Berlin Wall. According to multiple sources including the New York Times, the opening of
the Berlin Wall was not planned and was a onetime event that caught many flat-footed since
reporters described it as an accident regarding the security measures that were put in place by the
colonies.
It was expected by many people that an incident of this nature could be as a result of a
high-level conspiracy and great strategic plans but in contrast, it come was as a surprise and
contingency.1According to the New York Times magazine writer Christoph Hein, a day before
that historic day, he and his wife had visited a guy who was his publisher by them in Germany.
They also had no idea of what would happen the next moment since their main aim of the visit
1
Shortt, Linda. "Re-Imagining East Germany in the Berlin Republic: Jana Hensel, GDR
Memory and the Transitional Generation." In Memory and political change, pp. 115-129.
was to discuss two books which were yet to be published. 2Their discussions switched when they
learned of political changes and demonstrations that were reported to be taking place both in
Berlin and Leipzig. Opportunism was the main driver of the revolution that was about to take
place even though not all of the leaders had that virtue. He defended opportunism saying it also
had positive results mentioning the Soviet Union where it spearheaded the change of a few
people who held powerful positions at that time. This also highlighted the fact that people needed
more than just the outer changes that are witnessed now and then but wanted the Wall itself to
There was a noticeable change in the social life that people used to live as usual. This
came to reality when Christoph Hein and his wife had decided to head home after spending some
good times with his publisher. They noticed that there were no taxi cars around as they used to
be, something that had not happened for a very long time. He also mentioned the absence of the
“Black” taxis. These are those taxis that one could not miss at night since they were private cars
that belonged to workers who did their jobs up until late evening and opted to complement their
salaries with some cash from the taxi job. This incident is a clear revelation of how life was so
pressing to the people and it shows a clear reason as to why resistance was strongly needed by
According to an article by Tom Brokaw of the New York Times “Freedom Danced
Before my Eyes”, he had a chance to be one of those people who were in West Berlin on
November 8. He had arrived that very morning after the resignation of the East German
Government. He narrated that there was a mounting mood that the party of the communist was
on the run fearing the mass migration of people. He met some party leaders who from the look of
2
McAdams, A. James. "The Last East German and the Memory of the German Democratic
their face showed a lot of worry and confusion but they pretended by hiding their feelings and
gave him a warm welcome. This was meant to keep the faith of the people high even though
there were clear anxiety and confusion in the air at that moment of time.
There were calmness and a show of stability at the checkpoint where guards depicted a
picture of normality. 3Tom Brokaw and other visitors were taken through the security searches
just as usual. He and other journalists were allowed to do some news recordings but only on the
East flank of the Brandenburg Gate. He narrated that there were heavy Army patrols between the
Wall and the streets of East Berlin which covered 100 meters apart. There began as a rumor that
Politburo had taken an unusual decision to legally recognize those parties who were on the
opposition and was planning for free elections. This moved peoples attentions thought there was
still nothing about the Wall. There were several meetings that were held just before the historic
event began including the meeting between Gunter Schabowski who was then a Communist
leader of the East Berlin and more than 300 journalists. However, despite the meeting being
foreseen as a political meeting, there was nothing concerning the Wall that was discussed. There
was an acknowledgment of the need for a free press, women empowerment, and the economy
was supposed to reward those who were deemed to be performers. Gunter Schabowski
pronounced that his party was wiser and more informed than in the past not knowing what would
Mary Elise Sarotte an author and professor of history in his article “The Collapse”, also
revealed how there was mistrust amongst members of the regime. Neither colleagues nor
subordinates had faith in each other which contributed to the failure to blunt what was seen as
rising revolution. It was again this moment that we can learn from the author that people were
3
Sonnevend, Julia. Stories without borders: The Berlin Wall and the making of a global iconic
being mistreated by those in authority when Stasi interrogators questioned a prisoner called
Katrin Hattenhauer how they managed to hold on together despite the kind of treatment they
received.
Christoph Hein also narrated in his article about a woman who was confused about the
state of her relatives who she said were in West Germany. This showed the true picture of how
people would do anything to gain their freedom back from the hands of their inhuman rulers. He
also revealed that that day just before the Wall went down, there was a meeting between the
German Democratic Republic attorney’s collegium and in the meeting they had proposed that
they would make additional changes to the GDR Travel Law. Some politicians on that day
thought that the proposed changes would be embraced by many people since they would satisfy
the demands of people from East German more so about the freedom of travel.
The paper also stated that the meeting between Schabowski and the journalists was full of
questions that even forced him to skip answering some of the questions since he was also in a
confused state as to whether he was doing the right thing or not.4Again on the other side of the
town that same day, mayor Walter Momper was supposed to award what was by then called the
Golden Steering Wheel prize for the self-propelled design but just before the show went on, his
close people who were his driver and his press editor rushed in and gave him the news of what
they had heard. This was again evident that almost everyone in by then had no idea of what was
cooking. The confusion that was being witnessed among the government officials was what the
paper said that contributed much on the mix-up that the citizens had.
According to the New York Times, there was a parliament session going on at the West
German Parliament when news about the announcement that had been made by Schabowski
4
Peck, Jamie, Nik Theodore, and Neil Brenner. "Postneoliberalism and its
came in. There was an immediate interruption on the ongoing debate about tax-deductible
political aids. There was reported anxiety all over West German to an extent that a café owner is
almost attacked by a group of journalists who spotted him coming from the Eastern German side
not knowing that he only went there to sell tea and did not manage to do it at that moment. This
shows the kind of enmity that was build due to the erection of the Wall.
Mary Elise Sarotte also in her article revealed how the news agencies started reporting
the first reaction from political parties in West German. 5There was a speech from Frederick
Bohl who was at that time speaking for the Christian Democratic Union. He was urging those
leaders who were on the East German side to start demolishing the Wall the following day
stating that the Wall had lost its core value and purpose. Elise further revealed that a
broadcasting company in East German tried to take control of the situation whereby they tried to
stress on the need for citizens to obtain travel papers before making any move.
However, there was a contradicting difference on the other side of Germany which was
more than 600 kilometers away which was the southern city of Stuttgart. There was a powerful
team Bayern Munich which was playing against a home team VfB Stuttgart. The New York
Times journalist Mary Elise described the occurrence as being on another planet virtually but in
real sense, they were acting like blind people due to the abruptness of the events at hand. There
was total confusion but at the same time, it was also the reason as to why many people did not
die that day contrary to the expectations that there would have been a mass massacre at the
boarder as people were trying to make their way through the Wall.
5
Sarotte, Mary Elise. The collapse: The accidental opening of the Berlin wall. Basic Books,
2014.
7
Bibliography
McAdams, A. James. "The Last East German and the Memory of the German Democratic
Sarotte, Mary Elise. The collapse: The accidental opening of the Berlin wall. Basic Books,
2014.
Sonnevend, Julia. Stories without borders: The Berlin Wall and the making of a global iconic