This form is to be accomplished by the School LAC leader (MT, HT, or Senior Teacher).

Read this guide before using LDM Forms 3.1AP and 3.2BP.

1. Download this editable form by opening the file and clicking on the down arrow icon. Do not open it as Google Sh

2. Open Form 3.2BP Summary of Ratings of School Heads and enter the required data in the yellow cell. Data

3. Open Form 3.2AP School Head N / 3.2AP SH N, and enter the remaining required data in the Participant's Pro

4. Open/Get your copy of the LDM2 practicum portfolio submitted by school heads. Rate it according to the evalu
Management Team, if necessary.
5a. Input the score for each criterion by clicking the down arrow icon in the yellow cell. You may also directly ent
to white once a value has been assigned. You may add qualitative feedback in the Remarks section to substantiate

5b. To change the score, click on Delete or Backspace, then do 5a again.

6. You may navigate across the different tabs by clicking the Summary of Ratings icon or the School Head Num

7. Enter the required data in the yellow cell ONLY. Do not rename the tabs.
8. Once all ratings are in, rename and save this form, then submit it to the SDO LDM Program Management Team. Coordinate
Follow this file name format: SDO Name_LDMForm4P_LAC Leader 1_Last Name

This document is confidential. NO ENTRY in the LDM1P evaluation forms can be divulged with anyo
authorities for purposes of evaluation, validation and certification of participation/completion.
←Guide

Form 3.2P_LDM Practicum Portfolio - Summary of LDM2 Ratings of Teachers

LAC Leader MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD
Division LEYTE
Region VIII
Contact Details mariachristinsereno1975@gmail.com
LDM Coach ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR.

PART II LDM Implementation/ Practicum Portfolio

SH School Name Name Numerical Rating Descriptive Rating PD Credit Units

1 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE ALOPOOP, MYLENE 4.50 Oustanding Earned PD credit units will be subjected to the PD credit units banking mech
2 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE BASAS, CRISELDA 4.45 Very Satisfactory
3 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE BEREZO, PERLIE 4.70 Oustanding
4 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE DELA CERNA, KATRINA 4.70 Oustanding
5 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE DICO, EDITHA 4.70 Oustanding
6 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE LATO, CRIS CHAREN 4.70 Oustanding
7 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE ORTIZ, MARIA CARMELA 4.70 Oustanding
8 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE OSTERA, ARTEM 4.45 Very Satisfactory
9 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE PASTOR, RICAFLOR 4.70 Oustanding
10 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE PIAD, ELMER 4.45 Very Satisfactory
11 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE QUILLA, ZANDRA 4.70 Oustanding
12 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE ROJAS, LOVELY 4.25 Very Satisfactory
13 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE SEPTIMO, CERE ANN 4.70 Oustanding
15 TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND ALONE SERIÑO, JESAMIE 4.70 Oustanding
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: ALOPOOP, MYLENE Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) 4.490 to be determined
School: TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - STAND AL Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Very Satisfactory
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.500 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Oustanding

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 5
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Professional Language and Overall
Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
4 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 or The ideas are expressed in clear,
more indicators of relevant strands in coherent, and appropriately-
professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate the 2
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate any The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
indicator in the professional standards to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.250 0.800 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.500

Description of FR Oustanding
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
 ←Summary of
Ratings Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: BASAS, CRISELDA Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) 4.300 to be determined
School: TABANGO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Very Satisfactory
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.450 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Very Satisfactory

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 4
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.000 1.000 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.450

Description of FR Very Satisfactory

Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
 ←Summary of
Ratings Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: BEREZO, PERLIE Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) 4.580 to be determined
School: Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Oustanding
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.700 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Oustanding

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 4
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
4 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.500 1.000 1.000 0.750 0.200 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.700

Description of FR Oustanding
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
 ←Summary of
Ratings Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: DELA CERNA, KATRINA Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) 4.840 to be determined
School: TABANGO SHS -SA Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Oustanding
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.700 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Oustanding

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 5
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.250 1.000 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.700

Description of FR Oustanding
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: DICO, EDITHA Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) 4.690 to be determined
School: TABANGO SHS - SA Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Oustanding
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.700 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Oustanding

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 5
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.250 1.000 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.700

Description of FR Oustanding
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
 ←Summary of
Ratings Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: LATO, CRIS CHAREN Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) 4.730 to be determined
School: TABANGO SHS - SA Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Oustanding
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.700 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Oustanding

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 5
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.250 1.000 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.700

Description of FR Oustanding
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: ORTIZ, MARIA CARMELA Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) 4.620 to be determined
School: Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Oustanding
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.700 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Oustanding

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 5
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.250 1.000 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.700

Description of FR Oustanding
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: OSTERA, ARTEM Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) 4.290 to be determined
School: TABANGO SHS - SA Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Very Satisfactory
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.450 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Very Satisfactory

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 4
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.000 1.000 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.450

Description of FR Very Satisfactory

Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: PASTOR, RICAFLOR Division: LEYTE 4.780
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
School: TABANGO SHS - SA Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Oustanding
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.700 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Oustanding

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 5
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Professional Standards Language and Overall
Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 or more The ideas are expressed in clear,
indicators of relevant strands in professional coherent, and appropriately-
standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 indicators of The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM relevant strands in professional standards language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 indicators of The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the relevant strands in professional standards with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate the 2 indicators of
relevant strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate any indicator in The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
the professional standards to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.250 1.000 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.700

Description of FR Oustanding
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: PIAD, ELMER Division: LEYTE 4.450
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
School: TABANGO SHS -SA Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Very Satisfactory
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.450 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Very Satisfactory

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 4
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Professional Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5% 5%
5 5 5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 or more The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
indicators of relevant strands in professional coherent, and appropriately- is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
standards worded language with no errors in perspective and insights
structure and/or writing
conventions

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 indicators of The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
the progress of the implementation experience in the LDM relevant strands in professional standards language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
of the LDM implementation, shows some in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 indicators of The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the relevant strands in professional standards with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate the 2
indicators of relevant strands in professional
standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate any indicator The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
in the professional standards to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.000 1.000 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.450

Description of FR Very Satisfactory

Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: QUILLA, ZANDRA Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) 4.810 to be determined
School: Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Oustanding
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.700 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Oustanding

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 5
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.250 1.000 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.700

Description of FR Oustanding
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: IGNACIO, LOVELY JANE Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
School: TABANGO SHS - SA Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: N/A
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.250 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Very Satisfactory

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 4
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
4 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.000 0.800 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.250

Description of FR Very Satisfactory

Rem Type feedback here.
arks
(Opti
onal)
 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: SEPTIMO, CERE ANN Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) 4.800 to be determined
School: TABANGO SHS - SA Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Oustanding
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.700 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Oustanding

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 5
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.250 1.000 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.700

Description of FR Oustanding
Rem Type feedback here.
arks
(Opti
onal)
 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.2AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of Teachers
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units
Teacher: SERIÑO, JESAMIE Division: LEYTE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) 4.930 to be determined
School: TABANGO SHS - SA Region: VIII Part I Rating Description: Oustanding
Email Address: LAC Leader: MARIA CHRISTINA B. SEREÑO, EdD Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 4.700 to be determined
Contact Number: LDM Coach: ANTONIO B. DACATIMBANG JR. Part II Rating Description: Oustanding

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 5
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the implementation of the LDM,
showing innovations that
contribute to its smooth
implementation
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the LDM
implementation, shows in-depth
analysis and synthesis, and
excellently relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
5 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
5% 5%
5 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

4 - Very Satisfactory
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the implementation
of the LDM
Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
experience in the LDM indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors days before the deadline
implementation, shows some professional standards in structure and/or writing
analysis, and relates it to the conventions
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals

3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
the progress of the LDM experience and relates them to the indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
implementation professional standards and professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
personal development goals writing conventions

2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes the
experience in the implementation
of the LDM with limited attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

1 - Unsatisfactory
The outputs do not show the
progress of the LDM
implementation
Reflection describes experience in
the implementation of the LDM
with no attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order than 3 days after the deadline
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

Weighted Rating 1.200 1.250 1.000 0.750 0.250 0.250

Final Rating (FR) 4.700

Description of FR Oustanding
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)