TYPES OF LITERATURE REVIEWS

A literature review reviews and gives a description, summary and critical assessment of the work
in connection to the problem of study, books, academic reports and any other resources related to
a certain subject, field of research or theory. Literature reviews are aimed to offer a summary of
the sources researched throughout a certain subject and to show your readers how their research
fits into a broader field of study.
A literature review might consist just of a summary of relevant sources. In the social sciences
though, a literature review is normally organised and incorporates summary and synthesis,
generally in particular conceptual categories. A summary is a recap of the relevant source
information, but a summary is a re-organization or re-organization in a way that guides how a
research topic is to be investigated.
The aim of a literary review is to put each work into perspective in order to grasp the research
subject under consideration. Describe the link between each work and the others. Identify fresh
approaches to existing research interpretation. Disclose any gaps in the literature. Solve problems
between prior research that seemed inconsistent. Identify prior academic areas to prevent effort
duplication. Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research. Locate your own research
within the context of existing literature.
Knowledge must be seen as three layers in a particular topic. First, the main investigations are
conducted and published by researchers. Second, there are reviews of these research that
synthesise and provide fresh interpretations based on original findings and which frequently
expand beyond them. Third, impressions, findings, opinions and interpretations that are part of
the field are informally exchanged.
It is vital to remember when producing a literature review that it is frequently this third layer of
information which is called "right," but often it is related solely to primary study and secondary
literature. Given this, while the review of literature provides an overview and a summary of
relevant sources to be examined, there are several ways which may be used, depending on how
the subject is analysed.

Types of Literature Reviews

 Argumentative Review:
This form selectly explores literature to support or disprove an argument, a deeper
embedded premise, or a previously established philosophical dilemma. The aim is to
produce a corpus of literature that provides an opposing point of view. Given the value-
laden character of social-science studies, argumentative techniques can be a legitimate
and significant form of discussion [e.g. educational reform; immigration restriction].
 Note, however, that bias concerns can also be introduced when summarised statements of
the kind seen in systematic reviews are made.

 Historical Review:
Few stuff isolated from the historical precedence. Historical literature reviews focus on
the study of research over a long period of time, typically beginning with the first time
that the literature has developed a topic, conception, theory, and phenomena, followed by
a study. The aim is to put research into a historical perspective, to demonstrate
knowledge of cutting-edge advancements and to indicate the possible areas for future
study.

 Methodological Review:
A review does not necessarily concentrate on what someone says, but on what they say,
analysing process. The review of analysis methods provides a framework of
understanding at several levels, i.e. in theory, substantive fields, research approaches, the
collection and analysis of data and techniques, how scientists draw from a broad range of
knowledge from conceptual to practical documentation for fieldwork applications in
ontological and epistemological areas, quantitative information. This technique helps
highlight ethical problems that you should know about and take into account when
studying yourself.

 Systematic Review:
This form provides an overview of current evidence that relates to a clearly articulated
research topic that employs pre-specified and standardised processes to find, critically
assess and gather data from the studies included in the evaluation. The aims to document
every study on a clearly defined research subject carefully, critically assess and
summarise scientifically. It is normally a very precise empirical inquiry which frequently
is raised in the form of cause and effect, such as "How much does A contribute to B?"
This sort of literature review is mostly utilised in clinical and allied health research
investigations, but is becoming more and more often employed in social sciences.

 Theoretical Review:
It is intended to study the body of theory that has gathered regarding a problem, idea,
theory and phenomena. The theory review helps to identify the theories that currently
exist, their linkages, the extent to which existing ideas have been studied and new
hypotheses to be explored. This is often used to establish an absence of acceptable
theories or to indicate that present ideas are insufficient to explain new or developing
challenges in research. A theoretical topic or a comprehensive theory or framework might
be the focus of the analysis unit.