Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH Hist
CH Hist
By Rajesh Lopez
Introduction.
In the early church the dogmas and the doctrines of the church were in a
developmental stage. The theological concepts were gray areas; there was no universally
accepted teaching of the church. The main theological thinkers during this time came
from two schools of theology
a) The Alexandrian School.
b) The Antiocene School.
These two schools were always at logger-heads with each other as far as the theological
teaching was considered, each had a conflicting opinion over the others teaching. The
powerful party won in these conflicts and the oppositions view was branded as a heresy
and their promoters were called heretics. During this time two types of heresies prevailed
in the church.
a) Christological heresies
b) Heresies based on Rigorism.
It is in the following background that Nestorianism came into existence.
Among the christological heresies there were three heresies, which were based on
the nature of Christ - (Divine or Human) namely, Monophystism, Monotheletism and
Nestorianism. (1)
Nestorianism was fathered by Theodore of Mopsuetia and was later on carried on
and developed by Nestorius his student both belonging to the Antiochene school. The
Antiochene school stressed on the human nature of Christ and was influenced by the
thinking of Aristotle, on the other hand the Alexandrian school stressed on the divine
nature of Christ and was influenced by the teachings of Plato. (2) According to Nestorius
Christ was a man who contained God in himself (Theodochos) and ‘incarnation’ was just
‘an dwelling of the Logos in the man Jesus’. His teaching implied that, in Christ there are
two person, one divine (Logos) and the other human (Jesus) and two son ships, one
begotten of the Father, and other born of Mary. Similarly he said that Virgin Mary was
not the ‘Mother of God’ (Theotocos) but only the ‘mother of a man called Christ’
(Christotocos). He argued that how can God be born of a human creature. (3)
Nestorius believed that the Alexandrian thinking jeopardized the integrity of the human
nature of Christ. He quotes Luke 2:25f, while suggesting that Jesus became perfect by
what he had achieved as a human being- ‘born lived and suffered as a human and not
divine.’ (4)
I feel that the Christological argument on the nature of the person Jesus Christ
was totally uncalled for. It has resulted in many problems and divisions in the church. We
are called to be true followers of the teachings of Christ and not to get involved into
Philosophical debates on the nature of the person Christ. I’d like to quote the thoughts of
some modern day historians like A Harnack and F. Loofs, they say that, Nestorius never
spoke of ‘two sons’ neither did he consider Christ just a man. They feel that if the ideas
and vocabulary used by both parties were neatly clarified and well defined than this big
schism in the church could have been avoided. (6)
Remarkably the scriptures attribute the birth and passion of Jesus to his humanity
and not his divinity – the same view that was held by Nestorius.
END NOTES