Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kosambi and Questions of Caste
Kosambi and Questions of Caste
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Economic and Political Weekly
KUMKUM ROY
Caste
is inevitably platitudinous, but nonetheless true toass
state that
it is a privilege to be able to share one's ideasfor
quest and readings of
Kosambi as part of the centenary celebrations of an indubita-
a catego
bly (and possibly the sole) iconic figure within the domain of the
This
historiography of early India.1 Whatessa
is equally if not more true is
caste
that Kosambi remains, 40 years after he passed as
away, one of the a
most challenging and demanding of historians. His hypotheses
aspects o
may sometimes seem to border on the realm of speculation, we
were con
may often find it difficult to keep pace with his arguments, almost
And, thi
invariably presented with an impatient erudition, yet his con-
issues
cerns with historicising the early Indian past continue to inform an
our understanding, just as we revisit his wide-ranging metho-
within m
dologies, often eclectic in the best sense of the term.
he argued the
that group,
the an
organ
archical other
(ibid: 285 words,
ff). h
Hav
cidate the caste
working system,
of this
This included several
ologists, ca
owed
(scribe) to At
the the same
'cândâla'
according toacceptance
the of
brahman
of "mixed" ety did not
marriages m
betw
ferent varnas. More
Their spec
position
groups: the resources
garland in
makerg
armourer, gested that tr
leather-worker
copper order
smith and would
carpenh
vided outside,
services, becau
including
whole range
typical
of entertain
of cas
trappers populations.
and butchers,
bhrtaka, 'karmakàra'
History' an
that
earners) amongst
The others.
major hi
egories of near servile
dynasties and
but m
succeeded lands,
by the metamo
'cândâ
craftsmen.
'Pulindas' groups) (tribal
nate a wide However,
range of "ou
a^
animals including
ways the
in dog
which
By drawing attention to s
moved 3
away In Search
from the r
sudras and helots
Kosambito a far
often
one that had scope
caste for
systemd
see ideas that
us were devel
examine ho
that other giant of Marx
textualised th
Sharan Sharma,
of whose
the cla
Harapp
was that
produced urbanism
around the
Kosambi's reflections on
unproblematic
stantial. stepped
While he in wi
recogn
tler" and haps
his feel,
crucial unw
role a
63) this did hood
not extend
and i
ritu
this be because
ing of
social
the cont
rela
representations and/or
suggest that
alternative with
forms the
of Ary
socia
with varna interactions,
categories?
Also worth Gotras',
noting is
origin
that
ment of theof the fourfo
sudra-helot e
he did not expend
superiority,
intellec
w
the (ibid: 126).
brâhmanas and/or ks
ductive resources.
One of the most explicit and lucid statements of thisClearl
appeared in
defining the
'Early Stages of material
the Caste System in Northern India' (ibid: 200): bas
see, his discussions on b
It is at least plausible to assume that these Brâhmanas were associated
former, were substantia
with the rich pre-Aryan Indus valley culture, discovered by our archaeo-
socio-political identity
logists; a culture that may have been destroyed by Aryan invaders or a
envisaged died out because of the shift
and of the Indus. This passage-over of sections
enacted.
of the conquered as priests to the conquerors would account for the
As is evident, even as K
many discrepancies between Vedic and epic records, and for the rewrit-
equation was, for him, rar
ing of so much Indian tradition. It would account also for the early
Prehistory systematic
in India'
development of Sanskrit grammar, generally necessary whenthat
there are categories
a complicated foreign language has to be studied. In the same way, thethat
well as past) caste
astounding development lists
of religious philosophy in India at a very early (i
merited date again supports the hypothesis of violent assimilation as it speaks
explanation. He
for the unhappy existence of a cultured priest-class.
being typically food-gath
other things, by
The process that Kosambi a
thus reconstructed enabledbound
him to
homogeneity was
explain variations and changes within the maintai
brahmanical tradition.
80 JULY 26, 2008 Q3S9 Economic & Political weekly
recognised as (ibid:founders
archetypal 225). According to the story,
of Pasenadi could claim such a the
gotras, atti
Visvâmitra within the later brahmanical tradition was character- woman on account of his political strength. At the same time, the
ised by considerable ambivalence and a more or less grudging Sâkyans resented the claim, as they considered him to be their
acceptance of his position. This, according to Kosambi, could besocial inferior, and dealt with the tricky situation by passing off a
explained by taking into account that he was a ksatriya who func-slave woman as a Sâkyan. Ultimately, the ruse was discovered and
tioned as a priest. the Sâkyans had to pay a heavy price. In the process of recounting
What Kosambi was suggesting is that gotra had become athis story, Kosambi recognised the validity of these conflicting per-
marker of brâhmana identity. Consequently, the ways in which itspectives on social status. At the same time, he documented the
was acquired, conferred and hierarchised needed to be under- process whereby the category he designated as tribal ksatriyas was
stood through a detailed analysis of complex textual traditions.destroyed with the rise of the Magadhan empire (ibid: 228).
Through his own analysis he demonstrated that brâhmana In his brilliant thumbnail sketch of political history ('The Basis
origins were only seemingly uniform: in effect, brâhmanas wereof Ancient Indian History - 1') from the Mauryas to the Guptas
recruited through a variety of social processes. Also, claims to(ibid: 311) Kosambi alluded to this process of disintegration and
the status of brâhmana could be validated through diverse anddecimation. Here he pointed out that Asokan inscriptions indi-
even conflicting strategies. cate that kingship as an institution was well known along the
At another level, in his exploration of the specificities of thewestern frontiers of the Mauryan empire, but was virtually
brâhmana varna in Kashmir, Kosambi ('Origins of Feudalism inunknown along the other frontiers, where the references are to
Kasmir', 1957) drew attention to regional variations in whatpeoples rather than states. However, the Allahabad Pillar Inscrip-
purported to be a pan-subcontinental social category (ibid:tion of Samudragupta depicted an entirely different scenario: it
297-98). He used the evidence of the Râjataranginï to highlightmentions several kings who had been uprooted and contains
the range of activities attributed to brâhmanas, some of whomsome of the last available references to 'ganas' or 'samghas', often
were government functionaries, whilst others were warriors -regarded as tribal oligarchies or republics. Kosambi argued that
both deviations from the prescribed occupations for the varnathe intervening centuries had witnessed the formation of monar-
laid down in the sâstras. chical states in several parts of the subcontinent. While many of
If we wish then, to provide an answer to the question with these may have originated from tribal chiefships, they repre-
which we began, it is evident that Kosambi provided severalsented a radical departure from earlier political institutions.
answers: brâhmanas were drawn from various groups - pre-Vedic Kosambi's discussion on the tribe and the brâhmana is also
and non-Vedic. They could, moreover, perform a range of func- illuminating (ibid: p 310). On the one hand, he visualised the
tions, both sacred and secular. The abundantly varied traditionsbrâhmana as an agent of change, transforming tribal societies
of brâhmana origins and brahmanical practices that heand assimilating them within a more stratified socio-political
documented would point to the dynamism of caste identities, aorder. From this perspective, "the brahmin immigrant into tribal
dynamism that he was sometimes reluctant to acknowledge. lands was at first an effective pioneer and educator, though inevi-
tably becoming a mere drain upon production". Perhaps more
5 The Relationship between Tribe and Caste interesting, because less expected, is his designation of a category
Kosambi's exploration of the tribe-caste interface also exempli-of "tribal brahmin" whom he located specifically amongst the
fied the dynamism of caste. At one level, as we saw earlier, he peoples referred to in accounts of Alexander's campaigns in the
conceptualised tribes as pre-class social formations. At anothernorth-west. According to Kosambi this priesthood played a
level, he recognised that the relationship between tribe and caste crucial role in organising resistance to the invader.
was often complex. This is evident, for instance, in his discussion What is evident is that while at one level Kosambi conceptual-
on the Licchavis, whom he classified as a tribe, acknowledging, atised tribe and caste as mutually opposed social formations, he
the same time, that 'khattiya' identities were important withinexplored the intervening terrain, recognising it as a complex con-
the social formation, evidently trying to capture the process oftinuum rather than as a barren, polarised landscape.
internal differentiation by taking recourse to apparently incom-
patible modes of classification. 6 The Text and the Field
In 'Ancient Kosala and Magadha' (1952) Kosambi drew atten- I had mentioned at the outset that Kosambi's methodologies were
tion to the ambivalence towards such groups evident in the brah-often eclectic. On the one hand was his insistence that the scholar
manical tradition. On the one hand, they were treated dismiss-needed to step beyond the library or the archive. Consider for
ively in'texts such as the Manusmrti (ibid: 222). On the other instance, his characteristically scathing dismissal of the 19th cen-
hand, they evidently commanded respect amongst their contem- tury debates on widow remarriage in the essay titled 'Combined
poraries, obvious in the marriage between the early Gupta ruler, Methods in Indology' (1963):
Candragupta I, and the Licchavi princess Kumàradevï, pro- That 85 per cent of the population in their immediate locality allowed
claimed on coins and in inscriptions issued by the Gupta rulers. widows to remarry (and permitted divorce when either party felt
That the ambivalence was mutual is evident from another aggrieved) made no impression upon the scholars nor upon the
frequently-cited anecdote of the Pali tradition that Kosambi dis- authorities on Hindu Law (ibid: 4).
sected with his typical deftness. This was the story of Pasenadi, the As he never tired of repeating, fieldwork, which included
powerful king of Kosala, who wished to marry a Sâkyan womanobserving tangible material artefacts as well as the more
82
july 26, 2008 E33S3 Economic & Political weekly
intangible immutable:
modes ofworks on Sanskrit grammar, the Upanisads, Pali
communication
ments, was, texts, and the Mahâbhârata.
according to And he concluded theindispe
him, discussion by
ing the past and shaping
reverting, the
typically, to present-day practice: future
analogies betweenIt might
present-day
be added that the custom [of marriage withpractic
bride-price] is
past. In the light permissible
of and more recent
normal in some 80 per inves
cent or more of the Maharash-
ethnographies, it trian
is population; brahmins do not hesitate to to
possible officiate (for a considera-
dismiss
tion) at such weddings (ibid: 21).
lations that he worked out. Nonethe
that the frontiers between
Consider past
another, seemingly trivial instance and
of the way in p
than water-tight which he deployed his virtually
allowed him encyclopaedic
to knowledge
arriv
whom he described
('Development sarcastically
of the Gotra System', i960). In discussing theas "
contact with anthropology, sociology,
range of meanings that could be assigned to the term "vrata" he
The immense suggested that it could be connected
potential of withsuch
the notion of food
"dis
dent in his discussion on
taboos: "vrata has also the meaning the gotra
'feeding exclusively upon',
pointed out that while
proved by madhu-vrata for the brahman
a bee" (ibid: 173). It was this pheno-
seemingly menal ability to draw
congealed, on both minute details
there were as well as on broader
virtu
the ground': in issues of perspective and
south context that enabled
India Kosambi to weld
alone, va
single "gotra" together insights from explorations
according to into texts and the"high"
the field into
thousand gotras complex their
of and challenging analyses.
own.
It is not surprising that Kosambi view
(mainly 7 Towards of
Sanskritic) Subversive Histories of Caste India
early with
In his own words
Rich(ibid: 190)
and relevant as Kosambi's investigations of caste were, it is
In attempting to necessary to recognise
trace brieflythat there were areas thatmain
the remained
system down the to age
unexplored, of
questions thatthe Buddha
remained unasked, (fif
and consequently
to keep in mind the brahmanic origin of
unaddressed within his framework. Kosambi attempted to work
brahmanic transmission of all of them. As
with the equation between caste and class, defining both with a
evidence is concerned, most of these are m
reference is all we somewhat
have narrowto
precision. Although hisout
piece own explorations
Indian often
aggravated by led him beyond this postulate,
fantastically one senses that it waslate
ignorant a con-
well as by that fact that
stricting it The
factor as well. is a
equation poor Sansk
was useful up to a point,
dozen meanings.
beyond which it deflected his attention away from certain other
He used his facets of caste.
formidable grasp of an
Sanskrit, Pali and Present-day
Prakrit sociologists,2 for instance, have drawn trad
textual attention
plexities of the caste
to system
the category of dominant in
castes, not necessarily prac
identified as
heterogeneity ofbrâhmanas
the or ksatriyas,
category who owe their powerof
to their the
control
the example of over land people
the in specific localities. Searching for such categories in
designated
a case in point. Starting from
the early Indian textual and epigraphic material is the
obviously an a
the Madras with avenue
the worthnorth-west,
exploring. Reconstructions of the histories
he of rul-es
general was recognised as
ing lineages in the early medieval anpoint
period area wh
to the potential of
The such investigations.
grammarians Pânini and Patanjal
was also regarded as
Other a
studies3 havecentre of
focused on how exchange lear
(including gift-
Upanisad. exchange) constitutes
Further, this social
wasrelations, especially
independ those of caste.
Jâtakas, which almost invariably
While the ingredients of rep
these exchanges do not necessarily or
of learning. always fit in within easily identifiable of means of production,
At the same time, the
they are nonetheless Mahâbhârat
significant in creating and maintaining
infamous) caste identities
diatribe, and relations.
attributed to Kam
as people But perhaps
amongst whom the most substantive
normschallenges to earlier under-
of "p
are not maintained, and
standings of caste where
have emerged from Marxist feminist andthe
dalit id
order has been feminist perspectives. The former
replaced by is exemplified
a in the Indian
state of
sections of the context in the writings
epic suggest of Uma Chakravarti.4 Chakravarti
that draws the
distinctive attention to the
marital need to reconceptualise both caste and
practices, class in
includ
price. Kosambi terms of gender. This rests on an
showed understanding of class
that this as hav- re
with the ing a sexual dimension
descriptions of- to be understood
social not simply inconditi
terms of
Pali canonical control over inanimate or non-humanHe
literature. material resources,
also but dr
implicit in suchalso in terms of control of sexuality and
opinions reproduction (both ascr
being
social origins biological
are and
depictedsocial). as being o
sources Kosambi marshalled
Chakravarti documents how, in both contemporary to
and early est
meaning of the contexts,
term caste identities are/were often shaped through
Aryan was the con
The theory and practice of women's studies has, from its inception,
NOTES
underscored the relation between knowing and transforming; dalit
feminism qualifies this relation further. It places at the centre of 1 B D Chattopadhyaya's edited anthology of Kosambi's essays (Combined Met
knowing, not the unmarked category 'woman' but dalit women who in Indology and Other Writings, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2002)
proved invaluable for the present exercise. All citations, unless otherw
have an interest in overthrowing the system and not rising within it.
stated, are from this anthology.
It is in this context that Kosambi's reasons for engaging with 2 See for instance, M Srinivas, The Dominant Caste and Other Ess
Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
history bear reiteration: 3 For example, G Raheja, The Poison in the Gift: Ritual, Prestation and the Dom
Caste in a North Indian Village, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988.
The principal aim of history, as written hitherto, has been the presen-
4 Uma Chakravarti, Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens, Stree, Calcu
tation of great events in a chronological sequence. However, the 2003.
relative importance of events rarely appears the same to people of 5 See for instance Sharmila Rege, Writing Caste/Writing Gender, Reading Dalit
another time, place, civilisation, or class bias, so that a mere chronicle Women's Testimonios, Zubaan, New Delhi, 2006.
1857
Essays from Economic and Political Weekly
A compilation of essays that were first published in the EPW in a special issue in May 2007. Held together with an introduction by Sekhar Bandyopadhyay,
the essays - that range in theme and subject from historiography and military engagements, to the dalit viranganas idealised in traditional songs and the
"unconventional protagonists" in mutiny novels - converge on one common goal: to enrich the existing national debates on the 1857 Uprising.
The volume has 18 essays by well known historians who include Biswamoy Pati, Dipesh Chakrabarty, Peter Robb and Michael Fisher. The articles are grouped
under five sections:Then and Now'; 'Sepoys and Soldiers', The Margins'/Fictional Representations' and The Arts and 1857'.
Available from