1

IN THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL COURT UNDER THE TAMILNADU

PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS (In Financial Establishment)
ACT 1997, MADURAI.
PRESENT: Thiru.T.V. Hemanandakumar, B.A., L.L.B.,
  Special Judge, Special Court under TNPID Act Cases, Madurai.
Tuesday, the 9th day of March 2021
Calender Case No. 5/2015
State represented by the Inspector of Police,
Economic Offences Wing II, Karur
Cr.No.1/2014 … Complainant
/vs/
1) Fashion Investments,
D.No.106, North Narasimmapuram,
Karur,
Karur District.

2) Nallasivam,
S/o. Mani,
Nagampalli,
Nagampalli (PO),
Aravakuruchi (TK),
Karur District.

3) Rajamani, (discharged)
W/o. M. Nallasivam,
Nagampalli,
Nagampalli (PO),
Aravakuruchi (TK),
Karur District.

4) P. Raju (Died)
S/o. Palaniappagounder,
Ponnagoundanur,
Pallapatti,
Aravakuruchi (TK),
Karur District.

5) Om Prakash (discharged)
S/o. P. Raju,
 2

Ponnagoundanur,
Pallapatti,
Aravakuruchi (TK),
Karur District. … Accused
Offence : u/s. 5 of TNPID Act, 420, 406, 120(B) IPC.
Finding : In the result, prosecution failed to prove the offence alleged u/s 120(B) IPC

and the accused A1, A2 found not guilty u/s 120(B) IPC. The 1st accused is the

proprietorship concern and is not a legal person. Since it is not a separate legal entity,

the 1st accused cannot be convicted. 2nd accused found guilty u/s 406, 420 IPC and

section 5 of TNPID Act and convicted. Charge against 4th accused abated.

Sentence :Considering the nature of offences and amount involved in this case, the 2 nd

accused is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year u/s 406 IPC, and

sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of 7 years and to pay fine of

Rs.5000/- u/s 5 of TNPID Act in default of payment of fine sentenced to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for six months and he is sentenced to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of 4 years and to pay fine of Rs.5000/- u/s 420 IPC in

default of payment of fine sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six

months. All the above sentences imposed for the offences shall run concurrently. The

period of imprisonment already undergone by 2nd accused Nallasivam from

12.11.2014 to 24.03.2015 and from 19.12.2020 till 8.3.2021 are ordered to be set off

u/s 428 Cr.P.C.

The receipt books, note books, ledger, promissory notes, cheques remanded in

R.P.R.No.15/2014 are ordered to be kept with case records. The cash of Rs.80/- in

R.P.R.No.15/14 is ordered to be confiscated to State after expiry of period of appeal

time.
 3

Seri Description of the accused

al Name Father's name Caste Occupat Residence Age
Nu or ion
mb race
er
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
1 Fashion Door No.106,
Investments North Narasimma
puram, Karur

2 Nallasivam Mani Nagampalli, 40/14

Nagampalli (PO)
Aravakuruchi
(TK)
Karur District.

Date of
Occurr Complaint Apprehensio Release Commence Close of Sentence Expla
ence n or on bail ment of trial or order nation
appearance trial of
delay
(8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15)

05.06.2013 12.11.2014 24.3.2015 23.11.2016 16.08.2017 9.3.2021

This case up on 05.3.2021 for final hearing before me, in the presence of Thiru

K. Ramani, Special Public Prosecutor for the Complainant and of Thiru K.K.Kannan,

Advocate for the 1st and 2nd accused and upon hearing the arguments of the

Prosecutor and after perusing the records, and having stood over till this day for

consideration, this Court passed the following:

 4

JUDGMENT

The Inspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing-II, Karur filed final report

against the accused on the allegation that the accused No.2 to 5 in the name of A1

financial establishment, as association of individual, collected deposits from

depositors and then failed to repay Rs.31,86,000/- to 18 depositors. A2 to A5

conspired themselves to cheat the depositors and without repaying the deposit amount

converted the same to promote their wealth. Thereby the accused committed offences

punishable u/s 120(B), 406, 420 IPC and section 5 of TNPID Act.

2) On appearance of the accused before the court copies of records were

furnished to the accused u/s 207 Cr.P.C. and upon perusing the records and hearing

arguments on both sides and having satisfied that prima facie case made out against

the accused and from the available records, this court has framed charge against all

the accused u/s.5 of TNPID Act, 420, 406, 120(B) IPC. When the said charge was

read over and explained to the accused in Tamil they denied the charges. Hence this

court has ordered the prosecution to let in evidence.

3) To prove the guilt of the accused, the prosecution has examined P.W.1 to

P.W.27 and marked Exhibits P1 to P42.

4) It is the case of prosecution that A3 Rajamani is the wife of A2 Nallasivam,

A4 Raju is the father-in-law of A2. A3 Om Prakash is the son of A4. Then A2 to A5

as parters were conducting financial establishment namely Fashion Investments in

D.No.106 North Narasimmapuram, Karur. A1 Fashion Investment is an unregistered

financial establishment. A2 to A5 promised the depositors that they would give

 5

interest at the rate of 12% per annum for the deposits. Believing the version many

depositors including defacto complainant Silambannan deposited money in the 1st

accused financial establishment. The following witnesses deposited the following

sum in the 1st accused Fashion Investments in their name and in their relative's name.

Sl. Name of the Deposit in the name of Rec Date of Deposited

No. depositors eipt deposit amount
No.
1 M. Silambannan M. Silambannan 258 22.12.2010 18,000
S. Srirangammal 259 22.12.2010 17,000
K.R. Hanushmitha 260 22.12.2010 15,000
S. Rajkumar 261 22.12.2010 18,000
Kiruthika 262 22.12.2010 17,000
K.R. Hanushmitha 263 22.12.2010 15,000
S. Sarathy 264 22.12.2010 18,000
S. Vangalayee 265 22.12.2010 17,000
S. Radha 266 22.12.2010 15,000
K. Navamani 267 22.12.2010 18,000
K. Sandhiya 268 22.12.2010 17,000
V. Kandasamy 269 22.12.2010 15,000
2 K. Ramasamy K. Ramasamy 524 02.01.2013 20,000
R. Valarmathi 525 02.01.2013 20,000
R. Sathish 526 02.01.2013 20,000
R. Nallammal 527 02.01.2013 20,000
R. Indumathi 528 02.01.2013 20,000
R. Indumathi 529 02.01.2013 20,000
R. Sathish 530 02.01.2013 20,000
3 M. Kumarasamy M. Kumarasamy 284 09.02.2011 15,000
M. Kumarasamy 285 09.02.2011 6,000
M. Kumarasamy 415 09.12.2011 15,000
K. Latha 416 09.12.2011 15,000
 6

K. Latha 473 27.07.2012 40,000

4 A. Krishnan A. Krishnan 365 01.09.2011 20,000
A. Ramayee Ammal 366 01.09.2011 15,000
5 K. Shahul Hameed N. Shahira 335 08.06.2011 20,000
R. Apsarabarveen 84 05.05.2020 18,000
A. Jothi 86 05.05.2020 10,000
Khathabasha 31 05.04.2010 18,000
Juvethabeevi 32 05.04.2010 18,000
Fathima 33 05.04.2010 18,000
K. Shahulhameed 34 05.04.2010 11,000
S.R. Apasarapaparveen 486 28.09.2012 25,000
S.R. Rafeek 487 22.09.2012 25,000
S.R. Irfan 488 28.09.2012 25,000
S.R. Aashif 489 28.09.2012 25,000
Shahira 581 03.06.2013 25,000
A. Apsaraparveen 580 03.06.2013 25,000
Rafeek 582 03.06.2013 25,000
Ifran 583 03.06.2013 25,000
6 M. Yamini S.V.K. 19 2.4.2010 18,000
Murugaganapathy
M. Yamini 20 2.4.2010 18,000
S.V.K. 21 2.4.2010 14,000
Murugaganapathy
S.V.K. 51 12.04.2010 19,000
Murugaganapathy
M. Yamini 52 12.4.2010 19,000
S.V.K. 53 12.4.2010 19,000
Murugaganapathy
M. Yamini 54 12.4.2010 19,000
M. Yamini 349 1.8.2011 25,000
M. Yamini 472 1.8.2011 22,000
S.V.K. 18 1.7.2013 17,000
Murugaganapathy
 7

M. Yamini 19 1.7.2013 10,000

7 M. Vijayakumar M. Vijayakumar 482 31.8.2012 25,000
V. Aparna 517 17.12.2012 25,000
V. Akalya 518 17.12.2012 25,000
M. Rajeswari 543 8.2.2013 15,000
8 M. Periyasamy M. Periyasamy 514 17.12.2012 34,000
P. Marimuth 515 17.12.2012 34,000
P. Ramya 516 17.12.2012 34,000
9 S. Dharmalingam S. Dharmalingam 417 10.12.2011 25,000
D. Pappathi 418 10.12.2011 25,000
D. Mahendran 428 13.12.2011 20,000
S. Dharmalingam 437 11.02.2012 20,000
D. Pappathi 438 11.02.2012 20,000
D. Mahendran 439 11.02.2012 20,000
D. Karthikeyan 440 11.02.2012 20,000
D. Pappathi 441 11.02.2012 20,000
D. Pappathi 447 25.02.2012 15,000
S. Dharmalingam 448 25.02.2012 15,000
10 P. Sakthivel V. Palanisamy 103 31.05.2010 19,000
P. Sakthivel 104 31.05.2010 19,000
P. Seiyammal 105 31.05.2010 19,000
S. Vijayalakshmi 106 31.05.2010 19,000
S. Karthikeyan 107 31.05.2010 19,000
R. Ramasamy 108 31.05.2010 19,000
D. Selvakumar 109 31.05.2010 19,000
D. Saraswathi 110 31.05.2010 17,000
11 Sadhanandhan S. Kandasamy 311 01.04.2011 25,000
K. Angatthal 312 01.04.2011 25,000
S. Kandhasamy 313 01.04.2011 25,000
K. Angatthal 314 01.04.2011 25,000
S. Kandhasamy 315 01.04.2011 25,000
K. Sadhanandham 316 01.04.2011 25,000
 8

S. Karvendhan 317 01.04.2011 25,000

S. Savitha 318 01.04.2011 25,000
S. Kalavathy 319 01.04.2011 25,000
S. Kandhasamy 320 01.04.2011 25,000
K. Sadhanandham 321 01.04.2011 25,000
S. Karvendhan 322 01.04.2011 25,000
S. Savitha 323 01.04.2011 25,000
S. Kalavathy 324 01.04.2011 25,000
S. Kandasamy 390 01.04.2011 50,000
12 K. Periyasamy M. Rajendran 67 01.05.2010 18,000
R. Vijaya 68 01.05.2010 18,000
R. Saarika 69 01.05.2010 18,000
R. Karthick 70 01.05.2010 18,000
M. Muthusamy 71 01.05.2010 18,000
T. Sivaguruselvam 75 01.05.2010 10,000
M. Selvam 127 01.06.2010 18,000
S. Chitra 128 01.06.2010 18,000
S. Sivaguruselvam 129 01.06.2010 18,000
G. Ragunandhan 130 01.06.2010 18,000
M. Muthusamy 131 01.06.2010 18,000
M. Samiyatthal 132 01.06.2010 10,000
K. Periyasamy 177 01.06.2010 19,000
S.K. Saraswathy 178 18.08.2010 19,000
P. Chitra 179 18.08.2010 19,000
P. Sudha 180 18.08.2010 19,000
V. Preethi 181 18.08.2010 19,000
V. Ramshankar 182 18.08.2010 15,000
P. Palaniammal 183 18.08.2010 10,000
K. Baskar 394 18.11.2011 20,000
K. Kandhasamy 395 18.11.2011 20,000
B. Anbuselvi 396 18.11.2011 20,000
B. Navanitha 397 18.11.2011 20,000
 9

K. Saraswathi 398 18.11.2011 20,000

13 R. Karuppannan R. Karuppannan 564 03.04.2013 50,000
K. Samiyathal 565 03.04.2013 50,000
R. Swathi 566 03.04.2013 50,000
R. Kavipriya 577 04.05.2013 50,000
R. Karuppannan 28 16.08.2013 18,000
K. Samiyatthal 29 16.08.2013 17,000
R. Swathi 30 16.08.2013 15,000
R. Kavipriya 31 16.08.2013 18,000
R. Swathi 32 16.08.2013 17,000
R. Kavipriya 33 16.08.2013 15,000
14 Kandhasamy A. Marayee Ammal 195 08.09.2010 10,000
A. Kandhasamy 196 08.09.2010 10,000
K. Gowri 197 08.09.2010 15,000
K. Subash 198 08.09.2010 15,000
15 P. Kuppusamy S. Gomathi 230 26.10.2010 16,000
P. Kuppusamy 231 26.10.2010 16,000
K. Sivasubramani 232 26.10.2010 18,000
K. Pappayee Ammal 555 04.03.2013 30.000
S. Rathinam 570 15.04.2013 10,000
P. Kuppusamy 36 03.09.2013 10,000
16 Raciyatthal D. Vimala 97 28.05.2010 10,000
S. Valliammal 98 29.05.2010 15,000
N. Sadhasivam 99 29.05.2010 15,000
D. Raciyathal 135 09.06.2010 15,000
D. Subramani 136 09.06.2010 15,000
Periyammal 137 09.06.2010 10,000
17 R. Arumugam R. Arumugam 205 08.09.2010 18,000
A. Ramatthal 206 08.09.2010 17,000
R. Arumugam 207 08.09.2010 15,000
R. Arumugam 341 04.07.2011 10,000
18 P. Govindasamy P. Karuppayee 442 25.10.2011 30,000
 10

P. Shanthapriya 443 18.02.2012 40,000

G. Mukilan 500 16.11.2012 40,000
G. Rajeswari 501 16.11.2012 40,000
G. Palaniappan 537 17.01.2013 25,000
P. Karuppayee Ammal 538 17.01.2013 30,000
G. Mukilan 12 11.07.2013 19,000
G. Rajeswari 14 11.07.2013 19,000
P. Govindasamy 15 11.07.2013 12,000

5) Ex.P2, P4, P6, P8, P10, P12, P14, P16, P18, P20, P22, P24, P26, P28, P30,

P32, P34, and P36 are the deposit receipts issued by the 2 nd accused. Then the

accused used the deposit amount for their personal gain and defaulted to return the

deposit amount.

6) On 5.6.2014 P.W13 Silambannan went to Karur, E.O.W-II Police station at

16.00 hours and gave Ex.P25 complaint. On receipt of the complaint the Special Sub

Inspector of Police Mr. Arumugam registered a case in Cr.No.1/14 u/s 406, 420,

120(B) IPC and section 5 of TNPID Act. Ex.P42 is the First Information Report.

Then he placed the records before the Inspector of Police. On that day itself, P.W27

Inspector of Police Mr. Godwin Jegadish Kumar took up investigation went to the

office of the Fashion Investments. On 6.6.2014, he arrested Accused No.4 Raju at

11.00 A.M in police station. On interrogation, the accused No.4, Raju voluntarily

gave confessional statement which was recorded by P.W27 in the presence of Village

Administrative Officer, Thanthonimalai, P.W24 Azhagirisamy and P.W25 Village

Assistant Kanagaraj. Ex.P38 is the signature of P.W24 in the confession of accused

No.4. Ex.P39 is the signature of P.W25 in the confession of accused No.4. On that
 11

day, P.W27 examined witness No.24 Azhagirisamy, P.W25 Kanagaraj and recorded

their statements.

7) On 12.11.2014 at 11.30 A.M., P.W27 arrested the accused No.2 Nallasivam

in the bus stop in front of Government Arts College, Thanthonni Malai. After

bringing him to the police station, on interrogation the accused No.2 Nallasivam gave

confessional statement which was recorded by P.W27 in the presence of P.W26

Nagamanigandan who was Village Administrative Officer of Thanthonni Malai and

P.W25 Kanagaraj. Ex.P40 and 41 are the signatures of P.W25 and P.W26 in the

confession of accused No.2 Nallasivam. Then he examined P.W1 Ramasamy, P.W2

Kumarasamy, P.W3 Krishnan and other witnesses and received the complaint and

recorded their statements. Ex.P1, P3, P5, P7, P9, P11, P13, P15, P17, P19, P21, P23,

P25, P27, P29, P31, P33 and P35 are the complaints given by the depositors. After

completion of the investigation, P.W27 filed final report against the accused.

8) The accused was examined under section 313(1)(b) Cr.P.C. in respect of the

incriminating circumstances found against him in the prosecution evidence. The

accused denied them as false. On the side of accused, no witnesses were examined.

9) In this case, the 3rd accused Rajamani and 5th accused Omprakash were

discharged as per the order of this court in Crl.M.P. No.2720/2016 dated 23.11.2016.

The 4th accused Raju died during the course of trial and hence case against him

abates. Now the case as against the 1st and 2nd accused is dealt with herein. The

accused were charged u/s 420, 406, 120(B) IPC and section 5 of TNPID Act.
 12

10) Point for consideration is whether prosecution proved the offences against

1st and 2nd accused beyond reasonable doubt?

11) It is the case of prosecution that the 2nd accused Nallasivam along with

other accused was conducting a financial establishment namely Fashion Investments

and collected deposits from P.W1 to P.W17 and P.W21 and thereafter defaulted to

repay the same. P.W18 Balaji is the owner of the building in D.No.106 of North

Narasimmapuram, Karur. P.W19 Shanmugam and P.W20 Sekar are the nearby shop

owners of the Fashion Investments. According to P.W18 all the accused jointly

conducted the financial establishment Fashion Investments in the building owned by

him from the year 2010. Then in the year 2013, the accused closed their business and

absconded. According to P.W19 and P.W20, all the accused jointly were conducting

the 1st accused financial establishment in the building owned by P.W18 and in the

year 2013, they have cheated the depositors and closed their business and absconded.

From the above evidence of P.W18 to P.W20, it is proved that this second accused

Nallasivam along with other accused was running the financial establishment in

D.No.106 North Narasimmapuram, Karur.

12) P.W13 Silambannan is the informant in this case. According to him, the 2 nd

accused Nallasivam and his relatives (other accused) were conducting the 1 st accused

financial establishment and the 2nd accused induced him by stating that if money is

invested in his financial establishment, he would give higher rate of interest and he

would give gift articles also. Believing the version, P.W13 deposited totally a sum of

Rs.2,00,000/- in his name and in the name of his family members. He has further
 13

stated that since the amount was not returned, on 5.6.2014 he gave Ex.P25 complaint

to police.

13) P.W1 Ramasamy has stated that believing the words of the accused he

deposited a sum of Rs.1,40,000/- in his name and in the name of his family members

and the accused defaulted to repay it. Ex.P1 is the complaint given by him.

14) P.W2 Kumarasamy also has stated that he deposited a sum of Rs.91,000/-

in the 1st accused financial establishment run by the accused and thereafter the

accused cheated him.

15) P.W3 has deposed that he deposited a sum of Rs.35,000/- which was not

refunded by the accused.

16) P.W4 Shahul Hameed deposed that he deposited a sum of Rs.3,13,000/- in

the financial establishment of the accused and they did not return the amount.

17) According to P.W5 Yamini, she deposited a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and the

accused did not repay the amount.

18) P.W6 Vijayakumar has stated that he deposited a sum of Rs.90,000/- in the

1st accused financial establishment and which was run by Accused No.2 Nallasivam

and his family members and they cheated him by not returning the amount.

19) P.W7 Periyasamy has stated that he deposited a sum of Rs.1,02,000/-.

P.W8 Dharmalingam has stated that he deposited a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and P.W9

Sakthivel has stated that he has deposited a sum of Rs.1,50,000/-.

20) P.W10 Sadanandham has stated that he has deposited a sum of

Rs.4,00,000/-. According to P.W11, Periyasamy, he deposited Rs.4,20,000/-. P.W12

 14

Karuppannan stated that he has deposited Rs.3,00,000/-. P.W14 Kandhasamy stated

that he deposited Rs.50,000/-.

21) According to P.W15 Kuppusamy he deposited a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and

according to P.W16 Arumugam, he deposited a sum of Rs.60,000/-. According to

P.W17 Govindasamy, he deposited Rs.2,55,000/- and P.W21 Rasiyathal has stated

that she deposited a sum of Rs.80,000/-. All the above witnesses have clearly stated

that the 1st accused financial establishment was run by A2 Nallasivam and other

accused. Ex.P1, P3, P5, P7, P9, P11, P13, P15, P17, P19, P21, P23, P25, P27, P29,

P31, P33 and P35 are the complaints given by P.W1 to P.W17 and P.W21 to police.

All the above witnesses have stated that they deposited mondy in their name and in

the name of their family members and the accused cheated them and defaulted to

repay the deposit amount. All the above depositors / witnesses were not cross

examined on the side of the accused. So their evidence in chief examination remains

unchallenged. As already discussed, all the witnesses have produced the deposit

receipts before this court which support their evidence regarding the deposit in the

financial establishment, Fashion Investments.

22) There is nothing to disbelieve the evidence of P.W1 to P.W17 and P.W21

regarding the deposits made by them. It is seen that during investigation, the

investigating officer on 12.6.2017 at about 10.00 A.M., went to the office of the

Fashion Investments and recovered blank receipts, receipt books, rubber stamps,

ledger and cheque books in the name of the Fashion Investments, Karur. So on

analysing the entire evidence of witnesses and documents, it is proved that the 2 nd
 15

accused and others conducted the financial establishment namely Fashion

Investments, collected total sum of Rs.31,86,000/- from the witnesses and defaulted

to repay the amount. So the facts would clearly prove the offences alleged u/s 5 of

TNPID Act.

23) In this case, P.W1 has clearly stated that the accused induced him to deposit

money stating that they would give higher rate of interest. The other witnesses P.W2

to P.W17 also have clearly stated that the accused promised them that any deposit

amount will be returned at request and they would give higher rate of interest.

According to the witnesses, believing their version only they deposit money in the 1 st

accused financial establishment. It is seen from the evidence that the accused has not

returned any amount to any witnesses till date. So it can be held from the facts that

the accused with intention to cheat the depositors, induced them and received money

and thereafter cheated them. So to the facts of this case, the offence u/s 420 IPC is

proved beyond all reasonable doubts.

24) The next offence alleged is u/s 406 IPC. P.W1 to P.W17 and P.W21 have

clearly stated that they invested money with the accused and it was not refunded. So

the entrustment and subsequent breach of trust is proved and so the offence alleged

u/s 406 IPC is proved against the accused.

25) Regarding the offence, u/s 120(B), it is seen that 3 rd accused Rajamani and

5th accused Omprakash were discharged from this case. 4 th accused Raju already died.

Though it is stated by the witnesses in their evidence that all the accused jointly run

the financial establishment, there is absolutely no evidence that there was meeting of
 16

mind of all the accused at any point of time to cheat the depositors. So without such

proof, this court cannot come to a conclusion that criminal conspiracy was taken

place. So there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged offence u/s 120(B) IPC.

26) In the result, prosecution failed to prove the offence alleged u/s 120(B) IPC

and the accused A1, A2 found not guilty u/s 120(B) IPC. The 1st accused is the

proprietorship concern and is not a legal person. Since it is not a separate legal entity,

the 1st accused cannot be convicted. 2nd accused found guilty u/s 406, 420 IPC and

section 5 of TNPID Act and convicted. Charge against 4th accused abated.

Sd/ T.V. Hemanandakumar,

Special Judge,
Special Court under TNPID Act Cases,
Madurai.
27) The 2nd accused was questioned about the sentence to be imposed against

him. He pleaded leniency.

28) The plea of 2nd accused was considered. Considering the nature of offences

and amount involved in this case, the 2nd accused is sentenced to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for one year u/s 406 IPC, and sentenced to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a term of 7 years and to pay fine of Rs.5000/- u/s 5 of TNPID Act

in default of payment of fine sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six

months and he is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 4 years

and to pay fine of Rs.5000/- u/s 420 IPC in default of payment of fine sentenced to

undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. All the above sentences imposed for

the offences shall run concurrently. The period of imprisonment already undergone
 17

by 2nd accused Nallasivam from 12.11.2014 to 24.03.2015 and from 19.12.2020 till

8.3.2021 are ordered to be set off u/s 428 Cr.P.C.

The receipt books, note books, ledger, promissory notes, cheques remanded in

R.P.R.No.15/2014 are ordered to be kept with case records. The cash of Rs.80/- in

R.P.R.No.15/14 is ordered to be confiscated to State after expiry of period of appeal

time.

Dictated to stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me,

in open court this the 9th day of March 2021.

Sd/ T.V. Hemanandakumar,

Special Judge,
Special Court under TNPID Act Cases,
Madurai.

ANNEXURE

List of prosecution witnesses :-

P.W.1 Ramasamy
P.W.2 Kumarasamy
P.W.3 Krishnan
P.W.4 Shahul Hameed
P.W.5 Yamini
P.W.6 Vijayakumar
P.W.7 Periyasamy
P.W.8 Dharmalingam
P.W9 Sakthivel
P.W10 Sadanandham
P.W11 Periyasamy
P.W12 Karuppannan
P.W13 Silambannan
 18

P.W14 Kandhasamy
P.W15 Kuppusamy
P.W16 Arumugam
P.W17 Govindasamy
P.W18 Balaji
P.W19 Shanmugam
P.W20 Sekar
P.W21 Rasiyathal
P.W22 Senguttuvan (Village Administrative Officer)
P.W23 Selladurai (Village Assistant)
P.W24 Azhagirisamy (Village Administrative Officer)
P.W25 Kanagaraj (Village Assistant)
P.W26 Nagamanigandan (Village Administrative Officer)
P.W27 Godwin Jegadeesh Kumar (Inspector of Police)

List of exhibits marked by prosecution :-

Ex.P1 Complaint
Ex.P2 Receipts
Ex.P3 19.6.14 Complaint
Ex.P4 Receipts
Ex.P5 Complaint
Ex.P6 Receipts
Ex.P7 Complaint
Ex.P8 Receipts
Ex.P9 Complaint
Ex.P10 Receipts
Ex.P11 Complaint
Ex.P12 Receipts.
Ex.P13 Complaint
Ex.P14 Receipts.
Ex.P15 Complaint
Ex.P16 Receipts.
 19

Ex.P17 Complaint
Ex.P18 Receipts.
Ex.P19 Complaint
Ex.P20 Receipts.
Ex.P21 Complaint
Ex.P22 Receipts.
Ex.P23 Complaint
Ex.P24 Receipts.
Ex.P25 5.6.14 Complaint
Ex.P26 Receipts.
Ex.P27 Complaint
Ex.P28 Receipts.
Ex.P29 Complaint
Ex.P30 Receipts.
Ex.P31 Complaint
Ex.P32 Receipts.
Ex.P33 Complaint
Ex.P34 Receipts.
Ex.P35 Complaint
Ex.P36 Receipts.
Ex.P37 Athatchi
Ex.P38 6.6.14 Signature of P.W24 in confessional statement of A4
Ex.P39 6.6.14 Signature of P.W25 in confessional statement of A4
Ex.P40 12.11.14 Signature of P.W25 in confessional statement of A2
Ex.P41 12.11.14 Signature of P.W26 in confessional statement of A2
Ex.P42 First Information report.
III. List of M.O. marked by prosecution: - Nil,
IV. List of Defence witnesses: Nil.
V. List of exhibits marked by defence :- Nil.
Sd/ T.V. Hemanandakumar,
Special Judge,
Special Court under TNPID Act Cases,
Madurai.