INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

in the time of COVID-19

Name of Employee: GERLIE P. SUAYBAGUIO Name of Rater: RENATO O. MAG-ASO
Position: Teacher I Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED TAGUM CITY Date of Review: 01/04/2021
Rating Period: 2020-2021

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Weight Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
KRA QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
1. Content 1. Applied October Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 0
Knowledge and knowledge of 2020- July Level 7 in Objective 1 Level 6 in Objective Level 5 in Objective Level 4 in Objective Level 3 in Objective 1
Pedagogy content within and 2021 as shown in COT 1 as shown in COT 1 as shown in COT 1 as shown in COT as shown in COT
rating sheets
across curriculum rating rating rating rating
/interobserver
teaching areas. sheets/interobserver sheets/interobserve sheets/interobserve sheets/interobserve agreement forms
agreement forms r agreement forms r agreement forms r agreement forms or No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Efficiency
Timeliness
2. Ensured October Quality Ensured that the Ensured that the Ensured that the Ensured that ICT No acceptable
the positive 2020- July ICT used redefine ICT used augment ICT used modify are used but do not evidence was
Basic Education use of ICT to 2021 and transform and enrich learning processes and create a new shown
Services facilitate the learning experiences experiences and improve learning learning experience
teaching and and are documented are documented experiences and and/or are
learning properly and properly and are documented documented
process consistently using consistently using properly and but not consistent
any referencing any referencing consistently with one
style as shown in the style as shown in using any referencing style as
submitted learning the submitted referencing shown in the
material learning material style as shown submitted learning
in the submitted material
learning material

Efficiency
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
1. Content 3. Applied a October Quality Applied teaching Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
Knowledge and range of 2020- July strategies that teaching teaching teaching evidence was
Pedagogy teaching 2021 challenge strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
strategies to learners to require require lead learners
develop draw learners to learners to along a single
critical and conclusions make describe and path of inquiry
creative and justify their connections explain ideas and/or to
thinking, as thinking or put using ideas learned as simple recall
well as other parts together learned as shown in the and rote
higher-order to promote shown in the submitted memorization
thinking deeper submitted learning of concepts as
skills understanding of learning material shown in the
ideas learned as material submitted
shown in the learning
submitted material
learning material

Efficiency
Basic Education Timeliness
Services 2. Diversity of 4. Established October Quality Utilized effective Utilized effective Utilized an Utilized a No acceptable
Learners & a learnercentered 2020- July teaching teaching effective teaching evidence was
Assessment culture by 2021 strategies that strategies that teaching strategy or shown
and Reporting using teaching are appropriate are appropriate strategy that is strategies that
strategies that in responding to in responding to appropriate in partially
respond to learners’ learners’ responding to respond to
their linguistic, linguistic, cultural, linguistic, learners’ learners’
cultural, socioeconomic, cultural, linguistic, linguistic,
socioeconomic or religious socioeconomic, cultural, cultural,
and religious backgrounds at or religious socioeconomic, socioeconomic,
backgrounds an individual backgrounds at a or religious or religious
level* as shown group level* as backgrounds backgrounds as
in the submitted shown in the as shown in shown in the
learning material submitted the submitted submitted
learning material learning learning
material material

Efficiency
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
2. Diversity of 5. Planned and October Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 0
Learners & delivered teaching 2020- July Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
Assessment strategies that are 2021 Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as
and Reporting responsive to the shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
special rating rating rating rating rating
educational needs sheets/interobserver sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter sheets/inter
of learners in agreement forms observer observer observer observer
difficult agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms
circumstances*,
including:
geographic
isolation; chronic
illness;
displacement due
to armed conflict,
urban
resettlement or
disasters; child
abuse and child
labor practices

Basic Education Efficiency

Services
Timeliness
6. Used Quality Provided learners Provided Provided No evidence was
strategies for with accurate, Provided learners with learners with shown
providing and specific and learners with accurate, and inaccurate
timely, accurate directed accurate, and general and/or
and constructive specific constructive destructive
constructive feedback* as constructive feedback feedback
feedback to shown in the feedback as as shown in as shown in the
improve learner evidence shown in the the evidence evidence
performance submitted evidence submitted submitted
October submitted
2020- July
2021 Efficiency
Timeliness MOV submitted MOV No evidence was
shows feedback MOV submitted shown
given within 5 submitted shows MOV submitted
working days shows feedback shows
from feedback given within feedback given
submission** given within 11-20 beyond 20
6-10 working working days working days
days from from from
submission** submission** submission**
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
3. Curriculum 7. Selected, October Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated 0
and Planning developed, 2020- July Level 7 in Objective 7 Level 6 in Objective Level 5 in Objective Level 4 in Objective Level 3 in Objective
organized 2021 as shown in COT 7 as shown in COT 7 as shown in COT 7 as shown in COT 7 as shown in COT
and used rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets
appropriate /interobserver /interobserver /interobserver /interobserver /interobserver
teaching and agreement forms agreement forms agreement agreement forms agreement forms
learning forms or No acceptable
resources, evidence was
including ICT, shown
to address
learning
goals
Efficiency
Timeliness
8. Set October Quality All of the Majority of Half of the Less than half No acceptable
achievable and 2020- July learning the learning learning of the learning evidence was
appropriate 2021 outcomes set outcomes set outcomes set outcomes set shown
learning are aligned are aligned are aligned are aligned with
outcomes that with the with the with the the learning
are aligned learning learning learning competencies
with learning competencies competencies competencies as shown in the
Basic Education competencies as shown in as shown in as shown in MOV submitted
Services the MOV the MOV the MOV
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency
Timeliness
4. Community 9. Built October Quality Sustained Secured Communicated Communicated No acceptable
Linkages and relationships 2020- July engagement collaboration with and with parents/ evidence was
Professional with parents/ 2021 with parents/ with parents/ obtained guardians and/or shown
Engagement & guardians guardians guardians response from wider school
Personal and the wider and/or wider and/or wider parents/ community to
Growth and school school school guardians and/or facilitate
Professional community to community to community to wider school involvement in
Development facilitate facilitate facilitate community to the educative
involvement involvement in involvement in facilitate process but
in the the educative the educative involvement in received no
educative process as process as the educative response/reply
process evidenced by 2 evidenced by process as as evidenced by
or more of MOV one MOV no. 1 evidenced by MOV No. 3
no. 1 or 2 or 2 MOV No. 3
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Efficiency Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4 of the 3 of the of the of the evidence was
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable shown
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV
Timeliness
4. Community 10. Participated October Quality Participated in Participated in Participated in Participated in No acceptable
Linkages and in professional 2020- July any professional any professional any professional any evidence was
Professional networks to 2021 network/activity network/activity network/activity professional shown
Engagement & share that requires that requires that requires network/activity
Personal knowledge and output* and output* and output* to share that does not
Growth and to enhance proof of proof of knowledge and require output
Professional practice implementation implementation to enhance to share
Development ** within the ** within the practice as knowledge and
school to share department/ evidenced by to enhance
knowledge and grade level to the submitted practice as
to enhance share MOV evidenced by
practice as knowledge and the submitted
evidenced by to enhance MOV
the submitted practice as
MOV evidenced by
Basic Education the submitted
Services MOV

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No acceptable

different kinds different kinds different kinds 1 of the evidence was
of acceptable of acceptable of acceptable acceptable shown
MOV*** MOV*** MOV*** MOV
Timeliness
11. Developed a October Quality Updated the Discussed Accomplished No acceptable
personal 2020- July Development progress on Accomplishe the Strengths evidence was
improvement 2021 Plan and the d the and shown
Development
plan based on approved by Development Plan from
Development
reflection of the rater during Plan with the learning Needs portion of
one’s practice Phase II of the rater to check objectives up the Development
and ongoing RPMS cycle whether to resources Plan after
professional Development needed to selfassessment at
learning Needs were address the beginning of
addressed Development the school year
Needs during
Phase I of the
RPMS cycle
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education Efficiency Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the No acceptable
Services IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP with evidence was
any 4 of the any 3 of the any 2 of the any 1 of the shown
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
Supporting Supporting Supporting Supporting
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV

Timeliness
4. Assessment 12.Performed October Quality Performed at Performed at Performed at Performed at No acceptable
and Reporting various related 2020- July least 1 related least 1 related least 1 related least 1 related evidence was
works/activities 2021 work/activity work/activity work/activity work/activity that shown
that contribute that contributed that contributed that contributed to
to the to the to the contributed to the
teachinglearning teachinglearning teachinglearning the teachinglearning
process process process within teachinglearning process
beyond the the school/ process within within the class
school/ Community the learning as evidenced by
Community Learning area/ submitted MOV
Learning Center (CLC) department as
Center (CLC) as evidenced evidenced by
as evidenced by submitted submitted
by submitted MOV MOV
MOV

Efficiency Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4 of the 3 of the 2 of the of the evidence was
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable shown
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory GERLIE P. SUAYBAGUIO RENATO O. MAG-ASO, Ed.D JOY JADE E. RELOS, EdD
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority

Strengths
A. Functional Competencies (RPMS-PPST Objectives from Part II of e-SAT)
Objective 3, KRA 1
• To apply a range of
teaching strategies to develop
critical and creative thinking, as
well as other higher-order
thinking skills.
B. Core Behavioral Competencies (from Part III of e-SAT)
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XI – Davao Region
Schools Division of Tagum City
Magugpo Pilot Central Elementary School
Mabini Street, Tagum City, Davao del Norte
IPCRF- DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Action Plan
Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
Learning Objectives Intervention
Applying range of teaching
Acquire techniques and
Objective 1 KRA 1 To strategies. Learning and Development
strategies on the art of
apply knowledge of content Attending trainings and team, Supervisor, School
questioning that will enable
within and across curriculum seminars/workshops LAC/E- year round Head, Master Teacher, Local
to develop HOTS among the
teaching areas. learning Coaching Mentoring funds
students.
Feedback
 Coaching incorporating
Professionalism and Ethics Innovation Focus on personal Regular Coaching In-
Conceptualization of
Teamwork Service Conceptualizing "out of the productivity to create Service Training in HRTD Funds
innovative and ingenious Sepetember and March
orientation Result Focus box" ideas/approach higher value of results
methods and solutions

Feedback

ELLAINEE C. BAGASLAO RENATO O. MAG-AS0, Ed.D JOY JADE E. RELOS, EdD

RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY