Eric K. Behrens, Esq. (SBN: Filed by Fax

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

AUG-26-2008 TUE 04:03 PM Sanger & Olson FAX NO.

415 693 9322 P, 02

FILED BY FAX
ALAMEDA COUNTY
1 JOHN M. SANGER, ESQ. (SBN 49758) August 27, 2008
CHARLES R. OLSON, ESQ. (SBN 130984)
2 SANGER & OLSON, A Law Corporation CLERK OF
576 Sacramento Street, Seventh Floor THE SUPERIOR COURT
By Robbi McIntosh, Deputy
3 San Francisco, CA 94111-3023
Telephone: 415-693-9300 CASE NUMBER:
4 Facsimile: 415-693-9322 RG06301644
5 CHARLES F. ROBINSON, ESQ. (SBN 113197)
ERIC K. BEHRENS, ESQ. (SBN 79440)
6 KELLY L. DRUMM, ESQ. (SBN 172767)
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
7 1111 Franklin Street, 8th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607-5200
8 Telephone: 510-987-9800
Facsimile: 510-987-9757
9
Attorneys for Respondents,
10 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY; and
11 EDWARD J. DENTON, in his official capacity

12
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
13
FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
14

15
PANORAMIC HILL ASSOCIATION, a Case No. RG 06301644
16 non-profit corporation,
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
17 Petitioner,

18I V.

19I THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF


CALIFORNIA, an agency of the State of
20 California,

21 Respondent. [VIA FACSIMILE]

22

23

24'

25 \\\

26 \\\

27 \\\

28 111

Cacn Nn. RG 06301644: NOTICE+ OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT


AUG-26-2008 TUE 04:03 PM Sanger & Olson FAX NO, 415 693 9322 P. 03

1 CITY OF BERKELEY, a municipal )


corporation,
2
Petitioner/Plaintiff, )
3 )
v. )
4
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
5 BERKELEY; REGENTS OF THE )
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; and DOES)
6 2 THROUGH 50, inclusive )
)
7 Respondents/Defendants. )
)
8 )
)
9 )
CALIFORNIA OAK FOUNDATION, SAVE )
10 THE OAKS AT THE STADIUM, )
MCGEE-SPAULDING-HARDY HISTORIC )
11 INTEREST GROUP, DONA SPRING, )
DOUG A. BUCKWALD, SARAH
12 SHUMER, HENRY LINDSAY
VUREK, PATRICIA EDWARDS, ANNA )
13 MARIE TAYLOR, STAN SPRAGUE, and )
CA E SPRAGUE, )
14 )
Petitioners/Plaintiffs, )
15 )
v. )
16 )
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF )
17 CALIFORNIA, an agency of the State of )
California, and DOES II-XX, )
18 )
Respondents/Defendants, )
19 )
and )
20 )
DOES XXI-XXX )
21 )
Real Parties in Interest. )
22

23

24

25

26
27

28

Case No. RG 06301644: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT


AUG-26-2008 TUE 04:03 PM Sanger & Olson FAX NO. 415 693 9322 P. 04

1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL:

2 Please take Notice that on August 26, 2008, the i the Judgment attached

3 hereto a xhibit A.
4 Dated: 2008 SANG
A LAW
5

6
J j.
7 3 y1111 71. ^..r 14L4 ,

Att net's or Respondents


8 T - REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
9 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
10 BERKELEY; and EDWARD J.
DENTON, in his official capacity
11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

K:IDOCI01ffiI1IDZT1ouTue[-Trinl—Apcnl\Filu58s in Tnul CourLNgire ofEnuy oflndgmcn.DOC —1

Case No. RG 06301644: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT


AUG-26-2008 TUE 04:03 PM Sanger & Olson FAX NO. 415 693 9322 P. 05

EXHIBIT A

08/2N2008 4:00 PM
D mumW 5
AUG-26-2008 TUE 04:03 PM Sanger & Olson FAX NO. 415 693 9322 P. 06
5196992759 DEPT52 E PAGE 02/07 -^„
98/26/2098 15:55
AUG-20-2008 N ED 10 - 63 AM San .r & Ol s o0 F AX NO. 415 803 9322

1 FILED BY FACSIMILE
2' JOHN M. SANGE ESQ . (SBN 49758)
CHARLES R. OLSON. ESQ. (SBN 130984) A FILED
LAMMA {'.a;O7i^
5 SANGSR & OLSON, A Law o oration
576 Sacramento Sk oat, Seventh Floor
4 Son Francisco, CA 94111-3023 AUG262008
Tele ane; 4I5-693-9300 CLERK 'ffiBUP..RI(
5 Fecsile: 415-693-9322
6 CRA,RLES F. ROBINSON, S^i(SBN 113197)
ERIC K. BEHR NS ESQ. SBN 79440)
7 KELLY L. DRUMIV, ESQ. (SEN 172767)
UNIVERSITY OF CALIF01tNIA
8 1111 Fraklin Std, 8th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607-5200
9 Telephone: 510.987-9800
Facsimile: 510-987-9757
10
At arseya forg ondents,
11 THE R OE!''TS OF TH UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
LINTVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY; and
12 EDWARD I. DENTON, in his oftfcial capacity
13
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
14
FOR T1 E COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
is

16
PANORAMIC HILL ASSOCIATION, a FILED BY FACS IMILE
17 aeon-profit corporation,
Case No , RU 06301644
18 Petitioner,
RESPONDENTS' Pr
v. AMENDED JUDO NT lac
19

20 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF


CALIFORNIA, an agency of tho State of Date: 2008
21 California, De t: 512
Tu Hon. Earbera Mt11cr
22 Respondent.

23

24

25

26

27

28 tic
AUG-26-2008 TUE 04:04 PM Sanger & Olson FAX NO. 415 693 9322 P. 07
08/26/2008 25:55 510E902759 D T52 PAGE 03/87
A 20-2008 WED 10:63 AN g lor & Olson FAX NO. 41$ 693 9322 P. 03

1 \\\
2 CaY OF BERKELEY, a municipal
corporation,
3
Mfi=MItiff,
4
v,
5
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
6 13E E Y,. REGENTS OF TM
VM OF C AL IFORNIA; and DOES
7 2 OUGH 50, inclusive
8
9
10
CALIFORNIA OAK FOUNDATION, SAVE
11 THE O S AT THE STADIUM,
MCGU-SPA=MG-H Y UISTORIC
12 INTEREST GROUP DONA SPRING,
DOUG A. BUCKW D, SARAH
13 SHUM HENRY NOM, SAY
VURBIC, PATRICIA
14 MARIE TAYLOR, STAN SPRAGUE, and
C R
15
16
v.
17
OBNT S OF M UNIVERSITY OF
l8 CALIFORNIA„ an agency Oft Stake of
Wo =d DOES
19
Respndo dm%
20
21
DOES XXI-
22
heal P ro in Int t,
23
24 tilt
25

26
27 ul
25 \

Cow No. RG 06301 W; REMMEN ► TROMEDI MGM=


AUG-26-2008 TUE 04:04 PM Sanger & Olson FAX NO, 415 693 9322 P. 08

DEPT52E PAGE 04/07


08/26/2008 15:55 5106902759
AUG-20-2008 MD 10:63 AN Svger & Olson FAX NO 41F 803 9322 F. 04

1 Having considered the issues flramed by the operative pleadings, the administratly
2 mo filed by the parties in these partially consolidated
actions; having beard
3 argument by counsel for 41 parties in these matters; and having issued on June 18, 2008 an
4 Granting iu Pm and Den g in Part Petitions for Writ of Mandate (" "),
5
6 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
7
8 1. Insofar as petitioners' California Environme tai Quality A
9 (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 at w,) ("CEQA") we conoem4 the Petitions for Writ
10 Maaciate filed by petitioners Panoramic Hill Anwom City of Berkeley and California 0
11 Foundation, at 4 ("Petitioners") are panted solely on the ground
that the record
12 far findings and w ns in the that doubling
the nunnber of capaoity events at th
13 Califarnla Memorial Stadium ("CMS") as part of Phase 2 of the CMS Seismic Corrections
14 Program Impmv=MU, which is one component of the Southeast Campus
Integrated Projeo
IS environmental effects that are unavoidable. (Order, pp
(the "Project"), will cause significant
16 121-122.) In insofar as P etitioners' CEQA claims are concerned, the P4
17 deni ed and judgment
is entered favor of Respondents The Regents of the University o
/8 California, (` University"),
19
20 2, Insofar as Petitioners' Claims under the Alqu Plo Earthquake Fault
21 Act (Public Resources § 2621 at seq.) ("Alq t•Pfieb") are eeno , the Pet fims
22 granted solely on the grounds
23 a. The University is not exempt from the xe quirements of Mqu6t-Phol
24 (Order, pp, 10-17);
25 b. The S tudent Athlete High Performan ce Center ("S CI proj
26 includes the following alterations to the CMS within the mg of Alquist-Priolo:
27 (i) a grade beam to be installed along the taLse of the CMS west wall,;
28 (ii) alterations to hero CMS stairmes; and

- I-
No. RG 063016441 RESPONDENTS' MPOM1NDED=C
AUG-26-2008 TUE 04:04 PM Sanger & Olson FAX NO. 415 893 9322 P. 09

5106902759 DEPT52 E PACE 05/07


08/26/2008 15:55
A[ G2OE2008 WED 10154 AN Sa-osr & Olson FAX NO. 419 893 9322 P. 05
1 . .

1 (iii) 'ground floor slab penetrations" i n CM$ proposed to facilitate the


2 instaliatin^,, of the SAHPC telecommunications system; ad
3 G. At the time it approved the SAHPC, the Univer sity had not determined
4 value of the foregoing alterations to CMS identified in Paragraph 2.b. above.
5 In all other respects, Insofar as Petiti oners' claims under Alquist-P riolo are cane erned,
6 Petitions are denied and judgment is entered in favor of the University.
7

3. The Clark of the Court erernptory Writ


81
91 Mandate, ordering the University to do the fallowing:
10 a. suspend the approval of the SAHPC until the University demonstrates tl
11 the cost to construct the foregoing alterations to the CMS described above in Paraga
12 2.b, is less than fifty percent of the value of the CMS, or removes such alterations
13 CMS from the SAHPC project; and
14 b. pu rsuant to Public Resources Code section 21168.9(c), refrain fN
15 approving CMS Phases 2 or 3 of the Integrated Projects until the University (1) wl thdza
16 the proposal to increase the number of capacity events at the CMS as part of the Proje
17 or (ii) if the University chooses to retain them, until the University provides substani
18 evidence to suppo rt its findings and conclusions in the EIR that doubling the number
19 capacity events at the California Memorial Stadium will cause significant euvironnmen
20 effects that are unavoidable,
21

22 4. Tice Court deems the University's Response, filed Juno 27, 2008, to the Con,
23 June 18, 2008 Order as a return to the Peremptory Writ of Mandate. The University's Re apot
24 to the Order includes: (1) Luther environmental review of modifications to the Project and tl
25 SAIilC set forth in items (2) and (3) below In response to the court's Order, and modification
26 CEQA findings related thereto, including a subsequent finding superseding and effective
27 mooting the finding regarding unavoidable significant effects of increased capacity events; I
28 removal from the Project of the additional capacity events referred to In Paragraph 1, above, a

^2-

Case No. R(i06301644; [P'ROPOSEDI


AUG-26-2008 TUE 04:04 PM Sanger & Olson FAX NO 415 693 9322 P. 10
DEPT52t PAGE 06/07
08/26/2008 15:55 5106902759
:
AU0-20-2009 WED 10 54 AM Sager & Olson FAX MO. 415 893 9322 P. 08

1 in the S
(3) removal of all alterations to the CMS included C miwt referred to irk Paragraph
2 2.b. Such actions demonstrate the Perremptory Watt of Mandate.
3

4 5. In accordance with Code of sections 1032(a)(4), 1084.5


5 1095, and consistent with the &aeration that section 1032(a)(4) gives the court (see Lincoln v.
6 Schurgln (1995) 39 Ca1.Am4th 100, 105), the court apportions costs based on the degree
7 which the parties have prevailed in these partially consolidated proceedings. Because th
8 University has prevailed on the bgk of P etitioners' claims, the Court awards the Univers
9 eighty-five percennt of its costs, which shall be borne by Petid s as follows: one-third by Ci
10 of one-third by Panoramic Hill Association and one-third by California 0
11 Foundation, at at, Costs are determined in accordance with the procedures set rtlt in Coda
12 Civil Procedure sections 1032, 1033 and 1033.5, md the co respou &g CaliforniaRules o
13 Court. Any party wishing to seek attorney fees may do so by noticed motion.
14
15 6. On July 23, 2008, otter the Court issued its July 2Z 2008, Jud t Petitioner
16 filed a Motion to Vacate Judgment and for New
17
18 7. On Au gust 8, 2008, the Court issued Order to Show Cause %y Court S W
19 Not Enter Amended Judgment
20
21 & On Aus 15, 2008, Petitioners withdrew their Motion to Vacate Judgment
22 for New Mg.
23
24 9. Also on Augus t 15, 2008, Resporn dents filed a Notice of Decigo
25 Not to File a Supplemental that would not file th
26 supplemental that the Court mft&W them to file is para graph. 5 of the My 22, 2008
27 Order After Hearing.
28

-3-
Case Nm RG MOIW: azsmmmr (PROPOSED] A n =0
AUG-26-2008 TUE 04:05 PM Sanger & Olson FAX NO. 415 693 9322 P. 11
DEPT52± PAGE 07/07
08/26/2008 15:55 5106902759
AUG-20-2008 WED 10:64 AM S' er & Olson FAX NO, 415 893 8322 P. 07
II ._

1 10. On August 19, 2008, Petitioners filed a Response to Order to Show Cause.
2
3 11. . Also on August 19, 2008, Respondents flied a Response to Court's August
4 2008, Order to Show Cause.
5
6 12. Based on repro cntations Respondents wade in their Response to Court's
7 8, 2008, Order to Show Cause, the preliminary injunction entered on Febnrary 9, 2007, is

8 dissolved,
9
14 13. This Amended Judgment is effective and enforceable
it ok

DATED; 2008
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

26
27
28

-4.
AUG-26-2008 TUE 04:05 PM Sanger & Olson FAX NO. 415 693 9322 P. 12

PROOF OF SERVICE

under the laws of


I, Whitney Carlson, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury
the State of California that the following statements are true and correct:

1. I am at least 18 years of age and am not a party to the within action.

2. My business address is Sanger & Olson, 576 Sacramento Street, Seventh Floor,
San Francisco, California. My mailing address is Sanger & Olson, 576 Sacramento Street,
Seventh Floor, San Francisco, California 94111-3023.

3. On August 26, 2008 I served the attached document(s) entitled:

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

on the following named persons in this action:

Michael R. Lozeau, Esq. Kelly L. Drumm, Esq.


LOZEAU DRURY, LLP UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
1516 Oak Street, Suite 216 1111 Franklin Street, 8th Floor
Alameda, California 94501 Oakland, CA 94607-5200
Fax: (510) 749-9103 Fax: (510) 987-9757

Stephan C. Volker, Esq. Harriet A. Steiner, Esq.


LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. MCDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN
VOLKER PC
436 —14th Street, Suite 1300 555 Capitol Mall, 9 th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612 Sacramento, CA 95814
Fax: (510) 496-1366 Fax: (916) 444-8334

X BY MAIL by placing said copy in a sealed envelope for collection and processing for
mailing and, being familiar with my employer's mail collection and processing practices, know
that said mail is collected and deposited with the United States Postal Service on the same day it
is dated, and know that postage thereon is fully prepaid.

BY PERSONAL SERVICE by causing the same to be personally served by on the


above-named person at the above-stated address on this date.

X BY FACSIMILE by transmitting the same by facsimile transmission to the above-named


person at the above-stated fax number, and received a printed confirmation of successful
facsimile transmission.
BY OVERNIGHT MAIL by causing the same to be served via overnight mail on the
above-named person at the above-stated address on this date.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 26th day of August 2008 at San Francisco,
California.

You might also like