Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aman Deep Bail (High Court)
Aman Deep Bail (High Court)
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl M.A No …………….. 2019
FIR NO. 0121/2018
U/s: 420, 465, 468, 471, 120-
B IPC, U/S 13 OF The Travel
Professional Regulation ACT 2014
P.S.: Division No 1, JALANDHAR
IN RE:
IN THE MATTER OF:
AMANDEEP APPLICANT
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB RESPONDENT
INDEX
Sr. No. Particular Page No.
1. Notice of motion
2. Urgent Application
4. Annexure –-A1
5. Annexure –A-2
True Copy of the Suicide Note of Main Accused Gagan
Nawel Sharma
6. Annexure –A-3
True Copy of the Documents regarding
transfer of body of the main accused
Gagan Nawel Sharma
7. Annexure –A-4
True Copy of the Legal Notice Dated 10.03.2017
8. Annexure –A-5
True Copy of the Passbook of the applicant
9. Vakalatnama
FILED BY: -
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB RESPONDENT
URGENT APPLICATION
To,
THE HON’BLE REGISTRAR,
HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sir,
The applicant is filing the accompanying application under section
438 Cr.P.C.
In view of the grounds mentioned in the accompanying application
and the fact that the abovementioned applicants apprehend arrest so
the hearing of the application is urgently required.
It is prayed accordingly.
Surinder Kaur & Associates
Advocates
Off: 533,Rohini Courts
Chambers block,
New Delhi -110085
email : kaursurinder37@gmail.com
M: 9654531517, 9999601636;
Enrolment no. D-747/ 89
DATED:
NEW DELHI ADVOCATE OF APPLICANT
BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Crl M.A No …………….. 2019
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB RESPONDENT
NOTICE OF MOTION
To,
Sir / Madam,
Please take notice that the accompanying application filed on
behalf of the applicant will be taken up for hearing on ________
or on any other day as per the convenience and pleasure of the
Hon’ble Court.
DATED:
THROUGH
Surinder Kaur & Associates
(Advocates)
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB RESPONDENT
BRIEF FACTS
1. That the main accused i:e Gagan Nawel Sharma (now deceased)
was elder nephew of the complainant Ravi Sharda and both met
at a family wedding at 13.11.2015, where allegedly Gagan Nawel
Sharma introduced himself as Marketing Director in Samsung
India and that his company was hiring for immigration to Canada
where he first gets work visa and thereafter permanent residence
of Canada and the complainant on the asking of Gagan had
invested money for the same purpose but the purpose for which
the money was given allegedly was not fulfilled so he filed the
complaint which later on was converted into the FIR.
3. That in the impugned order the Ld District and Session Judge has
only mentioned the submissions of the counsel of the applicants
but had not appreciated the same and has dismissed this
application by mentioning the contents of recovery of Rs 12, 00,
000 (Twelve Lakh only) and had not completely gone through the
contents of the FIR minutely and word by word which itself
shows the false implication of the accused in the present case and
the entire contents of the FIR doesn’t attract the
provision/ingredients of the sections mentioned in the FIR.
GROUNDS :
1. That the applicant is a peace-loving and law-abiding citizen of
India having clean antecedents.
and 5 months after the death of the main accused with whom
contents of the FIR itself shows that the demand of money and
Sharma.
4. That as per the aforesaid FIR, the applicant has not committed
here that the name of the applicant Amandeep has not been
FIR are living under constant fear and tension of arrest hence
serious.
14. That the refusal of bail is not for punitive purpose but for
society affected.
this Hon’ble Court deem fit to impose upon him at the time of
granting bail.
PRAYER:
In view of the submissions made above, it is most respectfully
prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the IO/SHO
to release applicant/accused on anticipatory bail, in the event of their
arrest, in the interest of justice..
DATED
APPLICANT
THROUGH