Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Presentation Q3-4
International Presentation Q3-4
International Presentation Q3-4
2 Antenna Structure
The proposed RLSA is composed of two parts: 1) feeding part in the lower layer 2)
radiating part in the upper layer, as shown in Fig. 3. The feeding part is composed of an air-
filled rectangular feeding waveguide and an air-filled dog-bone cross slot. Conventionally,
radial waveguide is fed by a coaxial feeder or a cavity resonator. A rectangular feeding
waveguide was developed as the physical size of the coaxial feeder becomes small in
millimeter wave band and high accuracy in manufacturing becomes difficult. An advantage
of the waveguide feeder is its high-power handling capability which makes suitable for the
wireless power transfer application. The dog-bone cross-slot is used to couple waves from
the feeding waveguide and excites the rotating mode in the radial waveguide. The radiating
part is composed of a poly tetra fluoro ethylene (PTFE)-filled radial waveguide and an array
of radiating slot pairs. PTFE has a dielectric constant of 2.16 and a loss tangent of 0.001. The
slot pair is designed to excite circularly-polarized fields. The array radiates pencil-beamed
pattern when the slot pairs exited by the rotating mode fields. The feeding waveguide, dog-
bone cross slot, and radial waveguide are of aluminum with bulk conductivity of 3.8 107
S/m and the radiating slots are of copper with bulk conductivity of 5.8 107 S/m.
In this presentation, we focus mainly on the design of the dog-bone cross slot.
3 Design
This section presents a design method for the RLSA as detailed in section 2. In
subsection 3.1, a dog-bone cross slot including the feeding waveguide is designed using
electromagnetic simulator (HFSS). The design of the radiating part is given in section 3.2.
Finally, the full antenna structure is analyzed using the same software and some of simulation
results are given.
3.1 Feeding Part
We start the design with the initial model shown in Fig.4; a single dog-bone slot over
a rectangular feeding waveguide and the equivalent model of radial waveguide over the dog-
bone slot. The design frequency is 5.8 GHz. The initial dimension of the dog-bone slot is
determined using the method of moment (MoM). By properly scaling the length of the dog-
bone slot (while keeping the ratio between the length of the center part of the dog-bone slot
and the length of the edge parts), the characteristics of E-field at the position of the maximum
direction, see Fig.5., can be obtained for various slot lengths in terms of amplitude and phase
as shown in Fig. 6. In Fig. 6, the resonant frequency is found at the position where the
amplitude of the E-field is maximum. In order to create a cross-slot which can generate a
rotating mode, two slot lengths are determined: the amplitudes of the two slot length are equal
and the phases are 90-degree difference. Fig. 7 show the E-field distribution in the radial
waveguide by combining two slot range. The rotating mode is realized.
Fig. 8 (a) and (b) show the parameters of the feeding parts for two types of cross
coupling slots: Fig. 8 (a) is a straight cross-slot and Fig. 8 (b) is a dog-bone cross-slot. Both
were designed using the aforementioned method. Fig. 9 shows the comparison of the E-field
in the phi-direction within the radial waveguide for the previous and new designs. It is clear
that the amplitude ripples are about 2 dB lower than that of the previous design.
Radiating Slot
Copper
Radial Waveguide
(PTFE)
Aluminum
Coupling Slot
Feeding Waveguide
(Air-filled Aluminum)
Fig. 3 Antenna structure
Single slot
Fig. 6 Amplitude and phase of the E-field for various slot lengths
Cross-slot
Straight cross-slot
22.0 mm
1.5 mm
6.25 mm
19.90 mm
47.14 mm
76.97 mm
Dog-bone cross-slot
17.0 mm
3.88 mm
3.39 mm
1.5 mm
6.25 mm
15.70 mm
47.14 mm
77.72 mm
Frequency [GHz]
Fig. 12 Reflection
Relative Amplitude [dB]
Angle [Deg.]
Fig. 13 Amplitude ripples for various frequencies
(a) Old Cross-Slot (b) New Cross-Slot
4 Transmission
By adopting the new slot designs, the comparison of transmission (S21) between the
Tx and Rx RLSAs using each design is illustrated in Fig. 15. The result in Fig. 15 indicates
that the transmission level of the RLSAs adopting the new cross-slot and the dog-bone one
increases by approximately 2 dB from that using the old cross-slot ([1], [2], and [3]).
Moreover, the transmission ripples for the RLSAs using the new cross-slot and the dog-bone
one reduce by 2.15 dB and 2.25 dB respectively. The result points out that the lower the
amplitude ripples of E-field in the phi-direction in the radial waveguide, the lower the
transmission ripples.
5 Conclusion
The new feeding slots have been proposed to reduce the amplitude ripples of E-field
in the phi-direction in the radial waveguide. This improves the uniformity in the aperture
field distribution of the antenna. By adopting the new cross-slot and the dog-bone one, the
transmission increases by 2 dB from the RLSA using the old cross-slot and the transmission
ripples reduce to 1.14 dB and 1.04 dB for the antennas using the new cross-slot and the dog-
bone one respectively. Fig. 16 show a table comparison for the relevant works.
References
[1] T. Tomura, J. Hirokawa, M. Furukawa, and T. Fujiwara, “Study on 5.8 GHz band
Beam-Type Wireless Power Transmission by Radial Line Slot Antennas,” IEICE Tech.
Report., AP2018-156, pp. 29-32, Jan. 2019.
[2] T. Tomura, J. Hirokawa, M. Furukawa, and T. Fujiwara, “Radial Line Slot Antennas
for 5.8 GHz band Beam-Type Wireless Power Transmission,”, IEICE General. Conf., B-1-
48, Mar. 2019.
[3] T. Ruckkwaen, T. Tomura, and J. Hirokawa, “The Effect of Rotational Dependence
on Transmission Characteristics of Radial Line Slotted Array Antennas,”, IEICE Commun.
Conf., B-1-96, Sep.
2020.
[4] K. Sudo, T. Oizumi, J. Hirokawa, and M. Ando, “Reduction of Azimuthal Amplitude
Ripple in the Rotating-Mode Feed to a Radial Waveguide by Using a Crossed-Dogboned
Slot,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 2618-2622, Sep. 2007.
S21 [dB]
Distance [mm]
Fig. 15 Transmission comparison for various distances