- Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –

Table of Contents
1. General .................................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 Scope of Work.................................................................................................................. 2
2. References .............................................................................................................................. 3
2.1 Soil Investigation Data .................................................................................................... 3
2.1.1 Driving Stress Limit..................................................................................................... 3
3. GRLWEAP Analysis ................................................................................................................ 4
3.1 Bearing Graph Analysis .................................................................................................. 4
3.2 Driveability Analysis ....................................................................................................... 4
3.3 Input Parameter .............................................................................................................. 4
3.4 Analysis Result ................................................................................................................ 5
3.4.1 Bearing Graph Analysis ............................................................................................... 5
3.4.2 Driveability Analysis ................................................................................................... 6
4. Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................... 9
4.1. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 9
4.2. Recommendation ............................................................................................................ 9
APPENDIX – A Bearing Graph Result ......................................................................................... 10
APPENDIX – B Driveability Graph Result .................................................................................. 13
APPENDIX – C Soil Investigation Data ....................................................................................... 16

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 1

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –
1. General
Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 construction planned in North Jakarta with location shown in
Figure 1. For foundation design purpose, PT Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk. appointed PT.
Geotech Efathama to run a driveability analysis for 600 mm diameter concrete spun piles
planned to drive with hammer i.e. JUWEI DD 65. This report presents the driveability results
for piling works under specific condition.

Jembatan 5 – BH P1

(Courtesy of Google Earth)

Figure 1 Location of PDA Test project site

1.1 Objective
Driveability analysis simulated to specify the hammer and driving refusal criteria based on
specific pile size, representatives soil condition (provided by PT Bahana Teknik Raya) to
achieve the require bearing capacity with minimum issue during the pilling works. The
driveability study performed using GRLWEAP 2010 (PDI®).

1.2 Scope of Work

PT. Geotech Efathama do GRLWEAP analysis reporting, including bearing graph and
driveability analysis for this project as well as some recommendation about pile driving
criteria based on GRLWEAP result including : blow count (bl/m), final set (mm/10blow),
compression stress (MPa), and tension stress (MPa) on this report.

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 2

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –
2. References
2.1 Soil Investigation Data
The soil reference for this GRLWEAP analysis based on PT Bahana Teknik Raya soil test
result. Table below shows the soil data used for analysis.

Table 1 Soil Data by PT Bahana Teknik Raya

Bored Hole
N-SPT
Layer Depth (m) Soil Classification
(design)
1 0 – 14.0 2 Very soft to soft clay
2 14.0 – 20.0 5 Medium Clay
3 20.0 – 30.0 12 Stiff Clay
4 30.0 – 36.0 20 Very Stiff Clay
5 36.0 – 42.0 50 Hard Sandy Silt
6 42.0 – 70.0 22 Very Stiff Clay

From the given soil data, there the soil layer was dominated by clay soil. First 14 m
depth there is very soft clay followed by medium to stiff clay from 14 m – 30 m depth. From
30 – 36 and 42 – 70 m depth there is very stiff clay, and hard sandy slit layer was found in
between.

2.1.1 Driving Stress Limit

Pile driving result indicate a stress value. The allowable of stress value is recommended by
FHWA recommendation present in Table 2.

Table 2 Recommended Driving Stress Limits

Stress Type SI Unit Limit
Prestressed Concrete Compression (top) 0.85 f’c – fpe
Prestressed Concrete Tension fpe + 0.25 (f’c)0.5,

Foundation type used on this project is Spun Pile with diameter of 600 mm. The pile
manufactured by WIKA (class A3) with specification of concrete compressive strength (fc’)
= 52 MPa and pre-stressed strength (fpe’) = 4.2 MPa. Based on FHWA recommendation, the
maximum compressive stress and tension stress will be 40 MPa and 6 MPa; respectively.

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 3

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –
3. GRLWEAP Analysis

3.1 Bearing Graph Analysis

A bearing graph analysis is one of the few analysis types in GRLWEAP. The bearing graph
analysis was performed to get relation between hammer stroke, bearing capacity, and pile
stresses (compression and tension) with the blow count. The analysis can check, and control
required capacity, minimum blow count and hammer stroke, also the allowable stresses in
pile.

3.2 Driveability Analysis

The driveability analysis performed to simulate pile driveability to penetrate specified soil
condition under specified hammer. The pile stresses, hammer energy transfer, and hammer
stroke also can be check and control on this analysis.

3.3 Input Parameter

The input parameter for the GRLWEAP analysis are presented in the table below.

Table 3 Hammer Parameter

Hammer Parameter
Hammer Type RAM Maximum Maximum Pressure
Efficiency
(id) Weight (kN) Stroke (m) Energy (kN.m) (kPa)
JUWEI DD65 63.73 2.97 189.274 9000 0.8

Table 4 Pile Parameter

Pile Parameter
Pile Area (cm2)
Concrete Spesific
Diameter Thickness Cross Perimeter
Toe Modulus Weight
(mm) (mm) Section (m)
Area (MPa) (kN/m3)
Area

600 100 1570.8 2827.43 1.885 34500 24

Table 5 Pile Cushion Parameter

Pile Cushion (Plywood – Used Transverse)
Modulus
Diameter Thickness Area
Elasticity
(mm) (mm) (cm2)
(MPa)

600 50 2827.43 210

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 4

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –
Table 6 Hammer Cushion Parameter
Manufacturer’s recommended driving system

Hammer Area Thickness Helmet Modulus Coeficient of

Type (cm2) (mm) Weight (kN) Elasticity (MPa) Restitution

Juwei Hammer do not use any hammer cushion

Table 7 Soil’s Smith Damping Factor and Soil Quake

Soil Type Smith Damping Factor Quake
Clay 0.65 s/m

Shaft Sand 0.16 s/m 2.54 mm

Silt 0.40 s/m

Toe All Soil 0.50 s/m 2.54 mm

3.4 Analysis Result

3.4.1 Bearing Graph Analysis
The requirement of final set on this project is ≤ 25.4 mm/10 blows. From grlweap analysis
the ultimate capacity was found to be ± 3300 kN (330 Tons) with the maximum compression
stresses about 28.3 MPa. The compressive stress still below the allowable compressive
stress.
The tensile stress that occurred at those capacity is 1.4 MPa. High tensile stress will
occur during driving on soft soil. Detailed of the pile stresses are presented in Table 8 and
Figure 2 . The ram stroke during driving around 2.60 m. To achieve those capacities, the
required blow counts and set are presented on the Table 9 and Figure 2.

Table 8 Maximum Stresses Occur on the Pile

Pile
Hammer Compression Stress (MPa) Tension Stress (MPa)
Diameter
JUWEI DD
Ø 600mm ± 28.3 ± 1.4
65

Table 9 Blow Counts, Final Set and Ultimate Capacity to Achieve the Bearing Capacity
Pile Blow Count Final Set Ultimate
Hammer
Diameter (Blow/m) (mm/10 blows) Capacity (kN)
JUWEI DD
Ø 600mm ± 422 ± 25.4 ± 3300
65

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 5

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –

J 5 - BH P1 - PIK 2
5000 35
4500
30
4000
Ultimate Capacity (kN) 3500 25
3000

Stress (MPa)
20
2500
2000 15

1500 10
1000
5
500
0 0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
Final Set (mm/10 blows)
Ult. Capacity Comp. Stress Tens. Stress

Figure 2 Final Set compared with Ultimate Capacity (kN) & Stresses (MPa) for Jembatan 5 – BH P1

3.4.2 Driveability Analysis

In this analysis we simulate piles driveability up to 70.0 m depth for final set of ≤ 25.4 mm/10
blows. Using driveability analysis can simulate the blow count requirement to penetrate into
several depth. Also, with driveability analysis can give the prediction of pile’s compression
and tension stress at each penetration depth. Table below presents the analysis of pile
driveability simulation which contains; expected capacity, blow count (BC), compression
stress (CS) and tension stress (TS) and hammer stroke on each penetration depth.

Table 10 Driveability Result Using JUWEI DD65

Blow Comp. Tension
Depth Capacity Total BC Set Stroke
Count Stress Stress
(mm/10
(m) (kN) (blows/m) (blows/m) (Mpa) (Mpa) (m)
bl)
2 44.7 0 0 0 0 0 2.9
4 55.2 0 0 0 0 0 2.9
6 72.8 0 0 0 0 0 2.9
8 97.3 0 0 0 0 0 2.9
10 128.9 0 0 0 0 0 2.9
12 167.5 0 0 0 0 0 2.9
14 213.1 0 0 0 0 0 2.9
15 308.5 0 0 -10000 0 0 0
17 372.6 0 0 -10000 0 0 0
19 451 6.5 7 1538.5 13.1 -1.2 2.0
21 597.1 9.9 16 1010.1 17.2 -2.9 2.1
23 703.9 14 30 740.7 19.0 -3.0 2.1
25 828.6 18.5 48 540.5 20.7 -2.9 2.2
27 970.6 24.3 73 411.5 22.2 -2.5 2.2
Continue to the next page

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 6

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –
Continue from the previous page
29 1129.6 32.3 105 309.6 23.4 -2.2 2.3
31 1418.5 45.7 151 218.8 24.3 -0.9 2.3
33 1608.2 55.3 206 180.8 24.7 -0.5 2.3
35 1802.1 67 273 149.3 25.3 -0.1 2.4
37 3381 415.3 688 24.1 27.0 -4.2 2.5
39 3868.5 690.6 1379 14.5 27.3 -4.6 2.5
41 4396.8 1320.2 2699 7.6 27.5 -4.7 2.6
43 3550.7 366.3 3065 27.3 27.3 -3.9 2.5
45 3748.7 468.2 3534 21.3 27.5 -3.7 2.6
47 3946.6 619.7 4153 16.1 27.7 -3.4 2.6
49 4144.5 868.2 5022 11.5 27.9 -3.2 2.6
51 4342.4 1321.6 6343 7.6 28.0 -3.0 2.6
53 4540.4 2323.6 8667 4.3 28.2 -2.9 2.6
55 4738.3 7218.8 15886 1.4 28.2 -2.6 2.6
57 4936.2 9999 25885 1.0 28.4 -2.3 2.6
59 5134.1 9999 35884 1.0 28.4 -2.6 2.7
61 5332.1 9999 45883 1.0 28.6 -3.0 2.7
63 5530 9999 55882 1.0 28.7 -3.3 2.7
65 5727.9 9999 65881 1.0 29.1 -3.6 2.7
67 5925.8 9999 75880 1.0 29.5 -3.8 2.7
69 6123.8 9999 85879 1.0 29.9 -4.1 2.7
70 6222.7 9999 95878 1.0 30.1 -4.18 2.7

*Note : aaaa expected first pile penetration, driving will stop at this hard soil lens.
aaa final penetration if pile driving manages to penetrate hard soil lens at 37.0 m.

Simulation analysis shown ≤ 25.4 mm/10 blows of final set can be achieved at two
possibilities penetration under specific hammer energy with representative soil data. The
result described as follow:

• Based on soil investigation data there were soil lens / hard layer at 38.0 – 40.0 m depth
with NSPT value about 55.
• To achieve required final set of ≤ 25.4 mm/10 blows, there are two possibilities depth
of penetration to be achieved. If pile driving could penetrate through hard soil lens at
37.0 – 39.0 m depth, thus expected finals set will be achieved at about 41.0 – 43.0 m
depth. However, if it could not penetrate the soil lens, it would stop at 37.0 – 39.0 m
depth. If this occurred, suggested to do evaluate the potential for long-term settlement
due to underlying soil layer.
• Pile compression and tensile stresses during driving are still below allowable limit.
However, the use of low stroke is highly recommended at first 15.0 m depth of soft soil
layer to reduce the tension stress.

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 7

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –

J5 - BH P1 - PIK J5 - BH P1 - PIK

Figure 3 Ultimate Capacity, Blow Count, Stresses vs depth

for Bored Hole Jembatan 5 – BH P1 Using JUWEI DD65

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 8

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –
4. Conclusions and Recommendations
4.1. Conclusions

Table 11 Acceptance Criteria for Ø600 Pile for Bored Hole Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2
Max.
Average Final Set Max Ten. Ram Approximate
Pile Q.Ultimate Comp.
Hammer Efficiency Blow Count (mm/10 Stress Stroke Penetration
(mm) (kN) Stress
(blow/m) blow) (MPa) (m) Depth (m)
(MPa)

JUWEI ± 3364 ± 411 ± 2.4 ± 26 37.0 – 39.0

Ø600 0.8 ± 25.4 ±2.5
DD65 ± 3498 ± 103 ± 2.5 ± 27 41.0 – 43.0

4.2. Recommendation
1. This GRLWEAP report analysis only conducted and limited for spesific area based on
bored hole Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2, thus variated condition might be found during
actual driving. It is highly recommended for the geotechnical engineer to summarize
soil investigation data and compare this report analysis.
2. Indicator piles shall be performed with the test piles to ensure the analysis and
‘mapping’ local anomaly of soil profile, if exist. Dynamic testing will highly
recommended for those indicator pile.
3. The variation on pile length penetration could happen due to the variation of soil
stratum. By driveability analysis, there are two possibilities depth to achieved final set
set ≤ 25.4 mm/10 blows which are about 37 m and 41 m depth with expected pile
capacity about 3364 ~ 3498 kN.
4. Low stroke of hammer at soft soil area is highly recommended to reduce tension stress.
5. This driveability analysis is only a simulation, the result of actual pile driving on site
could be different from this analysis due to variation of actual hammer energy ,
different of soil layer and another variable that might be not match with actual driving
condition. For comprehensive accurate result suggest to conduct PDA Continuous
Monitoring during pile driving and back analysis shall perform afterwards.

Scan code for authentication

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 9

- Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –

APPENDIX – A
Bearing Graph Result

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 10

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –
Geotech Efathama 04-Sep-2020
Jembatan PIK 2 P1 NO.51 J5 GRLWEAP Version 2010
50 50
JUWEI DD65
Compressive Stress (MPa)

Ram Weight 63.73 kN

Tension Stress (MPa)

40 40 Efficiency 0.800
Pressure 8999 (90%) kPa
Helmet Weight 0.00 kN
30 30 Pile Cushion 1188 kN/mm
COR of P.C. 0.500

20 20
Skin Quake 2.540 mm
Toe Quake 2.540 mm
Skin Damping 0.650 sec/m
Toe Damping 0.490 sec/m
10 10
Pile Length 70.00 m
Pile Penetration 70.00 m
0 0 Pile Top Area 1570.79 cm2

5000 5
Skin Friction
Pile Model Distribution
Ultimate Capacity (kN)

4000 4
Stroke (m)

3000 3

2000 2

1000 1

0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Res. Shaft = 95 %
Set (mm/10 bl) (Proportional)

Geotech Efathama 04-Sep-2020

Jembatan PIK 2 P1 NO.51 J5 GRLWEAP Version 2010

Maximum Maximum
Ultimate Compression Tension
Capacity Stress Stress Set Stroke Energy
kN MPa MPa mm/10 bl m kN-m

2600.0 27.44 2.73 59.5 2.57 45.81

2800.0 27.76 2.38 45.1 2.58 45.94
3000.0 27.97 2.03 34.7 2.60 45.92
3200.0 28.20 1.73 27.3 2.61 45.93
3400.0 28.40 1.50 21.1 2.62 45.88
3600.0 28.54 1.37 15.7 2.63 45.74
3800.0 28.73 1.40 11.3 2.64 45.76
4000.0 28.86 1.52 7.5 2.65 45.65
4200.0 29.06 1.69 4.5 2.66 45.75
4400.0 29.15 1.88 2.0 2.67 45.59

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 11

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –
Geotech Efathama 07-Sep-2020
Jembatan PIK 2 P1 NO.51 J5 GRLWEAP Version 2010
50 50
Compressive Stress (MPa) JUWEI DD65
Ram Weight 63.73 kN

Tension Stress (MPa)

40 40 Efficiency 0.800
Pressure 8999 (90%) kPa
Helmet Weight 0.00 kN
30 30 Pile Cushion 1188 kN/mm
COR of P.C. 0.500

20 20
Skin Quake 2.540 mm
Toe Quake 2.540 mm
Skin Damping 0.650 sec/m
Toe Damping 0.490 sec/m
10 10
Pile Length 70.00 m
Pile Penetration 70.00 m
0 0 Pile Top Area 1570.79 cm2

5000 5
Skin Friction
Pile Model Distribution
Ultimate Capacity (kN)

4000 4
Stroke (m)

3000 3

2000 2

1000 1

0 0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Res. Shaft = 95 %
Blow Count (blows/m) (Proportional)

Geotech Efathama 07-Sep-2020

Jembatan PIK 2 P1 NO.51 J5 GRLWEAP Version 2010

Maximum Maximum
Ultimate Compression Tension Blow
Capacity Stress Stress Count Stroke Energy
kN MPa MPa blows/m m kN-m

2600.0 27.44 2.73 168.0 2.57 45.81

2800.0 27.76 2.38 221.6 2.58 45.94
3000.0 27.97 2.03 287.8 2.60 45.92
3200.0 28.20 1.73 366.1 2.61 45.93
3400.0 28.40 1.50 473.5 2.62 45.88
3600.0 28.54 1.37 635.0 2.63 45.74
3800.0 28.73 1.40 882.4 2.64 45.76
4000.0 28.86 1.52 1327.7 2.65 45.65
4200.0 29.06 1.69 2200.2 2.66 45.75
4400.0 29.15 1.88 5069.4 2.67 45.59

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 12

- Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –

APPENDIX – B
Driveability Graph Result

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 13

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –
Geotech Efathama 2020 Sep 07
Jembatan PIK2 P1 NO.51 J5 GRLWEAPVersion 2010
Gain/Loss 1 at Shaft and Toe 0.700 / 0.900

Ult. Capacity (kN) Comp. Stress(MPa) ENTHRU(kJ)

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 0 10 20 30 40 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0

10 10 10

20 20 20

30 30 30

40 40 40
Depth (m)

50 50 50

60 60 60

70 70 70

80 80 80

90 90 90

100 100 100

0 13 25 38 50 0 10 20 30 40 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Set (mm/10 bl) Tension (MPa) Stroke (m)

Geotech Efathama 2020 Sep 07

Jembatan PIK 2 P1 NO.51 J5 GRLWEAP Version 2010

Gain/Loss 1 at Shaft and Toe 0.700 / 0.900

Ultimate End Comp. Tension

Depth Capacity Friction Bearing Set Stress Stress Stroke ENTHRU
m kN kN kN mm/10 bl MPa MPa m kJ

2.0 44.7 3.5 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0

4.0 55.2 14.0 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
6.0 72.8 31.6 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
8.0 97.3 56.1 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
10.0 128.9 87.7 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
12.0 167.5 126.3 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
14.0 213.1 171.9 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
15.0 308.5 198.6 109.9 -10000.0 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.0
17.0 372.6 262.7 109.9 -10000.0 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.0
19.0 451.0 341.1 109.9 1538.5 13.112 -1.215 1.99 70.3
21.0 597.1 432.2 164.9 1010.1 17.243 -2.900 2.08 65.0
23.0 703.9 539.0 164.9 740.7 19.033 -2.994 2.14 60.0
25.0 828.6 663.7 164.9 540.5 20.729 -2.861 2.19 56.3
27.0 970.6 805.7 164.9 411.5 22.238 -2.521 2.24 53.3
29.0 1129.6 964.7 164.9 309.6 23.442 -2.165 2.29 51.2
31.0 1418.5 1143.6 274.8 218.8 24.337 -0.934 2.33 48.5
33.0 1608.2 1333.4 274.8 180.8 24.743 -0.479 2.34 48.5
35.0 1802.1 1527.3 274.8 149.3 25.306 -0.089 2.38 49.0
37.0 3381.0 1854.2 1526.8 24.1 26.986 -4.168 2.51 52.3
39.0 3868.5 2341.7 1526.8 14.5 27.270 -4.624 2.53 52.4
41.0 4396.8 2870.0 1526.8 7.6 27.482 -4.739 2.55 52.4
43.0 3550.7 3248.4 302.3 27.3 27.291 -3.936 2.54 51.3
45.0 3748.7 3446.4 302.3 21.3 27.527 -3.715 2.56 51.3
47.0 3946.6 3644.3 302.3 16.1 27.730 -3.367 2.57 51.3
49.0 4144.5 3842.2 302.3 11.5 27.851 -3.157 2.59 50.9
51.0 4342.4 4040.1 302.3 7.6 27.983 -2.981 2.60 50.6
53.0 4540.4 4238.1 302.3 4.3 28.166 -2.868 2.62 50.3
55.0 4738.3 4436.0 302.3 1.4 28.244 -2.627 2.63 49.8
57.0 4936.2 4633.9 302.3 1.0 28.378 -2.302 2.64 49.2
59.0 5134.1 4831.8 302.3 1.0 28.439 -2.568 2.65 48.4
61.0 5332.1 5029.8 302.3 1.0 28.594 -2.947 2.66 47.8
63.0 5530.0 5227.7 302.3 1.0 28.715 -3.271 2.67 47.0
65.0 5727.9 5425.6 302.3 1.0 29.063 -3.573 2.68 46.3
67.0 5925.8 5623.5 302.3 1.0 29.483 -3.839 2.70 45.7
69.0 6123.8 5821.5 302.3 1.0 29.937 -4.081 2.71 45.2
70.0 6222.7 5920.4 302.3 1.0 30.073 -4.189 2.72 44.6

Refusal occurred; no driving time output possible

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 14

 - Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –
Geotech Efathama 2020 Sep 07
Jembatan PIK2 P1 NO.51 J5 GRLWEAPVersion 2010
Gain/Loss 1 at Shaft and Toe 0.700 / 0.900

Ult. Capacity (kN) Comp. Stress(MPa) ENTHRU(kJ)

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 0 10 20 30 40 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0

10 10 10

20 20 20

30 30 30

40 40 40
Depth (m)

50 50 50

60 60 60

70 70 70

80 80 80

90 90 90

100 100 100

0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 10 20 30 40 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
BlowCount (blows/m) Tension (MPa) Stroke (m)

Geotech Efathama 2020 Sep 07

Jembatan PIK 2 P1 NO.51 J5 GRLWEAP Version 2010

Gain/Loss 1 at Shaft and Toe 0.700 / 0.900

Ultimate End Blow Comp. Tension

Depth Capacity Friction Bearing Count Stress Stress Stroke ENTHRU
m kN kN kN blows/m MPa MPa m kJ

2.0 44.7 3.5 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0

4.0 55.2 14.0 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
6.0 72.8 31.6 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
8.0 97.3 56.1 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
10.0 128.9 87.7 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
12.0 167.5 126.3 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
14.0 213.1 171.9 41.2 0.0 0.000 0.000 2.90 0.0
15.0 308.5 198.6 109.9 -1.0 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.0
17.0 372.6 262.7 109.9 -1.0 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.0
19.0 451.0 341.1 109.9 6.5 13.112 -1.215 1.99 70.3
21.0 597.1 432.2 164.9 9.9 17.243 -2.900 2.08 65.0
23.0 703.9 539.0 164.9 13.5 19.033 -2.994 2.14 60.0
25.0 828.6 663.7 164.9 18.5 20.729 -2.861 2.19 56.3
27.0 970.6 805.7 164.9 24.3 22.238 -2.521 2.24 53.3
29.0 1129.6 964.7 164.9 32.3 23.442 -2.165 2.29 51.2
31.0 1418.5 1143.6 274.8 45.7 24.337 -0.934 2.33 48.5
33.0 1608.2 1333.4 274.8 55.3 24.743 -0.479 2.34 48.5
35.0 1802.1 1527.3 274.8 67.0 25.306 -0.089 2.38 49.0
37.0 3381.0 1854.2 1526.8 415.3 26.986 -4.168 2.51 52.3
39.0 3868.5 2341.7 1526.8 690.6 27.270 -4.624 2.53 52.4
41.0 4396.8 2870.0 1526.8 1320.2 27.482 -4.739 2.55 52.4
43.0 3550.7 3248.4 302.3 366.3 27.291 -3.936 2.54 51.3
45.0 3748.7 3446.4 302.3 468.4 27.527 -3.715 2.56 51.3
47.0 3946.6 3644.3 302.3 619.7 27.730 -3.367 2.57 51.3
49.0 4144.5 3842.2 302.3 868.2 27.851 -3.157 2.59 50.9
51.0 4342.4 4040.1 302.3 1321.6 27.983 -2.981 2.60 50.6
53.0 4540.4 4238.1 302.3 2323.6 28.166 -2.868 2.62 50.3
55.0 4738.3 4436.0 302.3 7218.8 28.244 -2.627 2.63 49.8
57.0 4936.2 4633.9 302.3 9999.0 28.378 -2.302 2.64 49.2
59.0 5134.1 4831.8 302.3 9999.0 28.439 -2.568 2.65 48.4
61.0 5332.1 5029.8 302.3 9999.0 28.594 -2.947 2.66 47.8
63.0 5530.0 5227.7 302.3 9999.0 28.715 -3.271 2.67 47.0
65.0 5727.9 5425.6 302.3 9999.0 29.063 -3.573 2.68 46.3
67.0 5925.8 5623.5 302.3 9999.0 29.483 -3.839 2.70 45.7
69.0 6123.8 5821.5 302.3 9999.0 29.937 -4.081 2.71 45.2
70.0 6222.7 5920.4 302.3 9999.0 30.073 -4.189 2.72 44.6

Refusal occurred; no driving time output possible

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 15

- Jembatan 5 – BH P1 PIK 2 –

APPENDIX – C
Soil Investigation Data

- GRLWEAP Analysis Result - 16