Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOJ Advisory Opinion No.1 - Issues Advisory Opinion On Rules On Military or Polilice Checkpoints
DOJ Advisory Opinion No.1 - Issues Advisory Opinion On Rules On Military or Polilice Checkpoints
DOJ Advisory Opinion No.1 - Issues Advisory Opinion On Rules On Military or Polilice Checkpoints
CHECKPOINTS
24 March 2011
The Department of Justice (DOJ) released today the first Advisory Opinion summarizing the basic
rights of citizens in military/police checkpoints.
Advisory Opinion No. 1 signed by Secretary Leila M. De Lima is issued in line with the thrust of
the Department to take a pro-active stance and dynamic approach in criminal justice concerns.
“We came out with this initiative to protect the public from abuses committed by law enforcers and
to weed out illegal checkpoints,” said Secretary Leila M. De Lima.
The ten (10) checkpoint rules outlined in the Advisory are anchored on the constitutional guarantee
against unreasonable searches and seizures (Section 2, Article III). These are:
2. Upon approach, slow down, dim headlights and turn on cabin lights. Never step out of the
vehicle.
8. Keep your driver’s license and car registration handy and within reach.
Each rule is supported by law and jurisprudence to ensure that in the implementation of proper
search and seizure procedures at military and police checkpoints, human rights are not violated.
Important definitions such as “checkpoint,” “visual search” and “probable cause” are included in
the Advisory. The rules are couched in a language that is easy to understand and memorize.
Page 1 of 5
Republika ng Pilipinas
KAGAWARAN NG KATARUNGAN
Department of Justice Manila
15 March 2011
ADVISORY OPINION NO. 01
I. INTRODUCTION
This Department of Justice (DOJ) Advisory (the “Advisory”) is intended to address and advise the
public on the proper conduct of checkpoints to protect citizens, to serve as warning to erring law
enforcers and to weed out illegal checkpoints. The Advisory summarizes law and jurisprudence to
ensure that in the implementation of proper search and seizure procedures at military or police
checkpoints, civil, political and human rights are not violated.
1. Constitution
Section 2, Article III of the Constitution provides for the right of the people to be secure in
their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of
whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of
arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after
examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce,
and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
Section 3, Article III also provides that any evidence obtained in violation of the preceding
section shall be inadmissible for any purpose in any proceeding.
The Supreme Court, in several cases, has ruled that not all checkpoints are illegal. Those
which are warranted by the exigencies of public order and are conducted in a way least
intrusive to motorists are allowed. For, admittedly, routine checkpoints do intrude, to a
certain extent, on motorists’ right to “free passage without interruption,” but it cannot be
denied that, as a rule, it involves only a brief detention of travelers during which the
vehicle’s occupants are required to answer a brief question or two. For as long as the vehicle
is neither searched not its occupants subjected to a body search, and the inspection of the
vehicle is limited to a visual search, said routine checks cannot be regarded as violative of an
Page 2 of 5
individual’s right against unreasonable search. In fact, these routine checks, when conducted
in a fixed area, are even less intrusive. [1]
1. Checkpoint – A place where the military or police check vehicular or pedestrian traffic in
order to enforce circulation control measures and other laws, orders, and regulations which
involves only a brief detention of travelers during which the vehicle’s occupants are required
to answer a brief question or two.
2. Brief detention – a brief stoppage or interruption of travel or motion (in the context of the
conduct of checkpoints).
3. Plain view – that which is readily in sight of an officer who has a right to be in the position
to have that view.
4. Probable cause – the existence of such facts and circumstances as would lead a person of
ordinary caution and prudence to entertain an honest and strong suspicion that the person
charged is guilty of the crime subject of the investigation.
5. Uniformed personnel – refers to the AFP and/or PNP personnel wearing their respective
service uniforms with the name plates and other identification tags.
IV. ADVISORY
The general public is hereby advised on the rules on military/police checkpoints as follows:
Checkpoint guidelines provide that all personnel manning legitimate checkpoints should be
in service uniform with the name plates and other identification tags clearly visible and
readable.
In a checkpoint inquiry, the occupants cannot be compelled to step out of the vehicle.[2]
The search which is normally permissible is limited to visual search where the officer
simply looks into the vehicle and flashes a light therein without opening the car’s door.
Page 3 of 5
The search which is normally permissible is limited to an instance where the occupants are
not subjected to a physical or body search.[4]
The personnel manning the checkpoint cannot compel the motorist to open the trunk or
glove compartment of the car or any package contained therein. Such extensive search
requires the existence of probable cause.[5]
Checkpoint involves only a brief detention of travelers during which the vehicle’s occupants
are required to answer a brief question or two.[6]
The constitutional immunity against unreasonable searches and seizures is a personal right
which may be waived. Affirmative acts of volition without being forced or intimidated to do
so, shall properly be construed as a clear waiver of right.[7]
To avoid delay and inconvenience, ready the car registration documents for inspection, in
case requested by authorities.
In case of violation in any these standards, cellphones can be used anytime to call
emergency numbers:117 (PNP) or (02) 521-2930 (DOJ Action Center).
All violations shall be reported to the authorities to ensure steps are taken to investigate
checkpoint violations.
This Advisory is issued in line with the thrust of the Department to take a pro-active stance and
dynamic approach in criminal justice concerns and all are enjoined to observe this Advisory.
(signed)
LEILA M. DE LIMA
Secretary
Page 4 of 5
[1] People vs. Escaño, G.R. No. 129756-58, January 28,2000
Page 5 of 5