HRMG703 Global Mobility Semester 1, 2021
Assessment 1 Marking Criteria - Rubric
Student Name:
Please note: the work is examined holistically and sometimes clear boundaries between each of the assessment criteria may not necessarily be evident.
Be connected to business
Be self-directed reflective
learner
Demonstrate in-depth
knowledge of specialist
discipline(s)
Be critical enquirers and
creative problem solvers
Be effective
communicators
Indicators of ACHIEVED WITH
DISTINCTION
Demonstrates a thorough
understanding of their HR
field(s) of study, and their
relationships with the wider
business landscape.
Examples drawn from the
student’s individual practice,
experience and/or context are
clearly identified, relevant and
integrated into the discussion.
The student has drawn on an
excellent range (5-7) of
appropriate academic articles
and other relevant resources.
Comprehensive understanding
of relevant concepts and
theories; the analysis, synthesis
and application of knowledge
is consistently clear and
effective.
Examines the topics
extensively and discusses
multiple perspectives
appropriate to the topics.
Excellent engagement in
critical reflection, analysis and
evaluation.
Excellent indications of in-
depth thinking throughout
both written blogs.
Excellent insights.
Expressed ideas clearly and
concisely.
The language contains very
few, if any errors in grammar
and vocabulary. If slips are
present, the meaning is still
clear.
Conventions of academic
writing (e.g. references,
Student ID:
Indicators of ACHIEVED WITH
MERIT
Demonstrates a substantial
understanding of their HR/ER
field(s) of study, and their
relationships with the wider
business landscape, but with
some shortcomings.
Examples drawn from the
student’s individual practice,
experience and/or context are
clearly identified, relevant and
integrated into the discussion.
There may have been some
minor inconsistencies and/or
gaps.
The student has drawn on a
very good range (up to 5) of
appropriate academic articles
and other relevant resources.
Analysis, synthesis and
application of knowledge is
generally clear and effective
but has occasional
shortcomings in understanding
of relevant concepts and
theories.
Examines a range of
appropriate perspectives and
analyses topics.
Very good engagement in
critical reflection, analysis and
evaluation.
A clear indication of some in-
depth thinking in both written
blogs.
Very good insights
Clear and concise expression of
ideas with only few
inconsistencies.
The language is generally
accurate but contains some
errors in grammar and
vocabulary.
Conventions of academic
writing (e.g. references,
Overall Grade
Final Mark
Subject to late penalty if applicable*
Indicators of ACHIEVED
Demonstrates some
understanding of their HR/ER
field(s) of study, but limited
recognition of the interaction
between their field/s of study
and the wider business
landscape.
Has provided some examples
drawn from the student’s
individual practice, experience
and/or context. Examples are
identified, factual, mainly
relevant and discussed to some
extent.
The student has drawn on a
limited range (up to 5) of
academic articles and
resources which are not
consistently appropriate or
always relevant.
Analysis and application of
knowledge is mostly clear and
effective but in parts reveals
rather superficial
understanding of relevant
concepts and theories.
Describes a range of
perspectives and analyses
topics. There may be gaps.
Some engagement in critical
reflection, analysis and
evaluation.
While there is some evidence
of in-depth thinking it may not
be consistent across both
written blogs.
Some insights
Ideas correctly expressed but
at times may not be clear and
to the point.
The language is sufficient for
understanding but contains
errors in grammar and
vocabulary that are distracting.
Conventions of academic
writing (e.g. references,
Indicators of NOT ACHIEVED
Demonstrates a lack of
understanding of their major
field(s) of study, and limited or
no recognition of the
interaction of their field with
areas of business.
Little or no attempt to identify
specific examples drawn from
the student’s individual
practice, experience and/or
context..
Examples used may be general
and/or inappropriate.
The student has not drawn on
appropriate and relevant
academic articles and
resources.
No or limited reproduction of
relevant concepts and theories
and/or impaired in parts by
considerable inaccuracies.
Identifies a limited range of
perspectives. Very limited
analysis.
Little or no engagement in
critical reflection, analysis and
evaluation.
Focuses on description rather
than reflection and analysis or
may not be consistent across
both written blogs.
Limited insights.
Expression of ideas is confused
or difficult to understand.
Errors in language and
vocabulary are frequent and
distracting.
Does not adhere to the
conventions of academic
writing (e.g. references,
citations).
 citations) are followed citations) are followed apart citations) are followed but
meticulously. from the occasional oversight. show errors and
inconsistencies.

Comments:

*Please refer to page 9 of your Study Guide to read more on late assessments.