President Barack Obama's three-day visit to India

President Barack Obama's three-day visit to India came on the heels of an economic recession
and a losing war in Afghanistan. Just before his visit, Obama felt the full lash of frustration from the
American people in the midterm elections on account of a stagnant economy and increasing
unemployment. Thus creation of jobs in the United States is his prime objective.
American businesses desperately need markets to sell their products. They are looking towards
the developing world with great optimism. India, being the second-fastest growing economy after China,
is a major consumer of everything from bikes to aircrafts, nuclear power to defense equipment. In order
to take advantage of the burgeoning demand from India, on the very first day of Obama's visit, 20
business deals worth a total of $10 billion were signed between the two countries.
The deals included sales of Boeing passenger aircrafts, Boeing C-17 Globemasters to Indian
armed forces, GE 107 F414 jet engines to the Indian Air Force, GE power turbines, and the setting up of a
Harley Davidson assembly plant, among others. Obama declared that these deals will create around
54,000 jobs in the United States. All this was said and done despite the restriction on outsourcing from
India.
Obama also declared to lift the ban of high-tech and dual-use exports to Indian agencies—Indian Space
Research Organisation, Defence Research and Development Organisation, and Bharat Dynamics Limited.
Moreover, his administration has supported India's full membership in Nuclear Suppliers Group, Missile
Technology Control Regime, the Australian Group and the Wassenaar Arrangement. It is being said that
these concessions will help India to develop its space technology and defense industry.
All this might seem to be the generosity of the Obama administration towards India, but the
reality is different. Apart from eyeing economic gains by the sale of high-tech and dual-use products, the
United States also wants to make geopolitical impact in Asia. Worried by the rapid rise of China, the
United States wants to create a counterbalance in Asia by allying India with itself.
On the last day of his visit, Obama addressed the Indian Parliament. He said many things India
wanted to hear, and a few things it didn't. The most important was his vocal support for India getting a
permanent seat in the reformed U.N. Security Council (UNSC). Since such a statement would not come
without conditions attached, he asked India to play an active role in passing and enforcing sanctions
resolutions during its two-year stint as a non-permanent member. By this, he wanted India to change its
consistent stance on Iran. This was also reflected in the joint statement issued by both countries. On
Iran, both leaders reaffirmed their commitment to diplomacy and discussed the need for India to meet
its obligations towards the International Atomic Energy Agency and UNSC.
On Pakistan, in line with Indian expectations, Obama said that terrorist safe havens within Pak
borders are unacceptable and also called on Pakistan to punish the terrorists behind the Mumbai
attacks. This was the most an American president could do notwithstanding the lack of strategic
convergence between India and the United States on Pakistan. While for the United States Pakistan is a
part of the solution, for India it is the heart of the problem. The United States badly needs Pakistan in its
war against al Qaeda and the Taliban in the AfPak region. On the controversial issue of Kashmir,
repeating his earlier stance, the U.S. president said Washington couldn't impose a solution and intends
to work with both sides to resolve the issue bilaterally. His silence on Kashmir was ensured by the above
aircraft and defense deals.
Stressing the phrase "two largest democracies," Obama sought to send an indirect message to
China that development can be achieved by following democratic norms and values. This was in contrast
to his visit to China where he talked about "G-2" leading the world. It clearly shows that the United
States seeks to contain China in Asia by supporting India. In reality, India and China cannot be compared.
China has more than $2.6 trillion of investment in U.S. securities. Moreover, the annual bilateral trade
between the United States and China is more than $500 billion, with balance of trade in favor of China.
China has leverage with the United States that India does not.
Also in his speech, Obama questioned the silence of India on human rights violations in
Myanmar and maintained that being upfront on such issues did not mean interference in the affairs of
another country. One could say that the same should apply to U.S. policy towards Saudi Arabia and
other West Asian allies where citizens don't know the meaning of human rights—not to mention the
human rights violations of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay.
This visit was different in the sense that it was a give-and-take event, unlike prior visits by U.S.
presidents who sought only to extract from India as much as they could. Obama gave many concessions
and assurances to India. Still, there are many issues on which both countries do not share a common
view. India, being a sovereign nation, has always followed an independent foreign policy. Our defined
principles determine our relations with neighboring countries and the world. As Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh rightly said, "We cannot choose our neighbors." We need to learn to live in peace with
them without bowing to any external pressure. Indian policymakers should keep in mind that, in the
21st century, America may need India more than India needs America.
 Use Of Technology In Education
Laptops,ipod,mobile phone,iphone, are gadgets that are taking the place of textbooks and
libraries.The internet connectivity has brought in a revolution in the minds of even babies.Education has
taken a significant overhauling with technological advances being widely used in effective teaching and
mentoring.Teachers have had to undergo a seachange in updating their online skills so as to reach their
students.

Online social networking sites such as Orkut,Facebook keep students engaged for hours.Or it is
games online.So,it is only imperative that we use online tools and gadgets to teach and get them
interested in aiming for higher grades.

Distance education is easier these days as laptops and internet connectivity have given the
Universities faster means of reaching more students in real time.

Visual learning is extremely effective in learning.And so, we have Powerpoint presentations

made by teachers and also students being asked to create one to be graded later.Animated videos are
made and shared to explain a concept in math or physics.Languages are learnt using VOIP such as
Skype,Google Talk.Google Docs,wikis,blogs are tools being increasingly used on collaborative
classroom/online projects.Podcasts of classroom notes are downloaded to listen as students
commute.Universities are making these podcasts available to their students.

Online learning is where the tutor and student/students in different parts of the globe come
together for a virtual class at an appointed time.In real time,they share an interactive whiteboard,where
pictures,animated videos,powerpoint presentations can be shared for effective and engaging
teaching.Audio and video is possible along with a chatboard in the sidebar.Wiziq is one such platform
which I have been using effectively.Teaching languages or any subject under the sun,is a breeze with this
free platform.