1.

In what ways can Sociology help us understand and reduce racial

conflict? Explain in the light of Theoretical perspectives.

As we probably are aware there are three significant essential hypotheses, Representative
interactionism, and Functionalism and Conflict hypothesis. The representative Interactionism
hypothesis centers on the individual and how they identify with images. The functionalism
hypothesis is the possibility that society is made out of numerous parts cooperating to make a
useful society, additionally implying that when these parts are not working appropriately, society
is broken. At that point, there is Conflict Theory, which clarifies that society is contained
numerous gatherings, each rivaling each other for scant assets.

Social stability is important to have a solid society, and satisfactory socialization and social
combination are important to accomplish social strength. Society's social establishments perform
significant capacities to help guarantee social steadiness. Slow social change is attractive, yet
quick social change compromises social requests. 

Firstly, sociology studies human behavior and it considers human as a part of society, so
everything related to society, institution, culture, custom are the scope of study sociology.
Mainly sociology examines the relationship between human beings and those elements of
society, how human being responds and acts in society is the main concern of sociology, so it’s
needless to say how significant sociology is.

Secondly, the sociological perspective is very important in every branch of knowledge and life
also. As society studies sociological aspects it aims to know how a society survives and how it
works, for instance, history is the story of aristocrats but social history tells the story of mass
people.
In this way, to sum up, and answer the inquiry that how would we decrease racial clash? 

 Try not to compel variety.

 Permit individuals to isolate, ideally kept separate by geology, yet bombing that, political
limits. 
 Give the various gatherings critical self-administration. 
 On the off chance that individuals from one gathering begin to relocate into a region
previously involved by another gathering, don't permit single men to move (just families
and ladies). 
 Debilitate ladies/urge men to go into advanced education if there are a greater number of
ladies than men at the colleges. In any case, out-bunch antagonism will probably follow. 
Another way on the off chance that we incredibly need assorted networks is to ensure we have a
startling outer adversary that individuals can join around in disdain. Yet, the cost, not including
all the lives and enduring in the nation who we have esteemed a fitting objective of our disdain,
is additionally our own locale comprising of terrified and irate individuals who doubt each other
and their chiefs. 
Liberal and individualistic approaches will improve ethnocentrism and oblivious conformity in
the populace. And yet, that may be a value worth paying?

 To begin with, do no mischief 

 Stay away from poisonous character governmental issues-driven "research" 
 Try not to conflate research with activism 
 Use research strategies that incorporate transformative brain science-based
methodologies 
 Quit discussing "white advantage", or "people of color matter" would be a decent
beginning.