ABSTRACT

GROUND WATER - Dynamic Ground Water Resources Assessment for Tamil

Nadu as on March, 2Ot7 Categorr"zation of Firkas as Over Explo.ited,
Critical, Semi-Critical, Safe and ' Saline / Poor rQuality based on the
Assessment in Tamil Nadu - Approved - Orders - Issued.

Publiq Works(R2) Department

G.O. (Ms) No.161 Dated 23.10.2019
oflomfl, r-lrur-n#|6
plgocirqgorf ggrmr@ 2050
Read :

1. G.O.(Ms).No.326, Public Works Department, Dated 23.Lt.1993.

2. G.O.(fvls):No,51, Public Works De,partment, Dated 11.02.2004.
? G.O.(Ms).No.52; Public Works Department, Dated O2.O3.2Ot2
4. G.O.(F4s):No. 142, Public Wor:ks Department, Dated 23 -O7 .2OI4
5. G.O.(Ms).No.113, Public Works Department, Dated 09.06.2016
6. G.O.fMs).No.257 Dated-01.10.2018
7. From the Chief and Surface Water
Resources Data /8474/ AsSessment/
2Ot7, Dated 22.8.24t9.
ololo
ORDER:

Based on the development of the ground water resources, the

panchayat Union Blocks in Tamil Nadu were categorized as Dark and Grey
areas as on January L992 and January L997 (Projected development at
year 5) in the Government Order Lst read above. The Blocks with ground
water development between 85o/o to 100o/o were categorized as "Dark
Blocks" and the Blocks with ground water development between 55olo to
85% were categorized as "Grey Blocks'!. The Government.directed that no
Scheme should be formulate.d in the Dark Blocks and that in the Grey
Blocks, Schemes should be,formulated in consultation with the, Ground
.Water Wing of the Public Works Department only. The above categorisation
was done in accordance with the then prevailing Ground Water Estimation
Committee 1984 (GEC-1984) Norms. Thereafter, the Committee
constituted by the Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, has
 2

recommended to adopt the GEC- Igg7,,N"rt. for estimation of the ground

water resources in all the States.
2. In the Government Order Second read above, the Government
approved the categorization of thg.'
Over-Exploited, Critical, Semi-Cr:itical
d,evelopment as ,on . January, 20O3,
Schemes should be formulated in th,e
in the Semi-Critical and Safe Blocks;,
in consultation with,the State Ground and Surface Water Resources Data
Centre of the Water Resources Organ:isation,in the Public Works Departrnent,
It was also ordered therein that the term.llS-6hemsq excludes energisation of
agricultural pump sets by the Tarnil Nadu Electricity Board. The Goveqnment
further directed that appropriate rain water haruestinE and artificial recharge
schemes be carried out in all the categories of Blocks and while carrying out
the above Schemes, priority should be glven to the Over Exploited and
Critical Blocks so as to avoid further deterioration.
3. In the Governm,ent Or'-d,e,r,,.third, read above, the Governrnent
approved the ca at Union as Over-
Exploited, Critical, ,based on ssment of
the State Ground 2009. All'' ,Exploited
and Critical Btocks were notified as A Category Blocks (where thq stage of
ground water extfaction is 90o/o,and above) and all the Semi Critical and

Blocks", all the Schemes should be for

Surface Water Resources Data Centre of the Water Resources Department
and the Chief Engineer, State Ground and Surface Water Resources Data
Centre, would issue "No Objection Certificate'for ground water clearance.
The Government further directed to exclude th'e g'round water drawal for
domestic purpose by individual household; dornestic'Inftastt'ucture Froject
(Housing); Government's :Drinking, Wa,ter.Su'pply Schemes and'Non Water
based Industries (i,e., the industries which do not'require and use'water,
either as, raw material or for other processing). The Chief Engineer, State
Ground and Surface Water Resources Data Centre, would per:mit domestic
use of water by these Non'Water ,based'Industries,b,y',issuing' 'l;16 Objecti'on
Certificate'f based on the ',hyd'ro-g'sol'ogical ,conditions, 'The Governrnent
further. directed .that appropriate: Rain Water :Hantesting and Artiffcial
Recharge Schemes should be carrrled out' in the;, categories 'viz, Over
exploit6d, Critical, Semi Grritical and Safe Blocks of.'Tamit''Nadu and while
cairying out the above Schernes, prio :ity,should be given to marginsl qualit!
and bad quality areas'so ,as,to avoid' Further deterioration. The Government
further directed that 'all the Schemes' and' Proposals,based,, on ground' water
would have to adhere to the Governm,ent Orders and Conditions detailed in
 3

the Annexure-Il to the .above mentioned Goverriment Order. This

Government Order had been upheld by,the Hon'ble Bench of Madras High
court, in its common Judgement dated 19.09.,2013, in wA Nos. g23 to g16
of 2oo9, wP Nos 23116 of 2006, 23896 to 23900 of 2o16, 47tL of zOo4
and t2375 of 2008. The Hon'ble High Court had made it clear that even with
!!" repealing of the Tamil Na?u' Ground water (oevetofme"i ;;d
Management) Act, 2OO3, this G.O, would govern the interest ol the pafties
and the State in the matter of regulating the business of the Writ Appellants.
4. In furtherance of the Orders' and Instructions issued in the
Government Order third read above, the Regulations for management of
ground water and issue of No Objection'Certificate / License for extraction of
groundwater in the State were approved in the Government Order fourth
read above.
5. subsequently, in the Government order flfth read above, the
Dynamic Groundwater resources in the State were estimated taking a
Revenue Firka as an unit of assessment by the State Level Technical Co-
ordination Committee as on March
had approved categorization.of the
Safe and Saline Firkas based on t
Government, in the G.O sixth read a
of the Firkas in the State as Over-Ex
- Saline I Poor Quality Firkas based on lhe Ground Water Resources
Assessment as on March 2013.
6. In the letter seventh read above, the Chief Engineer (State Ground
and Surface Water Resources Data Centre) has sent a proposal to the
Government for approval of Estimation of the Dynamic Groundwater
Resources in Tamil Nadu'as on March 2OL7 and Categorisation of Firkas and
requested for approval of the Ground Water Assessrnent 2OI7 and
notification of the Categorization of the Firkas of Tamil Nadu based on the
above assessment.
7. The Government have decided to approve the categorization of the
Revenue Firkas in the State based on the Estimation of the Dynamic Ground
water Resources as on March, 2ot7. Accordingly, the Government approve
the categorisation of the Revenue Firkas in the State as Over-Exploited,
Critical, Semi-Critical, Safe and Saline/Poor Quality as detailed in the
Annexure of this Order, based on the Dynamic Ground Water Resources
'Assessment
as on March, 2Ot7 which shall be notified in the Tamil Nadu
Government Gazette.
8. The Chief Engineer(State Ground and Surface Water'Resources Data
Centre),Water Resources Department is further directed that appropriate
rain water harvesting and nrilRcial recharge schernes shall be carried out in
the categories viz, Over exploited, Critical, Semi Critical, Safe and
saline/Poor quality Firkas of Tamil Nadu. While carrying out the above
 Schemes, priority shall be given !9 m,a,r,ginal q,ual{ty and bad quality areas so
as to avoid fufther dete,rioration . i ,,, , : :,.;.
(BY ORDER oF,THE GOV-ERNOR)
K. MANIVASAN
PRINCTPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
E
The Works Manager, Government Central Press, Chennai-79.
The Chief Engineer, State Ground and Surface Water Resources Data Centre,
Water Resources Departrnent, .Taramani, Chennai-l13, :

The Engineer:in-Chief, rWater ,Resources Depa,ftment and Chief Engineer

(General), Public Works Department, Ghennai,,S. :
All the Regional and'. 'Functional Chief Eng,ineers, Water ,Resources
Department.
The Additional Chief Segretary and Commissioner of Land Administration,
Chennai-5.

ennai=l5. l

r: .Agricultu're and Ru,ral Development,

i Chennai:.
ee.ring), Chennai-35.
5.
'=The Director of Horticulture, Chennai-S. ':
The Commissioner / Managing .Director, Sugar Co
n, Chennai-35.
The: Managing Dir.ectoir.'',Tam,il Nadu Water Su
d Drainag,e Board,
Chennai-5.
The Engineering DireCtor,: Tarnil NadU 'Water Supply''sn6 Drainage Board,
Chennai-5.
The Managing'Director, Chennai Metro:politan Water'Supply and Sewerage
Board, Chennai-2. ,

The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai-2.

The Regional Director,,Central.Ground.Water Board, Rajaji,Bhavan, Chennai-90,
Coov to
The Agriculture Department, Chennai'9
The Revenue & Disaster,Management Dep€rtment, Chennai:9.
The Environment and Forest Departrlent; Chennai-9,
The Mun icipal Adm i nistration and Wate r Su p ply Depa ftment, Chen na i=9.
:

The Rural Development and Panchayat,Raj Department, Che:nnai-9.

The Energy Department, Chennai-9.
The Industries Department, Chennai-9.
StockFile/Spare'Copy:,,,
| | Forwarded b,yOrderll , .( n\9

, Section Officer
,Qr{J*si,K"r*
k"\*o
#\\'
 ANN ZO1p
in Tamil Nadu as on
OVER EXPLOTED CRITICAL SEMICRITICAL SAFE SALINE
(Gteater than toO.A) (Bstreen 90 6nd 100%) (Betmon 70 and (Lers than 70%)
900/61 '
Pq)RQUALITY
qRYALUR
Ootal Flr*as-l 5)
{RIYALUR TALUK

1 {RIYALUR

2 EI.AKURICHI

3 (EEIIPALUR

5 THRUMANUR
SEIIDURAI TALUK

o SENOURAI 7 VIATHUR

I )ONPAR/qPP|

JDAYARPALAYAf,I Taluk

s AM

10 JAYANKONDAM

11 KUNDAVELI

12 KUVAGAM

13 T. PATUR

14 JDAYARPALAYAM

t5 SUTHAMALLI
;HENI,|A| fIotal Fir*is-All
TALUK
=GMORE+IUNGAMBAKKAT
:GMORE.NUNGAMBAKI(AM -I

2 :GMORE+IUNGAMBAKKAM-I I

3 =GMORE-NUNGAMBAKKAM-III
1 :GMORE+.IU NGAMBAKKAJVFry

KOTTAI - THONDIARPET TALUK

5 KOTTAI- THONDIARPET-I

6 KOTTAI - THONOI,ARPET-II

KOTTAI- THONDIARPET.III

(OTTAI. THONDIARPET-IV
8
IIAMBALAJTI . GUINDY TALUK

WAIMFAI4M - GUINDYI
I
\|I,AMBAIAM . GUINDY-II
t0
11
IIAMBALAM - GUINDY.III

12 {AMBAI.AM. GUINDY.{V
IIYI-APORE . IRUVALUKENI TALT'K

1?t fYLAPORE . TIRWALLIKENFI

14 IYLAPORE . TIRWAIIIKENI-II
.
't5 {YLAPORE NRWALLIKENI-III

16 r,lYl-APORE - TIRWALUKENI{V

(/i||{l+EmrilAUR TAI-UK
'UR/+eAWAl
)URi{S{Wru<$il-PERAilBUR-r
17

18 SAWAI I(\III+ERAMBUR-II
'URi^
)URASAWAIKATi|+EMMBUR.III
19

m
;cxlrBAToRE (Tor.r Fifi as- 38)

{NNUR TALUK

ANM,R (S)

2 cl,|hruR(N)

3 SARKAR SAMAKUIAM
Annqu.s pgSe A of 24
(iv)
 Annexure prge 5 of24

OVER EXPLOIIED CRITICAL SEMI CRTNCAL SAFE SALINE

(Greator tian 'l0O%) (Bet*een 90 and 100%) (Betwsn 70 and'90%l (L€ss than 70%) '
POORQUALIW

21 VIODAKURICHI 22
'OONOURAI
73 \RACHALUR

TALUK
'ERUNDURAI
2A CHENNIMATAI 25 ]ALUR 26 (ANJIKOIL

)t PERUNOURAI

2e YELLODE

TALUK
'ATHYAMANGAI,AM
29 BHAVANISAGAR 30 II/AI\IGAI AM 31 KUTHIYALATHUR
'ATHYA
32 PUNJAIPULIAM PATN
33 ARASUR

THAI.AVAOI TALUK
u HAIAVADI

(ANCHEEPURAM ff otal Firkas4Bl

\LANTHUR TALUK
1 (OLI-APAKKAM 2. \I.ANTHUR

CHENGALPATTU TALUI(

3 iINGAPERUITIAL KOIL 4 3UDUVANCHERI

5 \PPUR 6 GTTANKULATHUR
a CHENGALPATTU I r'ANDALUR

9 )ALLUR

:HEYT/UR TALUK
10 ]I.IEYYUR 11 (ADAPAKI(AM

12 SFJTTHAMUR '13 LATHUR

'14 (AY:APAKKAM t5 KODUR

16 SUMMPEDU

.ANCHFF9I IPAU TAI I IK

3ovrNor-lAvADl 't8 THIRUPPU KUZII lo KANCHEEPURAM

17

20 JIRUKAVERIPAKKAM 21 ]HITTIAMBMKAM

4 PARANDUR

MADURAN'fHMAM TALUK
z5 )RATHI za ACC4IRUPAKTCAM 26 (ARUNKUZHI
21 -ENOATHUR
27 OMMPAKKAM 2A MADHUMNTHAGAM

29 JAMEENENOATHUR /AIYAVUR

31 FERUMPAKKAM

PALI-AVARAM TAIUK
32 PAMMAL

33 PALLAVARAM

34 KUNMTHUR

35 MANGADU

TI{OLINGANALLUR TALUK
36 SHOLINGAMLLUR

37 PALLIKARANAI

3S MEOAVAKKAM

SRIPERIiIPUDUR TAII'K
39 MADURAMANGATAM

40 PADAPPAI

41 SEMFPANAGHERI

42 SRIPERUMPUDUR

43 SUNKUVARCHATMM

44 TFIANDALAM

45 r'ALtAM
 AnmruE prgo 6 of 24

lrirr
OVER EJXPLOITED GRITICAL sEMr gRTTTCAL SAFE $ALINET
(Gr€aterthan 100%) (B€twen 90 ard 1Q0%) (Botwaen 70 and.90%) ( -s! rfiFn 7-0%) F@RQUAUTY

TAMBARAUTALUK
46 CHITI.APAKKAM

47 MADAMBAKKAII

49 TAMBARAM:

T}IIRUI(AZHUKUNDRAII TALUK

4{l \ERUMBUR 50 THIRUIqZHU KUNDRAM 51 9IAMALI.APURAM

5T ]oNVI LAYANTHAKALATHUR

THIRUPORURTALUK
53 IqRUMBAKKAM s THIRt,,PORUR.

55 NELLIKUPFAM

56 REI.AMBAKKAM

9t MAMPAKK/\M

MANAMBATHY

59: P'AIY.ANUR

ru \RUMPULIYUR 61 GLIYAMPOONDI 62 S,\LNAKI(AM

m THIRUPIJLIVANAM 64 QNNAVAKI(?IM

06 .lrHneMenun.

A'AIAIABADTALUK

66 VAIAJAEAD B7 MAHARAL

68 THENNERI

(ANYAKUMART mR|CrrrOral rnrns-rat

\GATHEESWARAM TALUK
I r]\,AK(A MANGAL:AM '2 KANNIYAKUMARI

NAGERCOIL

4 sucurNq!&11[;;:.
(ALKUALM TALUK
5 OOLACHEL

KUTASEIqRAM

7 KURUNTHUNGODE

I IIITRUVATTAR

,: E, THIRUVITHANCODE

10 THUCKALAY

runvAl al TAt I lr
11 AANAP;ANDIPURAM

'12

13 rHovAtal

,ILVANCODE TALUX
14 \RUMANAI

15
=DArcooE
16 UIOATAM

17 }AINKULAM

18 /ILAVANCODE

aaPl lF rtlsTRlcrfTdl'l Flrt i.2Ol

CPAII,i\I'\THY ]HINNADHARA PURAT' 3 {RAVAKURICHI

1

]ALL\I'ATN
4

5 IHENN'LAI

(ADAWRTALUK
(ADAVIJR

IIAII.AMPATTI
 Ann.xuro pa8e 7 of24

fvtiT
OVER D(PLOITED
(GEater than 100%)
I cruncal
(Betwe€n 90and 100%)
I SEMI CRITICAL SAFE
I SAL|NE /
| I te.tr,r""1 70and 00%) (Less than 70%) I FOOROUALI.rY

t9 PUGALUR
20 THAI APATTI

(RSHNAGIRI ItISTRICT ttotat Fid(as -29

)

]ARGUR TALUK
]ARGUR
]ALEPAILI

DENKANIKOTTAI TALUK

3 RAYAKOTTAI 4 KAKKADASAM CNDEVANAPALLT

6 KETAMANGALAM 7 \NJETN
I THALLY 9 )ENKANIKOTTA

{OSUR TALUK
10 JOSUR 11 UATHIGIRI 12 ]AGALUR

GISHNAGIRI TALUK

t3 ATAPATF 14 PHRIYAMUTHUR ''-': "'' -' 4< (AVERIPATTINAM

t6 GURUPAII\PALLI
17
VEPPAIVqPATLI

1a KRISHNAGIRI

POCHATIPALLI TALUK

1q MATHUR 20 2'l BARUR

22 POCMMPATU

TALUK
'HOOLAGIRI
23 :RIGAI 24 UTHANAPALLi 25 SHOOLAGIRI

JIHANGARAI TALUK

26 GLLAVI

27 JAMALPATN

26 SING,TlnPETTAI

2S JTHANGARAI

MADURAI DlStRlGTCrotat Firfts-st)

MADURAI EAST TAIUK

1 \PPAN THIRUPATHI

2 \RUMABANUR

3 KALLANDHIRI

4 KUNNATHUR

5 )T|o1461qP41

o IAJAKKUR

SAKKIMANGALAM

MADURAI NORTH TAIUK

I
'HATHRAPATTI
I (OOI.APANDI
 Annanre pil.8 ofA

( t,tt
,i
OVERSPL9ITED CRlTrcAL sEMlGRlncrAL . SAFE :, SALINE'
(GFaterthEh 1-0o[) (BetweeD 90 rnd.!90%) (Bstween 70ind 90%) (LEss than:70%) POOR QUALITY

'lo KUI.AMANGAI.AM
1l SAMAYANALLUR

't2 SATHAMANGAI.AM

IIADURAI SOTJTI{ TALUX

13 UADUMI EAST 14 AVANIYAPURAM

15 VIRATHANUR

ITADURAI WEST T!.LTIK

o MGAMATALI PUDUKOTTA 17 MADURAIWEST

.tA \,VELUUPATN 19 (ARUNAALAKUDI

20 (OTTAMPATN 21 (EELAVA|AW

az i/ELI-ALUR n IEI.AVALAVU

24 MELUR

a THRUVATHAWR

'ERATYUR TAUK
26 SEDAPATN 27 -LUMAI.AI 2S ATHIPATTI

29 )ERAIYUR so ,IOTHAGAM

31 T.|CLLUPATTI

THIRUMANGALAII TALUK
32 KOKKULAM 3tl THIRUMANGALAM u KALLIGUDI' 35 (URAIYUR

96 PANNKI(UNOU s7 ;IVARAKKOTTAI

IHIRUPPARAN KUNDRAII TALUK

38 ITAIAYANKUtAM s9 THRUPPARAN KUNDRr'WI

IStr AMPAM TAI IIT

JSIL.AMPATTI 11 (ARUMATHUR 12 r'AUNTHUR

an

1A JTTIAPPA"NAICKANUR -:]lir:
4 SINDHJPATN

,ANDAN TAI IIK

rllt |/IUDWARPATTI I \I.ANGANALLUR

)ALAMEDU 4e SOLAYANDI'IAN
17
49 IHiqN|GHIAM.

50 NEERATHAN

51 THENKARAI

NAGAPATnNAM DlSTFdCTfiotal Fkl€s311

KILVELUR TALUK
1 (EEIIIYUR

2 (ILVELUR

3 THEVOOR

1 /EI.ANGANNI

KUTTALAMTATUK
a (UTTALAM

B fiNGAMLLUR

'AI.AIYUR
rnr rrul tpat YAt I lK
UAYII.ADUTHURAI s dANALMEDU
I
)ATTAVARTHI
to
\IAGAPATNMilTAUK
17 THIRUKANNAPURAM

12 KANGATANCHERI

13 NAGAPPATT1NAM

14 THERKUPOIGAI NALLUR
 Ann.ruro plta 9 otZ

(t,{)
 Annexore pggq loaof 24

OVER APLOITED CRITEAL

(crEatorthefl 1@96) (Betwa€n {i0 rnC ioo%) I
I
sArrltE,
POOROUALIW
.

GUDALUR TALUK

4 DEVARSHOLA

5 SUOALLIR
-
(OIIIAGIRI TALUK

0 (TKOTAGIRI

7 !IEDU6UtA
8. [oTAGtRl
9 JFIERAMEADI

10 )ANDALUR

(UNDAH TALUK

11 ITHI\LAR

12 KUNDAH

13 SHOLUR

14 THUNERI

IDHAGAMANDALAM

ALANDURTALUK
}HETTIKUTAM ? (OOTHUR KOLAKAMTHAM

(UNNAII TALUK
GHNPULIYUR 5 VADAKKALUR

o /ARAGUR

'ERAMBALUR TALUK
KURUMBALUR

a 'ERAMBALUR

,EPPANIHATTAI TALUK
)ASI,JMBALUR
o

to r'ALII(ANDAPURAM

/ENGAI.AM

PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRIST ITOTAI Fi?K'S.'6I

1 (EER/\MANGALAM 2 VENNAVALKUOI a AI.ANGUDI

4 (ALLANADU

5 AR/A9{RKUL4M 6 ARANTHANGI

7 ATHANI

I NAGUOI

I POOVATHAKUOI

10 SILATruR

I\,UDA.|YAPK()II TAI III(

11 AWDAIYARKOIL

12 IMBAL

PONPETTE

14 MIMISAL

15 SANDARVAKOTTAI
\ xr)
 Annexurr pa!. 12 of 24

OVER EXPLOITED CRITICAL SEMI CRITICAL SAFE SALINE /

(Greater than 100%) (Between 90 and 100%) (Between 70 and 90%) (Less than 70%) POOR QUALITY

18 ,IELAKODUMALUR

19 MUDUKULATHUR NORTH

20 THERIRUVELI

>ARAMAKUDI TALUK

21 BOGALUR

22 KLYUR
23 MANJUR

24 NAINARKOIL

25 PARAMAKUDI

zo PARTHIPANOOR

RAMANATHAPURAM TALUK
27 )EVIPATTINAM

2S VIANDAPAM

29 1AMANATHAPURAM

30 ]ERUNKULAM

RAMESHWARAM TALUK
3'l ?AMESWAMM

THIRUVADANAI TALUK
32 \ANANDHUR 33 MANGALAKUDI

34 PULLUR THONDI

R.S.MANGALAM

37 SHOLANDHUR

38 THIRUVADANI

TALEM 9ISTRICT(Total Firkas-44)

ATTUR TALUK
ATTUR

KATTUKKOTTAI

THALAIVASAL

EDAPPADI TALUK
EDAPPADI

5 KONGANAPURAM

6 POOLAMPATTI

GANGAVALLI TALUK
GANGAVALLI 8 ,ATCHMALAI

I VEEMGANOOR

KADAYAMPATTI TALUK

10 KADAYAMPATTI
SEMMANDAPPATTI

METTUR TALUK
\iIECHER 13 (OLATHUR
'12

14 \ANGAVALLI
]ALAMALAI
't5

16 VIETTUR

17 )OTTANERI

1A )MALUR

19 <ARUPUR

THAMMANGALAM
20

'ETHANAICKAN PALAYAM TALUK

)ETHANAICKAN PALAYAM 22 GLRAYANMALAI
21

TETHAPUR
 Annerlr€ p.ge 13 of24

(xtur)
OVEREXPLdTED CRITICAL sEMr cRn'tcAL SAFE SAUNE /
(G|lrer |han 100ti) (Betrvo€n 90 and 10q,6) (Bet{oen 70 aid 90%) (Less than 70%) POORQUAUTY

TALEII TALUK

)a SALEM-TOWN 2S PANAMARATHUP PATN

/AIJqS,\IYUR
6
SALETI SOUTI{ TALUK

)7 r'EERAPANOI
,A /EMBADTTH.AI..AM

29 KONDALAMPATTI

SALET' WEST TALUK

30 THIRUMAI.AIGIRI

31 AI AGqPURAM

32 SURAI'ANG{L{I

331
i/!ALLIYA(qRiAl

iANKARI TALUK

u :RNAPURAM 35 THEVUR

36 ii\|ll(Alll FAST

SANKARI WEST
37

,AZHPPADI TALUK
,/AZHAPPADI 39 \RUNOOTHUMALAI
38

/t0
41 ]ELUR

TERCAUD TALUK
42 ]UTHUR

43 r'ELLAKKAOAI

44 YERCAUD

DEVAKOTTAI TALUK
]EVAKOTTAI

GNDADEVI

3 <ANNANGUDI

4 )UZHIYAL

SARUGANI

LYANGUDI TALTJK
o ILAYANGUDI

SOORANAM

I THAYAMANGALAM

I \,THIRUVUOUIR PURAM

10 ]ALAIGRAMAM

11 {ATTARASANKOTTAI

12 (ALAYARKOVIL

13

14 SILUKKAPATN

15 MALIJL

KARAIKUDI TALUK
1€ KALLAL

17 KARAIKUDI

18 PALLATHUR

19 SAKKOTTAI

20 MITHRAVAYAL

TAt I lr
2'l SEIKALATHUR
 AnmerE p.ge ldof 24

I r i",l
 Anreru.e p.Ee 15 of 24

f)v)
 Ann.rur. prt.17 ol 24

(xYir )
(xvrr)
(xixl
txx )
 Annexur€ pate 21 of 2A

[-x"ir
 AIlnou@ pzt222 ol A
(k
^
r,)
(r
^iii ;
 Annrh)r. pf,r :[ ot 24

(f xiv)

K, MAI{IVASAN
PRINC]PAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

ill Tnre CoW ill

 (xxvt

cleundwater Res.ources Ass€ssment'as on 2017

Total No.of Over Sallne /
st.No District Semi
Critical Safe Poor
Firkas Exploited Gritical
Quality
1 Arivalur t5 1 14
2 Chennai 20 20
3 Coimbatore 38 26 5 6 1
4 Cuddalore 32 7 1 5 18 1
5 Dharmapuri 23 15 4 2 2
6 Dinduqal 40 25 3 4 I
7 Erode 34 16 5 6 7
I Kancheepuram 68 10 3 {8 37
I Kanyakumari 18 1 17
10 Karur 20 14 3 3
11 Krishnaqiri 29 14 3 6 6
12 Madurai 5,| 11 3 7 30
13 Nagappattinam 3{ il3 7 17
14 Namakkal 30 22 1 4 3
15 Nilqiris 15 15
16 Perambalur 7,1 7 1 3
17 Pudhukottai 45 1 11 30 3
18 Ramanadhapuram 38 29 I
19 Salem 4 35 2 7
20 Sivaganqai ',:. 39 1
.38
21 Thanjavur 50 30 8 7 5
22 Theni 17 2 2 7 6
23 Thiruvallur 54 16 5 12 20 1
24 Thoothukudi 41 3 1 1 36
25 Thirunelveli 60 19 3 9 29
26 firuppur 33 2iS 3 3 1
27 Thiruvarur 27 10 1 3 I 4
28 Thirwannamalai 52 3n 7 I
29 Trichv 43 18 3 6 16
30 Vellore 52 33 5 10 4
31 Villupuram 57 25 6 13 13
32 Viruthunagar 39 I 6 6 19
fotal 1166 462 79 163 427 35

K. MANIVASAN
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
lllTrue Copy lll .e
t t
Xot"-r"--sh-O*
Section Officer

'
: k,s*A
nt-9\-