Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finance Commission of India Related Questions and Answers - : Why Is There A Need For A Finance Commission?
Finance Commission of India Related Questions and Answers - : Why Is There A Need For A Finance Commission?
necessary
Since the 90’s it has also started to recommend the augmentation of revenues at the local government
level.
The usage of the population of 1971 for deciding on the horizontal devolution was made mandatory from
the 7th FC, having said so it should be remembered that the 6th FC also used the 1971 population but
wasn’t mandated to use it.
2011 data along with the 1971 population data was used by the 14th FC (if it had used only the 1971
population then the data would have margin years of 45 years to 50 years during the implementation from
2015 to 2020).
Before 2000, only Income tax and union excise on certain duties were shared but the constitutional
amendment in 2000 allowed all the central taxes to be shared with the states
Who established Finance Commission in India? --- Government of India
Members[edit]
Shri K. C. Neogy, Chairman
Shri V. P. Menon
Shri Justice R. Kaushalendra Rao
Dr. B. K. Madan
Shri M.V. Rangachari Member-Secretary
Shri V. L. Mehta
V. P. Menon resigned on 18 February 1952 and was replaced by V. L. Mehta. [1]
.
The 15th Finance Commission has released a report titled ‘Finance Commission in COVID Times’ on 1st
February 2021.
***Shri Ajay Narayan Jha joins as Member Fifteenth Finance Commission - 1st March,2019. Shri
Ajay Narayan Jha today joined the Fifteenth Finance Commission as its Member. He joins in place of Shri
Shaktikanta Das who had resigned as a Member of the Commission after being appointed as Governor,
Reserve Bank of India.
***As per the reports of the previous finance commission, the share of the
states in the net proceeds of the shareable Central Taxes was 32%. The
fourteenth commission raised it to 42%, The fourteenth commission raised it
to 41%.
15TH MEMBER
N. K. Singh, IAS, Chairman
Commission
Ajay Narayan Jha, IAS,
executives
Member
Prof. Anoop Singh, Member
Prof. Ramesh Chand,
Member (part-time)
Arvind Mehta, IAS, Secretary
Vertical devolution:
In order to maintain predictability and stability of resources, especially during the pandemic,
XVFC has recommended maintaining the vertical devolution at 41 per cent – the same as in our report
for 2020-21. It is at the same level of 42 per cent of the divisible pool as recommended by FC-XIV.
However, it has made the required adjustment of about 1 per cent due to the changed status of the
erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir into the new Union Territories of Ladakh and Jammu and
Kashmir.
On horizontal devolution, while XVFC agreed that the Census 2011 population data better represents
the present need of States, to be fair to, as well as reward, the States which have done better on the
demographic front, XVFC has assigned a 12.5 per cent weight to the demographic performance criterion.
XVFC has re-introduced tax effort criterion to reward fiscal performance.
Table 1: Criteria for devolution (2020-21)
14th FC 15th FC
Criteria
2015-20 2020-21
Income Distance 50.0 45.0
Population (1971) 17.5 -
Population (2011) 10.0 15.0
Area 15.0 15.0
Forest Cover 7.5 -
Forest and Ecology - 10.0
Demographic
- 12.5
Performance
Tax Effort - 2.5
Total 100 100
Grants-in-aid
In 2020-21, the following grants will be provided to states: (i) revenue deficit grants, (ii) grants to local
bodies, and (iii) disaster management grants. The Commission has also proposed a framework for sector-
specific and performance-based grants. State-specific grants will be provided in the final report.
Volume I and II, as in the past, contain the main report and the accompanying annexes.
Volume III is devoted to the Union Government and examines key departments in greater depth, with
the medium-term challenges and the roadmap ahead.
Volume IV is entirely devoted to the States. We have analysed the finances of each State in great depth
and have come up with State-specific considerations to address the key challenges that individual States face.