Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cha-1 Macroeconomics I
Cha-1 Macroeconomics I
CHAPTER ONE
1.1. Introduction
1.2. Basic Concepts and Definitions
1. Microeconomics and
2. Macroeconomics
The words Micro and Macro are derived from the Greek words
‘Micros’ meaning small
‘Macros’ means large
1. Microeconomics:-
The study of issues that do not encompass the entire economy
And are in this sense “small”
It examines the economic behavior of:-
individuals households, businesses and industries
relatively small groups of them like
people operating in a teff market or
firms producing garments
In microeconomics one analyzes a small sector of the economy on the assumption that changes
in that factor are too small to affect the rest of the economy
Thus can be assumed “ceteris paribus”
“Ceteris paribus”
Latin word
Meaning’ let all other factors remain constant’
2. Macroeconomics:
The study of issues that are economy-wide or “large”
It examines the economy as a whole
Concerned with the combined, aggregate effects of millions of individual choices on such
variables
National output
The overall level of employment
The general level of prices
Because these aggregates are large in relation to the national economy, a change in one macro
variable tends to affect all other variables.
Therefore it is wrong to assume ceteris paribus in macro-analysis
Indeed the main purpose of macroeconomics study is to analyze how other things change in
relation to each other
For example if total demand increases then total supply or price will increase
In either case income rises meaning that there is a continuous flow of causation among the
various macro variables:
Level of employment
AD = C + I + G + X – M
Where,
1.3.2. The Medieval Period (5th century A.D. - 15th century A.D.)
- Mercantilism:
- Pysiocracy:-
1.3.4. Classical Era (last quarter of 18th century A.D. - late 19th century A.D.)
o Rational expectationists
Mercantilism:
Pysiocracy:-
Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Robert Malthus…etc were prominent figures
They favored the system
saving and investment are brought into equilibrium by the interest rate and investments
respond to the interest rate
In the money market:-
money demand is simply a transaction demand
money has no any effect on the real economy
Hence raising money supply simply pushes up prices (i.e. inflationary).
The implication is that, the government has no role in the economy through its monetary
policy.
the classical are proponents of laissez-faire and government intervention
stabilization policies, would be neither necessary nor desirable.
1.3.5. Neo classical era (Late 19th – Depression period)
This school of thought is basically not that much different from the classical school
Neo-classical economics developed in the late 19th and early 20thc-largely in England
It grew out of the blending of marginal concepts (e.g. marginal utility)
Marginal utility- a body of thought developed by 1 st and 2nd generation of marginalists
(Wickcel, Pareto, Goosen, Menger, Fisher, Marshal …etc.
This school developed the 1st branch of economics namely microeconomics theory
Has been very influential in macroeconomic theory
Providing a basis for the later monetarist and New Classical schools
Its methodology is:
strongly microeconomic
it pioneered the use of graphical and algebraic tools to explain economic
relationships
It uses inductive analysis
building generalized theories from basic assumptions
The theory is a deliberate abstraction from reality
Neo-classical economists always tried to check its predictions against historical
experience
Following this in 1950s and 1960s unemployment problem was resolved in England
Owing to this the Keynesian economics become popular
Fiscal policy has two instruments:-
1. Tax:- it is the major government revenue
2. Government spending: defence and non-defence spending
As a result the 2nd branch of economics, Macroeconomics emerged during the period of
depression
The originator of it was John Maynard Keynes
whose idea was influential until 1970s
In 1970s another problem emerged that is inflation and became a serious problem.
Economy started to decline
Economists tried to solve the problem using the previous principles
Milton Friedman understood that the problem worsened due to government intervention
He suggested markets to regulate economic activities by opposing government intervention
Milton’s idea led to the development of a monetarist school of thought
Emphasized regulation of the economy from money side rather than the demand side of the
economy
Monetarism advocated to influence the money side of the economy indirectly through central
banks by manipulating the policy instruments of money supply and interest rate rather than
activist demand management policy (Fiscal policy).
During the early 1970s there was a significant renaissance of the belief that a market economy
is capable of achieving macroeconomic stability
The ‘Great Inflation’ of the 1970s:-
Stagflation (inflation with unemployment) was a challenge for Keynes
provided increasing credibility and influence to those economists
warned that Keynesian activism was both over ambitious
predicated on theories that were fundamentally flawed
1.3.7. The new Classical macroeconomics (1970s plus)
o During the 1970s, another group of economists provided a much more damaging
critique of Keynesian economics
o Their main argument against Keynes and the Keynesians was that:-
they had failed to explore the full implications of endogenously formed expectations on
the behavior of economic agents.
o Only expectations accepted to incorporate into macroeconomic models-
They adopted some variant of John Muth’s (1961) ‘rational expectations hypothesis.’
o Following Thomas Sargent’s (1979) contribution, rational expectationists, who also
adhered to the principle of equilibrium theorizing, became known collectively as the
new classical school.
o The new classical school aim:-
restore classical modes of equilibrium analysis
by assuming continuous market clearing within a framework of competitive markets
o The assumption of market clearing:-
perfectly and instantaneously flexible prices
flexibility is the most controversial aspect of new classical theorizing
the incorporation of this assumption represents the classical element in their thinking
namely a firm conviction ‘that the economy should be modeled as an economic
equilibrium’
o Thus, to new classical theorists, ‘the ultimate macroeconomics is a fully specified
general equilibrium microeconomics.’
o This approach implies the revival of classical modes of thought.
o This school of macroeconomics sees the world as one
Why?
B/s individuals act rationally in their self-interest in markets that adjust rapidly to
changing conditions
o The government is likely only to make things worse by intervening.
o Their approach is a challenge to traditional macroeconomics
o Who are the traditional macroeconomics?
School thought advocating the usefulness of government action in an economy
a. adjusting sluggishly
Course Title: Macroeconomics I 17
College of Business, Economics, and Social Sciences; Department of Common and Supportive
Courses
any unemployed person who really wants a job will offer to cut his or her
wage until the wage is low enough to attract an offer from some employer
Similarly, anyone with an excess supply of goods on the shelf will cut prices
so as to sell
o Flexible adjustment of wages and prices leaves all individuals all the time in a situation
in which they work as much as they want and firms produce as much as they want.
o The essence of the new classical approach is the assumption that markets are
continuously in equilibrium.
1.3.8. The Neo-Keynesian School of Thought
New Keynesian economics is the school of thought in modern macroeconomics that evolved
from ideas of John Maynard Keynes
Keynes wrote The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money in the 30s, and his
influence among the academics and policy makers increased through the 60s
In the 70s the new classical economists called into question many of the perceptions of the
Keynesian revolution.
The new classical group remains highly influential in today’s macroeconomics
But a new generation of scholars, the Neo Keynesians, mostly trained in the Keynesian
tradition but moving beyond it, emerged in the 1980s
They do not believe that markets clear all the time but seek to understand and explain exactly
why markets fail.
The new Keynesians argue that markets sometimes do not clear even when individuals are
looking out for their own interests
There are information problems and cost of changing prices
lead to some price rigidities
price rigidities help cause macroeconomic fluctuations in output and employment
Example:- in the labor market:
firms that cut wage not only reduce the cost of labor
but are likely to wind up with a poorer quality labor
they will thus be reluctant to cut wages
Course Title: Macroeconomics I 19
College of Business, Economics, and Social Sciences; Department of Common and Supportive
Courses
The primary disagreement between new classical and new Keynesian economists is over how
quickly wages and prices adjust
New classical economists build their macroeconomic theories on the assumption that wages
and prices are flexible.
They believe that prices “clear” market by adjusting quickly
New Keynesians economists, however, believe that market-models cannot explain short-run
economic fluctuations
So they advocate models with “sticky” wages and prices
New Keynesian theories rely on this stickiness of wages and prices to explain why involuntary
unemployment exists and why monetary policy has such a strong influence on economic
activity.
A long tradition in macroeconomics emphasizes that:-
monetary policy affects employment and production in the short run
This is b/s prices respond sluggishly to changes in the money supply.
According to this view: -
If the money
supply falls
Why and how the fall of demand for goods causes drop in production and layoffs of workers?
Because prices and wages are inflexible and do not fall immediately
If they are sticky or inflexible then the decreased spending causes a drop in production and
layoffs of workers.
New classical economist criticized this tradition: - How?
Because they believe that this theory lacked a coherent theoretical explanation for the
sluggish behavior of prices
Much new Keynesian research attempts to remedy this omission.
In New Keynesian economics, among the reasons causing price not to adjust immediately to
clear markets (elements of New Keynesian economics) are:-
1. menu costs-the cost to a firm resulting from changing its prices
2. staggered prices,
3. coordination failures, and
4. efficiency wages.
These elements represent substantial departure from the assumptions of classical economics,
which provides the intellectual basis for economists’ usual justification of laissez-faire.
Thus, new Keynesian economics provides:
a rationale for government intervention in the economy
such as countercyclical monetary or fiscal policy
Whether policymakers should intervene in practice, however, a more difficult question is that
entails various political as well as economic judgments.
This variation is often used to illustrate the basic operation of the model including
adjustment to equilibrium and the multiplier process.
The two-sector model captures the role of induced activity through household saving and
the role of autonomous expenditures through business investment.
Saving is the only leakage and investment is the only injection.
b) Three-Sector Model:
The second variation of the injections-leakages model adds the government (or public)
sector to the household and business sectors contained in the two-sector model
This variation is used to analyze government stabilization policies
Especially how fiscal policy changes in government purchases and taxes can be used to
close recessionary gaps and inflationary gaps.
Saving and taxes are the two leakages.
Investment and government purchases are the two injections.
c) Four-Sector Model:
All 4 macroeconomic sectors--household, business, government & foreign are included in
the four-sector Keynesian model
This model is not only used to capture the interaction between the domestic economic and
the foreign sector, but also provides the foundation for detailed, empirically estimated
models of the macro-economy.
Saving, taxes, and imports are the three leakages.
Investment, government purchases, and exports are the three injections.
2. The working of an economy can also be explained into two ways
a) Closed economy:
b) Open economy:
A. Closed economy:
Characterized by absence of international trade.
Can be expressed as either
B. Open economy:
Characterized by the presence of international trade.
Can be expressed as
Where,
C – Household,
I - firms,
G-government,
NX - foreign sector or trade balance which the difference of total export(X) and import (M). I.e.
NX= (X-M).
C and I are major sectors that highly contribute in the creation of county’s wealth (GNP)
And thus economists tend to analyze C and I so as to conclude for the general economy as the
two sectors
C and I contribute for more than 80% of the total wealth
Business
expenses Income
Factor Markets
Labor Labor
Gross Domestic Product
Firms Households
Goods / Goods /
Services Services
Product Markets
Revenue Consumer
spending
Factors of production:
land,
labor,
are owned by HHs or individuals under free
capital and market economy
technology
It’s the households that supply the factors of production.
Firms produce final goods and services (G+S) combing the factors of production that are
offered by the households.
Once the final G+S have been produced then the firms will again supply these G+S to the HHs
Firms will pay for the factors of production they have used in the form of income while the
households make payment to the firms in the form of spending.
Wages, rents,
interest, profits
Factor services
Goods
Household Firms
(production)
Government
Financial markets
Personal consumption
Other countries
All sectors including the foreign sector is involved and that’s why it is called open economy.
Households supply factors of production to firms and firms will have to pay for the use of the
factors of production.
If the government is considered the whole income will not go to the pocket of a household
rather some part of the income will have to be pass to the government in the form of tax.
The remaining part after tax has been deducted is personal disposable income, Yd.
This is the amount that gets into the hands of households.
The personal disposable (Yd) income will then be broken down into 2 major parts
1. Saving (S): the amount that flows out of the system and transferred to banks.
2. Consumption (C): the amount which will be used to purchase different G+S
the total amount of personal Yd will be the sum of the consumption and saving
Part of the personal Yd which is used to purchase foreign G+S will leak from the system in the
form of import (M)
Again the one which is leaked as Tax injected into the system as G
Foreigners also purchase goods
exporting will be conducted
and cash will be obtained in the exchange
Exporting will be injected in the form of X.
The money leaked as S will also be injected in the form of investment (I).
Symbolically the above flow forms the aggregate demand that can be expressed as:
AD = C + I + G + (X – M)
At equilibrium aggregate demand and aggregate supply are equal.
M + Y = C+I+G+X
Aggregate demand (Y) are the sum of consumption (C), investment (I), government purchases (G),
and net exports (X - M).
Y= C+S+T-------……………………………………………………………..………..……… (2)
This is the income generated by aggregate production (Y) is used by the household sector for
consumption (C), saving (S), and taxes (T)
C+I+G+X-M = C+S+T
A balance between injections and leakages generates the same equilibrium as a balance between
aggregate expenditures and aggregate production.
A little manipulation of the Y = AE equilibrium condition illustrates why.
Aggregate expenditures (AE) are the sum of consumption (C), investment (I), government
purchases (G), and net exports (X - M).
AE = C + I + G + (X - M)
The income generated by aggregate production (Y) is used by the household sector for
consumption (C), saving (S), and taxes (T).
Y=C+S+T
Substituting each of these equations into the Y = AE equilibrium condition gives us:
C + S + T = C + I + G + (X - M)
S + T = I + G + (X - M)
For reasons that will be apparent later, let's move imports (M) to the left-hand side.
S+T+M=I+G+X
This last equation indicates that equilibrium can be achieved by equating injections I + G + X with
leakages S + T + M.
Most importantly, when aggregate expenditures equal aggregate production (Y = AE), then
injections are necessarily equal to leakages S + T + M = I + G + X.
I+G+X = S+T+M
↓ ↓
Injection Leakage
This implies that at equilibrium total injections (I+G+X) = total leakages (S+T+M)
Course Title: Macroeconomics I 28
College of Business, Economics, and Social Sciences; Department of Common and Supportive
Courses
Remember:
Refer the table to an open economy with government sector. In which situation is the economy in
disequilibrium?
C I S G T X M
Answer:
I+G+X = S+T+M
A 420 380
B 420 420
C 420 420
D 420 420