Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I, Brian Wainscott, The Undersigned Complainant, Being Duly Sworn, State The Following Is
I, Brian Wainscott, The Undersigned Complainant, Being Duly Sworn, State The Following Is
Plaintiff,
20-MJ-4013-RJD
vs. CASE NUMBER
KEVIN G. REAGAN
Defendant.
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
I, Brian Wainscott, the undersigned complainant, being duly sworn, state the following is
Count 1
(Attempted Enticement of a Minor)
defendant.
KEVIN G.REAGAN,
in Williamson County, Illinois, within the Southem District of Illinois, and elsewhere,
knowingly attempt to persuade, induce, entice, and coerce an individual who had not
attained the age of 18 years,to engage in prostitution and in sexual activity under such
2422(b).
INTRODUCTION
have been so employed since 2016. I am currently assigned to the Springfield, Illinois, Division
ofthe FBI where,for the past year, I have been assigned to work investigations related to violent
crimes against children. Prior to this assignment,I was assigned to the Las Vegas Division of
the FBI for approximately 3 years where I conducted gang and narcotics investigations. Prior to
joining the FBI,I was a police officer in the Village of Mundelein, Illinois for 14 years. I have
received law enforcement training from the FBI Academy at Quantico, Virginia. Since
becoming a Special Agent,I have worked with experienced Special Agents who also investigate
Child Exploitation offenses. In the performance of my duties, I have investigated and assisted in
the investigation of matters involving the possession, collection, production, receipt, and/or
transportation ofimages of child pomography and the solicitation and extortion of children to
produce sexually explicit images of themselves. I have also investigated and assisted in the
knowingly persuade,induce, and entice minors to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity
the sexual exploitation of children that constituted violations of Title 18, United States Code,
served as case agent, have been the affiant for several complaints and search warrants and I have
conducted interviews of defendants and witnesses. I also have served as an undercover agent in
online child pomography cases. As a federal agent, I am authorized to investigate and assist in
the prosecution of violations oflaws ofthe United States, and to execute search warrants and
Case 4:21-cr-40019-JPG Document 1 Filed 02/04/21 Page 3 of 8 Page ID #3
well as on information provided to me by other law enforcement officers. This affidavit is being
submitted for the limited purpose of securing a criminal complaint and an arrest warrant, and I
have not included each and every fact known to me concerning this investigation. I have set
forth only the facts that I believe are necessary to establish probable cause to believe that KEVESf
G. REAGAN committed violations of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b).
4. This investigation concerns violations of Title 18, United States Code, Section
prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged. Based upon my training
and experience, as well as conversations with other experienced law enforcement officers and
commerce to knowingly persuade,induce, entice or coerce any individual who has not attained
the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be
contact with the UCE by text messaging "good Sunday rainy morning!!" The UCE responded
via text message by saying "Yep" The SUBJECT and UCE continued the following text
message conversation:
Jan 31, 2021, 2:55:55 PM : Reagan: was hoping to possibly meet, but I am not out and about now.
possibly tomorrow?
Jan 31, 2021, 3:04:33 PM : UCE: Maybe what are you into?
Jan 31, 2021, 3:08:36 PM : Reaaan: adult fun
Jan 31, 2021, 3:11:05 PM : Reaaan: we could car play
Jan 31, 2021, 6:54:55 PM : UCE: Got busy I'll hit you up tomorrow
Jan 31, 2021, 8:26:37 PM : Reaaan: ok. sleep well
7. The affiant along with members from the FBI conducted surveillance in the
vicinity ofthe Mach 1 gas station: 912 N Park Ave, Herrin, Illinois. The UCE notified
SUBJECT that he would be at the gas station shortly. SUBJECT told UCE to park at the
vacuum pumps at the gas station. UCE parked at the vacuum pumps and SUBJECT said he
would meet UCE and provide M & M's for the UCE's purported 11 year old daughter.
SUBJECT was parked approximately 6 spots away from UCE,exited his gray pickup truck and
walked to the back of UCE's vehicle. UCE met with SUBJECT,the SUBJECT was carrying a
white plastic bag and opened it for UCE. SUBJECT said here's the bags of M&M's. UCE said
"Perfect, would you like to see her now?" SUBJECT looked toward the interior of UCE's
vehicle grinned and said "yes". SUBJECT was approached by agents, was detained, and the
SUBJECT was asked to consent to an interview, to which he declined and asked for his lawyer.
8. UCE sent at text message to SUBJECT'S cell phone. The cell phone was locked
but showed an app notification that the text was received. SUBJECT voluntarily unlocked his
phone to notify his wife about the incident and asked her to come pick up his pick-up truck.
When SUBJECT unlocked the phone the text message that UCE sent immediately appeared on
The SUBJECT pumped gas into his pick-up truck, relocated to the vacuum pumps,then
reparked in a parking spot across from the vacuum pumps next to the gas station. The
SUBJECT sat in his vehicle until approximately 9:47 a.m., when he exited his pick-up truck to
meet UCE.
internet to transmit the communications between himself and the man he met online.
Case 4:21-cr-40019-JPG Document 1 Filed 02/04/21 Page 7 of 8 Page ID #7
10. I have consulted with Assistant United States Attorney Casey Bloodwoith and I
am aware that the aforementioned scenario constitutes an offense under 18 U.S.C. 2422(b).
The Seventh Circuit has ruled that this statutory language covers not only direct efforts by the
perpetrator to persuade, induce, etc., the imderage person, but that it also criminalize
communication between two adults where one ofthe adults is purporting to be the parent or
guardian ofthe minor child. United States v. McMillan,744 F.3d 1033,1035-36(7^ Cir. 2014).
The majority ofthe Circuit Court of Appeals concur with McMillan. See United States v. Berk,
652 F.3d 132(1st Cir.2011); United States v. Douglas, 616 F.3d 161 (2d Cir.2010)(per
curiam); United States v. Nestor, 574 F.3d 159(3d Cir.2009); United States v. Caudill, 709 F.3d
444(5th Cir.2013); United States v. Spurlock, 495 F.3d 1011 (8th Cir.2007); and United States
V. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283(11th Cir.2004). See also United States v. Laureys, 653 F.3d 27
communications).
CONCLUSION
11. Based on the foregoing, I submit that there is probable cause to believe that
between January 31,2021 and February 3,2020, KEVIN G. REAGAN ,used a facility and
means of interstate commerce, mainly his laptop, and knowingly attempted to persuade, induce.
Case 4:21-cr-40019-JPG Document 1 Filed 02/04/21 Page 8 of 8 Page ID #8
and entice an individual who had not attainted the age of 18 years, to engage in a sexual activity
for which a person could be charged in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2422(b).
Attested to by the applicant in accordance with the requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 4.1 by
telephone, this 4th day of February, 2021, at Benton. Illinois.
RE^A'J. DAL'
Uoued States Magistrate Judge
CASEY BLOODWORTH
Assistant United States Attorney