Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Human Canine: Its Evolution and Adaptive Significance: Pascal PICQ
The Human Canine: Its Evolution and Adaptive Significance: Pascal PICQ
Pascal PICQ
Collège de France
ABSTRACT
The canine is a tooth with special characteristics and adaptive significance that varies
considerably between mammalian lines and the primates. No matter what the line,
canine teeth are never involved in mastication and do not interfere with masticatory
dynamics. Mastication, which is one of the most complex functions that monkeys and
apes display, appears well before the large canines in both phylogeny and ontogeny. In
apes, their size and shape have nothing to do with diet, but are linked to sexual selection.
The human line of hominids possesses smaller canines that have become incisiform and
have lost their sexual and social function. They are now used exclusively to tear apart
meat and other types of solid foods. The development of a wide, short buccal surface that
increased medial-lateral movement during the masticatory cycle, may explain this partic-
ular development in recent hominids including humans. From an evolutionary point of
view this means that the human canine has been subjected to stresses imposed by the
biomechanical environment of the masticatory apparatus. In other words, the human
canine, as well as those of the other anthropoids, does not guide mastication but has
acquired a morphology and position restricted by masticatory functions. In evolutionary
terms, it is therefore referred to as an “exaptation”; it has acquired, not a function, but a
passive characteristic which makes it a marker for rehabilitation – on condition that its
eruption is related to normal masticatory functions in individual histories, but it never
serves as a mediator of mastication.
KEYWORDS
Canine
Mastication
Address for correspondence:
P. PICQ Evolution.
Collège de France,
3, rue d’Ulm,
75005 Paris.
picq.anthrope@wanadoo.fr
4
Article available at http://www.jdao-journal.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/odfen/2010103
THE HUMAN CANINE: ITS EVOLUTION AND ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE
1 - INTRODUCTION
In 2009 we celebrated the bicente- tion (see Picq P., Les Mondes dar-
nary of the birth of Charles Darwin and winiens. Syllepse, 2009) of finalised
the one hundred and fiftieth anniver- morphogenesis, internal forces guid-
sary of the publication of: On the ed by the divinely-inspired sphenoid,
Origin of Species. But even after this the sacred basicranial flexion, the
long passage of time, the theory of apocalypse according to the third
evolution is still poorly understood, molar and the fairy neoteny. Oh poor
especially when we consider the pop- epistemology!
ular conception that mankind is a
special case because of the lingering
All science is based on observa-
persuasive power of obsolete pre-
tion, comparison, experimentation
mises that attempt to detach humanity
(when possible), modelling and,
from the mammalian lineage, claiming
above all, on the possibility of refuting
that our species, with its genius and its
the dominant paradigms, not on the
cultural and technical innovations, has
basis of arguments which consist of
gained freedom from evolutionary con-
refuting observed facts or revelation
straints. However, this is not the case
by experimentation in the name of
and what we call co-evolution or inter-
dogmatic ideas, but properly by taking
action between our biological evolution
these facts into account, as new
and our techno-cultural evolution is in
paradigms are developed. As Claude
constant operation, particularly with
Lévi-Strauss has reminded us, studies
respect to masticatory functions, mas-
devoted to examination of humans, as
tication and canine teeth.
well as sciences or those whose
Although evolutionary theory per- scope encompasses humans, cannot
meates all the life sciences, including claim scientific status if they limit
medicine, outmoded, non-scientific their range of study to humanity
beliefs about mankind‘s position in exclusively. If they ignore the species
nature and its intimate participation most closely related to us, whether in
in hominid evolution, still persist. It is the modern world or the past, they
not just the creationists, defending a will produce blunders as ludicrous as
narrow, unreasoning literalism, not those of Bouvard and Pécuchet and
based on a coherent exegesis (see this applies not only to paleoanthro-
Picq P., Lucie et l’Obscurantisme. pology but to dental science as well.
Odile Jacob, 2007), who refuse to The adaptive significance and evolu-
understand and argue against evolu- tion of the canine and its functions is,
tion. Many representatives of health as an English investigator has
disciplines, who claim to base their remarked, “a case in point”.
proposals on scientific procedures
In this article, we shall begin with
but are actually using concepts
a short review of canine anatomy
derived from theology and, especial-
and comparative ethology and we
ly certain schools of philosophy to
shall observe that the canine has
take an astonishing stand opposing
diverse types of adaptive significance,
evolution. Paleoanthropology is not
as seen in the mammalian line,
spared, with its ideas of hominisa-
with regard to natural and/or sexual
selection. We shall then see what the dentistry today. This taste of evolu-
situation is for primates and monkeys. tionary science may not risk tearing
Next, we shall engage the main the flesh of Platonian idealists but
themes of the evolution of the canine could certainly tweak the sensitive
in the human line over the past 7 mil- souls of these devotees of an intelli-
lion years. Finally, we shall address gent design dictated by the great
certain problems by canine teeth in heavenly occlusal architect.