Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Variability Submerged Primary: Prevalence
Variability Submerged Primary: Prevalence
TABLE 1
PREVALENCE OF SUBMERGING PER ETHNIC GROUP AND SEX
Total Affected Children Affected Teeth
No. of No. of
Ethnic Group Children Teeth at Risk N % N %
Kurds male 114 633 38 33.33 75 11.85
female 110 653 41 37.27 98 15.01
total 224 1286 79 35.27 170 13.22
East male 110 537 28 25.45 61 11.36
Euro- female 80 403 30 37.50 54 13.40
peans total 190 940 58 30.53 115 12.23
Druse male 97 519 31 31.96 46 8.86
female 104 514 24 23.08 40 7.78
total 201 1033 55 27.36 86 8.33
Circas- male 99 423 25 25.25 44 10.40
sians female 61 270 18 29.51 36 13.33
total 160 693 43 26.88 80 11.54
North male 133 771 37 27.82 79 10.25
Afri- female 130 802 30 23.08 60 7.48
cans total 263 1573 67 25.48 139 8.84
Cochins male 104 616 12 11.54 19 3.08
female 103 614 23 22.33 49 7.98
total 207 1230 35 16.91 68 5.53
Yeme- male 127 595 19 14.96 31 5.21
nites female 112 594 15 13.39 24 4.04
total 239 1189 34 14.23 55 4.63
TABLE 2
ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN SUBMERGING AND AGE
Age 4.6-7.5 Yr 7.6-10.5 Yr 10.6-13.5 Yr
Total % Total % Total %
Ethnic Group Sample Affected Sample Affected Sample Affected
East Europeans, C 235 20.85 290 26.90 105 19.05
Druse, Yemenites T 1459 5.35 1362 11.09 341 7.92
Kurds, Cochins, C 192 30.73 256 26.17 143 21.68
Circassians T 1333 9.08 1378 10.38 488 11.07
North Africans C 105 18.10 120 26.67 38 42.11
T 754 5.44 678 9.29 141 24.82
C, number of children.
T, number of teeth.
by the lower second primary molar. Only in Yemenite and Cochins, two were Kurds, and the other two were East
Druse boys did the percentage of submerged upper primary Europeans.
first molars exceed that of the lower second molar. In the
two above-mentioned groups, as well as in the Circassian
and Cochin groups, no submerged upper second primary Discussion.
molars were found. Previous epidemiologic surveys, in urban as well as in
In all ethnic groups, the majority of submerged teeth rural settlements, reported a very high occurrence of
were located in the lower arch only (p < 0.01), either in submerged primary molars in Israeli children.10,ll,17
one or in both its quadrants (Table 4). In East Europeans, Of all epidemiologic surveys cited in the literature,
Kurds, and North Africans, submersion in the upper arch or Brearly and McKibben7 found the highest prevalence
both arches, in three or four dental quadrants, was also (6.9o%) in North American children; in Israeli children of
found in a relatively large percentage of the sample. In mixed ethnic descent, it reached 24.8%. Although the
these three ethnic groups, multiple submerging of primary considerable discrepancy may partly be explained by our
molars (Table 5) and a severe degree of submersion (Table very minimal definition of submergence, the results of the
6) were present as well. present study reveal that this discrepancy evidently cannot
Out of the 46 children aged 2.6-4.5 yr, eight (17.39%) be solely attributed to this factor. The frequency of sub-
had a total number of 13 submerged lower first primary mergence varies considerably between the different ethnic
molars. No affected second primary molars were detected groups -- the frequency for the Kurds being about three-
in this age group. Four of the affected young children were fold that of the Yemenites. Nonetheless, even in Yemenites,
Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on February 19, 2015 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Vol. 61 No. 12 SUBMERGED PRIMARY MOLARS 1403
TABLE 3
DISTRIBUTION OF SUBMERGED PRIMARY MOLARS PER ETHNIC GROUP AND SEX
Lower M1 Lower M2 Upper M1 Upper M2
Ethnic Group T S T S T S T S
Kurds male 126 31.75 184 11.96 139 7.91 184 1.09
female 146 42.47 178 10.11 149 9.40 180 0.56
East male 90 24.44 136 13.97 133 12.03 178 2.25
Europeans female 75 36.00 93 11.83 104 14.42 131 0.76
Druse male 119 25.21 146 6.16 107 6.54 147
female 112 19.64 148 8.11 96 6.25 158
Circas- male 88 28.41 142 11.97 69 2.90 124
sians female 54 40.47 81 13.58 53 5.66 82
North male 164 25.00 232 12.07 165 4.85 210 0.95
Africans female 166 21.08 220 6.82 186 4.84 230 0.43
Cochins male 117 9.40 165 3.64 149 1.34 185
female 123 27.64 164 6.10 143 3.50 184
Yeme- male 96 19.79 167 2.99 144 4.86 188
nites female 116 12.93 155 3.23 131 3.05 192
M1, primary first molar; M2, primary second molar.
T, number of teeth at risk.
S, percentage of affected teeth.
TABLE 4
DISTRIBUTION ACCORDING TO LOCATION OF SUBMERGED TEETH
A. Dental Arches
Affected Lower Arch Upper Arch Both
Ethnic Group Children Only % Only % Arches %
Kurds 79 76.54 11.11 12.35
East Europeans 58 55.00 28.33 16.67
Druse 55 80.00 18.18 1.82
Circassians 43 86.05 4.65 9.30
North Africans 67 74.63 5.97 19.40
Cochins 35 82.05 7.69 10.26
Yemenites 34 76.47 17.65 5.88
B. Dental Quadrants
Affected One Both Quadrants One Quadrant Three or Four
Ethnic Group Children Quadrant % in One Arch % in Each Arch % Quadrants %
Kurds 79 33.33 54.32 2.47 9.88
East Europeans 58 48.34 35.00 5.00 11.66
Druse 55 52.73 45.45 1.82
Circassians 43 46.51 46.51 4.66 2.32
North Africans 67 43.28 37.31 2.98 16.43
Cochins 35 33.33 56.41 5.13 5.13
Yemenites 34 52.94 41.18 5.88
submerging occurs in a much higher percentage than in quency. In Kurd, Cochin, and Circassian groups, the percen-
North American children. tage of affected teeth increases with age, despite the decrease
The different age changes detected in the various ethnic in number of affected children. In a longitudinal study of
groups might possibly be related not only to the genetic 113 children with submerged teeth, Brearly and McKibben7
predisposition to submerging, but also to the inception of found that, during a four-year follow-up, in 29.2% of the
this condition and the exfoliation time of the submerged children from one to five additional teeth became affected.
tooth. Normal root resorption and exfoliation of submerged Although the present findings are based on a cross-sectional
primary teeth have already been established.7,18,19 It is study, similar events may be responsible for the trend in the
feasible that in East European, Druse, and Yemenite above-mentioned ethnic groups, as witnessed by the high
groups, there is an initial increase of the frequency of percentage of multiple submerging found in these children.
submersion due to excessive accumulation of affected The pattern of the North African group, in which the num-
teeth, and, after the age of ten yr, a normal shedding process, ber of affected children, as well as the number of submerged
especially of the first primary molars, decreases the fre- teeth, increased with age, could be attributed to a late onset
Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on February 19, 2015 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
1404 KOYOUMDJISKY-KA YE & STEIGMAN J Dent Res December· 1 982
TABLE 5 TABLE 6
DISTRIBUTION OF AFFECTED CHILDREN (%) PER NUMBER SEVERITY OF SUBMERSION IN AFFECTED TEETH
OF SUBMERGED TEETH IN EACH CHILD
Submersion
No. of Number of Submerged Teeth No. of
Affected Ethnic Group Affected Teeth Mild Moderate Severe
Ethnic Group Children 1 2 3 4 5-6
Kurds 170 84.97 13.29 1.74
Kurds 79 29.63 48.15 6.17 13.58 2.47 East Europeans 115 84.03 12.61 3.36
East Europeans 58 43.33 35.00 10.00 6.67 5.00 Druse 86 86.05 9.30 4.65
Druse 55 52.73 40.00 5.45 1.82 Circassians 80 82.50 17.50
Circassians 43 41.86 37.21 13.95 6.98 North Africans 139 84.17 10.79 5.04
North Africans 67 43.28 28.36 11.94 11.94 4.48 Cochins 68 96.00 4.00
Cochins 35 30.77 53.85 7.69 7.69 Yemenites 55 85.45 14.55
Yemenites 34 52.94 35.29 8.82 2.94
Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com at Bobst Library, New York University on February 19, 2015 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.