Case Study On Microstrip Patch Antenna

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

XL-RXIVREXMSREP'SRJIVIRGISR'SQTYXIVWERH(IZMGIWJSV'SQQYRMGEXMSR '3()' %47

A Microstrip Patch Antenna for Biomedical


Applications at 2.45 GHz
Shashiketan Samal, Santanu Dwari Ashudeb Dutta, S. Pradeep Reddy
Dept. of Electronics and Communication Dept. of Electrical Engineering,
Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad
Indian School of Mines, Hyderabad, India
Dhanbad, India

Abstract—A Microstrip Patch antenna resonating at similar to most industrial sources: 27 MHz, 433 MHz
2.47 GHz is proposed which is made of a silicon and 2.45 GHz [4]. Moreover, if resonating frequency
substrate. The proposed antenna has been designed for is considered very low the size of the antenna
biomedical applications in human body. The substrate increases. So, a microstrip antenna resonating at 2.45
chosen has an ease of fabrication and biocompatibility
GHz is proposed.
compared to other semiconductors. The designed
antenna is being aimed to be utilized on skin as well as When an antenna which is designed for on body
inside the body taking into consideration of tissue surface is placed inside the body its resonating
parameters. The directivity, gain and radiation frequency decreases. A 2.45 GHz antenna when
efficiency is high as compared to antenna made on placed inside the body resonates at 0.8 GHz. This
RO3730 of dielectric constant 3. decrease is due to the high permittivity of the muscles
tissue and conductivity of tissues [5]. The proposed
Keywords-patch antenna; biomedical implantation; antenna eliminates this effect with the use of a
silicon substrate; in body communication; radiation hexagonal patch. With a slight change in dimensions
efficiency
of antenna it can be used inside the body as well at
2.45 GHz.
I. INTRODUCTION The biocompatibility of antenna is another issue.
The antenna performance should not get affected by
In recent years a lot of research work has been body parameters neither the antenna should harm the
going on implantation of biomedical devices inside body tissues. So, antenna must be fabricated by
and on the human body. For body centric wireless biocompatible materials that will not elicit an adverse
communication there is a need of antenna in and out biological response. The tungsten metal [6] has been
of the body which reduces the diagnosis of patients. It used as the ground plane of antenna as it least affects
can communicate without a wire piercing of the skin the tissues. Superior fracture and fatigue resistance
preventing infections in a medical diagnosis [1]. have made metals the materials of choice for
Hence, there is a need of implantable antenna which traditional load-bearing applications. It doesn’t
can build reliable wireless links. . corrode inside the body.
The loop and monopole give similar For the choice of substrate, silicon (İ =11.7), is
omnidirectional patterns with maximum radiation used as a substrate. It is the basic semiconductor
along the surface. The patch antenna and planar material used for fabrication. This is used extensively
inverted F antenna gives strong radiation away from due to its ease of fabrication, abundance in nature,
the surface, suitable for the free-space links [2]. reliable high volume fabrication and exceptional
Dipole antenna has a good radiation pattern but to physical properties. Silicon has been widely used in
size constraint it cannot be implanted on or inside breast implant and prosthetics for increased facial
body. In contrary, Microstrip patch antennas are characteristics [7]. It maintains its mechanical and
lighter in weight, low volume, low cost, low profile, electrical properties inside the body. It does not
smaller in dimension and ease of fabrication and invoke inflammatory or toxic response proving its
conformity. biocompatibility.
For the use of antenna,frequency bands and power The performance of antenna greatly depends on the
levels are regulated by the Medical Implant permittivity and thickness of substrate. So a thin
Communication Service (MICS) band. MICS substrate is used. The effective dielectric constant of
operates in the 402-405 MHz band, with a power silicon is reduced by partially removing the silicon
level strictly limited to 25ȝWof effective radiated underneath the patch to form a mixed air-silicon
power [3]. However, diagnostic applications are region with a predetermined dielectric constant value.
allowed to exceed the basic restrictions of Council
Recommendation 1999/519/EC as there is a benefit
for the patient. Usual frequencies are those allowed
for industrial, scientific, and medical applications

谠-)))
XL-RXIVREXMSREP'SRJIVIRGISR'SQTYXIVWERH(IZMGIWJSV'SQQYRMGEXMSR '3()' %47

II. ANTENNA DESIGN 0.1067 S/m), and 30 mm for muscle of the


constitutive parameters of (ߝ௥ = 52.668 and ߪ =1.882
Fig.1 shows the simulation of proposed antenna S/m).
which is modified from [8] in High Frequency
Simulation Software (HFSS). The antenna substrate
is silicon wafer of the dielectric constant 11.9, height
1.534 mm and side is 21.8 mm. The substrate rests on
58mm x 78mm ground plane made of tungsten.
Window of 56 mm x 76 mm is open on back side of
wafer and open a rectangular cavity of depth 0.567
mm in silicon. Fig-2 shows the side view of the
antenna. The feedline width is 0.064mm.

Figure 3. Antenna on Human Tissue Model

IV. SIMULATION AND RESULTS


The antenna was simulated in HFSS software with
air as boundary. The antenna resonates at 2.47 GHz.
The return loss and radiation pattern were as shown
in Fig.4. The directivity is 4.99, gain is 4.39, and
Figure 1. Proposed Patch antenna in HFSS radiation efficiency is found to be 95.37%. The
radiation efficiency increased by around 10% as in
comparison to the antenna on substrate RO3730 of
dielectric constant 3 in [8].

Figure 2. Side view of the antenna

III. DESIGN AND ANALYSIS

The selection of height and dielectric constant of


the substrate plays a key role in obtaining high
directivity and better radiation efficiency [9]. Hence, Figure 4(a). Return loss of antenna in air
the effective permittivity of silicon is optimized to 3
F/m from 11.9 F/m by creating a cavity.
If ݄௔௜௥ is the height of cavity then, synthesized
dielectric constant can be calculated from the
following formula.
ߝ௔௜௥ ‫ߝ כ‬௦௜ (1)
ߝ௦௬௡௧௛ ൌ
ߝ௔௜௥ ൅ ሺߝ௦௜ ൅ ߝ௔௜௥ ሻ݄௔௜௥

The height was found to be 0.417mm. So,


dimension of cavity after optimization is: 56mm
76mm 0.567mm.
For the simulation of antenna on body a human
tissue was modeled as shown in Fig.3. Its layers
Figure 4(b). Radiation pattern of antenna in air when ‫ ׎‬ൌ Ͳι
dimensions are 120 mm 130 mm with 1mm height
for the skin of the constitutive parameters of (ߝ௥ =
The same antenna was then placed on the body
37.952 and ߪ =1.4876 S/m), 2 mm for fat of the
model and simulated. The antenna resonates at 2.47
constitutive parameters of (ߝ௥ = 5.2749 and ߪ=

谠-)))
XL-RXIVREXMSREP'SRJIVIRGISR'SQTYXIVWERH(IZMGIWJSV'SQQYRMGEXMSR '3()' %47

GHz with a directivity of 5.909 and gain of 4.91 the V. PERFORMANCE OF ANTENNA INSIDE
radiation efficiency however decreased to 82.98%. HUMAN BODY
The return loss and radiation pattern are as shown in
the figure. The peculiar characteristic of this hexagonal
patched microstrip antenna is that it can be used
inside human body taking into considerations all
tissue parameters with a little change in dimensions.
For simulation of antenna inside the human body a
three layer model or a single layer model can be used.
The one layer model tends to overestimate losses so it
can be accepted as a conservative approach from the
point of view of antenna pair gain [5]. If the antenna
is placed inside a fat tissue then detuning and
impedance mismatch takes place. Hence it should be
placed in between the muscle tissue. The implanted
antenna should be insulated from the body tissues as
much as possible.
The above proposed antenna with reduced
Figure 5(a). Return loss of antenna on body dimensions based on silicon substrate is used as
shown in Fig.6. The ground plane is of dimension 50
mm x70 mm. Window of 46 mm x 66 mm is open on
back side of wafer with same depth of 0.567 mm. The
antenna was enclosed within a muscle tissue
(permittivity 52.4 S/m and conductivity 1.882) of
height 6mm.

Figure 5(b). Radiation pattern of antenna on body


‫ ׎‬ൌ Ͳι

A brief comparison has been provided in Table. I


with that of [8] whose substrate is made of RO3730. Figure 6. Antenna structure inside human body

T ABLE I. (a) C OMPARISON OF ANTENNA PERFORMANCE WITH The structure was simulated in HFSS software. The
R O 3730 AS SUBSTRATE antenna was found to resonate at 2.45 GHz with a
very good value of directivity, gain and radiation
RO3730 In air On body efficiency as compared to [10] and [5].
Resonating frequency 2.45 2.45 The return loss parameters and radiation efficiency
Directivity 5.0281 5.2285 are as shown in the figure.7:
Gain 4.3671 4.2997
Radiation Efficiency 86.85 82.235

T ABLE I. (b) C OMPARISON OF ANTENNA PERFORMANCE WITH


SILICON AS SUBSTRATE

Silicon In air On body


Resonating frequency 2.47 2.47
Directivity 4.9525 5.909
Gain 4.7235 4.9034
Radiation Efficiency 95.377 82.982

Figure 7(a). Return loss of antenna inside body

谠-)))
XL-RXIVREXMSREP'SRJIVIRGISR'SQTYXIVWERH(IZMGIWJSV'SQQYRMGEXMSR '3()' %47

[3] Mehmet R. Yuce on "Implementation of wireless body


area networks for healthcare systems," ELSEVIER,
Sensors and Actuators A 162 (2010) 116–129
[4] "Preliminary Opinion on Possible effects of
Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) on Human Health,"
adopted by scientific committee on emerging and
newly identified health risks, 2006
[5] J. Gemio, J. Parr¶on, and J. Soler on "Human body
effects on implantable antennas for ism bands
applications: models comparison and propagation
losses study," Progress In Electromagnetics Research,
Vol. 110, 437-452, 2010
[6] D. Mihov*, B. Katerska on "Some biocompatible
materials used in medical practice," Trakia Journal of
Figure 7(b). Radiation pattern of antenna inside body Sciences, Vol. 8, Suppl. 2, pp 119-125, 2010.
‫ ׎‬ൌ Ͳι [7] Biodegradable materials for medical appliicatiions,
Biomedical Engineering Università degli Studi di
A comparison of antenna parameters has been Pavia - Structural Mechanics Department.
provided in Table II with [10] and [5]. [8] Ahmed al-Shaheen, on "New patch antenna for ISM
band at 2.45 GHz," ARPN Journal of Engineering and
Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, January 2012
T ABLE II. C OMPARISON OF ANTENNA PERFORMANCE [9] Rathi.V, Rawat.S, Pokhariya H.S., on "Study the effect
of substrate thickness and permittivity on patch
Proposed Compared antenna,"Signal Processing, Communications and
antenna antenna Computing (ICSPCC), 2011 IEEE International
Conference on 14-16 Sept. 2011
Radiation 86.211 0.16 [10] [10] Jaehoon Kim, Rahmat-Samii, Y., on "Implanted
efficiency antennas inside a human body: simulations, designs,
Directivity 5.2399 -- and characterizations, "Microwave Theory and
Gain 2.5 dB -15 dB [5] Techniques, IEEE Transactions Volume: 52, Issue: 8
Page(s): 1934- 1943, aug 2004

VI. CONCLUSION
Hence, a Silicon based hexagonal patched
microstrip antenna has been proposed and simulated.
The antenna can be used on the surface of human
body and inside the body easily due to
biocompatibility of materials which are used in
antenna. The above proposed antenna can be
fabricated and used for biomedical applications as
they are lighter in weight, low volume, low cost, low
profile, smaller in dimension and ease of fabrication
and conformity.
However, there are some factors which need to be
dealt cautiously while implanting antenna inside
human body. The proposed antenna takes care of air
gap between the antenna and the skin however
interstitial fluid between the antenna and skin andthe
internal body temperature may affect the
performance.

REFERENCES
[1] Tamotsu Houzen1, Masaharu Takahashi2, and Koichi
Ito3 on "Implanted Antenna for an Artificial Cardiac
Pacemaker System, "Progress In Electromagnetics
Research Symposium 2007, Prague, Czech Republic,
August 27-30
[2] M.R Kamarudin, Y.I.Nechayev, P.S.Hall on
"Performance of Antennas in the On-Body
Environment," Antennas and Propagation Society
International Symposium, 2005 IEEE475-478 vol. 3A,
2005

谠-)))

You might also like