Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Warren SM - Ch.10 - Final
Warren SM - Ch.10 - Final
Warren SM - Ch.10 - Final
1. a. Tangible 11. a. No
b. Capable of repeated use in the b. No
operations of the business 12. a. An accelerated depreciation method is
e. Long-lived most appropriate for situations in which
2. a. Property, plant, and equipment the decline in productivity or earning
b. Current assets (merchandise inventory) power of the asset is proportionately
3. Real estate acquired as speculation should greater in the early years of use than in
be listed in the balance sheet under the later years, and the repairs tend to
caption “Investments,” below the Current increase with the age of the asset.
Assets section. b. An accelerated depreciation method re-
4. $298,500 duces income tax payable to the IRS in
5. Capital expenditures include the cost of the earlier periods of an asset’s life.
acquiring fixed assets and the cost of Thus, cash is freed up in the earlier
improving an asset. These costs are periods to be used for other business
recorded by increasing (debiting) the fixed purposes.
asset account. Capital expenditures also c. MACRS was enacted by the Tax
include the costs of extraordinary repairs, Reform Act of 1986 and provides for
which are recorded by decreasing (debiting) depreciation for fixed assets acquired
the asset’s accumulated depreciation after 1986.
account. Revenue expenditures are 13. No. Financial Accounting Standards No.
recorded as expenses and are costs that 154, “Accounting Changes and Error
benefit only the current period and are Corrections,” is quite specific about the
incurred for normal maintenance and repairs treatment of changes in depreciable assets’
of fixed assets. estimated service lives. Such changes
6. Capital expenditure should be reflected in the amounts for
7. A capital lease is accounted for as if the depreciation expense in the current and
lessee has purchased the asset and the future periods. The amounts recorded for
asset is written off over its useful life. An depreciation expense in the past are not
operating lease is accounted for as a affected.
current-period expense (rent expense). 14. a. No, the accumulated depreciation for an
8. Ordinarily not; if the book values closely asset cannot exceed the cost of the
approximate the market values of fixed asset. To do so would create a negative
assets, it is coincidental. book value, which is meaningless.
9. a. No, it does not provide a special cash b. The cost and accumulated depreciation
fund for the replacement of assets. should be removed from the accounts
Unlike most expenses, however, when the asset is no longer useful and
depreciation expense does not require is removed from service. Presumably,
an equivalent outlay of cash in the the asset will then be sold, traded in, or
period to which the expense is discarded.
allocated. 15. a. Over the shorter of its legal life or years
b. Depreciation is the cost of fixed assets of usefulness.
periodically charged to revenue over b. Expense as incurred.
their expected useful lives.
c. Goodwill should not be amortized, but
10. 12 years
written down when impaired.
581
PRACTICE EXERCISES
PE 10–1A
PE 10–1B
PE 10–2A
PE 10–2B
PE 10–3A
PE 10–4A
a. 5% = [(1/40) × 2]
b. $32,500 ($650,000 × 5%)
PE 10–4B
a. 40% = [(1/5) × 2]
b. $58,000 ($145,000 × 40%)
PE 10–5A
PE 10–5B
c. Cash.................................................................................. 200,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment...................... 141,750
Equipment................................................................... 324,000
Gain on Sale of Equipment....................................... 17,750
PE 10–6B
c. Cash.................................................................................. 90,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment...................... 57,000
Loss on Sale of Equipment............................................ 13,000
Equipment................................................................... 160,000
PE 10–7A
PE 10–7B
PE 10–8A
PE 10–8B
Ex. 10–1
Ex. 10–2
a. Yes. All expenditures incurred for the purpose of making the land suitable for
its intended use should be debited to the land account.
Ex. 10–3
Ex. 10–4
Capital expenditures: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10
Revenue expenditures: 3, 7, 9
Ex. 10–5
Capital expenditures: 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9
Revenue expenditures: 1, 3, 5, 10
Ex. 10–6
Ex. 10–7
a. No. The $3,175,000 represents the original cost of the equipment. Its
replacement cost, which may be more or less than $3,175,000, is not reported
in the financial statements.
Ex. 10–8
(a) 50% (1/2), (b) 12.5% (1/8), (c) 10% (1/10), (d) 5% (1/20), (e) 4% (1/25), (f) 2.5%
(1/40), (g) 2% (1/50)
Ex. 10–9
Ex. 10–10
$145,000 $7,000
75,000 hours
= $1.84 depreciation per hour
Ex. 10–12
or or
Ex. 10–13
Ex. 10–15
Ex. 10–16
Ex. 10–19
Ex. 10–20
Current Preceding
Year Year
Land and buildings..................................................... $ 626 $ 361
Machinery, equipment, and internal-use software.. 595 470
Office furniture and equipment................................. 94 81
Other fixed assets related to leases......................... 760 569
$2,075 $1,481
Less accumulated depreciation................................ 794 664
Book value................................................................... $1,281 $ 817
A comparison of the book values of the current and preceding years
indicates that they increased. A comparison of the total cost and
accumulated depreciation reveals that Apple purchased $594 million ($2,075
– $1,481) of additional fixed assets, which was offset by the additional
depreciation expense of $130 million ($794 – $664) taken during the current
year.
b. The book value of fixed assets should normally increase during the year.
Although additional depreciation expense will reduce the book value, most
companies invest in new assets in an amount that is at least equal to the
depreciation expense. However, during periods of economic downturn,
companies purchase fewer fixed assets, and the book value of their fixed
assets may decline.
Ex. 10–22
1. Fixed assets should be reported at cost and not replacement cost.
3. Patents and goodwill are intangible assets that should be listed in a separate
section following the Fixed Assets section. Patents should be reported at
their net book values (cost less amortization to date). Goodwill should not be
amortized, but should be only written down upon impairment.
Appendix 1 Ex. 10–23
N(N + 1) 20(20 + 1)
Sum of Years of Useful Life = = = 210
2 2
a.
Price (fair market value) of new equipment....................................... $300,000
Trade-in allowance of old equipment................................................. 120,000
Cash paid on the date of exchange.................................................... $180,000
b.
Price (fair market value) of new equipment..................... $300,000
Less assets given up in exchange:
Book value of old equipment...................................... $115,500
Cash paid on the exchange........................................ 180,000 295,500
Gain on exchange of equipment....................................... $ 4,500
Appendix 2 Ex. 10–27
a.
Price (fair market value) of new equipment....................................... $300,000
Trade-in allowance of old equipment................................................. 120,000
Cash paid on the date of exchange.................................................... $180,000
b.
Price (fair market value) of new equipment........................ $300,000
Less assets given up in exchange:
Book value of old equipment........................................ $127,750
Cash paid on the exchange........................................... 180,000 307,750
Loss on exchange of equipment.......................................... $ 7,750
$93,469
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio =
($85,294 + $82,356)/2
b. Verizon earns $1.12 revenue for every dollar of fixed assets. This is a low
fixed asset turnover ratio, reflecting the high fixed asset intensity in a
telecommunications company. The industry average fixed turnover ratio is
slightly lower at 1.10. Thus, Verizon is using its fixed assets slightly more
efficiently than the industry as a whole.
Ex. 10–31
Prob. 10–1A
1.
Land Other
Item Land Improvements Building Accounts
a. $ 4,000
b. 400,000
c. 2,500
d. 31,750
e. $ 36,000
f. 10,000
g. (3,000)*
h. 15,200
i. 5,400
j. $(600,000)*
k. 9,000
l. 3,000
m. 1,800
n. $ 12,000
o. 14,500
p. 33,000
q. (4,500)*
r. 700,000
s. (450)*
2. $469,450 $ 26,500 $773,950
*Receipt
3. Since land used as a plant site does not lose its ability to provide services, it
is not depreciated. However, land improvements do lose their ability to
provide services as time passes and are therefore depreciated.
Prob. 10–2A
Depreciation Expense
a. Straight- b. Units-of- c. Double-
Line Production Declining-Balance
Year Method Method Method
2009 $ 86,000 $129,000 $190,000
2010 86,000 107,500 95,000
2011 86,000 60,200 47,500
2012 86,000 47,300 11,500*
Total $344,000 $344,000 $344,000
Calculations:
Straight-line method:
($380,000 – $36,000)/4 = $86,000 each year
Units-of-production method:
($380,000 – $36,000)/8,000 hours = $43 per hour
2009: 3,000 hours @ $43 = $129,000
2010: 2,500 hours @ $43 = $107,500
2011: 1,400 hours @ $43 = $60,200
2012: 1,100 hours @ $43 = $47,300
Double-declining-balance method:
2009: $380,000 × 50% = $190,000
2010: ($380,000 – $190,000) × 50% = $95,000
2011: ($380,000 – $190,000 – $95,000) × 50% = $47,500
2012: ($380,000 – $190,000 – $95,000 – $47,500 – $36,000*) = $11,500
*Book value should not be reduced below the residual value of $36,000.
Prob. 10–3A
a. Straight-line method:
2008: [($48,600 – $3,000)/3] × 1/2................................................ $ 7,600
2009: ($48,600 – $3,000)/3............................................................ 15,200
2010: ($48,600 – $3,000)/3............................................................ 15,200
2011: [($48,600 – $3,000)/3] × 1/2................................................ 7,600
b. Units-of-production method:
2008: 1,800 hours @ $6.08*.......................................................... $10,944
2009: 2,600 hours @ $6.08........................................................... 15,808
2010: 2,000 hours @ $6.08........................................................... 12,160
2011: 1,100 hours @ $6.08........................................................... 6,688
*($48,600 – $3,000)/7,500 hours = $6.08 per hour
c. Double-declining-balance method:
2008: $48,600 × 2/3 × 1/2.............................................................. $16,200
2009: ($48,600 – $16,200) × 2/3.................................................... 21,600
2010: ($48,600 – $16,200 – $21,600) × 2/3................................... 7,200
2011: ($48,600 – $16,200 – $21,600 – $7,200 – $3,000*)............ 600
*Book value should not be reduced below $3,000, the residual value.
Prob. 10–4A
1.
Accumulated
Depreciation Depreciation, Book Value,
Year Expense End of Year End of Year
a. 1 $33,300* $ 33,300 $110,700
2 33,300 66,600 77,400
3 33,300 99,900 44,100
4 33,300 133,200 10,800
*[($144,000 – $10,800)/4]
b. 1 $72,000 [$144,000 × (1/4) × 2] $ 72,000 $72,000
2 36,000 [$72,000 × (1/4) × 2] 108,000 36,000
3 18,000 [$36,000 × (1/4) × 2] 126,000 18,000
4 7,200 [$144,000 – $126,000 – $10,800] 133,200 10,800
2. Cash.................................................................................. 19,750
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment...................... 126,000
Equipment................................................................... 144,000
Gain on Sale of Equipment....................................... 1,750*
*($19,750 – $18,000)
3. Cash.................................................................................. 14,900
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment...................... 126,000
Loss on Sale of Equipment............................................ 3,100*
Equipment................................................................... 144,000
*($18,000 – $14,900)
Prob. 10–5A
2008
Jan. 7 Delivery Equipment....................................................... 45,600
Cash........................................................................... 45,600
2009
Jan. 8 Delivery Equipment....................................................... 75,000
Cash........................................................................... 75,000
1.
Land Other
Item Land Improvements Building Accounts
a. $ 1,500
b. 300,000
c. 20,000
d. 5,000
e. (3,600)*
f. 15,800
g. $ 4,200
h. 17,500
i. 18,000
j. $(750,000)*
k. 4,500
l. $15,000
m. 9,000
n. 1,100
o. 1,500
p. (6,000)*
q. 800,000
r. 45,000
s. (350)*
2. $356,200 $ 25,100 $866,850
*Receipt
3. Since land used as a plant site does not lose its ability to provide services, it
is not depreciated. However, land improvements do lose their ability to
provide services as time passes and are therefore depreciated.
Prob. 10–2B
Depreciation Expense
a. Straight- b. Units-of- c. Double-
Line Production Declining-Balance
Year Method Method Method
2008 $ 21,000 $ 30,240 $ 45,000
2009 21,000 22,680 15,000
2010 21,000 10,080 3,000
Total $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000
Calculations:
Straight-line method:
($67,500 – $4,500)/3 = $21,000 each year
Units-of-production method:
($67,500 – $4,500)/25,000 hours = $2.52 per hour
2008: 12,000 hours @ $2.52 = $30,240
2009: 9,000 hours @ $2.52 = $22,680
2010: 4,000 hours @ $2.52 = $10,080
Double-declining-balance method:
2008: $67,500 × 2/3 = $45,000
2009: ($67,500 – $45,000) × 2/3 = $15,000
2010: ($67,500 – $45,000 – $15,000 – $4,500*) = $3,000
*Book value should not be reduced below the residual value of $4,500.
Prob. 10–3B
a. Straight-line method:
2008: [($15,660 – $600)/3] × 1/2.................................................. $2,510
2009: ($15,660 – $600)/3............................................................. 5,020
2010: ($15,660 – $600)/3............................................................. 5,020
2011: [($15,660 – $600)/3] × 1/2.................................................. 2,510
b. Units-of-production method:
2008: 3,750 hours @ $0.80*........................................................ $3,000
2009: 7,500 hours @ $0.80......................................................... 6,000
2010: 5,000 hours @ $0.80......................................................... 4,000
2011: 2,575 hours @ $0.80......................................................... 2,060
c. Double-declining-balance method:
2008: $15,660 × 2/3 × 1/2............................................................. $5,220
2009: ($15,660 – $5,220) × 2/3.................................................... 6,960
2010: ($15,660 – $5,220 – $6,960) × 2/3..................................... 2,320
2011: ($15,660 – $5,220 – $6,960 – $2,320 – $600*)................. 560
*Book value should not be reduced below $600, the residual value.
Prob. 10–4B
1.
Accumulated
Depreciation Depreciation, Book Value,
Year Expense End of Year End of Year
a. 1 $24,000* $ 24,000 $107,250
2 24,000 48,000 83,250
3 24,000 72,000 59,250
4 24,000 96,000 35,250
5 24,000 120,000 11,250
*[($131,250 – $11,250)/5]
b. 1 $52,500 [$131,250 × (1/5) × 2] $ 52,500 $78,750
2 31,500 [$78,750 × (1/5) × 2] 84,000 47,250
3 18,900 [$47,250 × (1/5) × 2] 102,900 28,350
4 11,340 [$28,350 × (1/5) × 2] 114,240 17,010
5 5,760 [$131,250 – $114,240 – $11,250] 120,000 11,250
2. Cash.................................................................................. 21,500
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment...................... 114,240
Equipment................................................................... 131,250
Gain on Sale of Equipment....................................... 4,490*
*($21,500 – $17,010)
3. Cash.................................................................................. 12,500
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment...................... 114,240
Loss on Sale of Equipment............................................ 4,510*
Equipment................................................................... 131,250
*($17,010 – $12,500)
Prob. 10–5B
2008
Jan. 6 Delivery Equipment....................................................... 24,000
Cash........................................................................... 24,000
2009
Jan. 2 Delivery Equipment....................................................... 69,000
Cash........................................................................... 69,000
Prob. 10–6B
Activity 10–1
Activity 10–2
You should explain to Faye and Pat that it is acceptable to maintain two sets of
records for tax and financial reporting purposes. This can happen when a
company uses one method for financial statement purposes, such as straight-
line depreciation, and another method for tax purposes, such as MACRS
depreciation. This should not be surprising, since the methods for taxes and
financial statements are established by two different groups with different
objectives. That is, tax laws and related accounting methods are established by
Congress. The
Internal Revenue Service then applies the laws and, in some cases, issues
interpretations of the law and congressional intent. The primary objective of the
tax laws is to generate revenue in an equitable manner for government use.
Generally accepted accounting principles, on the other hand, are established
primarily by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The objective of
generally accepted accounting principles is the preparation and reporting of true
economic conditions and results of operations of business entities.
You might note, however, that companies are required in their tax returns to
reconcile differences in accounting methods. For example, income reported on
the company’s financial statements must be reconciled with taxable income.
Finally, you might also indicate to Faye and Pat that even generally accepted
accounting principles allow for alternative methods of accounting for the same
transactions or economic events. For example, a company could use straight-
line depreciation for some assets and double-declining-balance depreciation for
other assets.
Activity 10–3
1. a. Straight-line method:
2008: ($200,000/5) × 1/2........................................................................ $20,000
2009: ($200,000/5)................................................................................. 40,000
2010: ($200,000/5)................................................................................. 40,000
2011: ($200,000/5)................................................................................. 40,000
2012: ($200,000/5)................................................................................. 40,000
2013: ($200,000/5) × 1/2........................................................................ 20,000
b. MACRS:
2008: ($200,000 × 20%)......................................................................... $40,000
2009: ($200,000 × 32%)......................................................................... 64,000
2010: ($200,000 × 19.2%)...................................................................... 38,400
2011: ($200,000 × 11.5%)...................................................................... 23,000
2012: ($200,000 × 11.5%)...................................................................... 23,000
2013: ($200,000 × 5.8%)........................................................................ 11,600
Activity 10–3 Continued
2.
b. MACRS Year
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Income before depreciation.......... $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
Depreciation expense.................... 40,000 64,000 38,400 23,000 23,000 11,600
Income before income tax............. $460,000 $436,000 $461,600 $477,000 $477,000 $488,400
Income tax....................................... 184,000 174,400 184,640 190,800 190,800 195,360
Net income...................................... $276,000 $261,600 $276,960 $286,200 $286,200 $293,040
Activity 10–3 Concluded
3. For financial reporting purposes, Mike should select the method that
provides the net income figure that best represents the results of operations.
(Note to Instructors: The concept of matching revenues and expenses is
discussed in Chapter 3.) However, for income tax purposes, Mike should
consider selecting the method that will minimize taxes. Based on the
analyses in (2), both methods of depreciation will yield the same total
amount of taxes over the useful life of the equipment. MACRS results in
fewer taxes paid in the early years of useful life and more in the later years.
For example, in 2008 the
income tax expense using MACRS is $184,000, which is $8,000 ($192,000 –
$184,000) less than the income tax expense using the straight-line
depreciation of $192,000. Lonesome Dove Construction Co. can invest such
differences in the early years and earn income.
Activity 10–4
Note to Instructors: The purpose of this activity is to familiarize students with the
differences in cost and other factors in leasing and buying a business vehicle.
Activity 10–5
Note to Instructors: The purpose of this activity is to familiarize students with the
procedures involved in acquiring a patent, a copyright, and a trademark.
Activity 10–6
Revenue
a. Fixed Asset Turnover = Average Book Value of Fixed Assets
$348,650
Wal-Mart: $83,865 = 4.16
$30,379
Alcoa Inc.: $14,495 = 2.10
$24,966
Comcast Corporation: $20,009 = 1.25
b. The fixed asset turnover measures the amount of revenue earned per dollar
of fixed assets. Wal-Mart earns $4.16 of revenue for every dollar of fixed
assets, while Alcoa only earns $2.10 and Comcast Corporation only earns
$1.25 in revenue for every dollar of fixed assets. This says that Alcoa and
Comcast require more fixed assets to operate their businesses than does
Wal-Mart, for a given level of revenue volume. Does this mean that Wal-Mart
is a better company? Not necessarily. Revenue is not the same as earnings.
More likely, Wal-Mart has a smaller profit margin than do Alcoa and Comcast.
Although not required by the exercise, the income from operations before tax
as a percent of sales (operating margin) for the three companies is: Comcast,
14.3%, Alcoa, 9.9%, and Wal-Mart, 5.3%. Thus, the difference between the
fixed asset turnovers seems reasonable. Generally, companies with very low
fixed asset turnovers, such as aluminum making and cable communications,
must be compensated with higher operating margins.
Note to Instructors: You may wish to consider the impact of different fixed
asset turnover ratios across industries and the implications of these
differences. This is a conceptual question designed to have students think
about how competitive markets would likely reward the low fixed asset
turnover companies for embracing high fixed asset commitments.