Professional Documents
Culture Documents
It's The Activity, Stupid: A Tragic Story of Training
It's The Activity, Stupid: A Tragic Story of Training
It's The Activity, Stupid: A Tragic Story of Training
Many trainers fall into the content trap and waste their time and resources. More
importantly, content-based training is proven to be ineffective.
Trainers are often pushed into the content trap by their clients, subject-matter experts, and
instructional designers. These people aid and abet each other in the belief that the key to
training effectiveness lies in analyzing, organizing, and presenting content to participants
so they understand and recall everything. Eventually, participants also fall into the
content trap and everyone believes there is a direct correlation between how much you
know and how well you perform on the job. They also believe that there is one – and only
one -- specific set of content that will guarantee perfect performance.
1
Does this mean that we should dump all content presentation and trust participants to
learn from activities alone? No, what I am suggesting is to provide participants with
content that is integrated with training activities. This is how we present content in an
appropriate context:
• We provide the minimal amount of need-to-know content before the training
activity as a part of briefing.
• We provide just-in-time content through coaching, job aids, and performance
support during the training activity.
• We facilitate sharing of additional insights, best practices, and adjustments
through debriefing and follow-up after the training activity.
2
games. In textra games, participants read the assigned piece and play a game that
uses peer pressure and support to encourage recall and transfer of what they read.
If the content is available in the form of job aids, use application games. These
activities involve groups of participants to use the job aid for solving authentic
problems. The size of the group is gradually reduced until individual participants
are able to perform independently with the use of the job aid.
If the content is available as video or audio recording, use double exposure
activities which enhance the training value of recorded content. In a
typical double exposure activity, participants watch a videotape and
then play one or more games that help review and apply the new
concepts and skills.
If the content is primarily available in the form of disorganized bits of
information, don’t waste your time organizing them in a way that makes sense to
you. Instead, use item processing activities in which individuals and teams
generate, organize, and sequence ideas, facts, questions, complaints, or
suggestions. This type of activity enables participants to construct meaningful
categories and sequences from isolated items.
If bits and piece of the content is probably available among participants
(based on their existing experience and expertise) use structured sharing
activities which facilitate mutual learning and teaching among participants.
Typical structured sharing activities create a context for a dialogue among
participants based on their experiences, knowledge, and opinions.
If the content exists only inside the cranium of a subject-matter expert, use
interactive lectures. These training approaches involve participants in the learning
process while providing complete control to the training. Interactive lectures
enable quick and easy conversion of a passive presentations into interactive
experiences. Different types of interactive lectures incorporate built-in quizzes,
interspersed tasks, teamwork interludes, and participant control of the
presentation.
If the content is available online, use Bernie Dodge’s WebQuest approach. In
this special type of inquiry learning, participants collect information from the
Web. WebQuests focus on using the content rather than merely retrieving it. A
typical WebQuest requires participants to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate the
content.
The simple idea behind all of these training activities is that participants learn, recall, and
apply the content better, if they interact with it.
An Acronym
People learn more effectively by actively participating in activities than by passively
absorbing the content. Yet, most trainers equate telling and training. My friend Andy
Kimble refers to the typical behavior of trainers as providing “mindless explanations”. He
claims that training activities provide genuine alternatives to mindless explanations.
3
Genuine Alternatives to Mindless Explanations? Hmm…I wonder what would happen if
I take the initial letters of the key words in this phrase and create an acronym.
Useful Books
Finkel, Donald L. (2000). Teaching with Your Mouth Shut. Portsmouth, NH:
Boynton/Cook Publishers. (ISBN: 0-86709-469-9)
Nitsche, Pearl: Talk less. Teach more!: Nonverbal Classroom Management. Group
Strategies that Work. Charleston, SC: Create Space. (ISBN: 978-1453683637)
Stolovitch, Harold. Telling Ain’t Training. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press. (ISBN: 978-1-
56286-328-9)