# MODERATOR

Good morning ladies and gentlements. Today we will have a debate between
team A as the affirmative team and team B as the opposite team. Beside that, let me
introduce you to our time keeper “Anjar Satriya Nugraha” and I’m “Riyana Vini
Alvionita” as your moderator.

Ladies and gentlemen , before we start our debate today, let me introduce you
to the each team. On my left side, the affirmative team they have Niken Rumani
(stand up) as the first speaker, Aninda Kusumaningtyas (stand up) as the second
speaker and the last one is Sri Muthia Sari (stand up) as the third speaker.

On my right side , the opposite team they have Afriliyani Nur Azizah (stand
up) as the first speaker, Alifianna (stand up) and the last one is Dhimas Jalu Prakoso
(stand up) as the third speaker.

Okay ladies and gentlement , I’d like to show you about today’s motion.
Today we have “Should The Children Allowed to Playing Game Online” as today’s
motion. So, ladies and gentlemen let’s start our debate. So each team has finished up
their building and now they are ready to debate. So I’ll call the first speaker from the
affirmative team to deliver the opinions.

For the first speaker of the affirmative team, time is yours !

# THE 1st OF THE AFFIRMATIVE TEAM

Thank you so much for the time that given to me. I’m Niken Rumani as the
first speaker from the affirmative team. First of all, I would like to introduce my
team’s split. For today’s motion. I’m as the first speaker from the affirmative team
would like to give the definition and give arguments from knowledge perspective.
Aninda Kusumaningtyas as the 2nd speaker will deliver opinions from healthy
perspective, and Sri Muthiasari as the 3 rd speaker give rebuttal and strengthening the
team’s arguments.

I’m Niken Rumani from the affirmative team. I completely agree with the
motion that children should playing video games. Before I deliver my arguments. I’ll
be deliver the definition of playing video game.

Playing video game is a game that played with internet connection. This game
usually played in internet cafe.

Ladies and gentlements, beside that I’ll deliver some arguments about the
motion from knowledge perspective. My argument is :

1. Game online will indirectly teach children to understand the development of

upcoming technology.
2. Understanding economy. Many games teach children the values of economy.
For example : the game of shopping, arranging restaurant and etc. So when
they grow to be adult, they can solve the problem about economy.

1
 3. And the last one is the use of English language. One of the most popular
games on children is konsol. It is made by foreign company. Automatically
this game uses English language. When playing the game, children will find
many new english vocabularies.

I think thats all my arguments. And I completely agree with the motion that
the children should be allowed to playing video game. I’m Niken Rumani back to the
house

# MODERATOR

Well thanks for the first speaker of the affirmative team. Next I’ll call the first
speaker of the opposite team to deliver the opinion. Time is yours !

# THE 1st OF THE OPPOSITE TEAM

Thank you so much for the time that given to me. I’m Afrilyani Nur Azizah as
the first speaker from the opposite team. First of all, I would like to introduce my
team’s split. For today’s motion. I’m as the first speaker from the opposite team
would like to give my opinion about the motion. Alifianna as the 2 nd speaker will
deliver opinion from healthy perspective. And Dimas Jalu as the 3 rd speaker give
conclution of the team’s arguments.

I’m Afrilyani Nur Azizah from opposite team. I want to give my opinion
about the motion. I personally think that the children should not to be allowed to
playing game online. That’s right today’s technology gives many benefit for children.
But they are too young to use it. And beside that the children who is addicted to the
game will spend most of their time in home. They will isolate their selves from
society. They hardly play with friends because they have their own game. They also
look like have another world.

Maybe they can speak in English much better, but the game can change them
to be a lazy person. Beside that, they become lazy to doing their homework.

So, ladies and gentlements based on my opinion that I have been delivered. I
still stand up on my opinion that I disagree with the motion that said the children
should be allowed ` playing game online.

I’m Afrilyani Nur Azizah back to the house.

# MODERATOR

Well that’s the first arguments from the opposite team. What do you think
about the motion ? To the second of affirmative team , time is yours !

2
 # THE 2nd SPEAKER OF THE AFFIRMATIVE TEAM

Okay thank’s for the time that given to me. I’m Aninda Kusumaningtyas as
the second speaker from the affirmative team. I want to give my rebuttal for the first
argument of negative team. She said that the children being isolated, but I think with
playing game online they can get many friends from it. Because playing game online
not only at home but also at internet café with friends.

Playing game online could decrease our stress, beside that playing game
online also good for our brain.

When playing the game, the children are forced to win the game is helping the
children to use their logic in analizing and problem solving. So, they can learn to
solve their problem in the real life.

Game online can also stimulating the brain. The players of the game can
create their own game according to their want. This will help to stimulate the brain
and thinking process in creating the long scenario it is the part of their creativity.

That’s my opinion. For my reason above, I absolutely agree with the motion.
I’m Aninda Kusumaningtyas back to the house.

# MODERATOR

Well thanks for the second speaker of the affirmative team , next I’ll call the
second speaker from opposite team to give the rebuttal for the second arguments of
affirmative team. Time is yours !

# THE 2nd OF THE OPPOSITE TEAM

Thanks for the time that has given to me. I’m Alifianna as the second speaker
from opposite team. I want to give my rebuttal for the second opinion of affirmative
team.

She said that playing game online can stimulating the brain. But I disagree
about the opinion. I think that playing game online is not good for the health. Maybe
with playing game online can exercize the logic, but if the children have already
addicted to the game, it’s not good for their health. Usually the children who as
addicted to the game just have short duration of sleeping.

Children like to spend most of their time in school. However they also want to
play game online. Thus, they will use their time of sleeping to play the game. If it
runs for long time, it will disturb children’s health.

Beside that, the children are also being untidy. When someone is addicted in
playing game, she or he will ignore her surronding, including her clearness. She
rarely takes a bath. So, it will create agne and tootache.

3
 I think that’s all my opinion. Based on my rebuttal, I still stand up on my
opinion that I disagree with the motion. I’m Alifianna back to the house.

# MODERATOR

Thanks for the second speaker of the opposite team , that’s a good opinion.
Okay ladies and gentlemen, next I’ll call the third speaker of affirmative team to
deliver the conclution. Time is yours !

# THE 3rd SPEAKER OF THE AFFIRMATIVE TEAM

Thanks for the time that given to me. I’m Sri Muthia Sari as the third speaker
from affirmative team, here I want to deliver the conclution of our opinion.

In conclution, they who spend their time to play game online have a better
social responsibility, for example : leadership and decision making.

From the knowledge perspective the game can teach the children to
understand the development of upcoming technology.

The game also make the children understanding economy and teach them to
learn in English language.

And from the health perspective, game online can exercizing the logic and
stimulating the brain.

Game online also could decrease our stress.

That’s the conclution of our team. So, ladies and gentlement based on the
definition, limitation and opinion of our team, we are still stand up on our opinion
that we are agree with the motion that said allowed the children to playing game
online.

I’m Sri Muthia Sari back to the house.

# MODERATOR

Well that’s the conclution of the affirmative team. Next I’ll call the third
speaker of the opposite team to deliver the conclution. Time is yours !

# THE 3rd SPEAKER OF THE OPPOSITE TEAM

Thanks for the time that given to me, I’m Dhimas Jalu Prakoso as the last
speaker from opposite team, I want to deliver the conclusion of our team’s opinion.

4
 In the conclusion, in this case, games have so many negative impacts for
children. We can see from the explanation above that games will influence the
children’s health, social, psychology, and the last is achievement.

From the health side, the children who like playing game will get sleepless,
having no appetites, and games also can make the eye witness because their eyes are
too much watch on the monitor.

Second, from social side, the children who are addicted in games prefer to
lock himself in his room and just playing game without paying attention about how
much time they will play it than go outside with his or her friend and do the other
activities with them.

The third is about psychology impact. Games can make children stress and got
aggressive behavior because sometimes when they lose from the other gamer, they
will show his or her anger by saying junk words (swearing) and if this situation
happens continuously, they will get stress or depress.

The last is from the achievement side. Children automatically wasting their
time just to play the game and they usually forget about their study so their
achievement in the class will be decreased.

All of the impacts will create bad habit if the children do not change their
mindset if game is bad for their life. Parents need to control the children’s activity
when they are like playing games by giving time limit when they play it or by making
a schedule when the children can play games and when they must to study. Indirectly,
the children must obey the rules that given by parent and they’re not wasting time just
to play games all day long.

So, based on the definition and opinion above we are not agree with the
motion that allowed the children to play game online. Okay ladies and gentlemen ,
I’m Dhimas Jalu Prakoso back to the house.

# MODERATOR

Well that’s the conclution of opposite team. Now Anjar Satriya Nugraha as
the time keeper will deliver the conclution of debate today. Okay Anjar time is
yours !

# TIME KEEPER

Thanks for the time that given to me. Okay ladies and gentlements here I’m
Anjar Satria Nugraha as the time kepper will deliver the conclution of debate today.

In conclution the childrens who spend their time to play game online have a
social responbility, for example: leadership and decision making.

However the childrens who can not manage their time will get bad effects of
the game for example: they will be a lazy person, and have short time to sleeping.

5
 I think that’s conclution of debate today. So ladies and gentlement, play game
online have positive and negative impact depends on how we react it. I’m Anjar
Satria Nugraha back to moderator.

# MODERATOR

Well thanks for the conclusion from our time keeper. So, ladies and
gentlements , I think that’s all our debate today. Thanks for your attention and see
you.