This form is to be accomplished by the School LAC leader (MT, HT, or Senior Teacher).

Read this guide before using LDM Forms 3.1AP and 3.1BP.

1. Download this editable form by opening the file and clicking on the down arrow icon. Do not open it as Google Sh

2. Open Form 3.1BP Summary of Ratings of School Heads and enter the required data in the yellow cell. Data

3. Open Form 3.1AP School Head N / 3.1AP SH N, and enter the remaining required data in the Participant's Pr

4. Open/Get your copy of the LDM2 practicum portfolio submitted by school heads. Rate it according to the evalu
Management Team, if necessary.
5a. Input the score for each criterion by clicking the down arrow icon in the yellow cell. You may also directly ent
to white once a value has been assigned. You may add qualitative feedback in the Remarks section to substantiate

5b. To change the score, click on Delete or Backspace, then do 5a again.

6. You may navigate across the different tabs by clicking the Summary of Ratings and Guide icons or the Schoo

8.
7. Once all ratings are in, rename and save this form, then submit it to the SDO LDM Program Management Team. Coordinate
Enter the required data in the yellow cell ONLY. Do not rename the tabs.
Follow this file name format: SDO Name_LDMForm3P_Instructional Coach_Last Name
This document is confidential. NO ENTRY in the LDM1P evaluation forms can be divulged with any
authorities for purposes of evaluation, validation and certification of participation/completion.
 ←Guide

Form 3BP_LDM Practicum Portfolio - Summary of LDM2 Ratings of School LAC Leaders
LDM Coach MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Division MABALACAT CITY
Region III
Contact Details

PART II LDM Implementation/ Practicum Portfolio

SH Name Numerical Rating Descriptive Rating PD Credit
'3.1A LL 1'!A1 NIDA P.SOTO 4.00 Very Satisfactory UnitsPD
Earned
'3.1A LL 2'!A1 0 0.00 N/A credit units will
'3.1A LL 3'!A1 0 0.00 N/A be subjected to
'3.1A LL 4'!A1 0 0.00 N/A the PD credit
'3.1A LL 5'!A1 0 0.00 N/A units banking
mechanism of
'3.1A LL 6'!A1 0 0.00 N/A
DepEd NEAP
'3.1A LL 7'!A1 0 0.00 N/A as stated in DO
'3.1A LL 8'!A1 0 0.00 N/A 20, s.2020.
'3.1A LL 9'!A1 0 0.00 N/A
'3.1A LL 10'!A1 0 0.00 N/A
'3.1A LL 11'!A1 0 0.00 N/A
'3.1A LL 12'!A1 0 0.00 N/A
'3.1A LL 13'!A1 0 0.00 N/A
'3.1A LL 14'!A1 0 0.00 N/A
'3.1A LL 15'!A1 0 0.00 N/A
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Rep
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: NIDA P.SOTO Division:
School: MADAPDAP RESETTLEMENT ELEMENTAR Region:
Email Address: nida.soto@deped.gov.ph LDM Coach:
Contact Number: 09089432474

PART II - LDM IMPLE

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection
of LDM Implementation
30% 25%
Partial Rating
4 4
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching,
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 1.200 1.000
development goals

Final Rating (FR) 4.000

Description of FR Very Satisfactory

Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
- Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
MABALACAT CITY Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
III Part I Rating Description:
MAYLON D. MANALOTO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
Part II Rating Description:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%

4 4
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4 The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors
indicators of relevant strands in language
structure with very minimal errors
The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing
indicators of relevant strands in conventions
with incoherence in some areas
The outputs clearly demonstrate conventions
The
professional standards and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or
the 2 indicators of relevant very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions
The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure
standards and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are
almost everywhere in the output

0.800 0.600
ders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PD Credit Units
5.000 to be determined
Oustanding
4.000 to be determined
Very Satisfactory

Organization of Portfolio Timeliness

5% 5%

4 4
The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
organized. days before the deadline
The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
logical order more than 3 days after the
deadline

0.200 0.200
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

←Summary of Ratings
Form 3.1AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School
←Guide

PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: Division: MABALACAT CITY
School: Region: III
Email Address: LDM Coach: MAYLON D. MANALOTO
Contact Number:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Progress Quality of Reflection Demonstration of
of LDM Implementation Professional Standards
30% 25% 20%
Partial Rating

5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and Reflection describes the The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
adequately captured the progress experience in the provision of or more indicators of relevant
4 - Very Satisfactory The
of theoutputs adequately
provision captured
of technical Reflection describes the
technical assistance/coaching, The outputs
strands clearly demonstrate
in professional standards4
the progress
assistance onof the provision
instruction of
in extent
the experience
shows in-depth in the provision
analysis andof indicators of relevant strands in
3 - Satisfactory The outputs
technical reflect
assistance toon
a big
instruction Reflection
technical describes
assistance, the
shows some The outputs clearly
professional demonstrate 3
standards
modalities
the provided
progress of the to teachers
provision synthesis, and excellently relates
2 - Marginal in
Thethe
and, modalities
outputs
showing reflectprovided
toon to of
a limited
innovations that
experience
analysis,
Reflection
in relates
and the
describes
it to the professional
provision
it
theto the
standards
of indicators of relevant strands in
The outputs clearly demonstrate
technical
teachers assistance instruction technical
professional assistance
standards and relates
and to professional standards
extent
in the progress
contribute to do
theoutputs effective
modalities of facilitation
the to
provided experience in the provision
and totoprofessional
them the and
professional of
personal the 2 indicators of relevant
1 - Unsatisfactory The
provision not
of technical show the
assistance Reflection
professional
technical describes
and
assistance experience
personal
with limited in The outputs
strands do not demonstrate
in professional standards
of learning
teachers.
progress of provision of technical development
standards
the provision goals
andof personal
technical any indicator in the professional
on instruction in the modalities development
attempt goals
to relate it to the
assistance development goals
provided to on instruction in the
teachers. assistance
professionalwith no attempt
standards and to standards
modalities provided to teachers. relate it to the professional
personal development goals
standards and personal
Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000
development goals 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE PD Credit Units

Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs) to be determined
Part I Rating Description: N/A
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000 to be determined
Part II Rating Description: N/A

CTICUM PORTFOLIO
Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio Timeliness
Presentation of the Output
15% 5% 5%

The ideas are expressed in clear, The portfolio is logically The output/s is/are submitted
coherent, and appropriately- organized, is insightful, and offers more than 3 days ahead of the
The
wordedideas are expressed
language with no in clearin
errors The
new portfolio is logically
perspective and insights The output/s is/are submitted 1-2
deadline
language
structure with very minimal errors organized. days before the deadline
The
in ideasand/or
structure are writing well but
expressed
and/or writing The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on
conventions
with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
conventions
The
and few errors in structureusing
ideas are expressed and/or The portfolio
placed in the has 3-4organization
overall items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
very
writingbasic words and structure
conventions well placed in the overall days after the deadline
The ideas are jumbled and
with incoherence in many areas difficult The portfolio does not follow a
organization The output/s is/are submitted
to understand; errors in structure
and several errors in structure logical order more than 3 days after the
and writing
and/or conventions
writing conventions are deadline
almost everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000