The traditional waste management perspective focuses on short-term tactical issues such as

assurance compliance, risk management, and health and environmental protection.

Cervantes D.E, Martinez A., Hernandez M., and Cortazar A. 2018 changed traditional trash
management into a new value creation model that may boost productivity, improve
relationships, encourage eco-innovations, and enable long-term growth. However, the focus of
practical waste management is on three critical goals: waste quantification, waste
characterization, and strategies or procedures for waste management. The three types of waste
management practices are as follows:
Waste minimization methods, for example, are part of preventative practices.
Waste separation, recycling, proper landfilling, incineration, and other end-of-pipe methods are
examples of end-of-pipe strategies.
Environmental restoration techniques focused on correcting leaks and ecological damage.
Cooper classified raising resident knowledge and enacting legislation as preventive strategies.
As a result, as part of the two pillars of the Triple Bottom Line, it is said to help achieve
environmental and societal well-being. On the other hand, end-of-pipe solutions cover waste
segregation approaches such as origin-separated collection or destination-separated collection.
Eco-innovations are the term used to describe these end-of-pipe methods. In the light of
economic boundaries, prevention methods are less expensive but have the highest efficacy
rate, whereas environmental restorations are the most expensive but have the lowest
effectiveness rate.