Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T.lit Analysis - fiction.examPLE
T.lit Analysis - fiction.examPLE
T.lit Analysis - fiction.examPLE
REMEMBER: On the below maps’ reading lists (i.e. maps for Compositions 1 to 4),
no text (i.e. fiction or critical source) should be repeated. To encourage wider reading,
an SF&F text may be employed only once!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis Composition Format Here Employed (i.e. Compression Essay vs. Analysis
Screenplay vs. Analysis Fiction): ANALYSIS FICTION
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Student-Philologists’ Full Name: Bob Thingum
Course Instructor’s Full Name: Steven K. McClain
Topics in Literature: Analysis Composition 1
Deadline Date of Submission: 14 August 1984
Anchor Question Here Employed: According to the definition of science fiction
proposed by Darko Suvin in Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and
History of a Literary Genre (1979), is Octavia E. Butler’s ‘Bloodchild’ (1984) a work
of science fiction?
Butler’s Bug-Eyed-Monsters:
Regarding ‘Bloodchild’ as a Work of Suvinian Science Fiction
Alien-Insect in a wood near Dog Tower. Towering over an autumn oak, the monsters
ejecting a purpled egg from bearded jaws with a metallic burp—added that Suvin
contended that an SF text would include a setting and/or a character very different from
the ‘times, places and characters’ (Suvin 1979: viii) of realist fictions which—being
Vomiting up copious gallons of brown seawater while squinting under the forest
sun (as Fish-Giants are want to do), Fish-Giant added that Butler’s ‘Bloodchild’, as a
science-fictional text in agreement with Suvin’s definition of SF, included: (1) a non-
mimetic setting, i.e. the extrasolar alien planet of Connecticanaan where ‘extraterrestrial
religious practices include the fanatical worship of large robotic dogs’ (Butler 2007:
37); and (2) non-mimetic characters, i.e. large robotic dogs, products of bio-mechanical
Alien-Insect, while picking a triangular larva from between skin folds of the
aforementioned ejected egg (as Alien-Insects are want to do), rocked the hatched
creature between jointed tentacles and, worried at the clarity of the Fish-Giant’s
examples, and intent on gaining the upper hand, stated that in accord with Suvin’s
terms, empirically validated, i.e. obedient to rules of reason at play in the world of the
author and/or reader. Alien-Insect clarified that the large robotic dogs of Butler’s
Connecticanaan, and the cyborg scientists that construct them are, in biomechanical
terms, possible in relation to the cognitive norms, i.e. the scientific rules of reason seen
in the ‘author’s epoch’ (Suvin 1979: viii), that is to say, the late twentieth century of
feared he was losing to the brainy extraterrestrial, Fish-Giant, following a stealthy flick
of fins, then ensnared Alien-Insect’s larval young. Tossing the hatchling into the forest
air, and catching the larva in his toothy mouth, Fish-Giant swallowed and—his appetite
Lovecraft’s ‘Dagon’ (1917), and R.L. Stine’s Ghost Camp (1996) included non-mimetic
(i.e. anti-realist) settings and characters which violate the rules of reason (i.e. cognitive
Not willing to surrender their larval young and fearful of losing a literary debate
removed the swallowed young from the belly of Fish-Giant who—with a howl, a burst
of blood and a frown—collapsed onto the forest floor and died. Seeing that concluding
the Butlerian analysis fell solely to them, Alien-Insect, addressing their purple hatchling
then in tentacles cradled, stated, in a cooing, paternal tone, that Shakespeare, Lovecraft
and Stine’s texts did not qualify as science-fictional in relation to the conceptual
to the King of Fairies who, in the play’s third act’s opening scene, happily demonstrates
his ability to swap the human head of weaver Nick Bottom with that of a donkey. Alien-
Insect, intent on their fanged child’s education, clarified that said magical
With a sad smile and a dismissive nod at the fallen corpse of Fish-Giant, Alien-
Insect then stated that, similar to the magical feats of impossible anti-science seen in
giant, a ‘whale-sized, bipedal specie’ (Lovecraft 2020: 52) impossible in relation to the
the author (i.e. Lovecraft) and the twenty-first century setting of the reader (i.e. Bob
Thingum).
Nostalgic for the best books of their unearthly childhood, Alien-Insect added
that Stine’s Ghost Camp included impossible (i.e. anti-scientific) persons as seen in the
Camp Moon Cheese. Said ghost camper hope, claimed Alien-Insect, to possess the body
of adolescent protagonist, Fenton Bright using ‘the dark magic of the dead’ (Stine 1996:
speech, Alien-Insect—their rescued young tucked safely under the joints of several
tentacles and slithering in the direction of their vast steam powered spacecraft—dragged
the body of Fish-Giant behind them with the slimy hand-like help of their prehensile
tail.
Works Cited
Butler, Octavia E. (2007) ‘Bloodchild’. In Bloodchild and Other Stories. New York:
Routledge, pp. 103-145.
Lovecraft, H. P. (1990) ‘Dagon’. The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. 20 August 2020.
https://www.hplovecraft.com/writings/texts/fiction/d.aspx
(Accessed 25 January 2021)
Stine, R. L. (1996) Ghost Camp. Milford: Complutense University Press.
Suvin, Darko. 1979. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of
a Literary Genre. New Haven: Yale University Press.