Professional Documents
Culture Documents
McKinsey Universities
McKinsey Universities
This report contains information that is confidential and proprietary to McKinsey & Company, Inc.
and is solely for the use of McKinsey & Company, Inc. personnel. No part of it may be used,
circulated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution outside McKinsey & Company, Inc. If you are not
the intended recipient of this report, you are hereby notified that the use, circulation, quoting, or
reproducing of this report is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The Challenge
1
Despite high spending increases in OECD, education outcomes have
stagnated
Belgium 65 -5
United Kingdom 77 -8
Japan 103 2
Germany 108 -5
Italy 126 1
France 212 -7
Australia 270 -2
* Real expenditure, corrected for the Baumol effect using a price index of government goods and service
** Math and Science
Source: UNESCO, EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005, Pritchett (2004), Woessmann (2002). McKinsey analysis 2
Similarly, the US has experienced stagnant outcomes despite rising spend
per student
Spend per student
Linear 70 ($ 2004)
Index
60
50
Student-to-
40 teacher ratio
10 Literacy (9 years)
0
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Source: National Centre for Education Statistics, NEAP, Hanushek (1998), McKinsey analysis 3
The skill impact of socio-economic differences is significant by as early as
age four
Children of ‘professional’ 45
parents
No significant effect
of reduced class sizes 89
Source: Hanushek The Evidence on Class Size, Akerhielm Does class size matter, McKinsey analysis 5
Popular reforms have not improved student outcomes: Autonomy
NAEP scores in reading for charter schools and public Charter school students
schools, Grade 4, 2003 Other public school students
240
190
180
All White Black Hispanic Eligible Not Central Non-
students eligible city central city
Race/ethnicity Eligibility for free/ Type of location
reduced-price
school lunch
Source: NAEP: America’s Charter Schools: Results from the NAEP 2003 Pilot Study; NAEP, A Closer Look at Charter
Schools using Hierarchical Linear Modelling (2006), McKinsey analysis 6
Popular reforms have not improved student outcomes: Spend
Finland 47 59,000
Sweden 12 68,000
Denmark -4 75,000
Norway -5 78,000
8
This is the theme of our recent publication: ‘How the world’s best-
performing school systems come out on top’
How to be top
What works in education:
the lessons according to
McKinsey
THE British government, says Sir Michael Barber, once an adviser to the
former prime minister, Tony Blair, has changed pretty much every
aspect of education policy in England and Wales, often more than once.
“The funding of schools, the governance of schools, curriculum
standards, assessment and testing, the role of local government, the
role of national government, the range and nature of national agencies,
schools admissions”—you name it, it's been changed and sometimes
changed back. The only thing that hasn't changed has been the
outcome. According to the National Foundation for Education Research,
there had been (until recently) no measurable improvement in the
standards of literacy and numeracy in primary schools for 50 years.
Source: McKinsey 9
We benchmarked 20 school systems, including ten of the world’s
top performers
• Alberta2 • Atlanta
• Australia • Boston
• Belgium • Chicago
• Finland • England
• Hong Kong • Jordan
• Japan • New York
• Netherlands • Ohio
• New Zealand The team also understood the
• Ontario2 reform direction rationale of five
• Singapore3 other school system that are
• South Korea currently launching improvement
programs
1. OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment, examination every three years of reading, math, and
science skills of 15-year olds. Liechtenstein and Macao also scored in the top ten in 2003 but were excluded for
technical reasons.
2. Canada scored 5th overall on PISA; Alberta and Ontario were included as representative provinces
3. Singapore did not participate in PISA; Singapore scored top in both science and mathematics in TIMSS 2003
4. Systems with high improvement rates according to the US National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) or
TIMSS scores. In addition, Boston and New York have been consistent finalists of the Broad Prize for Urban Education
Source: PISA, McKinsey 10
Lesson 1
Source: McKinsey 11
Teacher quality is the most important lever for improving student US EXAMPLE
outcomes
Student performance
100th percentile
r
t ea che 90th percentile
Two students with rming*
erf o
same performance gh-p
wi t h hi
t
St u den 53 percentile points
50th percentile
Student
with low
perform
in g** teac
her 37th percentile
0th percentile
Age 8 Age 11
*Among the top 20% of teachers; **Among the bottom 20% of teachers
Analysis of test data from Tennessee showed that teacher quality effected student performance more than any other variable; on average, two
students with average performance (50th percentile) would diverge by more than 50 percentile points over a three year period depending on the
teacher they were assigned
Source: Sanders & Rivers Cumulative and Residual Effects on Future Student Academic Achievement, McKinsey analysis 12
Great school systems attract great people into teaching
• Check skills
Assessment – Applicants must have a high level of literacy and Only 1 in 10
tests numeracy applicants is
accepted to
become a
• Check attitude, aptitude and personailty: teacher
– Conducted by a panel of experienced headmasters
Interviews – May include practical tests or activities
High school
or university
Teacher
(degree in a Teaching
training
subject other in a
program
than school
education)
Source: OECD Attracting Developing and retaining effective teachers; interviews, McKinsey 15
Top-performers paid good salaries, but not great salaries
Primary teacher salary as a % of GDP per capita
159
131
112 112
95 95
Source: McKinsey 18
Improving teacher quality can have substantial impact in a short
time frame (1/2)
There had been no improvement in literacy levels in English schools for 50 years. A strategic
approach to raising teacher quality lead to significant improvements in just 3 years.
Implementation of strategies to
improve teacher quality
% students 80
achieving target
literacy level 75
70
65
60
55
50
1948* 1997 1998 1999 2000
* Literacy levels prior to the introduction of national assessments were extrapolated from available data sources
Source: Department for Education and Skills (UK), Trends in Standards of Literacy and Numeracy in the United Kingdom 1948-1996, McKinsey
analysis 19
Improving teacher quality can have substantial impact in a short time
frame (2/2)
77
74
43
25
Enabling teachers to share best practice, learn from each others strengths
and weaknesses, and jointly develop and disseminate excellent practice
Source: McKinsey 22
Inspections and examinations enable schools to continuously track their
performance and improve
School School review/ System-wide School exit Not separated
System inspections* assessments** examinations**
Separate unit
Alberta within Ministry
External
Boston
organization
Chicago
England
Finland
Hong Kong
Korea
Netherlands
New York
New Zealand
Singapore
* Formal school reviews conducted by a person to whom the school is not directly accountable
** Assessments of students during the first 10 grades; School Exit examinations refers to leaving qualifications
Source: Interviews, McKinsey analysis 23
Finland’s Special Education identifies students in need and provides them
with intensive support
Source: McKinsey 25
Top-performers recruit and train excellent school leaders: Singapore
“We train our teachers and vice-principals to apply best practices; we train
our principals to create them”
Source: McKinsey 27