Visual pleasure and narrative cinema

logo
Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema
Laura Mulvey
Enjoy this free preview
Unlock all 28 pages of this Study Guide by subscribing today.
Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema Summary and Study Guide
Thanks for explore ing this SuperSummary Study Guide of “Visual Pleasure and Narrative
Cinema” by Laura Mulvey. A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary
offers high-quality study guides that feature detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major
themes, characters, quotes, and essay topics.

SUMMARY: “VISUAL PLEASURE AND NARRATIVE CINEMA”

Laura Mulvey’s essay “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” originally appeared in the
autumn 1975 issue of the British film journal, Screen. This study guide refers to the reprint of the
essay included in Mulvey’s book Visual and Other Pleasures (Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd edition
2009).

Part 1: “Introduction”

In the “Introduction” to her 1975 essay, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” Laura Mulvey
announces her agenda: to appropriate psychoanalytic theory “as a political weapon” to expose
how “the unconscious of patriarchal society has structured film form” (14). She acknowledges
that other film theorists have written about psychoanalysis and film but argues they have failed
to address “the importance of the representation of the female form” (14) in narrative cinema. To
explore how this representation provides “visual pleasure” while also fortifying male dominance,
Mulvey enlists the theories of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan.

Identifying Freud’s model of psychoanalysis (along with the system of patriarchal values it
reflects) with phallocentrism, Mulvey explains that fundamentally “it depends on the image of the
castrated woman to give order and meaning to its world” (14). Psychoanalysis maintains that,
due to woman’s “real absence of a penis” (14), she signifies lack and nothingness, thereby
conferring on man, her sexual opposite, the opposing attributes of presence and subjectivity.
While man gains authority by virtue of woman’s lack, he also acquires an abiding fear of
castration. Mapping concepts from structural linguistics onto these psychoanalytic theories,
Jacques Lacan introduced terms such as “the symbolic order” (14) and “the Name of the Father
and the Law” (15) to indicate the ideological systems that constitute society and its subjects.
Because woman only signifies lack, man is the “maker of meaning” (15), or of the symbolic
order itself (which includes language). Woman’s essential function is to symbolize “the
castration threat” (14), which in turn compels children to submit to “the Name of the Father and
the Law.”

According to Lacan, language, which is encoded with patriarchal values, creates the
unconscious. Noting the difficulty of challenging the structures that diminish women when those
structures are inscribed in language and the unconscious, Mulvey argues that psychoanalysis
can be used to “advance our understanding of the status quo” (15). She acknowledges
alternative forms of cinema, but declares that the “status quo” of cinema, Hollywood cinema,
visually responds to and satisfies unconscious (patriarchal) desires and “formative obsessions”
(16) that center on woman. Mulvey’s stated intention is to analyze and destroy the pleasure
produced by the visual and narrative structures of classic cinema.
Part 2: “Pleasure in Looking/Fascination with the Human Form”

Mulvey begins the second part of her essay with a discussion of Freud’s ideas on scopophilia,
or the pleasure associated with looking. According to Freud, scopophilia is manifest in “the
voyeuristic activities of children” (17), who have a desire to see forbidden bodily areas and acts.
This active way of looking transforms others into objects of pleasure, and Freud considers it
“one of the component instincts of sexuality” (17). By developing conventions that create the
“illusion of looking in on a private word” (17) separate from the darkened viewing gallery,
mainstream cinema positions audiences to engage in scopophilia and experience its erotic
pleasure.

Freud also identifies a narcissistic aspect of scopophilia, which Mulvey links to Lacan’s “mirror
phase” (18) and to the ego-reinforcing operations of classic narrative films. Lacan theorizes that
before a child can talk or even walk, “he” develops “inklings of self-awareness” (18) by glimpsing
himself in a mirror. He recognizes himself, but also misperceives this reflected self as having
more autonomy and agency than he, who still lacks motor skills, possesses. In this moment, the
child experiences the notion of an ideal ego, the reflection of which he can receive from others
(in this case, the other in the mirror). Mulvey notes that “the conventions of mainstream film
focus attention on the human form” (18) in its most glamorous incarnations, thereby appealing
to the spectator’s narcissistic desire to gaze at others who reflect his ideal ego. Because it
reproduces Lacan’s proposed formative moment of recognition/misrecognition in the mirror
image, Hollywood “cinema has structures of fascination strong enough to allow temporary loss
of ego while simultaneously reinforcing it” (18).

In the final section of Part 2, Mulvey points out that the first aspect of scopophilia involves
objectifying the other for erotic pleasure, while the second entails identifying with the other to
secure one’s ideal ego. These two aspects register a tension between objectivity and
subjectivity. As Mulvey explains, “in film terms, one implies a separation of the erotic identity of
the subject from the object on the screen […], the other demands identification of the ego with
the object on the screen through the spectator’s fascination with and recognition of his like” (18-
19). In Freud’s terms, one is a function of sexual drives and the other of ego drives, and both
are coded in the symbolic order as the purview of male desire. Although cinematic images of the
female form offer “a beautifully complementary fantasy world” (19) for man’s erotic and
narcissistic scopophilia, the image of woman also represents castration. Thus, the object of “the
look” (19) is both pleasurable and threatening to man.

Part 3: “Woman as Image, Man as Bearer of the Look”

Part 3 of the essay applies the foregoing theories to the essential role woman plays in creating
the visual pleasure of narrative cinema. Because the symbolic order rests on an ideology of
sexual difference that attributes presence and power to man, “pleasure in looking has been split
between active/male and passive/female” (19). Woman is the object of the look. Ever on
display, she receives the look and holds it, but lacks authority to give or direct it. Woman is the
fundamental erotic object of the gaze, and, as such, she “is an indispensable element of
spectacle in normal narrative film, yet her visual presence tends to […] freeze the flow of action
in moments of erotic contemplation” (19). By holding the look, she jeopardizes the development
of the film’s narrative.

Hollywood cinema relies on the subjectivity of the male hero to overcome the disruptive effects
of woman’s image. While film spectators look at the woman on the screen as an erotic object,
she is also objectified by the gaze of other screen characters, particularly that of the leading
man. Contrasting woman’s passive role as erotic spectacle, the male hero is the active subject
of the narrative. He is positioned to control events not only by “the ruling ideology and the
psychical structures that back it up” (20), but also by the framing and editing conventions of
classic cinema. Camera technology that delivers a deep-focus perspective combines with film
editing and other techniques to establish the illusion of an on-screen space that faithfully reflects
the real world. Indeed, the screen assumes the aspect of a mirror, at the center of which is the
male hero, who “articulates the look and creates the action” (21). Due to his command of the
space, he reproduces the ideal ego conceived in the mirror phase of childhood development.
The film spectator thus identifies with the male hero, assumes his perspective (or “look”), and, in
this way, “the extra-diegetic tendencies represented by woman as spectacle” (20) are
neutralized.

Woman’s image, however, remains destabilizing inasmuch as she “connotes something the look
continually circles around but disavows: her lack of a penis, implying a threat of castration and
hence unpleasure” (22). Mulvey maintains that traditional cinema works to mitigate this problem
in one of two ways. The first relies on a story propelled largely by voyeurism and a narrative arc
(typified in film noir) that begins with investigation of woman’s guilt or “mystery” (22) and ends
by punishing or saving her. The second exploits fetishistic scopophilia, which is the “complete
disavowal of castration by the substitution of a fetish object or turning the represented figure
itself into a fetish so that it becomes reassuring rather than dangerous (hence […] the cult of the
female star)” (22). This strategy dispenses with efforts to maintain the narrative development,
inviting the film spectator to suspend himself in the pleasure of looking at woman as highly
stylized spectacle.

Mulvey briefly engages her theories with the work of two directors, Joseph von Sternberg and
Alfred Hitchcock. Numerous Sternberg films revel in the image of his preferred female star,
Marlene Dietrich, and exemplify the cinematic rendering of fetishistic scopophilia. In films like
Morocco and Dishonored, Dietrich’s perfected beauty suffuses the screen, relegating the story
to the sidelines in favor of enticing and holding the spectator’s look. Mulvey notes that “[t]he
most important absence is that of the controlling male gaze within the screen scene” (23), which
allows the audience to indulge in unmediated fetishistic scopophilia.

While “the look” largely constitutes the content in Sternberg’s films, it serves as the subject of
several Hitchcock films featuring male heroes embroiled in investigative voyeurism. Because
Hitchcock’s Vertigo, Rear Window, and Marnie also contain examples of fetishistic scopophilia,
Mulvey states that in these works, “the look is central to the plot, oscillating between voyeurism
and fetishistic fascination” (23). In each of these films, the male protagonist is invested with
authority by means of his occupation or wealth. Scottie (Vertigo) and Jefferies (Rear Window)—
policeman and photographer, respectively—exemplify power and authority in the symbolic
order. Film audiences identify with them as ego ideals, see through their viewpoint, and are
“absorbed into a voyeuristic situation within the screen scene and diegesis” (24).

Mulvey argues that voyeurism involves a sadistic impulse, and she explores this association as
it plays out in Vertigo. When Scottie, the protagonist, is hired to spy on a beautiful woman, he
becomes obsessed with her. He ultimately confronts her, subjects her to interrogation, compels
her to change her appearance, and, finally, instigates her punishment (death). Meanwhile,
Hitchcock’s use of subjective camera intensifies the spectator’s identification with Scottie. As
Scottie’s controlling perspective turns sadistic, however, the spectator “finds himself exposed as
complicit, caught in the moral ambiguity of looking” (25).
Part 4: “Summary”

In the concluding section of her essay, Mulvey notes that while other visual mediums (such as
photography or even strip-tease) exploit the psychic structures that subtend “woman’s to-be-
looked-at-ness, cinema builds the way she is to be looked at into the spectacle itself” (26).
Traditional cinema accomplishes this by means of conventions that suppress the constructed-
ness of the screen’s content, thereby absorbing the viewer (via the male hero’s perspective or
fetishistic scopophilia) into the seemingly real world of the narrative film. One way to expose
these conventions and disrupt their affirmation of the male gaze is to allow the camera to make
its presence known in the film. While an intrusive camera will destroy the pleasure produced by
the illusion of realism, Mulvey concludes that women “cannot view the decline of the traditional
film form with anything much more than sentimental regret” (27).

Unlock this
Study Guide!
Join SuperSummary to gain instant access to all 28 pages of this Study Guide and thousands of
other learning resources.
logo
Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema

Laura Mulvey
Guide covers
DigiCert Seal
7 day money back guarantee
Powered by Braintree
ABOUT

About Us

Testimonials

Write for Us

LIBRARY

View All Titles

Plot Summaries

Suggest a Title

RESOURCES

Literary Devices

Other Resources

LEGAL

Privacy Policy
Terms of Service

CONNECT

Help
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram