Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Capital Tuan Hasrudi
Capital Tuan Hasrudi
Part 1..........................................................................................................................................................2
Answer 1..................................................................................................................................................2
Answer 2..................................................................................................................................................2
Net present value (NPV):....................................................................................................................2
Internal rate of return (IRR):...............................................................................................................3
Payback Period (PP):...........................................................................................................................4
Profitability index (PP)........................................................................................................................5
Answer 3..................................................................................................................................................5
Answer 4..................................................................................................................................................6
Part 2..........................................................................................................................................................7
Answer 1..................................................................................................................................................7
Answer 2..................................................................................................................................................7
Calculation of Net present value (NPV):.............................................................................................7
Calculation of Internal rate of return (IRR):.......................................................................................9
Calculation of Payback Period (PP):....................................................................................................9
Calculation of Modified Internal rate of return (MIRR):....................................................................9
1
Part 1
Answer 1
By inspecting the cashflows without using any methods, the rank could be come by looking at
excess of cashflow over investment,
From the above table it is clear that, the project could be ranked by using the net cash flows
easily. However, it is important to use the net cashflows of the future outcomes. Therefore, it is
important to use present value of the future cashflows in order to get better results for the
decision-making process.
Answer 2
There are many methods that the organization can use in order to rank the project. It mainly
depends on the users of different methods. Some of the popular methods are as follows,
2
1. NPV > 0 : Accept Project
2. NPV < 0 : Reject Project
3. NPV = 0 IRR/Brocken down
1 NPV 1
IRR = R+ ∗( R2−R 1)
NPV 1−NPV 2
R1 = Rate used to obtain the positive NPV
R2 = Rate used to obtain the negative NPV
NPV1 = Positive NPV
NPV2 = Negative NPV
3
Payback Period (PP):
Payback period is one of the techniques for investment. It shows the capital payback time. By
calculating payback period, a businessman can easily know the period that when he will get his
money back. It is also indicating the period that from when the owner of the business will start
earning profit. Normally it is the default technique for the small business. It focuses only cash
flow. It does not show the profit.
4
Profitability index (PP)
The profitability index (PI), alternatively referred to as value investment ratio (VIR), or profit
investment ratio (PIR), describes an index that represents the relationship between the costs and
benefits of a proposed project, using the following ratio:
All the projects are undertaken except project 8. It is because it is mutually exclusive with
project 7 and project 7’s performance is better than project 8 in all the calculations.
On the other hand, by looking at all the methods it could be said that, NPV outcomes provides
more importance than other outcomes. It is because, NPV considers discounted cashflows of the
future investment which reduces risks of the project and it is much helpful for the decision-
making process.
On the other hand, project 6, 7 and 3 has been to top four all the time in all the calculations.
Therefore, it could be said that, all those three projects are viable according to quantitative
methods. However, as only one project needs to be considered, therefore, by looking at NPV
outcomes, the project could be considered. As project 6 has got maximum outcomes according to
NPV table, therefore, the company can choose project 6 among all 8 projects.
Answer 3
Following is the ranking that has been found from quantitative methods,
5
The ranking is different from simple inspections of the cashflows. It is because, the ranking has
taken place after deducting the costs of capital from the cashflows.
Answer 4
Following are the estimated real investment projects that could be similar to the cash flows,
1 Project 1 Bonds
2 Project 2 Equipment depreciation
3 Project 3 Land or real estate investment
4 Project 4 Dairy factory that incur agricultural costs
5 Project 5 Car loan
6 Project 6 Stock
7 Project 7 Trucks depreciation
8 Project 8 Construction Project
6
Part 2
Answer 1
Total firm value= $2,000,000 + $500,000 + 2,500,000
= $5,000,000
Therefore,
WACC= cost of equity * % Equity + Cost of Debt * %Debt * (1-Tax rate) + Cost of Preferred
stock * % Preferred stock
=0.1196
= 11.96%
Answer 2
Calculation of Net present value (NPV):
Project1 Project2 Project3 Project4 Project5 Project6 Project7 Project8
$ $ $ $
Initial 2,000.0 2,000.0 2,000.0 $ $ 2,000.0 $ 2,000.0
Investment 0 0 0 2,000.00 2,000.00 0 2,000.00 0
Year
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
1 300.00 1514.55 145.45 254.55 1818.00 1090.91 (318.18)
$ $ $ $ $ $
2 272.73 276.03 165.29 231.40 743.80 (49.59)
$ $ $ $ $ $
3 247.93 123.97 262.96 210.37 225.39 45.08
$ $ $ $ $
4 225.39 269.79 191.24 61.47 239.05
5 $ $ $ $ $
7
204.90 268.84 173.86 43.46 434.64
$ $ $ $ $
6 186.28 248.37 158.05 2258.00 677.37
$ $ $ $
7 169.34 226.82 143.68 1154.61
$ $ $
8 466.51 207.13 130.62
$ $ $
9 189.15 118.75 848.20
$ $ $
10 1927.50 172.72 107.95
$ $
11 157.72 98.14
$ $
12 143.70 89.22
$ $
13 130.64 81.11
$ $
14 119.03 73.73
$ $ $
15 2393.92 (478.8) 67.03
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Total DCF 2073.08 3842.5 2154.53 228.22 129.70 4076.00 2942.23 2182.98
Excess of
cashflow
Over $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
investment 73.08 1842.5 154.53 228.22 129.70 2076.00 942.23 182.98
Rank 8 2 6 4 7 1 3 5
8
According to IRR rules, the project could be acceptable if the outcomes of outcomes are more
than costs of capital. The case has shown that, cost of capital is 10%. Therefore, all the projects
are viable according to IRR rules.
9
References
Collings, S., 2013. Corporate Finance For Dummies. West Succex: John welly and
sons.
Demarzo, P. & Berk, J., 2016. Corporate Finance, Global Edition. London: Pearson.
Gullifar, L. & Payne, J., 2015. Corporate Finance Law: Principles and Policy. Oxford:
Oxford university press.
Hillier, D., 2016. Corporate Finance: European Edition (UK Higher Education Business
Finance). Berkshire: Mcgrewhill.
Warner, S. & Hussain, S., 2017. The Finance Book: Understand the numbers even if
you're not a finance professional. London: FT Publishing.
Watson, D. & Head, A., 2013. Corporate Finance: Principles and Practice. Harlow:
Pearson.
10