Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kevin Ruddy - Literature Review12
Kevin Ruddy - Literature Review12
Kevin Ruddy
Proff. Helmers
English Comp
8/7/2021
When United States President Richard Nixon visited the People’s Republic of Chi1na in 1972, the
nation was still a third world country mostly isolated in the geopolitical sphere. Nixon’s visit would come
during China’s cultural revolution, a period when 80 million peoples living under the Communist Party of
China perished senselessly and unnaturally at the hands of the totalitarian regime. Nixon’s visit would
only solidify the tyrannical grip of Mao Zedong and his communist government, and would usher in an
industrial revolution on a scale never seen before. Since then, the Communist Party of China has
prospered, the death of Mao in 1976 brought a new authoritarian market-based economy that has
greatly up lifted the people of China. This uplifting of the Chinese peoples who were starving to death by
the millions during much of the 20 th century is truly an achievement for humanity. But the cost has been
paid by middle class people from developed nations primarily in the west, and the progress has made
the ultra-tyrannical Communist Party of China into a world power. A regime who had murdered perhaps
over 80 million of their own just a few decades ago, is now in possession of a nuclear arsenal and the
second most powerful military force on Earth. World trade is completely reliant the Communist regime
who to this day is actively committing genocide against their people. So many around the world are
asking, what threat does the Communist party of China pose to Humanity?
On October 1st, 1949, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong declared the creation of the
Peoples Republic of China, China would not become a republic, but a corrupt totalitarian state only
concerned by wealth and power. From the founding of the nation until Mao’s death the Communist
2
Party of China operated a highly dysfunctional socialist economy based strictly of off Mao’s Marxist
fundamentals. The Communist Party would lead their people into “The Great Lead Forward”, where
over 50 million Chinese would perish due to starvation and the utter incompetence of the Communist
Party. Not long after another 80 million would perish during the “Cultural Revolution”. Also, during
these years China would make a series of territorial claims, including Taiwan, Tibet, and parts of India.
Since, China has become a world power due to foreign investment and the liberalization of the Chinese
economy, with little concern for their people the Chinese Communist Party is able to control the world
economy by offering foreign companies manufacturing costs that are impossible to compete with, and
by engaging in unethical dealings all over the world that no other nations are willing to make.
Corporations are unable to turn away from these opportunities if they wish to stay competitive, and
governments are unable to regulate trade with China without severe disruption to the global economy.
The modern Chinese Communist Party’s ambitions are nothing less than global domination in all
domains. Their economic and territorial goals intensify with every day that passes. This consolidation of
power is an imminent threat to the global economy, and a existential threat to nations like Taiwan, and
Perhaps the greatest global concern regarding the Communist Party of China’s economic
strangle hold is their control over rare earth element (REEs) and critical minerals. According to Areil
Cohen and James C. Grant at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, China owns 36.7% of global rare
earth elements and critical mineral totals. In 2019 alone, it produced 62% of the world’s raw materials,
with the United States only producing 12.2%. These materials are essential to the production of
essentially all items the people of the world rely on today, especially hi-technology. Currently the world
3
economy is completely reliant on China’s supply and production of rare and critical materials. With this
power over the supply chain the Communist Party of China can dictate the world economy, and the flow
of essential high-tech goods. Cohen and Grant suggest the United States will likely make big efforts to
secure the western supply chain of REEs and critical minerals in coming years.
While in the theater of economics the Communist Party of China masquerades as an altruistic
force pushing for world peace and prosperity, their territorial ambitions are much more straight forward
and belligerent but are still hidden behind a mask of altruism. Since the founding of the Communist
Party of China, one goal has remained consistent, the acquisition of Taiwan by any means necessary. A
small island nation and thriving democracy, Taiwan is not recognized as a country by most of the world,
regardless of all the support they receive from the United States and other nations. Originally founded
by Chinese nationalists fleeing communist tyranny, Taiwan has become the focal point of tensions
between liberal nations and the Communist Party of China, according to Lindsay Maizland from the
Council on Foreign Relations. “Taiwan has been governed independently of China since 1949, but Beijing
views the island as part of its territory. Beijing has vowed to eventually “unify” Taiwan with the
mainland, using force if necessary.” An invasion of Taiwan could rival the likes of climate change with
the threats that it poses to humanity. The breakout of a major conflict between China and Taiwan could
very likely spiral into a third world war. Nations such as India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and many
more would be directly threatened by such an event. And with the recent toppling of Hong Kong and
every ounce of liberty that once existed in the city, such an event seems even more likely.
Hong Kong is the poster child of communist tyranny. Once a crown jewel of Asia, and thriving
center of liberalism within the region, the city is now the prime example of how the Communist Party of
China can impose its oppressive totalitarianism in the blink of an eye. Lindsay Maizland and Elanor
Albert from the Council of Foreign Relations have spoken out against the large-scale deterioration of
4
Hong Kong and Hong Konger’s civil liberties since the Communist Party took control of the city from the
United Kingdom. They point to the implementation of Hong Kong’s highly controversial national security
law, which criminalizes any descent and adopts extremely broad definitions for crimes such as terrorism,
subversion, secession, and collusion with foreign powers. These laws make democracy virtually
impossible and turn democratic notions into threats of terrorism. Similar laws have been implemented
in mainland China, but with even more extreme characteristics and consequences.
China’s northwestern region of Xinjiang is currently the center of the Communist Party of
China’s oppression. Home to 12 million ethnic Uyghurs, and other Muslims, the Communist Party of
China is currently engaged in the largest genocide of an ethnic minority since the holocaust, to erase the
Uyghur culture, and assimilate Uyghurs into Han Chinese culture. Similar laws to Hong Kong’s have been
implemented in Xinjiang, making any dissent a crime. Vice News correspondent Isobel Yeung bravely
visited the region in 2019 to show the world the genocide that was shrouded in secrecy. In her
documentary the totalitarian state and all its atrocity is exposed, Uyghurs are seen being marched
through the streets silently in the dead of night, on their way to so called “reeducation camps”, where
millions of Uyghurs are currently being held against their will. In these camps Uyghur men and women
are sterilized, brainwashed, tortured, and many killed. Many of these imprisoned Uyghurs are used as
slaves in Xinjiang’s cotton and solar industries. Companies such as Nike, Apple, Amazon, Samsung, BMW,
and many more directly benefit from Uyghur slave labor. A consequence of China’s strangle hold on the
world economy, these corporations are seemingly powerless and can do nothing but slightly
acknowledge the activity. If this is the fate of the Uyghurs, could this not be the fate of the Taiwanese?
The rise of Communist China in recent years as a global superpower is reminiscent of the rise of
the Nazi Third Reich or Soviet Union in the early 20 th century. The Communist Party of China is the
newest totalitarian throwing its weight around the world stage, but this time around it seems there is no
one nation who can get in their way. The Chinese government is a threat to humanity in multiple realms,
their iron grip on the world supply chain is used to control the most sovereign of nations, their
territorially ambitions threaten a third world war, their implementation of authoritarian laws in Hong
Kong pose great risk to legal systems around the globe as developing nations observe these laws and
make them their own, and in a true return to the early 20 th century the Communist Party of China is
committing a massive genocide against its own citizens. The Chinese Communist Party is of great threat
to humanity, perhaps it is even the greatest threat to humanity, the only question left is when the rest
Works Cited
6/22/2021)
https://www.fpri.org/article/2021/06/americas-critical-
strategic-vulnerability-rare-earth-elements/
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-taiwan-
relations-tension-us-policy
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/hong-kong-
freedoms-democracy-protests-china-crackdown
7
6/29/2019)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=v7AYyUqrMuQ&ab_channel=VICENews
8
(Dollar, David. Seven years Into China’s Belt and Road, BROOKINGS,
10/1/2020)
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-
chaos/2020/10/01/seven-years-into-chinas-belt-and-road/
https://www.fpri.org/article/2020/10/chinas-monopoly-on-rare-earth-elements-and-
why-we-should-care/
(Frankopan, Peter. The Silk Roads, pg. 1-30, Penguin New-York, 2015)
https://www.heritage.org/asia/heritage-explains/how-china-taking-control-
hollywood
Relations, 02/17/17)
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/media-censorship-china
9
The new sources I added really helped me create a more comprehensive paper. Without
them I wouldn’t had been able to make some of the claims I had without my intellectual
honesty coming into question. I think these sources really closed me off from a lot of
potential fallacies. Along with enhancing my writing, this sources have truly expanded