Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kpa 2 Kpa 3: Focus Area 1 2 0.9 0.6 0.8 1.5 1.2

    Uploaded by

    Koshtub Vohra
    5 views3 pages
    This document contains a scale for scoring performance on key performance areas (KPAs) in two focus areas. It provides raw scores, weighted scores by funding priority, and translated dependence scores. The results show the funding, technical assistance, and secretarial support dependence scores for each KPA and cumulatively. Focus area 1 has medium dependence on funding and low dependence on other supports, while focus area 2 has high dependence on funding and medium on technical assistance.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    DDA_Scoring

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains a scale for scoring performance on key performance areas (KPAs) in two focus areas. It provides raw scores, weighted scores by funding priority, and translated dependence scores. The results show the funding, technical assistance, and secretarial support dependence scores for each KPA and cumulatively. Focus area 1 has medium dependence on funding and low dependence on other supports, while focus area 2 has high dependence on funding and medium on technical assistance.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    5 views3 pages

    Kpa 2 Kpa 3: Focus Area 1 2 0.9 0.6 0.8 1.5 1.2

    Uploaded by

    Koshtub Vohra
    This document contains a scale for scoring performance on key performance areas (KPAs) in two focus areas. It provides raw scores, weighted scores by funding priority, and translated dependence scores. The results show the funding, technical assistance, and secretarial support dependence scores for each KPA and cumulatively. Focus area 1 has medium dependence on funding and low dependence on other supports, while focus area 2 has high dependence on funding and medium on technical assistance.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Score Scale

    Highly Significant Significant Noticeable Negligible


    4 3 2 1

    Raw Scores from DDA


    Funding Technical Assistance Secreterial Support
    KPA 1 4 3 3
    Focus Area 1 KPA 2 2 2 0
    KPA 3 1 1 4
    KPA 4 0 2 0
    Focus Area 2 KPA 5 3 4 1

    Weighted Scores
    Funding (0.5) Technical Assistance (0.3) Secreterial Support (0.2)
    KPA 1 2 0.9 0.6
    Focus Area 1 KPA 2 1 0.6 0
    KPA 3 0.5 0.3 0.8
    KPA 4 0 0.6 0
    Focus Area 2 KPA 5 1.5 1.2 0.2

    Scores Translation
    Funding (0.5) Technical Assistance (0.3) Secreterial Support (0.2)
    Highest Weighted 2 1.2 0.8
    Score
    High Dependence 1.2 0.72 0.48
    Medium Dependen 0.6 0.36 0.24
    Low Dependence 0.5 0.3 0.2

    Results
    Funding Technical Assistance Secreterial Support
    KPA 1 2 0.9 0.6
    Focus Area 1
    KPA 2 1 0.6 0
    KPA 3 0.5 0.3 0.8
    Focus Area 2 KPA 4 0 0.6 0
    KPA 5 1.5 1.2 0.2
    Cumulative Funding Technical Assistance Secreterial Support
    2.04
    Dependence 1 0.72 0.32
    None
    0

    Total
    10
    4
    6
    2
    8

    Total
    3.5
    1.6
    1.6
    0.6
    2.9

    Total

    2.4 or above
    1.2 or above
    1.1 or below

    Total
    3.5
    1.6
    1.6
    0.6
    2.9

    You might also like