Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English For Academic and Professional Purposes
English For Academic and Professional Purposes
1. Formalist Approach
-The most basic approach
-Relies on the formal elements affecting the
situation
-Include discussion of the event, place or thing
in relation to its structure, message or theme.
-examines the form of the work as a whole
-example: analyzing the individual scenes and
chapters, the characters, the settings, the tone,
the point of view, the diction, and all other
elements of the text which join to make it a
single text.
2. Historical Approach
-It recognizes that the social and cultural
environments have tremendous effect on
events and situation
-Consider the time, social milieu, political
climate and socio-political context in relation to
the material you are writing about
3. Reader-response approach
-Reader’s own interpretation of the
text/material
Lesson 2: Writing A Critique -Based on the premise that the text/material is
not complete until the readers have interacted
Reaction Paper, Review and Critique
with it
E-VALUE-ATION 4. Gender or feminist approach
-Concerns itself with how the
- Definitive judgments or detailed analysis event/phenomenon/material is perceived from
- Like a journal entry a viewpoint that assumes that men and women
have sex-ascribed roles in the society.
- Value 5. Biographical Approach
-Is premised on the fact that the author’s life
Reaction paper – For elementary pupil opinion
has a significant bearing on how the
Review – For hs students opinion and facts are
work/material is written/prepared and how it
combined
will take shape.
Critique – SHS/College students facts &
opinions are integrated with significant ideas. Parts of a critique
Critique 1. Introduction
-Introduce author and title of
Analyze - Break into parts and examine the components
work/product/company, etc.
Interpret - Offer possible meanings -Provide author’s main point
-State your overall evaluation of the
Guidelines for writing a Critique
work/product
-Be thoroughly familiar with the material (event, -Add background information for the reader
program, movie, occasion, etc) that you are writing 2. Summary
about. -Entire work or section of it
-Written objectively to relate:
-Be observant and record significant details in relation
to the material being reviewed. ✓Author’s overall point
✓Support provided for the overall point
- Give enough proof to validate what you are writing -Goal of a summary
about.
✓Provides author’s thesis and main point -Was anything done exceptionally well? If so, what?
untainted by opinion Some organizing questions to get you started….
-Accuracy of information -What could have been done better? Are there any
particular improvements you would have suggested?
-Definition of key terms
-For book reviews, consider the writing. Was the book
-Hidden assumptions well organized? Were the sentences easy to follow and
to understand? Some organizing questions to get you
-Clarity of language
started….
-Fairness
-For movie reviews, consider people other than the
-Logic and organization director and actors who may have contributed to the
film. In particular, think about costume designers,
-Common fallacies like name-calling, hasty screenwriters, music directors, and cinematographers.
generalization, oversimplification, emotional language, Some organizing questions to get you started….
bandwagon appeal
-For reviews of plays and other performances, consider
4. Response people other than the director and actor who may have
-Where do I agree or disagree? contributed to the performance. In particular, think
about costume designers, set designers (and builders!),
-What does the author get right or wrong? playwrights, music directors, and lighting directors.
-What ultimate merit does this work have?
-Would I recommend this work?
-Remember to consider your response section a
MINIATURE ESSAY.
-The main point in the response section should support
the opinion expresses in your thesis.
5. Conclusion
-Remind audience of overall importance of topic
-Combine your rating with personal response on overall
strengths and weaknesses.
-State what you believe is the ultimate success of the
work
Some organizing questions to get you started
-What kind of work is it, and who is its intended
audience?
-What was the work about? Consider including a brief
summary of the plots or the events described.
-What seems to be the author's main purpose? To offer
advice, make practical suggestions, solve a specific
problem? To critique? To establish the truth? Some
organizing questions to get you started….
-What is the principal point, conclusion, thesis,
contention, or question?
-What patterns or categories does the work use to
divide up the subject matter being discussed?
-What is new, different, or controversial about the work
in terms of the course text? -How does the work fit into
its genre? In other words, how does it measure up to
similar books/movies/performances/etc?
-Did the author do anything innovative or creative? If
so, what?