Assignment (15 marks) of Advanced Research Methodology

Submitted to: Dr. Imran

Submitted by: ATKA ATHER AWAN Roll # 03
Assigned Variable: Organizational Climate
Sr Citation DV (firm Theory Data collection Sample size Respons Country Industry Analytical method Reference
(Authors) performance) e rate
measures
01 Song et al. 1. Green EIP (environmental administered 220 66.81% China Multiple 1. Mean, SD, & correlations Song W, Wang G‐Z, Ma X.
(2020) creativity innovation practices) can survey 147 2. coefficients of alpha and Environmental innovation practices
2.Green product significantly affect green 5-point Likert (useable composite reliability (CR) and green product innovation
innovation product innovation scale sample) 3. average variance extracted performance: A perspective from
performance performance (AVE) organizational climate.
Sustainable Development.
2020;28:224–234.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1990
02 Kaluza et Employee health-promoting online survey 65 leaders and Not China Multiple multilevel structural equation Kaluza AJ, Schuh SC, Kern M, Xin
al. emotional leadership behavior, of leaders and 291 employees given modeling (MSEM) K, van Dick R. How do leaders'
(2020) exhaustion employee emotional employees chi square analysis perceptions of organizational health
exhaustion and work (subordinates) Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and climate shape employee exhaustion
engagement, the Root Mean Square Error of and engagement? Toward a
organizational health Approximation (RMSEA) cascading-effects model. Hum
climate confirmatory factor analyses Resour Manage. 2020; 59:359–377.
(CFAs) https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22000
03 Baskin and engagement in Positive perceptions of Email based 111 87% USA Service Hierarchical linear modeling Brock Baskin ME, McKee V.
McKee time banditry job , supervisor, & Survey Industry and An intercept‐only model, the Employee perceptions of climate as
(2019) Organizational levels common equivalent of a random effect an antecedent of time banditry in
climates employees at ANOVA the workplace. Int J Select Assess.
engagement in time random 2019;27:83–89.
banditry https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.1223
04 Berberoglu 1. Organizational Positive organizational a self- 1000 21.8% Cyprus healthcare Factor Analysis, Reliability Aysen Berberoglu, Impact of
(2018) commitment climate administered 220 useable Analysis, ANOVA and Linear organizational climate on
2. Perceived organizational questionnaire sample Regression Analyses organizational commitment and
organizational commitment with a 5-point perceived organizational
performance Likert scale performance: empirical evidence
from public hospitals. BMC Health
Services Research (2018) 18:399
05 Lee and Perceived Employees' OCB can purposive 309 total sample 89.9% USA fashion covariance relationships Lee and Brookshire, The effect of
Brookshire Organizational help to achieve the triple sampling was size retailing Factor Analysis ethical climate and employees'
(2018) Sustainability bottom line of used for self- 278 useable average variance extracted (AVE) organizational citizenship behavior
Performance sustainability‐financial, administered sample common method variance (CMV) on U.S. fashion retail organizations'
social and environmental survey common latent factor test sustainability performance. Corp
 performance. Using 5‐point chi‐square Soc Resp Env Ma. 2018; 25:939–
Likert scale Measurement Invariance Analysis 947.
Multi‐group Analysis https:// doi.org/10.1002/csr.1510
06 Kang et al Passion for Multiple Organizational systematic 173 29% USA SMEs multilevel structural equation J.H. Kang et al. Interactive effects
(2016) inventing, Climates sampling Organizations organizat model of multiple organizational climates
Employee procedure with Out of 39 ional, on employee innovative behavior in
innovative multiple steps useable 17% entrepreneurial firms: A crosslevel
behavior five-point With 105 individua investigation. Journal of Business
Likert-type employees l level Venturing 31 (2016) 628–642
scale
07 Yi-Ting Lin organizational Organizational service Administered 290 total 70% Taiwan Multinational analysis of common method Yi-Ting Lin and Nien-Chi Liu,
and Nien- service performance Survey with 203 useable Food service variance bias by Harman’s single- High performance work systems
Chi Liu performance, High performance work structured chains factor test and confirmatory factor and organizational service
(2016) systems questionnaires retailers analysis (CFA), performance: The roles of different
Service Climate using a 7-point organizational climates.
Likert scale International Journal of Hospitality
Management 55 (2016) 118–128
08 Varnali the human The resource-based view face-to-face in- 12 (Interviews) 100% Turkey multiple NVivo8 software. Renin Varnali, An exploratory study
(2015) relations model, of the firm depth Qualitative Analysis of the cultural context of
open systems interviews organisational climate and human
model, internal resource practices. Asia Pacific
process model, Journal of Human Resources (2015)
and rational goal 53, 432–447 doi:10.1111/1744-
model 7941.12080
09 Dul and Creativity The creativity- Observation, 103 firms 49.8% Netherla Multiple Means, Standard Deviations, and Dul and Ceylan, The Impact of a
Ceylan supporting supporting work Document nds Correlations of the Study Measures Creativity-supporting Work
(2014) work environment framework Analysis, Environment on a Firm’s Product
environment can be used in Interviewing Innovation Performance. J PROD
managerial practice to INNOV MANAG
enhance employee 2014;31(6):1254–1267
creativity for product © 2014 Product Development &
innovation. Management Association
DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12149
10 Vashdi et Job satisfaction Developing an in-depth Filed Study 2102 school 84% Israil Education/Sc Standard regressions and Vashdi, Vigoda-gadot, and dvir
al. (2013) Self-report theory teachers hool hierarchical linear model statistics shlomi, Assessing Performance:
Group Level The Impact of Organizational
OCB Climates and Politics on Public
(GOCB) Schools’ Performance. Public
Administration Vol. 91, No. 1, 2013
(135–158)
11 Towler et Concern for service climate theory Survey Employees 69% USA Automotive Common Aggregation justification Towler, Lezotte, and Burke, The
al. (2011) Employees strategic human 12,518 useable Service Statistics, Service Climate–Firm Performance
Concern for management theory of Intraclass Correlation Coefficients Chain: The Role of Customer
 Customers 18,109 total. ICC(1) and ICC(2), and Retention. Human Resource
Customer Average Deviation Index (ADM) Management, May–June 2011, Vol.
Satisfaction 1,500 50, No. 3, Pp. 391 – 406
Customer automotive © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Retention service stores Published online in Wiley Online
and 30,000 Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
customers DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20422
12 Hunter et financial Boundary-spanning interviews, 218 51% USA Multiple Confirmatory factor analysis Hunter, Perry, and Currall, Inside
al. (2011) munificence and theory longitudinal respondents at Outlier analysis multi-disciplinary science and
industry archival data, 21 engineering engineering research centers: The
involvement, and survey research centers impact of organizational climate on
On-site Industry data invention disclosures and patents.
Involvement Research Policy 40 (2011) 1226–
1239, Elsevier B.V.
doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.024
13 Luthans et Climate and Hope theory Email Survey 737 Not givrn USA Multiple Means, standard deviations, and Luthans et al. The mediating role of
al. (2008) PsyCap Resilience theory inter-correlations among study psychological capital in the
variables supportive organizational climate-
employee performance relationship.
Journal of Organizational Behavior
J. Organiz. Behav.29, 219–238
(2008)
Published online in Wiley
InterScience
(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI:
10.1002/job.507
14 Jong et al. higher levels of homogeneity theory A mail 226 service 69% Netherla Multiple the rWG (j) coefficient Jong, Ruyter and Lemmink, Service
(2005) autonomy, organizational theory questionnaire engineers nds intra class correlation (ICC) Climate in Self-Managing Teams:
functional was designed organized in 26 coefficient Mapping the Linkage of Team
flexibility, and containing teams. rWG( j)-coefficient Member Perceptions and Service
coordination closed and Performance Outcomes in a
between open-ended Business-to-Business Setting.
teams questions. Journal of Management Studies
42:8 December 2005 0022-2380
15 Patterson et Overall job expectancy theory Survey 8339 employees 54% U.K Multiple r w g index of agreement Patterson, Warr and West,
al. (2004) satisfaction, action theory Through email of 42 Organizational climate and
Organizational theory of planned manufacturing company productivity: The role of
commitment, behaviour companies employee affect and employee
Skill level.
development and Journal of Occupational and
concern for Organizational Psychology (2004),
employee 77, 193– 216
welfare © 2004 The British Psychological
Society
 List of students along with assign variable
Sr no Roll no Name of student Assign variable
1 S21BMGMT3E03002 MUHAMMAD HAMZA SHAHID Perceived organizational Support
2 S21BMGMT3E03003 ATKA ATHER AWAN Organizational climate
3 S21BMGMT3E03004 AZIB ASGHAR Organizational socialization
4 S21BMGMT3E03007 IQRA ISLAM Psychological capital
QAMAR ISLAM Organizational Happiness
5 S21BMGMT3E03008

6 S21BMGMT3E03009 AYESHA KAHAN TAREEN Firm performance

7 S21BMGMT3E03011 NAILA RASHEED Innovative performance
8 S21BMGMT3E03015 AREEBA AMIN Market performance
9 S21BMGMT3E03016 MOHSIN FIDA Quality performance
10 S21BMGMT3E03021 AQIB MUNIR Export performance
11 S21BMGMT3E03022 MUHAMMAD FAISAL SAQLAIN Employee performance
12 S21BMGMT3E03024 ZAIN UL ABEDIN Service innovation performance
MUHAMMAD SHAHRAIZ ATTA Environmental performance
13 S21BMGMT3E03025
ABBASI
14 S21BMGMT3E03026 UZAIR TAHIR Purchase behaviour
15 S21BMGMT3E03027 NUMERA SALEEM SMEs sustainability
16 S21BMGMT3E03029 MENAL HROON Turnover intention
17 S21BMGMT3E03030 UMER SALEEM Entrepreneurial intention
18 S21BMGMT3E03035 KAINAT ALTAF Operational performance
19 S21BMGMT3E03036 ARHAM ALI Supply chain performance
20 S21BMGMT3E03039 ADINA ZAIDI Project performance
21 S21BMGMT3E03040 ALI RAZA Total quality management
22 S21BMGMT3E03041 ERUM TANVEER Satisfaction
23 S21BMGMT3E03042 MUHAMMAD RASHID Employee commitment
24 S21BMGMT3E03045 HAMMAD BASHIR Motivation
25 S21BMGMT3E03047 EHTASHAM KHAN Employee engagement
26 S21BMGMT3E03049 MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE Loyalty
27 S21BMGMT3E03051 UMER NAZIR Service behavior
28 S21BMGMT3E03052 AMJAD LATEEF Customer orientation
29 S21BMGMT3E03053 TAHIR AMEEN Entrepreneurial orientation
30 S21BMGMT3E03056 SHAHID ABBAS Servitization
31 S21BMGMT3E03057 SHERAZ AHMED Industry 4.0
MUHAMMAD ASAD Market orientation
32 S21BMGMT3E03058
MEHMOOD KHAN
HAFIZ AHMED HASSAN Business Network
33 S21BMGMT3E03066
LODHI
34 S21BMGMT3E03014 Shahzad Akhtar Competitive advantage
35 S21BMGMT3E03032 Shiekh Abdul Ali Citizenship Behavior
36 S21BMGMT3E03048 Asif nawaz Workplace practices
37 Muhammad Saqlain Ilyas Big data analytics
38 S21BMGMT3E03017 Maria Tariq Corporate social responsibility
39 S21BMGMT3E03061 Asif Ali Sustainable tourisam
40 F20BMGMT3E03020 Imran Rehman Internet of things