The document outlines a rubric for evaluating digital storytelling presentations on four criteria: voice, content, graphics, and an overall score. It provides descriptors for excellent, good, fair, and poor performances in each category. For example, an excellent voice projection is clear throughout, while a poor voice is inaudible. An excellent story meets all requirements with rich details, while a poor one is incomplete. The best graphics create distinct atmospheres, while little attempt is made to use images in a poor presentation.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating digital storytelling presentations on four criteria: voice, content, graphics, and an overall score. It provides descriptors for excellent, good, fair, and poor performances in each category. For example, an excellent voice projection is clear throughout, while a poor voice is inaudible. An excellent story meets all requirements with rich details, while a poor one is incomplete. The best graphics create distinct atmospheres, while little attempt is made to use images in a poor presentation.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating digital storytelling presentations on four criteria: voice, content, graphics, and an overall score. It provides descriptors for excellent, good, fair, and poor performances in each category. For example, an excellent voice projection is clear throughout, while a poor voice is inaudible. An excellent story meets all requirements with rich details, while a poor one is incomplete. The best graphics create distinct atmospheres, while little attempt is made to use images in a poor presentation.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating digital storytelling presentations on four criteria: voice, content, graphics, and an overall score. It provides descriptors for excellent, good, fair, and poor performances in each category. For example, an excellent voice projection is clear throughout, while a poor voice is inaudible. An excellent story meets all requirements with rich details, while a poor one is incomplete. The best graphics create distinct atmospheres, while little attempt is made to use images in a poor presentation.
M2 Midterm Examination – Digital Story Telling Presentation
Excellent (20) Good (15) Fair (10) Poor (0)
Voice - Projected their - Projected their The voice is so - No audio voice voice clearly voice throughout hard to hear. - Syntax and diction throughout the the presentation - Syntax and were poor. presentation allowing allowing most diction were fair. -There was no everyone to hear people to hear -Dialogue was dialogue at all them clearly. them. mentioned but not - Syntax and diction - Syntax and clear were perfect. diction were -Dialogue between good. characters was -Dialogue evident between characters was hinted at Content - Story exceeded the - Story met all - Story met some - Story was requirements; requirements; of the incomplete. beg/mid/end beg/mid/end requirements; beg/mid/end -Poor setting details -Excellent setting -Setting is very clear -Setting is -Poor detailed -Chunky details mentioned but characters overall regarding all -Characters are needs elaboration elements very detailed -No conflict evident -Characters are clear Graphics Images create a mages create an An attempt was Little or no attempt to distinct atmosphere atmosphere or made to use images use images to create or tone that matches tone that matches to create an an appropriate different parts of the some parts of the atmosphere/tone atmosphere/tone. story. The images story. The images but it needed more may communicate may work. Image symbolism and/or communicate choice is logical. metaphors. symbolism and/or metaphors.