Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Film Critique

“Globalization at the Crossroads”

The document depicts that globalization is a crucial act because it affects every living
and non-living things alike. It is meant to make use of each countries’ potentials in order to
create a lot more differences in terms of living in prosperity. It is a questionable point about
leaving orphans behind because due to the vast communities, there will be always a very small
percentage of civilization who will be automatically locked out because of deficits. As being
described that globalization is under attack due to the least opportunity that most of the
developing countries should receive, it is observed every day in different perspectives.

One of the problems stated in the documentary mostly are due to the result of a
country’s history of civilization. It mentioned about the Industrial Revolution, World War,
prejudices between people due to any form of rights and other survival matters which shaped a
lot of those countries as to what they are right now. In both conditions alike (as of being locked
out and being globalized), they still have the same objectives. One for example, is the manner
of selling livestock in different parts of a region. People who are locked out of globalization go by
themselves just to sell those livestock, the same operation as they bring those to the appointed
site themselves. As for globalization, it is taken care of single-handedly in terms of being on line.
The result yields the same kind of manner. The documentary sees a great opportunity that the
people who work on extra-legal circumstances would perform great if they were on sync with the
right people. It is a good plan, but as they said that the people out of globalization, lack the
amount of institution in order for them keep with the pace of the globalized routine. It would be
better for the extra-legal community to just stay active in the production of their usual items as
for me, it does not show negative effects for citizens alike, that it only shows a ton of
disadvantages.

There is a line between the people inside the globalization and the people who are
locked out of the globalization. As said in the documentary, people create order/wanted to be
ordered regardless of the type of leadership in their society. It is a manner of making valuable
assets and resources in equilibrium with its usage for people. For me, it is a genuine solution
but it works best on a temporary timeline. It would be too soon for people to find another back
up resolve because crisis does not pick locations and time. For my ideology, it is actually not a
requirement for people to dwell in the globalized vicinity in order live. Aside from money, the
resources like plants and animals in the environment hold the same amount of value and it
gives off the same benefit when these are utilized correctly and responsibly.

You might also like