Professional Documents
Culture Documents
And Microbial Growth Effect of Synchronization of Energy and Nitrogen Supply On Ruminal Characteristics
And Microbial Growth Effect of Synchronization of Energy and Nitrogen Supply On Ruminal Characteristics
And Microbial Growth Effect of Synchronization of Energy and Nitrogen Supply On Ruminal Characteristics
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on
the World Wide Web at:
http://jas.fass.org
www.asas.org
ABSTRACT The effect of energy and N synchroni- tion). Continuous infusion of energy resulted in a 17%
zation in the rumen on microbial growth was inves- ( P < .05) and 14% ( P = .18) higher efficiency of
tigated. The same daily amount of readily available microbial growth than did pulse dosing in Exp. 1 and
energy and N sources ( 19 g of ruminally degradable 2, respectively. This coincided with lower ( P < .01)
N k g of fermentable OM) was supplied intraruminally ruminal pH and higher ( P < .05) ruminal lactic acid
to sheep, according t o different patterns, namely both concentration for energy pulse-dose treatments. The
energy and N as 12-hourly pulse-doses (fast syn- results suggest that merely improving the degree of
chronized supply), energy as 12-hourly pulse-doses
synchronization between energy and N release rates
and N as a continuous infusion (unsynchronized
in the rumen does not increase microbial yield.
supply), energy as a continuous infusion and N as
12-hourly pulse doses (unsynchronized supply), and Dietary manipulation, rather, should be aimed at first
both energy and N as continuous infusions (slow obtaining the most even ruminal energy supply
synchronized supply). The study was done near pattern, and then at providing the appropriate amount
maintenance (Exp. 1) and at a higher level of of ruminally available N. Thereafter some further
nutrition (Exp. 2). The degree of energy and N advantage may be gained in also ensuring a more
synchronization affected neither microbial flow even N supply pattern, particularly avoiding too rapid
nor efficiency of growth ( P > .2 for energy x N interac- a ruminal N release.
Key Words: Ruminal Fermentation, Energy, Nitrogen, Synchronization
2516
Exp. 1
Lactic acid concentration, mM 6.6 6.7 4.4 5.0 .86 <.05 NSC
Retention time of water, h 12.3 12.1 11.6 12.1 .81 NS NS
Exp. 2
Lactic acid concentration, mM 7.7x 7.OXY 5.OXY 3.9y .a1 <.001 NS
Retention time of water, h 13.9 12.4 12.8 12.5 .73 NS .15
aE = energy; N = nitrogen; P = pulse; G = gradual (even).
bEffect of energy x nitrogen interaction: P > .2 for all items.
‘NS = P > .2.
XJMeans within a row that do not have a common superscript differ ( P < ,051.
.001) on ruminal NH3 N concentration (Figure 2 ) . to just c 6.0 by 1 h after dosing but returned to > 6.0
There was also interaction between N supply pattern by 3 h after dosing. Nitrogen pulse-dosing resulted in
and time. Ruminal NH3 N levels remained relatively a greater decline ( P < .O 1) in pH than did the
constant and mostly higher when N source was corresponding NG treatments for some time after the
infused than when it was pulse-dosed. Supplying N as pulse. Lactic acid concentration was higher ( P < . O O l )
a pulse-dose resulted in a sharp increase in ruminal for E P than for EG treatments (Table 1).
NH3 N directly after dosing, followed by a rapid Ruminal Ammonia Nitrogen Concentration. There
decrease t o predosing levels by 5 h after dosing. was a n interaction ( P < .001) between N supply
Ruminally Soluble Carbohydrate Concentrations. pattern and time (Figure 5). The NG treatments
Energy supply pattern affected soluble CH concentra- resulted in a relatively constant ruminal NH3 N
tions in the rumen (Figure 3); a n interaction occurred concentration throughout the day. The NP treatments,
between energy supply pattern and time ( P < . O O l ) . conversely, caused a sudden fivefold increase in
For the EG treatments, appreciable levels of soluble
CH were present in the rumen at all times, whereas
for the E P treatments these were much lower (mostly
zero), except 1 h after dosing, when they were higher
( P < ,051 than for the EG treatments.
Intake, Flow, and Digestibility o f Organic Matter.
Microbial OM flow was higher ( P < .05) for EG than
for E P treatments (Table 2). Ruminal outflow of
dietary OM tended ( P = . 0 7 ) to be lower for the NP
than for the NG treatments. In accordance, true
digestibility of OM in the rumen was higher ( P < ,051
for NP than for NG treatments. There was no effect ( P
> . 2 ) of treatments on the ruminal retention time of
water (Table 1).Retention time of water was shorter
( P < .001) during than before the addition of water to
the rumen (Table 3 ) .
Microbia7 Growth Efficiency and Intake, Flow, and
Digestibility of Nitrogen. Total N, nonammonia N, and
microbial N outflow from the rumen ( P < .001), as
well as both apparent and true microbial growth
Time relative to dosing, h
efficiency (MOEFF; P < .05), were higher for EG
treatments than for E P treatments (Table 4). Neither
N supply pattern nor energy x N interaction had a n Figure 2. Ruminal ammonia N concentrations in
effect ( P > . 2 ) on these traits. sheep receiving similar amounts of soluble carbohy-
drates and nitrogen intraruminally according to differ-
Experiment 2 ent patterns EPNP (A), EPNG (.), EGNP ( + ) and EGNG
(H) (Exp. 1).The SE was .99 when comparing treatment
Rumina7 pH and Lactic Acid. Both energy and N means at a specific time and .81 when comparing
supply patterns showed interactions with time ( P < means at different times within the same treatment. E
.001; Figure 3 ) . After a pulse-dose of CH, pH declined = energy; N = nitrogen; P = pulse; G = gradual [even).
5.51
.I.
>-3 -1
I I
1
I
3 5
I L
7 -3 -1 1 3 5 7
The NP treatments resulted in a 25% higher ( P = .2) Intake, FZow, and DigestibiZity o f CeZZ WuIZ Consti-
urinary N excretion, a 54% higher ( P < .001) ruminal tuents. There were no differences ( P > .2) between
outflow of NH3 N, a 47% lower ( P = .09) N retention, treatments in any of these traits (Table 7). Ruminal
an 11%lower ( P= . 0 7 ) microbial N flow, and a 10% digestion of NDF and ADF, expressed as a percentage
lower ( P = ,19) true MOEFF than the NG treatments. of total tract digestion, averaged 72 and 7996, respec-
tively.
Discussion
.rl
"r
a
rl
W
Effectiveness o f Buffer
Before During
Item infusioddosing infusioddosing SEAM Significance
Exp. 1
Water intake, gld
Voluntary 3,230 2,002 124.9 <.001
Infused/dosed 0 2,300 - -
Total 3,230 4,302 - -
Retention time of water, h 17.1 12.0 .77 <.001
Exp. 2
Water intake, gld
Voluntary 2,187 2,275 283.3 NSa
Infuseddosed 0 3,200 - -
Total 2,187 5,475 - -
Retention time of water. h 16.6 12.8 .93 <.001
Effect of Energy and Nitrogen Synchronization remained >7 mM at all times, that for treatments
on Rumen Characteristics and EPNP and EGNP, respectively, declined to between
Microbial Growth 4.6 and 5.2 mM and 3.3 and 4.3 mM for 65% of the
time. These values are, however, still at or above the
Experiment 1 . Degree of energy N synchronization mean concentration of 3.5 mM generally considered
had no significant effect on microbial N flow or sufficient for maximum microbial growth (Satter and
MOEFF, as is evidenced by the absence of any energy Slyter, 1974; ARC, 1984). The argument is further
x N interactions ( P > . 2j for these traits (Table 4 j. supported by the fact that microbial flow and MOEFF
This is in agreement with results obtained in vitro did not differ between the NG and NP treatments
(Henning et al., 1991; Newbold and Rust, 1992). It (Table 4).
may be argued that, although the time pattern of The data presented in Figure 2 suggest that the N
ruminal N H 3 N concentration differed between treat- supplied as pulse-doses in the NP treatments was
ments, the actual concentration was never limiting "depleted" by 5 h after dosing. Ruminal NH3 N
relative to the microbial growth resulting from the concentration nevertheless remained above approxi-
various energy supply patterns. From Figure 2, it can mately 3.5 mM until the next dosing (Figure 2).
be seen that, whereas NH3 N for the NG treatments Although N released from the basal diet would have
Table 4. Intake and flow of nitrogen and microbial growth efficiency in sheep receiving similar amounts of
soluble carbohydrate (energy) and nitrogen intraruminally according to different patterns (Exp. 1)
made some contribution in this respect, it is likely fermentation in the rumen (Houpt, 1970; Kennedy
that recycling of N from blood urea, via saliva or and Milligan, 1980).
through the ruminal epithelium, played a n important The plasma urea pool may be considered as a
role (Preston and Leng, 1987). This recycling can be “reserve N pool.” During periods of excessive N
considerable, as shown by Potthast et al. (19771, who availability in the rumen, NH3 N is absorbed and
calculated that 9.5 g of urea N daily entered the appears as urea in the plasma urea pool. This N may
rumen of sheep given a N-free basal diet plus 300 g of then be recycled back to the rumen during subsequent
sucrose per day. Recycling of urea to the rumen seems periods of N shortage. Nitrogen recycling may explain
to be positively related to the amount of soluble in the present study the lack of response to better
carbohydrate entering the rumen or to the rate of OM synchronization of energy and N supply t o the rumen.
Table 6. Intake, flow, and retention of nitrogen and microbial growth efficiency in sheep receiving similar
amounts of soluble carbohydrate (energy) and nitrogen intraruminally according to different patterns (Exp. 2)
This may not hold true at higher levels of energy and the time (Figure 4). This is lower than the mean
N input, at which point excessive absorbed N may be concentration of 3.5 mM generally considered to be
excreted in urine and recirculation of N to the rumen sufficient for maximum microbial growth (Satter and
at a later stage may be insufficient to meet the needs Slyter, 1974; ARC, 1984) and suggests the possibility
dictated by the higher energy supply. Cocimano and of insufficient recirculation of N H 3 to the rumen
Leng (1967) showed that high NPN input into the during the later stages of fermentation. This notion is
rumen, without a concomitant utilization of the further supported by the lower microbial N flow,
resulting N H 3 N, led t o more NH3 N being absorbed MOEFF, and N retention for treatment EGNP than
from the rumen into the blood, resulting in increased for EGNG.
plasma urea concentrations and subsequent increased The average ratio of N:energy for all treatments in
urinary excretion of urea. Inefficient ruminal utiliza- the present study was approximately 19 g of RDNkg
tion of NH3 N would thus be reflected in increased of FOMR. This corresponds to the value suggested as
urinary N excretion. ideal for ruminal microbial growth by Newbold and
Experiment 2. Similar to Exp. 1,better synchroniza- Rust (1990), based on their own results and those
tion of energy and N supply to the rumen at the presented by Czerkawski (1986). The need to balance
higher level of nutrition gave no significant improve- daily inputs of ruminally available energy and N is
ment ( P > .2 for energy x N interaction) in microbial well recognized (Stern, 1986; Nocek and Russell,
protein flow or MOEFF (Table 6). The higher N H 3 N 1988). From the foregoing discussion, it may be
outflow and urinary N excretion and the lower N postulated that, provided the overall balance between
retention, microbial N flow, and MOEFF for NP than
ruminally available N and ruminally fermentable OM
for NG treatments (Table 6 ) support the abovemen-
in the daily intake is sufficient, there is no further
tioned notion that high inputs of readily available N
advantage in synchronizing the release of energy and
into the rumen may result in inefficient NH3 N
utilization for microbial growth. A more synchronized N in the rumen over the shorter term.
energy supply did not seem to improve the situation, Salter et al. (1983) added tapioca or glucose ( a s
as is evidenced by a comparison of microbial N flow energy source) and urea ( a s N source) t o the rumens
and MOEFF values between EPNP and EGNP treat- of straw-fed steers according to various degrees of
ments in Table 6. In contrast, the lower ( P< ..05) NH3 synchronization. Their results support our conclusion
N outflow from the rumen for treatment EPNP than that no advantage is gained from diets and feeding
for treatment EGNP does suggest some advantage to regimens that aim at a high degree of energy and N
better energy and N synchronization with a fast N synchronization in the rumen. Studies with silage-
supply. based diets apparently yielded contradictory results.
Ruminal N H 3 N concentration for treatment EGNP The synchronization of N and energy release from
was approximately 2.5 mM for approximately 30% of silage is often considered to be poor (Rooke et al.,
1987). Dietary treatments aimed at rectifying this (Compare Figures 1 and 4 with 3 and 6, respectively.)
problem gave positive results, which were interpreted The fact that in the present in vivo study energy
as indicating a response in microbial growth to energy gradually supplied to the rumen resulted in higher,
and N synchronization in the rumen (Rooke et al., more efficient microbial production than the same
1987; Dawson et al., 1988; Rooke and Armstrong, amount of energy supplied according to a rapid
1989). None of these studies was, however, designed pattern seems t o conflict with results obtained using
to critically test the “energy and N synchronization” similar treatments in vitro (Henning et al., 1991).
idea per se and other factors may have played a role. This, however, may be explained by the fact that in
There are a number of recent studies specifically the in vitro study, pH remained well above 6.0 for
aimed at determining the effect of synchronizing the most of the incubation time for all treatments under
supply of protein and energy to the rumen on consideration and never declined below 6.0. Further-
microbial protein synthesis and animal production more, the MOEFF values referred t o were only
(Casper et al., 1990; Herrera-Saldana et al., 1990; calculated up to the point at which the energy-yielding
Matras et al., 1991). In all these studies, ingredients substrate was depleted. This is in contrast to the
with different rates of starch and N fermentation in periods of low pH and low levels of readily fermentable
the rumen were used t o formulate diets supposedly substrate encountered in the present study. The
varying in degree of synchronization of energy and N present results are also in contrast to those of Salter
released in the rumen. Some studies did show et al. (19831, who added starch or glucose to the
increased microbial flow and efficiency of growth for rumens of straw-fed steers, either as single doses or as
“better-synchronized” treatments (Herrera-Saldana et three, equally divided doses at 2-h intervals. They
al., 1990), whereas others showed no response found no significant differences in MOEFF between
(Casper et al., 1990). Treatments in these studies, the various supply patterns, in spite of the fact that
however, differed in ingredient composition, so degree the pulse-dose resulted in the decline of ruminal pH to
of energy and N synchronization may have been approximately 5.5, whereas pH remained well above
confounded by other ruminal effects inherent to 6.0 for treatments in which CH was more evenly
specific ingredients. Furthermore, using different in- supplied. Results of Casper and Schingoethe ( 1989)
and Casper et al. (1990) with diets that differed in
gredients, each with a different fermentation rate,
starch degradation rates also suggest that there is no
would also cause differences between treatments in
difference between faster or slower release of energy
respect to the ratios and total amounts of energy and
in the rumen. In contrast to these findings, Herrera-
N released into the rumen. It is quite likely that
Saldana et al. (1990) and Matras et al. (1991), using
responses in microbial growth ascribed to improved
complete diets varying in the ruminal degradation
energy and N synchronization may instead have been rate of ingredients, found improved microbial protein
the result of an improvement in overall balance of flow and efficiency of growth with the faster-ferment-
energy and N supply t o the rumen. ing diets. Again, it must be emphasized that treat-
ments in these studies differed not only in energy
Effect o f Energy Supply Pattern on Ruminal supply pattern but also in ingredient composition.
Characteristics and Microbial Growth Thus, the effect of energy supply pattern may have
The EP treatments in Exp. 1 resulted in lower been confounded with other ruminal effects inherent
to the specific ingredients. The use of different
microbial N flows ( P < .OO 1) and MOEFF ( P < . 0 5 )
ingredients with different fermentation rates also
than the respective EG treatments (Table 4). Effi-
implies treatment differences in the total amount of
ciency of microbial growth in Exp. 2 showed a similar
energy released in the rumen.
trend ( P = .16) (Table 6). This may be ascribed t o the
abundance of rapidly fermentable CH in the rumen
Fiber Digestion (Experiment 2)
directly after dosing for the EP treatments (Figures 3
and 61, which in turn would have caused the observed The absence of any significant treatment effects on
increase in ruminal lactic acid concentration (Table ruminal or whole-tract fiber digestibility (Table 7 ) is
1) (Dawson and Allison, 1989). Although lactic acid similar to the findings of Herrera-Saldana and Huber
as such is not detrimental to MOEFF (Jaakkola and (1989) when they fed diets that varied in protein and
Huhtanen, 19891, lactate production implies a lower starch degradation to dairy cows. The NDF and ADF
energy yield per unit of carbohydrate fermented digestibility values are in the expected range for high-
(Strobel and Russell, 1986). Energetic uncoupling of concentrate diets, in which the presence of CH and the
microbial growth was also found to occur at a pH of 5 lower ruminal pH may have had a negative effect on
6.0 (Russell and Dombrowski, 1980; Strobel and fiber digestibility (McCarthy et al., 1989). Ruminal
Russell, 1986). The combined effect of these events digestibility of NDF and ADF was on average 72 and
would be a decrease in MOEFF and microbial flow. 79% of the respective total-tract digestibilities. This
The situation may have been further aggravated by compares well with corresponding values of 72 and
the relatively lower soluble CH availabilities that 76% found by Cecava et al. (1990).
coincide with the return of ruminal pH to levels Fahey and Jung (1983) reviewed the use of lignin
similar to those before the pulse-dose was given. as a digesta flow marker. They pointed out that many