Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Raman Spectroscopy of Carbon-Nanotube-Based Composites
Raman Spectroscopy of Carbon-Nanotube-Based Composites
net/publication/234252195
CITATIONS READS
182 1,054
2 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
EU Matera grant „Bioactive Nanocomposite Constructs for Regeneration of Articular Cartilage.” Acronym:BioNanoCoRe (2007-2010y) View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Daniel Hanoch Wagner on 29 May 2014.
Email alerting service Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top
right-hand corner of the article or click here
10.1098/rsta.2004.1447
Raman spectroscopy of
carbon-nanotube-based composites
By Q i n g Z h a o a n d H. Daniel Wagner
Department of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science,
Rehovot 76100, Israel (daniel.wagner@weizmann.ac.il)
1000
critical
900 strain
points
800
5% SWNT loading
700
stress (MPa)
600
500
400
300 1% SWNT loading
200
100
0
0 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.012 0.015
strain (mm mm−1)
Figure 1. Typical stress–strain plots for composite carbon fibres with 1 and 5 wt % SWNT
loadings. (Reproduced with permission from Andrews et al. (1999).)
electron microscopy (TEM) observation confirmed the effective load transfer between
the matrix and the nanotubes (Qian et al. 2000). In conclusion, nanotubes may in
principle be used as polymer modifiers to improve electric, magnetic and mechanical
properties.
(a) (b)
Raman intensity
9
RBM D G'
number
G 6
3
2nd 0 1 2 3
0.5 µm
dt (nm)
0 1000 2000 3000
frequency (cm−1)
Figure 2. (a) Raman spectrum from one nanotube taken over a broad frequency range using
Elaser = 785 nm = 1.58 eV excitation, and showing the radial breathing mode, the D band, the
G band, second-order features and the G band. The features marked with ‘∗’ at 303, 521 and
963 cm−1 are from the Si/SiO2 substrate and are used for calibration of the nanotube Raman
spectrum. (b) AFM image of the sample showing isolated SWNTs grown from the vapour phase.
The small particles are iron catalyst particles. The inset shows the diameter distribution of
this sample based on the AFM observations of 40 SWNTs; dAV t = 1.85 nm. (Reproduced with
permission from Dresselhaus et al. (2002a).)
effects, all of which lower the crystalline symmetry of the quasi-infinite lattice. This
association of the D band with symmetry-breaking phenomena results in a D band
intensity that is proportional to the phonon density of states (Brown et al. 2001).
The G (or D∗ ) band is the second-order overtone of D band. The locations of D
and D∗ Raman bands of CNTs depend linearly on the laser excitation energy and
this dispersion relation of the D and D∗ band of nanotubes is similar to that in other
sp2 carbons, though with some distinct characteristic behaviour that is specific to
nanotubes. A shift of the D and D∗ bands of CNTs has been observed in different
cases. The strong linear dispersion of the D and D∗ band frequency in graphite
has been identified with a resonance process between a phonon and an electronic
transition between π and π ∗ electronic states (Matthews et al. 1999; Pócsik et al.
1998; Thomsen & Reich 2000).
nanotube fractions were compared and the Raman frequencies were identical for
all three fractions. This indicates that each fraction contained nanotubes of equiv-
alent diameter. There was no obvious band broadening and shoulders observed in
the sample, which suggests a high degree of uniformity in nanotube diameter within
the sample. Therefore, the difference in mobility between fractions is due to differ-
ences in nanotube lengths (Doorn et al. 2002). More results indicate that CE has the
potential to separate CNTs, not only by differences in length but also by differences
in size or other geometric factors, such as diameter or cross-section. Closer inspec-
tion of how the radial breathing mode region of the Raman spectra changes over
the course of a separation, provides information on whether diameter-selective sepa-
rations are occurring superimposed on the length-based mechanism. The variations
in the radial breathing mode intensities indicate that there are diameter-dependent
spectral changes occurring over the course of a separation (Doorn et al. 2003).
The Raman frequency, intensity and band shape of the vibrations can vary when
nanotubes interact with other species: this can be used to examine the structure
of the interface and obtain information about the nature, localization and force
of the interaction. Raman spectroscopy was used to probe the structure of pep-
tide/nanotube fibres, in which a specially designed amphiphilic α-helical peptide
was used not only to coat and solubilize CNTs, but also to control the assembly
of the peptide-coated nanotubes into macromolecular structures through peptide–
peptide interactions between adjacent peptide-wrapped nanotubes. After the nano-
tubes were dispersed in aqueous solution by sonication, a shift of more than 9 cm−1
was observed towards higher frequencies in the radial breathing mode, evidence that
nanotubes were no longer in direct contact with one another along their length as
they were in the absence of peptide. The changes observed in the nanotube tangential
mode feature centred at 1590 cm−1 emphasized that peptide is coating the individual
nanotubes in the peptide/SWNT composite. Raman spectra of NaCl induced fibres
confirmed the presence of CNTs in the fibres and showed increases in the radial
breathing mode frequencies, suggesting that the fibres were composed of peptide-
coated SWNTs (Dieckmann et al. 2003).
polarized Raman spectroscopy has been used to analyse the orientation of CNT
bundles generated by an electrophoretic method (Poulin et al. 2002). In another
case, nanotubes were oriented into bundles by applying an electric field between a
carbon fibre and the ultrasonicated SWNT/N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) suspen-
sion, and polarized Raman spectroscopy was then used to quantify the alignment of
nanotubes as a function of the angle between the fibre and the polarizer (Gommans
et al. 2000). The crystallite orientation and the SWNT alignment in melt-blended
SWNT/PP composites fibres have been studied using X-ray diffraction and polarized
Raman spectroscopy, which showed that there is an orientation effect in the drawn
SWNT/PP fibre (Bhattacharyya et al. 2003). A combination of solvent casting and
melt mixing was used to disperse SWNTs in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA),
and polarized Raman spectroscopy was again used to demonstrate the alignment of
nanotubes in the PMMA (Haggenmueller et al. 2000). More recently, Frogley et al.
(2002) have performed a thorough study of nanotube alignment in polymers using
polarized Raman spectroscopy, and compared a large amount of experimental results
with existing models such as those by Saito et al. (1998) and Gommans et al. (2000).
It was demonstrated that a non-resonant theory (Saito’s) gives the most reasonable
orientation distribution for the tubes. A good degree of nanotube alignment was
obtained by a simple shear-flow technique.
2003). With the introduction of nanotubes in PP, the feature at 1270 cm−1 is shifted
up to 1275 cm−1 and its width is narrower. The peak observed at 1260 cm−1 for neat
SWNTs decreases in intensity in the composite, indicating a dilution effect of the
CNTs when blended with PP. In fact, Valentini et al. (2003) believe that the polymer
exerts a pressure on the individual tubes, which leads to an increase of the breathing
mode frequencies. In a recent study (Zhao et al. 2001b), irregularities (or discontinu-
ities) have been observed in the wavenumber–temperature plot for both amorphous
bisphenol A polycarbonate (PC) and polyurethane acrylate (PUA), where nano-
tubes have been embedded. The Raman results have been compared with dynamic
mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) data for both polymers, and the sources of the
discontinuities were investigated. The concordance found between the DMTA data
and the Raman spectral response shows that these irregularities reflect basic poly-
mer phase transitions, which may thus be sensed by nanotubes and reflected in the
Raman spectrum. This demonstrates that SWNTs can be used as molecular sensors
(Zhao et al. 2001b).
These examples show that, since nanotubes are sensitive to their environment,
Raman spectroscopy is a useful and reliable tool for the investigation of nanotube–
polymer interactions and can be used for the research of CNT-based composites, as
will now be further demonstrated.
arise from the strain transferred from the matrix to nanotubes. The different Raman
responses in tension and compression are most likely to be due to the structure of
MWNTs. Indeed, Schadler et al. (1998) believe that, under tension, the outer layer
of the MWNT is loaded, but load is not effectively transferred to the inner layers
due to the relatively weak bonding between the nanotube layers. Instead, the inner
tubes may slip with respect to the outer tubes. Since the Raman signal is averaged
over the whole MWNT, the result is only an insignificant Raman peak shift. Under
compression, however, the load transfer to the inner layers of the MWNT occurs
through buckling and the bent sections of the nanotubes. Slippage of nanotubes lay-
ers in compression is prevented because of the seamless structure of the tubes and
the geometrical constraint the outer layer imposes on the inner layers (Schadler et al.
1998). Similar experiments have been performed with SWNTs, but the D∗ Raman
results showed that under compression there is almost no shift and only a small
downward shift under tension (Ajayan et al. 2000). Ajayan et al. (2000) observed
that the applied compressive stress is transferred into buckling, bending or twisting
of the nanotube network without introducing important local deformation that can
be monitored by Raman. Since SWNTs tend to form ropes, the small Raman shift
under tension is due to the fact that the individual SWNTs are slipping within the
ropes and decrease the load required to deform the ropes (Ajayan et al. 2000). In
both cases, the tensile and compressive strains are applied uniaxially on the samples,
though the nanotubes are dispersed randomly in the polymer matrix (Ajayan et al.
2000; Schadler et al. 1998). When the nanotube composite samples are under ten-
sion, nanotubes lying along the tensile direction are under tension, but those in the
perpendicular direction are under compression because of the Poisson’s contraction.
The reverse is true when the sample is under compression. Since the Raman laser
spot size is ca. 1–5 µm thick, and nanotube diameters are several nanometres in size,
the Raman signal is averaged over nanotubes in all directions, but Ajayan et al.
(2000) and Schadler et al. (1998) do not consider this in detail.
Significant D∗ Raman shifts were measured when a nanotube polymer composite
was tested at different temperatures under no mechanical tension, and this was con-
sidered to result from thermal shrinkage (Lourie & Wagner 1998). Other results show
that an elastic tensile strain can be transferred from the polymer matrix to SWNTs
resulting in a downward shift of the D∗ Raman wavenumber of the nanotubes (Cooper
et al. 2001). Additional research shows that an empirical linear relationship exists
between the SWNT D∗ wavenumber shift and the applied elastic strain (Wood et al.
2001). If the nanotube D∗ wavenumber difference between zero strain and the applied
strain (ε) is defined as the Raman wavenumber shift ∆Nw , then the empirical slope
m of the wavenumber–strain relation can be defined from:
∆Nw = mε. (4.1)
A mechanical stress–strain curve can be recorded simultaneously with the Raman
measurement. In the elastic regime of a tensile test, the stress σ and the strain ε in
the polymer are related by
σ = Eε, (4.2)
where E is the Young modulus of the polymer. Therefore, the matrix stress may be
deduced from the Raman measurement:
E∆Nw
σ = Eε = . (4.3)
m
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A (2004)
Downloaded from rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org on May 23, 2011
2635
10 13 14
2630 9 15
wavenumber (cm−1) 6 12 16
11
2625 5
7
3
2620 2 8
4
2615
2610 1
2605
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800
pressure (MPa)
∗
Figure 3. The peak positions of the D Raman peak in SWNTs plotted as a function of () the
molecular (by immersion in liquids) and () macroscopic (using DAC) pressure. The molecular
pressure is the cohesive energy density of the liquid in which the nanotubes are immersed: for
these experiments the external applied pressure was ambient, 1 atm. The macroscopic pressure
was applied to nanotubes immersed in liquid argon as a hydrostatic pressure medium. The solid
line is a polynomial fit. 1, air; 2, decane; 3, hexane; 4, dodecane; 5, cyclohexane; 6, carbon
tetrachloride; 7, chloroform; 8, hexylene glycol; 9, acetone; 10, diethylene glycol; 11, propylene
glycol; 12, ethanol; 13, ethylene glycol; 14, glycerol; 15, formamide; 16, water. (Reproduced with
permission from Wood et al. (2000).)
2645
2640
m (235 K) = 909 cm−1 / ε
wavenumber (cm−1)
2635
2625
2620
2615
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
strain
Figure 4. The wavenumber–strain response of SWNTs embedded in PUA. data are obtained
at 298 K (room temperature) and • data are obtained at 235 K.
140
120
100
σy
stress (MPa)
80
60
40 σy
20
Experiments show that m varies when nanotubes are embedded in different poly-
mer matrices (Frogley et al. 2002; Wood et al. 2001; Zhao et al. 2001b). Recent results
in our laboratory show that, for a given matrix, m is a temperature-dependent param-
eter. Figure 4 shows the Raman wavenumber–strain response of SWNTs embedded
in PUA at two temperatures. The data denoted by triangles were obtained at 298 K
(room temperature) and the data denoted by solid circles were obtained at 235 K.
The initial part of both datasets is approximately linear within the elastic strain
region (ca. 1.5%). The values of m at both temperatures are 467 cm−1 /ε (as in Wood
et al. (2001)) and 909 cm−1 /ε, respectively. As the tensile strain increases, the wave-
number reaches a value of ca. 2623 cm−1 then remains approximately constant with
increasing strain, for both temperatures. The temperature dependence of the m val-
ues of the SWNTs in PUA can be attributed to the fact that the Young modulus (E)
of the polymer is a temperature-dependent parameter, E(T ). Equation (4.3) should
read
E(T )∆Nw
σ = E(T )ε = . (4.4)
m(T )
A spectroscopic stress–strain curve can thus be constructed from these data. In fig-
ure 5, the solid lines represent the mechanical stress–strain curves of PUA at 235 K
and 298 K. The symbols in figure 5 are the ‘spectroscopic stress–strain curve’ con-
structed from equation (4.4) using the Raman data in figure 4. The values of m(T ),
E(T ) used for these specimens are obtained experimentally at the corresponding
temperatures. Within the linear region, the spectroscopic curves fit exactly the cor-
responding mechanical curves. Beyond ca. 1.5%, the spectroscopic data deviate from
3.5
3.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
theory
0.5
the mechanical curve. The yield stress σy at which the mechanical stress–strain curve
becomes nonlinear is indicated on the figure.
The discussion thus far shows that SWNTs indeed perform as sensors to detect
the elastic stress or strain in the polymer matrix. Such a microscale Raman sensing
technique has practical importance. As an example, it may be useful to measure the
matrix stress distribution in the vicinity of fibres to detect or predict the onset of fail-
ure in composite materials (Hull 1981). As already mentioned, Raman spectroscopy
has been successfully used since the early 1980s to monitor the deformation of spe-
cific fibres such as aramid, SiC and carbon, as specific Raman peak frequencies of the
Raman bands of these fibres are indeed sensitive to the applied strain (Batchelder
& Bloor 1979; Galiotis et al. 1983; Robinson et al. 1987a). Correlating these Raman
shifts to the applied strain leads to an evaluation of the stress distributions in the
fibres at a micrometre scale, and provides a means of deducing the interfacial shear
stress (Galiotis & Batchelder 1988; Galiotis et al. 1984; Nielsen & Pyrz 1999; Robin-
son et al. 1987b; Wagner et al. 2000). In reality, the micro-Raman technique cannot be
applied universally, since some fibres do not have strain-sensitive Raman peaks, glass
fibres being the best known example. In addition, since most polymers do not have
strain-sensitive Raman bands, it is practically impossible to use Raman spectroscopy
in those materials to detect the stress (or strain) distribution around discontinuities
in polymers for most composites; it is also impossible to perform in situ measure-
ments of the stress (or strain) distribution in glass fibres and in the matrix. This is
where dispersing SWNT sensors in the polymer matrix proves useful, as a flexible
tool that makes such measurements possible.
1.00
4 1.06
R (fibre radius)
1.11
1.14
2 1.18
1.24
(a)
2.5
2.0
1.0
0.5
−0.5
21 (b)
stress in the matrix (MPa)
18
15
12
6
−1000 0 1000 2000 3000
distance along the fibre (µm)
Figure 8. Stress distributions in (a) the HMCF and (b) the PUA matrix along the fibre edge
(2 µm from the edge), measured simultaneously by micro Raman spectroscopy. The distributions
are mirror images of each other. The applied stress level was 10 MPa. The solid line in (a) is a
polynomial fit to the data. In (b), the line is the mirror image of the fit in (a), scaled accordingly.
(Reproduced with permission from Zhao & Wagner (2003).)
basic idea of this experiment was to simultaneously detect the stress distributions
in the fibre and in the matrix using Raman spectroscopy, and to compare the
results with existing stress-transfer models. A continuous high-modulus carbon fibre
(HMCF)/PUA composite with nanotubes dispersed in the matrix was chosen. The
G Raman band of HMCF shifts linearly with applied strain. The strain in the fibre
and the matrix were measured simultaneously under three applied stress levels, par-
allel to the fibre direction. Figure 8 presents the distribution of stress in the carbon
fibre and in the matrix, between two break locations measured at an applied stress
of 10 MPa. A polynomial curve was fitted through the experimental data points. As
seen, the stress profiles in the matrix and the fibre, measured simultaneously for the
first time to the authors’ knowledge, complement each other well (Young et al. 2001).
Also, the experimental result fits the Kelly–Tyson stress-transfer analysis (Kelly &
Tyson 1965).
5. Conclusions
Recent developments in the application of Raman spectroscopy to CNT-based com-
posite materials have been reviewed, and some new data presented. This technique
may be used to distinguish CNTs from other carbon materials or polymers, as well
as to sort nanotubes by diameter or length. Raman spectroscopy has also been used
to check the dispersion of nanotube in polymers, evaluate nanotube/matrix inter-
actions, and detect polymer phase transitions. The Raman spectra of nanotubes
can also be used to quantify the strain or stress transferred to nanotubes from the
surrounding environment. Since small amounts of embedded nanotubes required to
make the polymer Raman sensitive to strain do not affect the mechanical properties
of the embedding matrix, these nanoscale tubes may be used to investigate local
stresses and strains in polymer materials, a result that is so far inaccessible by using
other methods. Polarized Raman can be used to detect the orientation of nanotubes
in polymer matrices. Oriented SWNT sensors can be used to detect stress fields
around a circular hole in a plate, demonstrating the applicability of the technique
for the mapping of the stress distribution in the vicinity of discontinuities.
A polarized Raman technique was developed to detect the stress or strain in a
matrix using randomly dispersed SWNTs, based on the fact that the intensity of the
signal arising from SWNTs is a function of the polarization direction. This method is
more convenient than the tube orientation technique, since it is not always possible
to orient SWNTs inside a polymer. The polarized Raman technique was used to
detect and map the stress fields in the model fibre–polymer composite. The stress
distributions around fibre breaks were measured and compared with classical load
transfer models in composite materials.
This project was supported by the (CNT) Thematic European network on ‘Carbon Nanotubes
for Future Industrial Composites’ (EU), the G. M. J. Schmidt Minerva Centre of Supramolecular
Architectures, and by the Israeli Academy of Science. H.D.W. is the incumbent of the Livio Norzi
Professorial Chair. Thanks are due to Dr Mark Frogley and Dr Jonathan Wood for guidance.
H.D.W. acknowledges the inspiring assistance of B. Goodman and L. Hampton.
References
Ajayan, P. M., Schadler, L. S., Giannaris, C. & Rubio, A. 2000 Single-walled carbon nanotube–
polymer composites: strength and weakness. Adv. Mater. 12, 750–753.
Andrews, R., Jacques, D., Rao, A. M., Rantell, T., Derbyshire, F., Chen, Y., Chen, J. & Haddon,
R. C. 1999 Nanotube composite carbon fibers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 1329–1331.
Barraza, H. J., Pompeo, F., O’Rear, E. A. & Resasco, D. E. 2002 SWNT-filled thermoplastic
and elastomeric composites prepared by mini-emulsion polymerization. Nano Lett. 2, 787.
Batchelder, D. N. & Bloor, D. 1979 Strain dependence of the vibrational-modes of a diacetylene
crystal. J. Polym. Sci. B 17, 569–581.
Bhattacharyya, A. R., Sreekkumar, T. V., Liu, T., Kumar, S., Erincson, L. M., Hauge, R. H.
& Smalley, R. E. 2003 Crystallization and orientation studies in polypropylene/single wall
carbon nanotube composite. Polymer 44, 2373–2377.
Brown, S. D. M., Jorio, A., Dresselhaus, M. S. & Dresselhaus, G. 2001 Observations of the
D-band features in the Raman spectra of carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 64, 073403.
Cooper, C. A., Young, R. J. & Halsall, M. 2001 Investigation into the deformation of carbon
nanotubes and their composites through the use of Raman spectroscopy. Composites A 32,
401–411.
Nielsen, A. S. & Pyrz, R. 1999 Study of the influence of thermal history on the load transfer effi-
ciency and fibre failure in carbon/polypropylene microcomposites using Raman spectroscopy.
Compos. Interf. 6, 467–482.
Pócsik, I., Hundhausen, M., Koós, M. & Ley, L. 1998 Origin of the D peak in the Raman
spectrum of microcrystalline graphite. J. Non-cryst. Solids B 227–230, 1083.
Poulin, P., Vigolo, B. & Launois, P. 2002 Films and fibers of oriented single wall nanotubes.
Carbon 40, 1741–1749.
Qian, D., Dickey, E. C., Andrews, R. & Rantell, T. 2000 Load transfer and deformation mech-
anisms in carbon nanotube-polystyrene composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2868–2870.
Rinzler, A. G. (and 14 others) 1998 Large-scale purification of single-wall carbon nanotubes:
process, product, and characterization. Appl. Phys. A 67, 29–37.
Robinson, I. M., Zakikhani, M., Day, R. J., Young, R. J. & Galiotis, C. 1987a Strain dependence
of the Raman frequencies for different types of carbon-fibers. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 6, 1212–1214.
Robinson, I. M., Young, R. J., Galiotis, C. & Batchelder, D. N. 1987b Study of model polydi-
acetylene epoxy composites. 2. Effect of resin shrinkage. J. Mater. Sci. 22, 3642–3646.
Saito, R., Takeya, T., Kimura, T., Dresselhaus, G. & Dresselhaus, M. S. 1998 Raman intensity
of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 57, 4145.
Salvetat, J. P., Bonard, J. M., Thomson, N. H., Kulik, A. J., Forro, L., Benoit, W. & Zuppiroli,
L. 1999 Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. A 69, 255–260.
Schadler, L. S., Giannaris, S. C. & Ajayan, P. M. 1998 Load transfer in carbon nanotubes epoxy
composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3842–3844.
Shaffer, M. S. P. & Windle, A. H. 1999 Fabrication and characterization of carbon nano-
tube/poly(vinyl alcohol) composites. Adv. Mater. 11, 937–941.
Stephan, C., Nguyen, T. P., de la Chapelle, M. L., Lefrant, S., Journet, C. & Bernier, P. 2000
Characterization of single-walled carbon nanotubes-PMMA composites. Synth. Metals 108,
139–149.
Thomsen, C. & Reich, S. 2000 Double resonant Raman scattering in graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett.
85, 5214–5217.
Treacy, M. M. J., Ebbesen, T. W. & Gibson, J. M. 1996 Exceptionally high Young’s modulus
observed for individual carbon nanotubes. Nature 381, 678–680.
Valentini, L., Biagiotti, J., Kenny, J. M. & Santucci, S. 2003 Morphological characterization of
single-walled carbon nanotubes-PP composites. Compos. Sci. Tech. 63, 1149–1153.
Venkateswaran, V. D., Rao, A. M., Richter, E., Menon, M., Rinzler, A., Smalley, R. E. &
Eklund, P. C. 1999 Probing the single-wall carbon nanotube bundle: Raman scattering under
high pressure. Phys. Rev. B 59, 10 928–10 934.
Wagner, H. D., Amer, M. S. & Schadler, L. S. 2000 Residual compression stress profile in high-
modulus carbon fiber embedded in isotactic polypropylene by micro-Raman spectroscopy.
Appl. Compos. Mater. 7, 209–217.
Wood, J. R., Frogley, M. D., Meurs, E. R., Prins, A. D., Peijs, T., Dunstan, D. J. & Wagner, H. D.
1999 Mechanical response of carbon nanotubes under molecular and macroscopic pressures.
J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 10 388–10 392.
Wood, J. R., Zhao, Q., Frogley, M. D., Meurs, E. R., Prins, A. D., Peijs, T., Dunstan, D. J. &
Wagner, H. D. 2000 Carbon nanotubes: from molecular to macroscopic sensors. Phys. Rev.
B 62, 7571–7575.
Wood, J. R., Zhao, Q. & Wagner, H. D. 2001 Orientation of carbon nanotubes in polymers and
its detection by Raman spectroscopy. Composites A 32, 391–399.
Yakobson, B. I. & Smalley, R. E. 1997 Fullerene nanotubes: C1 000 000 and beyond. Am. Sci. 85,
324–337.
Young, R. J., Thongpin, C., Standford, J. L. & Lovell, P. A. 2001 Fragmentation analysis of
glass fibres in model composites through the use of Raman spectroscopy. Composites A 32,
253–269.
Zhao, Q. & Wagner, H. D. 2003 Two-dimensional stress field mapping of fiber reinforced polymer
composites using carbon nanotube strain sensors. Composites A 34, 1219–1225.
Zhao, Q., Frogley, M. D. & Wagner, H. D. 2001a The use of carbon nanotubes to sense matrix
stresses around a single glass fiber. Compos. Sci. Tech. 61, 2139–2143.
Zhao, Q., Wood, J. R. & Wagner, H. D. 2001b Using carbon nanotubes to detect polymer
transitions. J. Polym. Sci. B 39, 1492–1495.
Zhao, Q., Wood, J. R. & Wagner, H. D. 2001c Stress fields around defects and fibers in a polymer
using carbon nanotubes as sensors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 1748–1750.