Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CRPC Midterm Online Answer Script
CRPC Midterm Online Answer Script
The case is about, upon which grounds Discharge can be given under section 265C
of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Discharge can be given if after submission of charge sheet, in the hearing, if the
court finds no valid ground from the records of the case or documents, for
proceed against such accused.
On basis of statement upon the record of the case and documents or his
designation or status can not be considered as ground for discharge.
All the evidences and statements of the witnesses is not clear against the accused
and valid charge was not made against him.
The trial court can accepts his application and discharged him on the grounds of
his statement, designation and his status.
Analyzing section 265C, the High Court states that, the accused can only be
discharged under 265C if no ground to proceed against him is found in the case
record or documents.
Accused can submit his statements or documents in defense under section 342
but at the time of his examination, not before that.
If accused wants to give excuse to get rid of such charge then he is bound to
prove it under section 106 of the Evidence Act.
Student ID:
The incident is Mr X lodged a first information report with the Foridgonj Police Station on
27.03.2010 against P, N & R. The informant is the owner of a piece of land by away
of inheritance. The informant has been living in the said land for a long time by
constructing a house. The accused persons named in the F.I.R. were trying to
dispossess them from the said land a for a long time but failed. A salish was held
on the date of occurrence and the local elite persons took an attempt to make a
peaceful compromise between the accused and the informant parties. At the time
of holding salish, the accused persons, all on sudden, being armed with deadly
weapons made on attacked upon the informant and his relations with lathal
weapon. The witnesses nos. 1-8 as shown in the F.I.R. tried to restrain them but
the accused persons assaulted the informant and his relations severally, broken
down their houses and took away valuable articles of the house (worth of) valued
at TK. 4,00000 (four lacs). It is stated in the F.I.R. that, amongst the accused persons,
accused P with a view to kill the victim Anzoman Begum inflicted a “Chheni” hit
on her head and the victim sustained a grievous cut injury. She was sent to Dhaka
for treatment. N with a view to kill Jolekha inflicted a “Dao” hit on the head of
Jolekha and she also sustained grievous cut injuries. R dealt lathi hits on the body
of witness No. 5 and caused lacerated injury. The victims were taken to Faridgonj
Health Complex but they were prevented. Thereafter they were sent to Chandpur
Sadar Hospital and was admitted. But the Chandpur Medical Authority did not
The learned Additional Sessions Judge took up a hearing for framing of charge on
29.2.2012 and accused persons submitted an application under section 265C of the Code
of Criminal Procedure for getting them discharged from the allegations made out in the
F.I.R.
** Plagiarism will be checked after you submit your response. You are advised to be honest
during the online exam.
Student ID:
power of courts. It Does not mean that courts are bound to accept all appeals .
Everyone has a right to be heard before any order is made or any decree is passed against him.
Similarly, everyone also has a right to appeal against such order or decree if the person believes
that he was heard properly or if the deciding authority ignored material facts or evidence while
determining the issues. However, to facilitate justice and prevent malicious or meritless
prosecution, the Code of Criminal Procedure provides situations where no appeal lies from the
order or judgment of a court in criminal cases.
According to section 404 of CRPC No appeal shall lie from any judgment or order of a
Criminal Court except as provided for by this Code or by any other law for the time being in
force.
In case where the accused person plead guilty and get convicted by the court in that case there
is no right to appeal but the accused can appeal only for the extent or legality of the sentence.
That means if the accused person had confessed his guilt before a court and was convicted on
such confession he cannot appeal against his conviction but can only challenge the extent or
legality of the sentence.
It is provided by section 412 of crpc. But if after pleading guilty, the accused feels that the
sentence passed by the trial court or any other court of the first instance is too harsh, an appeal
can be allowed in such circumstances as well to allow the accused to argue on the extent of the
sentence, i.e. imprisonment or/and fine.
An appeal cannot be taken from a criminal case that is considered petty in the eyes of law For
example in case where the court of session give sentence for only one month or a magistrate
give a fine not more then fifty taka only in that case there is no appeal for this petty cases. In
provision is included in section 413 of the code of criminal procedure.
According to section 414 of CRPC " Notwithstanding anything hereinbefore contained, there
shall be no appeal by a convicted person in any case tried summarily in which a Magistrate
empowered to act under section 260 passes a sentence of fine not exceeding two hundred Taka
only."
It has already been established that in certain criminal cases, appeals are not allowed by the
Code of Criminal Procedure and there are certain exceptions to this rule as well.
The appeal is a constitutional right for an unsuccessful party in the court. Revision on the other
hand is discretion of the court, meaning it can take place or not.
** Plagiarism will be checked after you submit your response. You are advised to be honest
during the online exam.
Student ID:
The appeal is a court hearing like any other while revision is not necessarily heard in the court.
In appeals, the courts have the power to interfere in any way but in revision the influence of
intervention is limited.
There is only one procedure involved in an appeal that is the hearing of the case. In revision,
however, two methods are included, preliminary and final.
according to the above question X has been sentenced to imprisonment for 5 (five) years. The
session court remitted his punishment on certain conditions.
The session court has no power to to remit the punishment of accuse only the government has
the power to remit it.
According to section 401 only the government can suspense or remit the sentence of the accuse
person.
In remission, the duration of the sentence is reduced, without changing the nature of the
sentence.
The procedure followed is given under Section 401 of CrPC. The government would ask the
opinion of the court which gave such a sentence. The court would revert with proper records.
The government can grant or reject the application for remission and suspension if in its view
all the conditions necessary for such a grant are not fulfilled. The power of remission is wholly
an executive action. There is no law as such to question the legality of this action.
According to section 401(1) When any person has been sentenced to punishment for an offence,
the Government may at any time without conditions or upon any conditions which the person
sentenced accepts, suspend the execution of his sentence or remit the whole or any part of the
punishment to which he has been sentenced.
in the above question we notice that the session court has remitted the punishment on some
condition it has no legality because only the government can remit or suspense the
punishment.
When a person is convicted at one trial of two or more offences, the Court may, subject to the
provisions, sentence him for such offences, to the several punishments prescribed therefor
which such Court is competent to inflict; such punishments when consisting of imprisonment to
commence the one after the expiration of the other in such order as the Court may direct, unless
** Plagiarism will be checked after you submit your response. You are advised to be honest
during the online exam.
Student ID:
the Court directs that such punishments shall run concurrently. According to482.(1) If the Court
in any case considers that a person accused of any of the offences referred to in section 480 and
committed in its view or presence should be imprisoned otherwise than in default of payment
of fine, or that a fine exceeding two hundred taka should be imposed upon him, or such Court
is for any other reason of opinion that the case should not be disposed of under section 480,
such Court, after recording the facts constituting the offence and the statement of the accused as
hereinbefore provided, may forward the case to a Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the same,
and may require security to be given for the appearance of such accused person before such
Magistrate, or if sufficient security is not given, shall forward such person in custody to such
Magistrate.
** Plagiarism will be checked after you submit your response. You are advised to be honest
during the online exam.
Student ID:
** Plagiarism will be checked after you submit your response. You are advised to be honest
during the online exam.
Student ID:
** Plagiarism will be checked after you submit your response. You are advised to be honest
during the online exam.