Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This Study Resource Was
This Study Resource Was
m
unnecessary (Antibiotic Resistance Project). Diseases, such as pneumonia,
er as
tuberculosis, and gonorrhea, are growing increasingly difficult to treat, and in
co
some cases, they are impossible due to the bacteria’s resistance to what at one
eH w
point was a solution (WHO). As a result, medical costs increase because of the
development of newer, more complicated, and more expensive drugs.
o.
Despite these developments, there is little to no guarantee for these new drugs
rs e
to be safe against antibiotic resistance. In fact, due to eventual overuse,
ou urc
misuse, and the high reproductive rates and a short generational gap of
bacteria, it is only a matter of time before mutations and natural selection
bring about resistance.
Without any specific solutions or strategies, new drug production is a seemingly
o
Economic Forum, Nobel Prize winner and chemist based at the Laboratory of
v i y re
development process, as well as a large amount of time it could take, all with
ar stu
the potential for failure. The World Health Organization (WHO) shares a similar
view on the issue. They also call for the sparing use of antibiotics and for the
healthcare industry to invest in the research and development of new vaccines
and other tools to bring forward alternatives to antibiotics, making it easier
to limit their use (WHO). However, Ramakrishnan goes on further to say that
sh is
This study source was downloaded by 100000822654079 from CourseHero.com on 08-13-2021 06:47:08 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/86783881/document-3txt/
multidrug-resistant Klebsiella aerogenes was only controlled once the use of all
antibiotics was suspended (Barbosa). The general consensus in the successes of
decreasing antibiotic resistance in hospitals occurred after implementation of
policies that regulate and control antibiotic use (Barbosa). This also holds
true on a much larger scale. In 1998, Denmark began to restrict the use of
antibiotics for growth promotion in livestock and poultry.
With the implementation of these new policies, all antibiotics used on food
animals must be prescribed by a veterinarian who can not profit from the sale,
and farmers, pharmacies, and veterinarians must report their use (Antibiotic
Resistance Project). As a result of these restrictions, a diminution of
resistance to antibiotics such as avoparcin and macrolides occurred (Casewell).
Within a year after the ban took place, antibiotic resistance in Denmark’s
livestock dropped 26 percent (Antibiotic Resistance Project). The World Health
Organization has found that in general, the ban has reduced human health risk
without causing significant harm to animal health or to the income of farmers
(Chan). Currently, in fact, many consider Denmark to be “spearheading the fight
against antibiotic resistance” (Technologist). However, it should also be noted
that decreases in antibiotic resistance cannot be fully attributed to policies
alone. The results in smaller case studies, such as in hospital communities, are
not completely clear, as they do not account for other factors, such as
infection control measures, and the other effects that arise from decreasing the
use of antibiotics (Barbosa).
m
Generally, a decrease in the use of one antibiotic results in an increase in
er as
another, but the resistance levels of the other antibiotic are rarely reported
co
in the case studies (Barbosa). On the larger scale of Denmark, the Animal Health
eH w
Institute claimed that the ban was not a success, but caused increase death and
disease among animals, labeling the ban as counterproductive. They also claimed
o.
that while resistance to some antibiotics has decreased in animals, resistance
rs e
to other antibiotics has increased (Animal Health Organization). However, it is
ou urc
not fair to call the ban completely unsuccessful. Reportedly, the change in
antibiotic policy had a little negative impact on the country’s pork industry.
Since the ban, the cost of raising pigs has only gone up €1 per animal (Levy).
To counteract the use of antibiotics, farmers in Denmark are now allowing
o
piglets to remain with their mother for longer periods of time in order to build
aC s
up their immune systems due to the fact that using antibiotics is no longer a
v i y re
viable means of doing so (Levy). Despite the supposed claims against it,
however, the ban was recognized as a success in Europe and by 2006, the use of
growth promoters was banned by the European Union (Levy). In order to properly
combat the growing threat of antibiotic resistance, it is necessary to look at
the evidence provided by the Danish ban on the use of antibiotics as growth
ed d
being used haphazardly, and were only used when absolutely necessary (Antibiotic
Resistance Project). Denmark’s success was made possible through the efforts of
the agriculture industry, veterinarians, human health researchers, and the
government working together (Levy). In order for a similar system to work on a
global level, collaboration is needed on that large scale.
sh is
Governments need to take responsibility for the creation of any new antibiotics
and work conjointly with the governments of other nations to draft effective
Th
This study source was downloaded by 100000822654079 from CourseHero.com on 08-13-2021 06:47:08 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/86783881/document-3txt/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)