Professional Documents
Culture Documents
45 Supplement - 2 S99
45 Supplement - 2 S99
New and advanced methods of molecular diagnostics are changing the way we practice clinical microbiology,
which affects the practice of medicine. Signal amplification and real-time nucleic acid amplification technologies
offer a sensitive and specific result with a more rapid turnaround time than has ever before been possible.
Numerous methods of postamplification analysis afford the simultaneous detection and differentiation of
numerous microbial pathogens, their mechanisms of resistance, and the construction of disease-specific assays.
The technical feasibility of these assays has already been demonstrated. How these new, often more expensive
tests will be incorporated into routine practice and the impact they will have on patient care remain to be
determined. One of the most attractive uses for such techniques is to achieve a more rapid characterization
of the infectious agent so that a narrower-spectrum antimicrobial agent may be used, which should have an
impact on resistance patterns.
It has been 12 decades since the inception of the PCR lecular revolution” under way. Although this is exciting,
[1, 2]. Although this technique was almost immediately the responsibility of the laboratorian and the ordering
implemented in research laboratories to study a variety physician is to ensure that these tests are used appro-
of infectious diseases, among other processes, it has priately. The abuse of this technology has serious im-
been within only the past 5–7 years that these assays plications for cost as well as patient care, because, as
have been made so user-friendly that they may be im- with any test, false-positive and false-negative reactions
plemented in any microbiology laboratory [3]. In ad- may occur.
dition to PCR, there are numerous competitive tech- The clinical microbiologist is occasionally asked to
nologies that have been developed and shown to be exclude the presence of a particular microorganism in
useful for the detection and characterization of micro- a clinical specimen. For example, CSF may be submitted
organisms. Many of these more recently developed as- for the exclusion of herpes simplex virus, or a blood
says may be performed by medical technologists who, smear may be submitted for the exclusion of Plasmo-
although highly skilled, do not have advanced training dium species. However, in many instances, several tests
in molecular biology. The simplification of this type of are ordered per clinical specimen, and the questions
testing means that it may be performed after hours or asked are of a broader nature. For example, when a
in adverse conditions (i.e., in the field). Several of these blood or wound culture is ordered, the question really
assays are US Food and Drug Administration approved is “Are there any bacteria or fungi present in this clinical
or cleared, and more are in this process. Today, in the specimen, and to what antimicrobial agents are they
modern microbiology laboratory, there truly is a “mo- susceptible?” The clinician rarely draws a blood sample
for culture for the detection or exclusion of a single
type of microorganism (i.e., blood is not drawn for
Reprints or correspondence: Dr. Gary W. Procop, Dept. of Pathology, University culture to “rule out [r/o] Pseudomonas” but, rather, to
of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital (R-5), 1611 NW
12th Ave., Holtz Bldg., Rm. 2090, Miami, FL 33136 (gprocop@med.miami.edu). “r/o bacteremia and fungemia”). The task of the clinical
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 45:S99–111 microbiologist is complicated, because he or she must
2007 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.
1058-4838/2007/4505S2-0002$15.00
be aware of all of the potential pathogens that may be
DOI: 10.1086/519259 present in a clinical specimen and must devise or utilize
postamplification melt curve analysis. This provides different be detected in the instrument’s “quantification” mode, and, if
information, depending on the type of probe used. If SYBR such a scenario occurred, the specimen would erroneously be
Green dye I or another nonspecific DNA binding dye is used, deemed positive. However, if a postamplification melt curve
then the information derived is similar to that derived from analysis was performed, then the nucleotide mismatches be-
gel electrophoresis. Larger amplicons are held together by more tween the probe and target sequences would be detected, be-
hydrogen bonds, whereas smaller amplicons, such as primer cause the probe could not hybridize to its target sequence with
dimers, are held together by fewer hydrogen bonds. The post- the optimal affinity and would “melt off” at a lower temper-
amplification melt curve derived using these types of DNA ature. This technology is so sensitive that it is commonly used
binding molecules demonstrates high melting temperatures to determine SNPs in human genetic pathology (e.g., the SNP
(95C–98C) for large amplicons and lower temperatures for responsible for factor V Leiden) [61]. Thus, postamplification
smaller amplicons and primer dimers. Some researchers have melt curve analysis is a method whereby one may obtain ad-
demonstrated the detection and differentiation of single nu- ditional data concerning the specific nature of the amplified
cleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by use of high-resolution melt DNA product after real-time PCR.
curves and nonspecific DNA binding dyes, but, for the most This difference in melt curves created by imperfect comple-
part, these uses remain experimental [60]. mentarity between probes and their target hybridization sites
The FRET probes and another oligonucleotide probe called may be exploited to differentiate taxonomically related micro-
an “eclipse probe” are the types of specific oligonucleotide organisms to the species level. Assays have been designed to
probes that provide the best postamplification melt curves. differentiate HSV type 1 and 2, the BK and JC polyoma viruses,
Foremost, a melt curve analysis after amplification provides human herpesvirus 6 types A and B, the commonly occurring
information regarding the specificity of the reaction. A partic- Bartonella species, and M. tuberculosis from nontuberculous
ular melting temperature is expected for the hybridization be- mycobacteria (figure 2), among others [53, 62]. This applica-
tween the oligonucleotide probe and its target. The presence tion is quite useful, but there is some evidence that there may
of the expected melt curve after amplification helps to assure be diminished sensitivity for the target that has the lower melt-
the user that the results are correct. If, for example, the primers ing temperature (i.e., the imperfect complementarity) [63].
were degenerate and also amplified a related microorganism, Therefore, it would be prudent to not use this type of appli-
the melt curve generated would have a lower temperature than cation if the target that had this profile caused serious disease
expected, if nucleotide polymorphisms existed at the probe (i.e., if there would be a significant sequela associated with a
hybridization site. This molecular misidentification would not false-negative reaction) or if such a target organism is present
in small quantities and may be missed because of the limited hybridization, DNA sequencing—including pyrosequencing—
sensitivity. The approach we have taken with the mycobacteria and microarray analysis, with a focus on limited microarrays
has been to utilize this technology to differentiate mycobacteria of both the solid and liquid formats.
that are detected either in the acid-fast smear or in histologic There is often a need to assess for or identify 11 microbial
sections stained by the Ziehl-Neelsen method. In such an in- pathogen. It is more time- and cost-effective if these assess-
stance, it is not a question of “if” mycobacteria are present but, ments can be performed simultaneously or in a single reaction
rather, a question of “which type of” mycobacteria is present, than if they are performed in numerous monoplex amplifi-
with the primary goal being the separation of M. tuberculosis cation reactions. For example, it is necessary to assay for nu-
from the nontuberculous mycobacteria (figure 2). The hybrid- merous high-risk HPVs to appropriately diagnose or exclude
ization probes have 100% homology to M. tuberculosis, with a high-risk HPV infection in a woman. It is preferable to per-
the nontuberculous mycobacteria having a ⭓1-nt mismatch at form a single assay to detect and/or differentiate these viruses
the probe hybridization site. This design makes the assay most rather than to perform 110 individual PCRs for the various
sensitive for the detection of the most important mycobacteria high-risk HPV subtypes. Postamplification analyses are often
that we encounter in North American microbiology, M. tu- employed when the number of results obtained exceeds the
berculosis. If acid-fast bacilli are seen in the smear or stained technical differentiation capabilities of multiplex reactions
tissue section, but amplified product is not detected, then one wherein each reaction contains a different fluorescent label, or
may categorize the result as “quantity of mycobacteria below when the number of results achieved may exceed the differ-
the limit of detection of this assay,” which is a more useful entiation capabilities of a melt curve analysis.
result than a false-negative result. Reverse hybridization. One of the most simple-to-perform
There are a variety of other methods of postamplification methods of detecting a variety of pathogens, after either a mul-
amplicon analysis that require the opening and manipulation tiplex or a broad-range amplification reaction, is through re-
of amplified PCR product. These are acceptable methods, but verse hybridization. This technique is the opposite of Southern
care must be taken to avoid the introduction of amplified prod- blot analysis in many aspects and is therefore termed “reverse.”
uct into the areas of master mix preparation or specimen prep- Herein, a variety of probes are placed on a nitrocellulose
aration, to avoid false-positive reactions. The types of methods membrane strip, and the amplicon rather than the probe is
are too numerous to describe in an exhaustive manner in this labeled. The amplicon is applied to the strip under appropriate
article, so I have selected a few to highlight that either have or hybridization conditions, and then wash steps are performed.
will likely have an impact in clinical medicine; these are reverse If the amplicon hybridizes to one of the immobilized probes,
Figure 4. Pyrogram (i.e., tracing derived from pyrosequencing) of a 40-bp region that has been used for the identification of the most commonly
occurring yeast species. The sizes of the peaks are measurements of the amount of light generated, which correlates to the amount of pyrophosphate
generated during nucleotide incorporation in the process of DNA synthesis. C. parapsilosis, Candida parapsilosis.
of the most promising areas in molecular diagnostics is the use identify the typical causes of invasive fungal and mycobacterial
of limited microarrays for the assessment of numerous genetic infections (figure 5). This approach is optimized with the in-
targets after either a multiplex reaction or a broad-range PCR. clusion of broad family or kingdom probes. For example, a
A number of different microarray platforms have been de- Raoutella species is an uncommon cause of bacteremia, and
scribed, including bioelectric arrays and liquid microarrays. As genus- or species-level probe sites are not likely to be included
with any technology, there are strengths and limitations with in a “bacteremia” microarray. The presence of an uncommon
each system. These systems used today have improved hybrid- bacterium such as this in the blood culture sample could be
ization and reporting for the individual probe/target combi- detected through the inclusion of a broad-range bacterial probe
nations (i.e., they have been made more reliable), and, perhaps site on the microarray. Hybridization at this site, with the ab-
most importantly, some have been scaled down from large sence of hybridization at a species-determining site, would
platforms to smaller-sized versions that address clinically im- demonstrate the presence of a bacterium other than any of the
portant issues that require multiple results. In clinical micro- more common causes of bacteremia that are included in the
biology, a microarray with 20–30 hybridization sites would be panel.
sufficient to address the most common causes of bacteremia The possibility of producing disease-specific microassays also
and fungemia (i.e., the most common causes of positive blood exists, because these formats may be used after broad-range
culture results), and similarly sized arrays could be used to PCR, multiplex PCR, or a combination of such assays. For