Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anointing of Jesus Christ
Anointing of Jesus Christ
There are numerous debates regarding the number times that Jesus was
anointed by women.
Some contend that He was anointed only once, other contend thatbHe was
anointed twice and still others contend that he was anointed three times.
General anointing as an act of hospitality. This anointing was carried out by the
host of the home or master of the house on the guest or stranger that was
invited into the home. The anointing oil was mixed with perfume. It is interesting
to note that this anointing was not carried out by a female or a servant. It was
carried out by the master of the house. This demonstrates the honouring of the
guest.
We have one case recorded in the book of Judges 19. This was during the dark
days of Israel. Hospitality was turned into tragedy and brutality. The Levite said
to his servant let us not go into the territory of the Gentiles (Jebusites) but pass
by the way of Gibeah. He was confident to be taken in by someone of the city.
No one from the city welcomed them. Late in the evening an old man from the
hills of Benjamin invited them in. He took care of their physical needs. He
washed their feet and gave them water to drink. He also fed the animals as well.
Wicked men of the city stormed the man’s house and demanded that he release
the male guest to them so that they could sodomise them.
The master of the house offered up his virgin daughters and the guest concubine
so that his male guests would be protected. They took the concubine and gang
raped her for the night. The master of the house was willing to sacrifice his
daughters in order to protect his guests.
We see a similar event in the book of Genesis. Wicked men of the city young and
old came to Lots house and demanded that he give them his guests so that they
could sodomise them. What the men of the city did not know that these were
not men but angels send by God. The men of the city was struck with blindness.
Later the whole city of Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed.
THE ANOINTED
The person or thing to be anointed was directed by God. God gave specific
instructions concerning the person to be anointed.
Isa 61:11 this is the proclamation of Jesus being the Anointed One.
THE ANOINTER
God used Prophets and Priests to carry out the anointing.
Moses anointed Aaron and his sons. Samuel anointed Saul and David. Solomon
was privileged in that both prophet and priest was involved in his anointing. 1
Kings 1. Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet
WOMAN:
Women in general in the Patriarchal society were regarded very low. They were
subordinate to their male counterparts.
Joyce Anderson Reed describes the harshness of the women’s social context as
follows:
When a daughter was born to a Jewish family, there was great lamenting,
for the daughter would not be able to fight for Israel or win favour with
God. The rabbis believed and taught that God favoured men only. The men
sat in prominent places in the synagogues. The men studied and read the
Torah. The women were not allowed to read or study the Torah. If they
accidently touched the Torah, the Torah had to be burnt because it had
been defiled by the woman. Women were regarded as impure. The Torah
had to be kept pure.
The Talmudic prayer cited daily by men has the words: “Blessed art thou who did
not make me a women, and it goes further to say blessed art thou for not
making me a Gentile or slave. This is misogynistic world view of the day that
Jesus had to contend with.
Sinful woman.
If being a woman was looked down upon what was the plight of the sinful
woman in our text?
By implication she was a prostitute, a women of the streets who forsook a
chaste way of life to indulge in habitual sexual activity. All of the city knew her
and her activities. Jesus knew all the more about her. The Bible does not say
much about her upbringing, all we know is that she was a sinful woman.
Being a sinful women, we can deduce the following:
1 She was the talk of the town in a scornful manner.
2 She was an outcast in society and social circles.
3 She was the object of continual insults and verbal abuse by the
wives of her patrons.
4 She had no self-esteem.
5 She was psychologically wounded, bleeding and broken. She may
have at times experience this on a physical level as well.
6 She live a life of constant humiliation and was looked upon with
disgust.
7 Deep down:
a. She wanted to escape all of this.
b. She wanted to be loosed or set free from the bondage she was
subjected to.
c. She purposed in her heart to do something even if it cost her a
lot.
d. She had to meet the Messiah.
There is an important lesson that can be drawn from the manner in which the
ointment/ perfume was used. This will be discussed as we unpack each instance
of the anointing.
BROKEN
OPENED
ALABASTER FLASK
ALABASTER FLASK
Michael A.Verdichhio and George Muller hold to the custom of tear bottle. An
extract from Michael Verdichhio below explains their understanding.
Thus, their tear bottle was very precious to them. If one’s house is on fire,
the tear bottles are saved first! It was a great sacrifice for this woman to
wash Jesus’ feet with the tears from her tear bottle.
And then she dried his feet with her hair. In our Western culture, that may
sound a bit odd, but in the Bible culture, a woman’s hair is her glory. She
was indicating to everyone there that her own glory was good enough only
to wash Jesus’ feet.
Although this may be a good explanation for the quantity of tears, I am not fully
convinced that this was the case. Luke would not have left out such an
important detail. Those who agree with the above understanding also make
mention that the bottle of tears was more valuable than the perfume in the
alabaster flask.
A close examination of the text sheds more light on what happened.
Luke 7:38 and stood at his feet behind him weeping, and began to wash his feet
with tears, and did wipe them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet, and
anointed them with the ointment.
The word for weeping is (κλαίω) klaio. Which means to sob and wail aloud. The
same word is used in in Matt 2:18. When Racheal wailed due to the killing of her
son. The other word of interest is brecho (brecω).This word is translated as
wash. A better translation is rain. The word also means moisten by shower. Luke
uses these words to demonstrate the intensity of her lamentation and
mourning. Tears were practically dripping from her eyes. It is highly possible that
she produced enough tears to wash the feet of Jesus. As each tear dropped on
to the feet of Jesus, she carefully spread the tears on His feet and washed His
feet.
She then proceeds to dry the feet of Jesus with her hair and then anoints the
feet of Jesus.
4 After having washed the feet of Jesus and wiped them with her hair, now
she proceeds to anoint His feet with ointment. She rubbed the feet of Jesus.
The aroma permeated the room where they sat. Every one present smelt
the effect of the perfume. Does our worship have such an impact on those
around? Even if they despise the act of worship.
Her focus was on the Lord and nothing else. We are not certain whether
she used all the contents of the flash. She may have emptied the flask of
ointment on the feet of Jesus. She chose to worship with that which cost
her much. She worship from a broken spirit.
You see having men or women of God in your home without accepting the
message or admonition they bring, is futile. You will be just like the Pharisee.
Self-righteous and empty.
How do you respond when a man of God enters your home? Do you open your
home and offer your hospitality from your heart without any grudges? Or do you
count it a joy to minister to Gods servant even if it is offering a glass of water.
(This may be all you have to give). How do you offer it? Even a glass of water in
the name of the Lord is precious. The Lord Jesus highlighted this when he
commented on the lady with the two mites. She out gave all that put in the
money box. She gave her all.
Mat 26:6 Now when Jesus was in Bethany, in the house of Simon the leper,
Mat 26:7 There came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of very
precious ointment, and poured it on his head, as he sat at meat.
Mat 26:8 But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what
purpose is this waste?
Mat 26:9 For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the
poor.
Mat 26:10 When Jesus understood it, he said unto them, Why trouble ye the
woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me.
Mat 26:11 For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always.
Mat 26:12 For in that she hath poured this ointment on my body, she did it for
my burial.
Mat 26:13 Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached in
the whole world, there shall also this, that this woman hath done, be told for a
memorial of her.
Mar 14:3 And being in Bethany in the house of Simon the leper, as he sat at
meat, there came a woman having an alabaster box of ointment of spikenard
very precious; and she brake the box, and poured it on his head.
Mar 14:4 And there were some that had indignation within themselves, and
said, Why was this waste of the ointment made?
Mar 14:5 For it might have been sold for more than three hundred pence, and
have been given to the poor. And they murmured against her.
Mar 14:6 And Jesus said, Let her alone; why trouble ye her? she hath wrought a
good work on me.
Mar 14:7 For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may
do them good: but me ye have not always.
Mar 14:8 She hath done what she could: she is come aforehand to anoint my
body to the burying.
Mar 14:9 Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached
throughout the whole world, this also that she hath done shall be spoken of for a
memorial of her.
The last of the anointings occurs two days before the Passover. This would have
probably be Wednesday. See the table below for the chronology of the last two
anoints.
There are subtle details that Mark and Matthew records that are interesting and
important to look at.
Both Matthew and Mark says the women “having a alabaster box”
The Greek word is echo ecw. Means to have, to hold.
This is an important detail. Mary in the book of John “took”, but here the
unknown women HAD. By implication, this women was not a resident of the
home where the meal was prepared. This women came from outside of the
home with the alabaster box of spikenard in her hand. This women is not
classified in any way. She is not classified as a sinner nor is she named. Many
scholars conclude that she is Mary, Martha sister. Some scholars put her to be
Mary Magdalene. It may very well the case that one of the Mary’s fit the profile.
I personally believe that if God wanted us to know who this person was, He
would have named her. What is important here is the lasting testimony of the
unknown women. John’s gospel does not echo the words of Matthew and
Mark;
“Mar 14:9 Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached
throughout the whole world, this also that she hath done shall be spoken of for a
memorial of her”.
The setting is in Bethany in the house of Simon the leper. This classification of
Simon is very interesting. There are various views as to who this person is. Some
commentators liken him to be the father of Martha and Mary, some see him as
the same Simon in Luke. Others still say he is a maker of alabaster boxes.
I personal believe he was different to the Simon of Luke. They were in two
different places. Simon the Pharisee was from Capernaum while Simon the leper
was from Bethany.
His classification as being the leper could have two meanings, either he was a
leper that was cured or he became a leper. I am inclined to believe that he was
healed of leprosy by Jesus and in appreciation to the miracle he invited Jesus to
his home to demonstrate his hospitality and gratitude towards Jesus.
Simon opened his house to Jesus company as well, His disciples.
While having a meal, an unknown women comes into the house having an
alabaster box of very costly ointment with her. She does not say a word, there is
no record of her speaking, and she just acts according to her intended purpose.
She planned and purposed to anoint the head of Jesus. The other two
anointings, Jesus feet was anointed and not His head. This difference is
important to understand to broader implication of what was happening.
Mark records an important detail, she broke the box and poured not rubbed on
the head of the Lord Jesus.
Breaking the alabaster box is only recorded for the last anointing. The other two
anointings, the other two anointings were different. The first anointing, no
mention is made of the value and quantity used. The annoyance was not that of
waste but that of being a sinner, and untouchable. The second anointing a fixed
amount is mentioned, 300 denarii. Judas was cunning and well informed about
market value of the spikenard. But here in the house of Simon the leper, the
description is different. Matthew says it could be sold for much while Mark says
it could be sold for MORE than 300 denarii. Mark and Matthew sees her offering
different. No value could be put to what she has done. The breaking of the box
indicates that she had no intension of holding back any of the perfume. All had
to be used on the Lord Jesus. Her selfless sacrifice was to be a memorial to her.
Jesus knew her intensions as well as the symbolism of what was happening.
There is a dualistic symbolism of what is taking place here.
Matthew, Mark and John are very specific as to the time of the anointings. John
puts the anointing 6 days before Passover. Matthew and Mark puts the
anointing 2 days before the Passover.
The Exodus tradition was specific. The lamb had to be chosen and set apart 10 of
Nissan and on the 14 of Nissan at twilight the lamb had to be sacrificed. This
sacrifice took place at the homes of the Jewish families. The Passover meal had
to be eaten the night of the sacrifice which makes it the evening of 15 Nissan.
This tradition changed once the temple was built. The sacrifice had to be
performed in the temple at the 9 hour. Other aspects of the tradition developed.
The lamb had to be chosen 6 days before Passover. As explained above this was
due to the enormous amounts of people coming to the Passover. The lamb had
to be purchased 6 days before Passover and declared fit two days before pass
over. The lamb had its feet anointed 6 days before Passover, and had it head
anointed two days before pass over.
As shown above the Lord Jesus feet was anointed 6 days before pass over. Jesus
was separated as the Lamb. This was done unknowingly. Mary did not know the
full implication of what she was doing. Jesus knew all too well. He accepted the
anointing. This anointing was supposed to be carried out by the men not
woman. Jesus head is now anointed two days before Passover.
First symbolism: Jesus is now declared clean and acceptable for the sacrifice.
Like the lamb Jesus head was anointed. This unknown women had no clue what
she was doing was of great and immense importance. Jesus our Passover lamb
was now ready for the process of sacrifice. This anointing took place before the
last supper.
Second symbolism: Jesus as king. Caiaphas being the high priest at the time did
not recognise who Jesus was. It was the responsibility of the high priest to
anoint the king. Caiaphas did not interpret scripture adequately. He was in the
company of the chief priests and scribes when the wise men from the East
enquired where He that is born king of the Jews is. The scribes and chief priests
answered and said in Bethlehem of Judea. These priests were aware of the
prophecies concerning the coming messiah. Caiaphas knew the scripture but did
not recognise the Lord of the scripture. His privilege was given to a women! This
unknown women did not know that she was performing such an important act.
She anointed Jesus King. Jesus knew this. Jesus had to be anointed as king in
order to die as a king. He had to be anointed as a lamb in order to die as a lamb.
Jesus was fully aware of what was happening. He could have stopped the
woman and said, you are out of order, and He was supposed to be anointed by a
priest. Remember when we do not do what God has called us to do, he will raise
up people of His choice. Do not be surprised when he raises up persons that do
not fit the profile in our eyes. Our truncated vision often robs us from Gods
leading and direction.
These women reminds me of Abraham’s servant who said, “I being in the way,
the Lord led me”. These women were in the way of Gods direction. They did
what God purposed them to do.
It is sad to see that the disciples objected to the anointing. Here again they
overlooked what was happening and looked at the material WASTE. Why the
waste. What is the purpose of this waste as Matthew states? They were
indignant, perhaps horrified at the action of the woman. They did not appreciate
the fragrance that permeated to atmosphere. The fact that she broke to box
showed to them she had no intension of holding back any portion of the
spikenard.
They had in mind the instruction of the law of waste. That is why they asked the
question, why the waste. What was the reason for this? What are we
celebrating?
Jesus interjects by letting the disciples know what she was doing. She did a good
work. She did it for my burial. There was no celebration. This was a time for
mourning. Jesus defends her and then He makes a proclamation ta=hat is not
made in the other two anointings. ”this will be as a memorial to her”.
Conclusion
The anointing of Jesus recorded in all the gospels highlights the following:
1 The missed opportunities of the learned and self-righteous persons.
Simon the Pharisee missed the opportunity of honouring the Lord
Jesus. We too can fall into this trap of material prosperity that the
simple things of our Saviour we miss. Judas and the disciples did not
come to the full recognition of who Jesus was. Thus they objected
to what was being done. So often we miss the fragrance of worship
because it does not fit our profile. Jesus showed that He is no
respecter of persons. All are welcomed to worship Him. He will not
turn away the humble heart and contrite spirit. Jesus deserves our
full worship.
2 Restoring women to pre-fall position. Jesus come to reconcile us
back to God the Father.
All the actions of the women engaged in was supposed be
performed by men. The men did not rise to the occasion, they were
interested on the letter of the law. Simple women availed
themselves to the leading of the Holy Spirit. We have side lined our
women for far too long. They were also created in the image of
God. They were created as a HELP to man not as a doormat to man.
Jesus showed respect towards the women. He did not judge them
He judged their sin and forgave their sin. He looked at the women
as children of Abraham. Let us our paradigm to Jesus way of
thinking.
According to Gal we are all equal in the sight of the Lord. We are all
kings, priests and a holy nation.
Jesus has made us free, let us walk in the liberty wherewith Christ
has made us free.
3 Coherence of scripture: Scripture is without any contradictions.
What may seem contradictory, when examined by consistent
exegeses and sound hermeneutical will show no contradiction.
Jesus fulfilled all prophecies concerning Him, even when some of
these fulfilments were through the agency of women.
Let us live as the Lord intended us to live. Never judging nor imposing our limited
understanding of doctrinal imperatives. Let us relook at how we relate to others.
All of us are made in the image of God. All of us are in the need of salvation. All
of us needs the grace of God and his forgiveness.
Let humility prevail.