1

Performance Evaluation System

Student Name

Professor's Name

Institution Affiliation

Course Code

Date
 2

Performance Evaluation System

Explain what sort of performance assessment method you would use to assess industrial

workers. Just explain why you think it's the correct system to utilize.

Absolute systems are ideally suited for use in manufacturing facilities. The absolute

performance standard provides a theoretical baseline for quality control, which is crucial in the

mobile manufacturing organization. Although unachievable, it may be a valuable method to

assess how effectively a company and its employees do so. The organization can measure the

extent to which the business and its operations deviate from the ideal of excellence (Norman,

2014).

Many organizations apply various types of performance standards that measure various

areas of their operation. One approach is to set your team a zero-defect or loss target. For

example, as part of its quality control, the HR Director can use a standard of zero faults to

guarantee that its goods (cell phones) are produced and shipped to retailers are complete and

flawless (Shabani et al., 2016).

What assessment technique would you use based on the selected system? Justify why you

think this is a technique for quality evaluation.

The employees more generally accept evaluations since they do not compare each other

and know the criteria in advance, and feel more in charge of this knowledge to a certain extent.

They are based on predefined conduct, for example, its revenue, perhaps a service. For example,

behaviors are established in advance and measure what excellent and bad performance is. It can

be concentrated on future development (Norman, 2014). When built appropriately, especially in a

checklist model, one may look at future goals and base that on realistic goals.
 3

Checklists may be consistent and simple to utilize. You have four or five preset behaviors

or characteristics that you may wish to assess. You have the criteria of pre-performance. Check

them out of the list, and everybody knows it. In addition, records are kept to demonstrate positive

and negative performance occurrences. The supervisor weighs the high and low points on the list

and scores overall (Shabani et al., 2016). However, it can be inaccurate, such as being a

challenging classifier, evaluating everyone the same, or grading as some judgment is required. It

can also take a bit longer than comparative systems. Since one doesn't directly compare

individuals, it is a bit of an assessment that matches the management's requirements and may

sometimes be a small fudge (Norman, 2014).

The visual rating scale frequently employed by organizations is another assessment tool.

Supervisors utilize this approach to assess workers' abilities and achievements and their

communication, behavior, and trustworthiness.

Explain how the selected system and technique are consistent or distinct from the

manufacturing industry performance management practices.

The ultimate performance standard is a notion of quality control adopted by organizations

to enhance their efficiency. Quality control is a business procedure that guarantees that no

manufacturing flaws or defects exist and that the quality of the product is consistent and

enhanced. This is completely relevant to the fabrication business, especially in this instance,

when cellular phones are produced, their standard must be ideal and unachievable (Norman,

2014). Furthermore, having an absolute performance standard in place allows firms to assess their

efficiency and performance and identify ways of improving and implementing these plans. For

example, a manufacturing team of a manufacturing firm consists of 25 people, and only five

employees do not fulfill their objectives (Shabani et al., 2016).

 4

Performance criteria should be in terms of quality, quantity, timeliness, and cost, be

reachable, explicit, observable, and quantifiable. The firm might also explore increasing training

for its personnel by employing an absolute performance system. If they are not up to speed with

what they need and how their objectives may be achieved, the firm will not meet its absolute

performance level and make it useless (Shabani et al., 2016). However, individual performance in

absolute rating systems is judged against a certain standard, while individual performance in

comparative systems can be established by comparing persons with one other (Norman, 2014).
 5

References

Shabani, F., Kumar, L., & Ahmadi, M. (2016). A comparison of absolute performance of different

correlative and mechanistic species distribution models in an independent area. Ecology and

Evolution, 6(16), 5973-5986.

Norman, G. (2014). Absolute Performance Evaluation. In Dictionary of Industrial Organization. Edward

Elgar Publishing Limited.