Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maths Report Assignment
Maths Report Assignment
The digitization of supply chains has potentially huge benefits for businesses. Research has shown that
greater levels of digitization can boost fill rates (i.e. the amount of customer demand that is met through
stock availability) by up to 80%, and shorten cash-to-cash (C2C) cycle times (i.e. the time between when
a company sends cash to suppliers and receives cash from customers), which is shown to lead to greater
profitability in 75% of cases. Further research from McKinsey estimates that, on average, companies
with highly-digitized supply chains can expect to boost their annual growth of EBIT (earnings before
interest and taxes) by 3.2% – the largest increase from digitizing any area of business – and annual
revenue growth by 2.3%. The benefits are indeed clear – but how do companies go about realizing
them? The answer is business integration. Put simply, business integration (also known as B2B
integration, or just B2Bi) refers to the comprehensive digital strategy that enables the integration,
automation and optimization of key business processes that connect an organization with its trading
partners – customers, suppliers, logistics companies, and financial institutions.
The ultimate goal of business integration, then, is to improve upon the speed and productivity of
conducting digital transactions across the supply chain and value chain. In addition, business integration
reduces the need for error-prone, costly, and time-consuming manual processes.
For example, most companies now receive purchase orders from other businesses electronically, often
via email. In the past, processing these purchase orders was a manual affair – an employee had to
conduct a review, and then manually enter the information into an order fulfilment system of some
kind. But with a business integration solution, when the company receives a purchase order, it is
automatically reviewed and passed along into the order fulfillment system, minimizing delays for orders
being fulfilled.
What’s more, for the company that submitted the purchase order, there is no more uncertainty as to
whether or not the order was received, as the business integration system allows the submitting
company to view this information and confirm that the order is being processed.
The Benefits of Business Integration
Such transparency offers great benefits to businesses. From business process management (BPM) to
supply chain visibility and global community management, business integration gives companies
comprehensive control, ensuring its trading partner operations flow smoothly and efficiently. With
business integration, organizations can reduce shipment delays, foresee supply chain bottlenecks, and
gain comprehensive visibility via a centralized view of revenue-driving B2B processes, enabling more
end-to-end responsiveness and better customer service.
For a company to get started with business integration, it needs to first decide
on the technology platform it will use. The choices essentially boil down into
four categories – on-premises, hosted, cloud, and hybrid.
No matter which a company uses for its own purposes, there are four
components that make up a standard business integration process.
Supermarket A prepares an order for cat food in its purchasing system (source
application). The order is extracted and translated (data format) into a
Purchase Order. The Purchase Order is then securely transmitted (transport
protocol) to Supplier B via the internet, and processed by Supplier B (target
application). Supplier B then sends back a Functional Acknowledgement to
confirm the order was received.
Matrices
Definition
A matrix organizational structure is a company structure in which the reporting relationships are set up
as a grid, or matrix, rather than in the traditional hierarchy. In other words, employees have dual
reporting relationships – generally to both a functional manager and a product manager.
This type of matrix organizational structure is most similar to a traditional workplace hierarchy. A
functional manager oversees all aspects of a project and acts as the primary source of decision making.
While there is a project manager who also acts as a point of authority, they ultimately answer to the
functional manager.
In this type of matrix organizational structure, more authority is given to the project manager. While
there is still a functional manager who is the primary authority, employees also report to the project
manager.
A strong matrix organization provides the project manager with equal or more power than the
functional manager. The project manager has primary control over resources and distribution of tasks.
A matrix organizational structure allows multiple departments to easily communicate and collaborate on
a project. Because employees answer to multiple managers as opposed to just the functional manager,
issues are resolved more quickly, and company-wide interaction is increased
In a matrix organizational structure, employees have much more autonomy and input in projects. This
type of structure encourages employee contribution and places a higher value on workers’ point of
view.
Increased teamwork
In a matrix organization, employees work across multiple projects and with various departments within
the company. This increases employee interaction and promotes a better sense of teamwork.
This type of structure allows resources to be maximized because of how equipment and employees are
shared across projects. A matrix structure also allows project managers to work in the areas of their
expertise rather than being pulled across multiple projects, boosting the overall contribution of their
talents.
A matrix structure allows employees to work across a wide variety of projects and often requires them
to utilize and/or learn different skills. Being exposed to various job duties and responsibilities can
increase employee development and enhance their professional skills.
Because this matrix requires employees to answer to two or more managers and work
on multiple projects, it could cause workers to become conflicted between managers
and projects. Also, because there are multiple managers in charge, there is the potential
for inconsistent managing directives among teams.
Authority confusion
Matrix organizational structures employ two or more managers that employees answer
to. This can cause several potential challenges, including confusion as to who the
supervisor is, undefined responsibilities among managers and the possibility of
managers opposing each other's decisions.