The Chief Justice of India criticized the functioning of Parliament, saying debates lack quality which has led to ambiguous laws and increased litigation. He noted that parliamentary debates after independence were very wise and constructive compared to today. The CJI lamented the lack of quality debate in enacting laws, saying this leads to more litigation and courts unable to understand the intent behind new laws. He suggested lawyers should participate more in public life to improve parliamentary debates.
The Chief Justice of India criticized the functioning of Parliament, saying debates lack quality which has led to ambiguous laws and increased litigation. He noted that parliamentary debates after independence were very wise and constructive compared to today. The CJI lamented the lack of quality debate in enacting laws, saying this leads to more litigation and courts unable to understand the intent behind new laws. He suggested lawyers should participate more in public life to improve parliamentary debates.
The Chief Justice of India criticized the functioning of Parliament, saying debates lack quality which has led to ambiguous laws and increased litigation. He noted that parliamentary debates after independence were very wise and constructive compared to today. The CJI lamented the lack of quality debate in enacting laws, saying this leads to more litigation and courts unable to understand the intent behind new laws. He suggested lawyers should participate more in public life to improve parliamentary debates.
Ramanna on Sunday said it is a sorry state of affairs and there is a lack of quality debates in Parliament. “Now it is a sorry state of affairs (on Parliament debate). The laws have a lot of ambiguity. And the courts do not know the object and intent behind enacting of law," CJI said. He termed parliamentary debates after independence as very illuminating. "If you see debates which used to take place in Houses in those days, they used to be very wise, constructive," he added. He said there is a lack of quality debate in Parliament while enacting laws which leads to litigations. "It seems that there is a lack of quality debate in Parliament while enacting laws. This leads to a lot of litigation & the courts, in the absence of quality debate, are unable to fathom the intent and object behind the new law," CJI NV Ramana said at a flag hoisting ceremony in the Supreme Court campus.
He said post-independence, lawyers were in Parliament in large numbers which
probably led to knowledgeable debate. He said the lawyer community should rededicate themselves to public life and bring change in parliamentary debates. Ramana lamented the lack of quality debate in Parliament while enacting laws. “This leads to a lot of litigation and the courts, in the absence of quality debate, are unable to fathom the intent and object behind the new law,” the CJI added.